Future Challenges in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Loading...

PPT – Future Challenges in PowerPoint presentation | free to view - id: fe909-MWVmZ



Loading


The Adobe Flash plugin is needed to view this content

Get the plugin now

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Future Challenges in

Description:

Future Challenges in Cooperative Petroleum Research. Future Challenges in ... Diagenesis. Clay minerals* Provenance. Structural. Geology? Seismic interpr. Key data ? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: KSL
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Future Challenges in


1
  • Future Challenges in
  • Cooperative Petroleum Research
  • Status
  • Progress

Grafisk030118
2
(No Transcript)
3
  • Norwegian Research Council suggested 20
  • increase (570 MNOK) in funding from the
    government
  • for 2003
  • Wanted to strengthen research within
  • Biotechnology
  • Petroleum technology
  • Materials engineering

Before last week Actual increase was
10 Revised budget last week Actual increase is
8
October 1st 2002 SkatteFUNN (max
4MNOK/year/company)
4
  • RD-support as of GNP (Source NRC, 2003)
  • Sweden 4.3
  • Finland 3.4
  • Iceland 3.0
  • Denmark 2.4
  • Norway 1.6
  • OECD-average 2.2
  • Sweden 10300 NOK/inhabitant
  • Norway 5400 NOK/inhabitant

5
Good relations - personal contacts
Research institutions
Oil companies
6
Several research istitutions lack the right
links to the right people in the oil companies
  • Project theme defined based on internal/personal
    interest or believing idea
  • might be of interest to the companies
  • Proposal sent to people they know without
    necessarily being the right
  • technical person
  • Possibly no initial discussion prior to project
    presentation sent via e-mail

7
Research institutions are using lots of time and
effort to
Should use the time for research
8
Oil company
Dept. F
Dept. E
Dept. D
RecommendationNo
Dept. A
Dept. B
Dept. C
Need a more effective process!
  • no formal system for internal
  • handling of external project proposals
  • no given formal contact person
  • no deadline for feedback
  • no given system for feedback

9
2002
Seminar
Enhanced cooperation
10
Feedback from research institutions
No more boxes, please! Action is needed!
High quality research projects
11
Abroad. ? Example UK
  • Industry Technology Facilitator (ITF)
  • a not for profit organisation owned and
    supported by major operating and service
    companies
  • the vehicle through which these companies fund
    joint industry projects that address the
    technology needs of the UK oil and gas industry.
  • Among other tasks
  • Identify gaps in technology and potential
    solutions
  • Assess feasibility of proposed projects
  • Proposals that have passed through the
    assessment stage are developed and
  • put forward to members with a recommendation
    for funding

12
(No Transcript)
13
Action Improve the process
Asked all oil companies to list Long-term
research topics and technology needs
14
(No Transcript)
15
Message Base the project proposals on Long-term
research topics and technology needs
Submit the proposal to Force within 15th June
  • Purpose
  • find the right themes for projects
  • gain more interest for the proposals

16
  • Experience
  • Discussion of project theme was often fruitless
    as the right people
  • were not involved either concerning content or
    budget
  • Companies answered No without giving any
    feedback on
  • what theme(s) might rather be of interest
  • Companies hesitate to give out ideas of what to
    do research on
  • due to competition (especially in exploration)
  • Result
  • Not a single project was initiated

17
(No Transcript)
18
Norwegian Sea (Lysing/Lange) Research Consortium
Biostratigraphy
Sedimentology
Rock Properties
Structural Geology?
Depositional model.
Biofacies
Petrography
Seismic interpr. Key data ?
Paleogeographical maps.
Biostrat/dating
Diagenesis
Provenance
Core descriptions
Clay minerals
Trace Fossils (Atlas?)
Link to geophysics, rock properties.
N/G distribution
Budget estimate pr. year 2000 kNOK 1000kNOK
(forskningsråd)
19
Norwegian Sea Research Consortium (NOSE RES-Q)
The aim of the project is to address two main
un- certainties in the exploration process
  • The absence of mineralogical input to a "rock
    properties" model for the
  • Upper Cretaceous (shale rock properties in
    particular), enhancing
  • seismic attribute evaluation
  • Methodologies to predict sand-presence in a
    distal/basinal setting

Interest from technical people, but need to be
aligned with the funding process within the
companies
20
Conclusion
  • Action has been taken, but success is lacking
  • Why?
  • Lack of interesting themes
  • Lack of money

21
Needs
  • Agreement on themes for research among oil
  • companies that address the technology needs
  • Commitment from high-level management
  • Communication of agreed themes to research
  • institutions

22
Focus this years seminar on
Mechanism of cooperation
23
(No Transcript)
24
Need
  • Mechanism of cooperation
  • Which leads to initiation of high quality
  • research projects
  • Does there already exist such a mechanism
  • to build on?

25
  •  The absence of mineralogical input to a "rock
    properties" model for the
  • Upper Cretaceous (shale rock properties in
    particular), enhancing
  • seismic attribute evaluation
  • Methodologies to predict sand-presence in a
    distal/basinal setting

26
Norwegian Research Council Not enough to
increase activity and raise level of research
Research institutions Although a list of needs
was presented, some project proposals were
not aligned according to the list
27
that address the technology needs
  • Purpose
  • find the right themes for projects
  • gain more interest for the project proposals
  • Result
  • Not a single project was initiated
  • Assess themes that address the technology needs
About PowerShow.com