Nucleon Form Factors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Nucleon Form Factors

Description:

What are the elastic nucleon form factors? ... Compared results using 2 different parameterizations for Gmp Brash and BBBA05. D j vu ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: robertb83
Category:
Tags: brash | factors | form | nucleon

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nucleon Form Factors


1
Nucleon Form Factors
  • Robert Bradford
  • Jupiter/MINERnA Group Meeting
  • May 16, 2005

2
Outline
  • Little about nucleon form factors
  • BBBA2005 form factors
  • Recent developments
  • Gep from BBBA2005
  • Influence of Gmp on Gep fit
  • Current shape of BBBA form factors
  • Conclusions

3
What are the elastic nucleon form factors?
  • Arise from spatial size of nucleon in elastic
    cross section formula in 1-photon exchange
    approximation

where ?e electron scattering angle Ee
electron energy Ee scattered electron energy
and
4
Gep Controversy
  • Two methods for measuring
  • Rosenbluth Separation
  • Good for measuring Gep for Q2 lt 1.0 GeV2
  • Recoil polarization
  • 2 methods dont agree

Ratio should have been close to 1 if consistent
with older Rosenbluth data
Source M.K. Jones et al, PRL 84, 1398 (2000)
5
BBBA2005 Fits
  • Uses fit function borrowed from J. Kelly
  • Emphasizes recoil polarization data for GMP
  • Uses 2 additional conditions from duality to
    constrain poorly-measured neutron form factors

4 parameters for Gep, Gmn, and Gmn 7 for Gen
6
Gep Issue
Our fit is a good match to J. Kellys Gep - here
they are plotted side-by-side
Then Arie noticed this graphic from my NuInt05
talk.... 2 figures are consistent (Gd is small so
differences are emphasized)
Q2 (GeV2)
7
So, I got to work...
  • To extract Gep from recoil polarization data, we
    scale ratio by parameterization of Gmp
  • Arie suggested our Gep differs from Kelly because
    we scale the data differently.
  • Didnt think this would change anything, but
    tried it anyways....
  • Compared results using 2 different
    parameterizations for Gmp Brash and BBBA05

8
Déjàvu
  • Essentially got the same results...
  • Gmp well measured to high Q2, so
    parameterizations all well constrained...
  • Not a lot of effect on fit

Q2 (GeV2)
9
What else could be going on...
  • Low-Q2 data appears to be driving our fit.
  • Lots of it
  • More precise
  • Most is Rosenbluth data
  • Tried to run fit with only polarization data, but
    high-Q2 behavior was wrong
  • May try to fudge error bars so that polarization
    data is emphasized.

Gep/Gd
Q2 (GeV2)
10
Other Efforts
  • Arie had me grab the Kelly parameterizations of
    Gep and Gmp and then re-fit the neutron form
    factor data.
  • He wasnt happy with the results....
  • Finally grabbed plots using Gep from Kelly and
    Gmp, Gen, and Gmn from BBBA05.
  • Cant really do that form factor fits are all
    coupled
  • Will show at conference, but well keep working..

11
Future Efforts
  • Arie has in mind what he wants the curves to do,
    I just have to keep trying.
  • Final fits should be similar to BBBA05, but need
    to emphasize high-Q2 polarization data in fits.
  • Artificially decrease error bars on polarization
    data
  • Remove some low-Q2 Rosenbluth data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com