Stand Level Biodiversity Preparing for Effectiveness Evaluations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Stand Level Biodiversity Preparing for Effectiveness Evaluations

Description:

Stand Level Biodiversity 'Preparing for Effectiveness Evaluations' By ... Deciduous Tree Classes. Class 6 not sampled (now CWD) CWD Decay Classes. Fresh / Recent ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: deanmc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stand Level Biodiversity Preparing for Effectiveness Evaluations


1
Stand Level Biodiversity Preparing for
Effectiveness Evaluations
  • By
  • Dean McGeough and Nancy Densmore
  • FREPs CI Workshop
  • Victoria
  • Feb. 28, 2007

2
Presentation Outline
  • Background what are we doing?
  • Ecological Anchors
  • Data Validation
  • Improvements for 2007
  • Fire Sites what to do?

3
Stand Level Biodiversity Question
Is stand-level retention providing the range of
habitat with the structural attributes understood
as necessary for maintaining the species
dependent on wildlife trees and CWD?
The underlying question is whether we are
maintaining the health or sustainability of the
resource.
4
Ecological Anchors
Ecological Anchors are structural elements that
will provide ecological integrity (structure and
composition) and resilience to the ecosystem.
Are Ecological Anchors PRESENT in Permanent
Retention strata?
5
Ecological Anchors
Vet trees
Big stick nests
Largest tree
Large Witches broom
Large hollow tree
Heavy CWD
Active wildlife trail
Cavity Nest
Active WT Feeding
Mineral Lick
Rare tree species
6
Risk Ranking Ecological Anchors
  • Are VET Trees Present?
  • ABSENT Score of 0 (very high risk)
  • PRESENT Score of 5 (low risk)

7
Large Stick Nests
  • Goshawk nest

Bald Eagle Nest
8
Wildlife Trees
9
Culturally Modified Trees
10
Risk Ranking Ecological Anchors
  • Are OTHER Anchors Present (Not vets)?
  • For EACH retention stratum Number of Anchors
    OBSERVED per hectare
  • SUM of all Anchors in Stratum(Form B)

Frequency of Ecological Anchors Risk Scores
Absent 0 (Very High) lt0.5/ha 3
(High) 0.5 1.0/ha 7 (Mod Risk) gt1/ha 10
(Low risk)
11
DATA Validation
  • BEC classification confirm validity

Strata Sizes (NAR, Gross) confirm in RESULTS
Species confirm consistency and
validity Stratum confirm type and
consistency Data complete ? (Height, Diameter,
Sp, Class)
12
Improvements for 2007
  • FORM D- Reference Card
  • Tree Class Refinements
  • CWD refinements
  • Species code Revised and Standardized

13
Conifer Tree Classes
Class 9 not sampled (now CWD)
14
Deciduous Tree Classes
Class 6 not sampled (now CWD)
15
CWD Decay Classes
Fresh / Recent Hard Bark firm Elevated Hard
Branches Supports Person
Bleached Saprot Loose Bark Sagging Soft twigs May
crack
Advanced Decay Bark Absent Breaks easy Branches
absent
Class 5 not Sampled
Extensive Decay Soft Heartwood Shape collapses No
Branches
16
Improvements for 2007
  • FORM C Block Information
  • WTP Over-ride
  • Invasive Plants Keep to Listed Species Codes
    (Species and Distribution)
  • Section 15 Time Resources
  • Section 16 Do NOT duplicate stratum

17
Improvements for 2007
  • FORM B Stratum Summary
  • One summary for EACH Patch
  • Protocol improvements to guide summary
  • Constraints and Ecological Anchors for Patches
    AND Dispersed

18
Improvements for 2007
  • FORM A Plot Information
  • Full Count put all info onto 1st Plot
  • Plot ID Numeric and NO repeats
  • Data Use APPROVED Codes Complete Info

19
Fire Sites What to do?
  • Wildland Fire following Harvest
  • Wildland Fire pre-Harvest (Salvage)

20
Discussion or Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com