Comparison and Analysis of the Condensation Benchmark Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison and Analysis of the Condensation Benchmark Results

Description:

Van Leer's second order, slope-limiting advection scheme. GASFLOW 2.4 ... High resolution advection scheme. CFX 10. JRC Petten, The Netherlands ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: ber73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison and Analysis of the Condensation Benchmark Results


1
Comparison and Analysis of the Condensation
Benchmark Results
W. Ambrosini, M. Bucci, N. Forgione, F. Oriolo,
S. Paci, J-P. Magnaud, E. Studer, E. Reinecke,
St. Kelm, W. Jahn, J. Travis, H. Wilkening, M.
Heitsch, I. Kljenak, M. Babic, M. Houkema, D.C.
Visser, L. Vyskocil, P. Kostka, R.
Huhtanen UNIPI (I), JSI (SLO), CEA Saclay (F),
NRG (NL) , FzJ (D), NRI Rez (CZ) , FzK IKET (D),
VEIKI (HU), JRC Petten (NL), VTT (FIN)
3rd European Review Meeting on Severe Accident
Research Nesseber, Hotel Vigo, Bulgaria 23 - 25
September, 2008
2
Content
  • Introduction
  • Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat Plate
  • Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN Facility
  • Conclusions and Future Work

3
Introduction
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics codes are very
    promising for assessing the risk associated with
    the presence of hydrogen in power plant
    containments after a severe accident
  • detailed description of flow patterns and gas
    distributions
  • capability of a mechanistic approach to simulate
    basic phenomena
  • Wall condensation is one of these relevant
    phenomena also influencing the levels of
    pressurization and atmosphere mixing
  • engineering models based on the heat and mass
    transfer analogy
  • CFD models
  • completely mechanistic models based on vapour
    diffusion and low-Re models
  • models based on wall functions and/or on
    engineering heat transfer coefficient evaluation

4
Introduction (contd)
  • The application of low-Re models needs a great
    detail in describing the near-wall region
  • ? it is often impractical in describing
    real-life equipment
  • Wall functions or engineering models for HTC are
    based on assumptions limiting their applicability
  • ? an effort should be made to improve their
    reliability
  • ? part of the useful information on flow fields
    from CFD is not used
  • There is therefore strong motivation to go on in
    developing wall condensation models fro CFD
  • In the frame of SARnet it was decided to analyse
    the state-of-the-art of models available to
    Partners and to propose a Benchmarking activity
    lead by the University of Pisa

5
Introduction (contd)
  • The activities on condensation in which the
    University of Pisa served as a coordinator where
    three
  • Reporting on the models adopted within SARnet for
    condensation
  • Proposing and analysing a 0th benchmark exercise
  • code-to-code comparison in an idealised condition
  • comparison with a heat and mass transfer
    correlation
  • Proposing a 1st benchmark exercise in comparison
    with experimental data from the CONAN facility
  • first data and spreadsheets already distributed
  • more data to come in future steps

6
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Problem Description
  • This initial step dealt with an idealised version
    of the problem to be subsequently addressed on
    the basis of experimental data
  • The objective of the 0th Step was to compare code
    results with correlations considered applicable
    to the addressed problem
  • Reference was made to the 2D computational domain
    sketched in the Figure

7
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Heat Transfer and Heat and Mass Transfer
Problems
  • The domain had to be used in different ways
  • in pure convective heat transfer calculations (no
    steam condensation), to assess the adequacy of
    the adopted turbulence models and numerical grids
    in front of the correlation
  • in simultaneous heat and mass transfer
    calculations, whose results should be compared
    among each other and with the correlation

8
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Different formulations for the Sherwood
number
  • In heat and mass transfer cases, Participants
    were asked to calculate the Sherwood number at
    least according the two relationships
  • As expected on the basis of the theories leading
    to these formulations, they provided very similar
    results
  • Classical definitions were adopted for the
    Nusselt number

9
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Boundary conditions
  • The condensing plate is assumed to be kept at
    uniform temperature and saturated vapour
    concentration
  • Atmospheric pressure conditions are addressed (as
    in the CONAN facility) for a saturated mixture
  • Two values of mixture velocity are considered

10
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Participants and models
11
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Results for Heat Transfer Cases HT-30-3
Reasonable agreement with the correlation
12
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Results for Heat Transfer Cases HT-30-6
Reasonable agreement with the correlation
13
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Results for Heat and Mass Transfer Cases
HTM-30-3
Greater spread around the correlation
14
Step 0 Condensation on an Isothermal Flat
Plate Results for Heat and Mass Transfer Cases
HTM-30-6
Greater spread around the correlation
15
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN
Facility Experimental Apparatus (1)
  • The primary loop circulates an air-steam mixture,
    with a variable speed blower
  • The secondary loop extracts water from a mixing
    vessels and circulates it into a 5 mm deep, flat
    rectangular channel behind the cooled plate
  • The tertiary loop injects cold water from a large
    reservoir into the mixing vessel, returning an
    equal flow of warm water

16
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN
Facility Experimental Apparatus (2)
17
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN
Facility Addressed domain
  • In the purposes of the exercise, the apparatus
    can be modeled as in the figure
  • A 1D domain representing the center plane of the
    channel was suggested

18
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN
Facility Modelling the cooled plate
  • Concerning the simulation of the cooled plate,
    two possible strategies were suggested, as
    already experimented by the University of Pisa,
    through internal preliminary calculations
  • adopting a conjugated heat transfer approach,
    including heat conduction in the heated plate and
    energy transport in the channel
  • imposing an equivalent heat transfer conductance
    between the cooled surface and the secondary
    fluid, obtained as reciprocal of the series of
    the heat transfer resistances of the plate and of
    the secondary fluid

19
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN
Facility Proposed approaches
Conjugated heat transfer Equivalent heat
transfer conductance
20
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN
Facility Experimental Uncertainties
Additional uncertainties are expected by the
limited steadiness of the process, requiring time
averaging of the relevant variables
21
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN
Facility Boundary Conditions
Five experimental data points were proposed
22
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN
Facility Obtained Results
A group of models (CEA, NRG, UJV, UNIPI and
VEIKI) provided very similar results, in
reasonable agreement with experimental data
negligible effect of plate representation
23
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN Facility Sample
Detailed Comparisons CEA Results

The observed tendency to underestimate the
overall condensation rate seems to be due to
limited accuracy in simulating boundary layer
development
24
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN Facility Sample
Detailed Comparisons UJV Results


This feature is common to all the models based
on low-Re capabilities and a mechanistic approach
for vapour diffusion the effect of simulation of
the falling film was weak
25
Step 1 Condensation in the CONAN Facility Sample
Detailed Comparisons FzK Results



The near-wall model adopted by FzK in GASFLOW
provides a different heat flux distribution at
channel entrance
26
Conclusions and Future Work General Outcome from
the Activity
  • The two steps of the benchmarking activity
    performed up to now allowed assessing the
    behaviour of the models adopted in the frame of
    the Severe Accident Research Network
  • The proposed problems were related to forced
    convection condensation, which is often of lower
    interest for containment analyses with respect to
    free convection
  • However, the availability of the CONAN facility
    offered an opportunity to address in a systematic
    way the capabilities of codes in predicting
    experimentally observed behaviour




27
Conclusions and Future Work Quantitative Aspects
  • Though at different extents, most of the adopted
    CFD models are reasonably in agreement with the
    information at the basis of well known
    correlations
  • Even in the idealised case of condensation over
    an isothermal flat plate, most codes provided a
    reasonable prediction of the expected behaviour
  • The application to actual experiments revealed
    more details on the behaviour of models,
    highlighting a general tendency to underestimate
    entrance effects, whose reason is still matter of
    analysis (3D effects, boundary conditions)




28
Conclusions and Future Work Challenges and Future
Perspectives
  • The use of low-Re models is promising but still
    relatively expensive from the computational point
    of view if applied to large facilities or a full
    scale plant.
  • Further efforts must be therefore spent in order
    to develop accurate but affordable techniques for
    predicting near-wall behaviour without loosing
    too much about the necessary quantitative details
    (e.g., FzK GASFLOW model)
  • The rather enthusiastic adhesion in both steps of
    the activity encourages the University of Pisa to
    go ahead in proposing new experimental data, also
    on free convection



Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com