Encouraging Critical Thinking Online - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Encouraging Critical Thinking Online

Description:

Record your search strategy and what you find on the worksheet ... Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan Dictionary both suggest nine million ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Mer4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Encouraging Critical Thinking Online


1
Encouraging Critical Thinking Online
  • Unit 1
  • Checking Facts and
  • Gathering Opinions

2
When and what were the Burning Times? How many
people died as a result?
  • Find a selection of websites that address this
    question
  • Record your search strategy and what you find on
    the worksheet
  • Comment on any notable features of the sites or
    answers you discover

3
When and what were the Burning Times?
  • The phrase refers to the persecution of people
    accused of witchcraft in the early modern period
    (ca. 1450-1700)
  • A Google search for defineBurning Times
    produces a range of definitions, including this
    glossary

4
When and what were the Burning Times?
  • However
  • In England and America, most people convicted of
    witchcraft were hanged
  • In Scotland and on the continent, burning was
    more common, but victims were rarely burnt alive
    they were usually executed by other means first

5
When and what were the Burning Times?
  • Many academics prefer to avoid the term
  • Instead, more neutral terms such as early modern
    persecution of witches or witch hunts are
    preferred
  • But the term is still in frequent use in the
    neo-Pagan community

6
How many people died as a result?
  • Some popular estimates are as high as nine
    million
  • Most scholarly investigations put the figure at a
    few tens of thousands
  • Many websites reflect the scholarly research, but
    there are also sites which still give inflated
    figures

7
Example websites giving high estimates
  • The website Witch Prickers suggests a maximum
    estimate of 13 million dead and a minimum
    estimate of 4 million
  • Wiccan Terms and Definitions and the Wiccan
    Dictionary both suggest nine million

8
Example websites giving lower estimates
  • Religious Tolerance.org suggests between 50,000
    and 100,000
  • The article Falsehoods of the Burning Times
    suggests 60,000
  • Wicca For the Rest of Us suggests between 40,000
    and 100,000

9
Compare and contrast
  • Look at the example sites and consider
  • Other than in the figures they give, how do these
    sites differ?
  • Who wrote these sites? What are their
    credentials?
  • Are sources/references given?

10
Compare and contrast
  • There is a significant difference in tone
  • Articles quoting higher numbers often use more
    emotive language
  • Those giving lower numbers are frequently couched
    as attempts to set the record straight

11
Compare and contrast
  • There may also be a marked difference in the
    picture painted
  • Sites giving higher numbers are more likely to
    identify the victims as Pagans or followers of
    the Old Religion
  • The Catholic Church is more likely to be blamed

12
Compare and contrast
  • However, sites giving lower estimates are not
    immune from error
  • For example, Religious Tolerance.org implies that
    alleged witches were routinely burned alive

13
Compare and contrast
  • Sites with lower estimates more frequently give
    information about the author
  • From Religious Tolerance.org
  • From Wicca For the Rest of Us
  • But this isnt universally the case

14
Compare and contrast
  • Sites on this topic are frequently written by
    people with a keen personal interest rather than
    an academic background in the area
  • The occasional source is listed, but full
    references are rarely given

15
Alternative search strategies
  • Search using terms favoured by academics
  • Phrases like witch hunt and witch craze
    produce slightly different results
  • Some more academic sites e.g. The Witch Hunts,
    by Prof. Brian A. Pavlac but still a fairly
    high proportion of non-scholarly material

16
Alternative search strategies
  • Use more specific search terms
  • Phrases like witch hunt scholarship or witch
    hunt scholarly research produce some useful hits
  • But not all the material is helpful some is
    irrelevant, some only suited to in-depth
    research, and some requires subscription

17
Alternative search strategies
  • Consult a gateway
  • An academic gateway site such as Intute offers
    hand-selected resources
  • Searches give fewer results, but theyre more
    likely to be what youre looking for

18
Alternative search strategies
  • Searching Intute for Burning Times, witch
    hunt, or witch craze gives a small number of
    (mostly) relevant results
  • A description of each site aids the process of
    determining whats most useful
  • Also offered are additional features such as
    Limelight articles

19
Alternative search strategies
  • The hits include Jenny Gibbonss informative
    essay Recent Developments in the Study of the
    Great European Witch Hunt
  • Gives the authors credentials and mentions her
    sources (though still lacks detailed references)

20
Summary - key things to note
  • Popular and scholarly answers may vary widely
  • Its useful to consult a variety of sources
  • Checking where the information given is drawn
    from is also wise

21
Why might we find conflicting answers to a
question?
  • There may be real uncertainty about the answer
  • Authorities may disagree
  • There may be multiple ways of interpreting a
    question

22
Why might we find conflicting answers to a
question?
  • Some sources may be more up to date than others
  • Answers may vary in precision
  • Some sources may simply be wrong

23
Questions to ask when assessing sources
  • Who is the author?
  • An individual or an institution?
  • What are the authors credentials?
  • Is this a scholarly resource, or a more informal
    one?
  • How up to date is this source?

24
Questions to ask when assessing sources
  • Are there reasons to doubt the reliability of
    this source?
  • Does it include information I know to be false?
  • Does it contradict itself or use poor reasoning?
  • Is it biased towards a particular view?

25
Questions to ask when assessing sources
  • Is the information provided confirmed by other
    sources?
  • Are references provided?
  • Do other websites agree? (A major advantage of
    the Web is that many sources can be compared
    quickly and easily.)

26
Remember the three Ws
  • WHO wrote this site?
  • Is the author a trustworthy source?
  • WHEN was it written?
  • Is it up to date?
  • WHY was it written?
  • Does the author have an axe to grind?

27
  • This slideshow is part of
  • Encouraging Critical Thinking Online,
  • a set of free teaching resources designed to
    develop students analytic abilities, using the
    Web as source material.
  • For the full set, please visit Intute Training
    http//www.intute.ac.uk/training/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com