ARKANSAS

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

ARKANSAS

Description:

Data Retrieval Tool. Most data on SLD website, using DRT ... Academy for Academic Excellence. DA 07-1180. Form 486 Deadline. 09/14/06. Alaska Gateway ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: statear

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ARKANSAS


1
ARKANSAS
Work Group (AEWG)
2
WELCOME
  • This will be a quick overview of the E-rate
    activity for the summer followed by an overview
    of the last 14 FCCs General Resolution Orders

3
Year 10 (2007-2008)
  • If you HAVE been funded.
  • File 486 within 120 days after FCDL date.
  • Cannot file 486 until an FRN has been funded.
  • Contact vendors if you would like to receive
    discounted bills.
  • Appeal within 60 days of FCDL date if you
    disagree with a decision.

4
Year 10 (2007-2008)
  • BEAR deadline is October 28, 2007!
  • For recurring services
  • (Jan 28, 2008 for nonrecurring services)
  • File Invoice Deadline Extension Request within 30
    days if you missed deadline.
  • Submit SPIN change requests by October 28.
  • Approval of SPIN change will give you an
    automatic invoice deadline extension of 120 days.
  • Submit SPIN changes using Submit a Question on
    SLD website.
  • File Form 500 to release funding or cancel FRN

5
SPIN CHANGE
  • Corrective SPIN CHANGE
  • A corrective SPIN change is a notification to
    USAC that the SPIN associated with a Funding
    Request Number (FRN) is not correct. This occurs
    when (1) either the applicant or USAC made a data
    entry error or (2) a change occurred that was not
    initiated by the applicant. Corrective SPIN
    changes include the following
  • Data entry errors made by the applicant or USAC
    when the Form 471 was submitted on paper or by
    the applicant when the Form 471 was submitted
    online. This includes entering the wrong SPIN on
    the Form 471 because you entered the SPIN for
    another provider or entering the wrong SPIN
    because your provider has multiple SPINs and you
    chose the wrong one.
  • The original service provider has merged with, or
    been acquired by, another company and the SPIN
    indicated on the FRN has changed.
  • Other instances when the SPIN indicated on the
    Form 471 changed when such change was not
    initiated by the applicant.

6
SPIN CHANGE
  • OPERATIONAL SPIN CHANGE
  • An Operational SPIN change is a request to change
    the service provider associated with an FRN. The
    change in service providers is the result of a
    deliberate decision by the applicant to change
    the service provider supplying the services for
    an FRN.

7
Split FRNs
  • When service on single FRN is provided by two
    different companies in a single funding year.
  • Accomplished by submitting Operational SPIN
    Change to SLD.
  • Must state beginning date and ending date for
    each provider
  • Also include how much should be allotted to
    each provider.
  • 486 required for BOTH FRNs.

8
Data Retrieval Tool
  • Most data on SLD website, using DRT
  • Download by state, by SPIN, by entity, etc
  • Updated nightly
  • Shows
  • Entity info / 471 / FRN / 470 / SPIN
  • if FRN funded
  • whether 486 was submitted
  • last date to invoice
  • original requested amount committed amount
  • discount
  • invoice paid and by what mode
  • etc.

9
2 in 5 Rule for IC
  • Determined on an entity basis (ie each school,
    library or NIF)
  • 2006 is the second year for the rule
  • All entities on a Block 4 worksheet that received
    a positive commitment for IC, are counted as
    taking a year
  • Can erase year if funding not used and Form 500
    submitted to cancel FRN.
  • If a school or library building received IC
    funding in 2005 and 2006, that school or library
    is not eligible again until 2010.

10
Document Retention
  • Documentation retention five years from last
    date of service
  • Training Material
  • Eligible Services List
  • Copies of
  • All forms
  • ALL bids and quotes
  • Contracts and agreements
  • Invoices
  • Payment record
  • All correspondence between applicant service
    provider
  • Service Provider selection process

11
FCCs Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
  • Released Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM)
  • Asks for comments on sweeping changes
  • Formula to Schools/Libraries?
  • What forms could be eliminated?
  • What else should be changed?
  • Comments were due Oct. 18, 2005 with Reply
    Comments due Dec. 19, 2005
  • http//gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi
  • Enter 02-6 in the Proceeding to view all
    comments
  • No action to-date

12
Recent FCC Decisions
  • We note that the primary jobs of most of the
    people filling out these forms include school
    administrators, technology coordinators and
    teachers, as opposed to staff dedicated to
    pursuing federal grants, especially in small
    school districts. Even when a school official
    becomes adept at the application process,
    unforeseen events or emergencies may delay
  • filings in the event there is no other person
    proficient enough to complete the forms

13
BISHOP PERRY
  • The FCC recognized three types of errors that
    should not be cause for outright rejection of an
    application
  • (1) immaterial clerical errors,
  • (2) ministerial errors, and
  • (3) procedural errors. Below are examples of
    these all from the FCC decisions. The first three
    are general, followed by more specific examples

14
BISHOP PERRY
  • Failure to comply with minimum processing
    standards.
  • Failure to file a Form 470 or 471 in a timely
    manner.
  • Failure to timely file certifications related to
    a Form 470.
  • Clerical errors on the part of applicants who
    inadvertently left portions of the Form 470 or
    Form 471 blank or made minor errors while
    completing the form.
  • Technical problems, either with applicant's
    equipment or while interfacing with the SLD's
    online filing system, and thus failed to properly
    file electronically.
  • Rules and instructions for filing a Form 470 or
    Form 471 are vague and unclear.
  • Denial for filing outside the Form 471 filing
    window when applicant maintains they submitted
    the relevant information on time and it is
    difficult to determine whether the error was the
    fault of the applicant, USAC or a third party.
  • Applicants' staff made a mistake that prevented
    them from filing on time or inadvertently failed
    to file the application forms in a timely manner.
  • Applicants had an emergency situation and were
    unable to comply with the filing deadline due to
    staff illness or relatives of staff members who
    were ill.
  • Failure to file a Form 471 in a timely manner due
    to circumstances beyond the applicant's control,
    such as school reorganizations or inclement
    weather.
  • Denial of funding for applications because their
    FCC Forms 470 were not certified or not certified
    before the close of the filing window.
  • Hardship or impact on the applicant's) should be
    considered when analyzing whether a given
    application should be funded or rejected

15
Recent FCC Decisions
16
Recent FCC Decisions
17
FCC Office of Inspector General Issues
Report
  • Technology Plans
  • Beneficiary did not have an approved technology
    plan, technology plan was outdated, etc.
  • Ineligible Items
  • Beneficiary was reimbursed for ineligible
    products or services.
  • FCC Form 500
  • Beneficiary did not submit a Form 500 to USAC
    when the commitment was not fully utilized.

18
FCC Office of Inspector General Issues
Report
  • FCC Form 472/474 Items
  • Errors in amounts for reimbursement, inadequate
    support, etc.
  • Childrens Internet Protection Act
  • Beneficiary did not comply with the Childrens
    Internet Protection Act.

19
FCC Office of Inspector General Issues
Report
  • Technology Budget
  • The beneficiary did not have proper approval for
    its budget or an adequate amount budgeted for its
    share of the non-discounted costs.
  • Equipment
  • Equipment missing, not installed, no asset lining
    maintained, etc.
  • Discount Calculation
  • Beneficiary incorrectly calculated its discount
    percentage, could not support the discount, or
    could not provide documentation to verify
    information on the FCC Form 471.

20
FCC Office of Inspector General Issues
Report
  • Service Provider Billing
  • Bills not properly prepared or inaccurate.
  • Document Retention
  • Beneficiary did not maintain the required
    documentation or documentation was non-existent.

21
RESOURCES
  • Schools and Libraries / USAC web site
  • Client Service Bureau
  • Use the Submit a Question link on the web site
  • Fax toll-free at 1-888-276-8736
  • Telephone toll-free at 1-888-203-8100
  • Form instructions

21
22
RESOURCES
  • AEWG E-rate website www.asl.lib.ar.us/arerate/ind
    ex.htm
  • AEWG E-rate list serve
  • http//list.state.ar.us/mailman/listinfo/e_rate
  • or
  • send a message with the word help in it to the
  • request address, e_rate-request_at_list.state.ar.us
  • Arkansas Contacts
  • Wilma Toombs, ADE 501) 682-1286 or
    wilma.toombs_at_arkansas.gov
  • Becky Rains, DIS 501.682.4003 or
  • Becky.rains_at_arkansas.gov

23
Questions?
23
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)