PerformanceBased Operations Aviation Rulemaking Committee PARC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

PerformanceBased Operations Aviation Rulemaking Committee PARC

Description:

FANS 1/A aircraft exempt from ATN aircraft equipage ... Aircraft Equipage. ATS provider and network Infrastructure. SFO. Global Seamless Operations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: tomkraftar
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PerformanceBased Operations Aviation Rulemaking Committee PARC


1
Performance-Based Operations Aviation Rulemaking
Committee (PARC)
  • Communications Working Group (CWG) Activity

Presented to Boeing Tailored Arrival Symposium
By Tom KraftEmail tom.kraft_at_faa.govTel
202-369-2168Arnold OldachEmail
aoldach_at_rockwellcollins.comTel 319-295-6913
Date March 22, 2007
2
PARC (Who - What)
  • Performance-based operations Aviation Rulemaking
    Committee (PARC)
  • Operates under the FAA Administrators legal
    authority in accordance with 49 USC 106(p)(5)
  • Comprises members from the FAA the aviation
    community at large
  • Provides recommendations to FAAs Senior
    Management for action implementation
  • Effective in implementing RNAV/RNP

3
Performance-based operations
  • Balances capability performance of
  • Communications
  • Navigation, e.g., RNAV/RNP
  • Surveillance, e.g., ADS
  • Air Traffic Management
  • Builds on what we have to improve

RNP
ATM
RCP
C
N
S
RSP
What is RNP x airspace?
What is applying separation using ADS?
4
Communications Working Group
  • To produce a Roadmap to apply Required
    Communication Performance (RCP), initially to the
    implementation of
  • 30/30 NM separation minima
  • Clearance delivery in U.S. domestic en route
    airspace
  • To produce a Roadmap for Data Link in all
    airspace domains (oceanic domestic)
  • Include interoperability criteria
  • Consider convergence
  • Address technological issues

5
PARC Communications Working Group
  • Roadmaps, etc.
  • Build consensus among aviation stakeholders
  • Communicate fundamental capabilities
  • Assess benefit and investment
  • Set metrics to measure success of FAA
    implementation programs

Roadmap for Performance-Based Communications
6
Introduction
2006 air traffic data link services coverage area
  • North Atlantic Region benefits from data link
  • In 2004, traffic levels exceeded pre2001 levels
  • NAV CANADA has reduced communication costs to
    users by 50
  • 55 of the fleet use either FMC WPR or FANS 1/A
    ADSC for automatic position reporting

PDC DATIS via ACARS
U.S. oceanicairspace boundary
  • Pacific SubRegion benefits from data link
  • Reduced separations to 50/50 NM and 30/30 NM
    (trials)
  • User preferred routes and reroute (trials) for
    all city pairs in South Pacific
  • Weather deviations
  • Automatic position reporting
  • 80 of the fleet in South Pacific use CPDLC and
    ADSC, based on FANS 1/A, 60 in the Central
    Pacific, and 30 on average in the entire Pacific

7
Introduction
2006 air traffic data link services coverage area
Globally harmonized data link services for
existing fleet (2012)
ATN w/FANS 1/A (2009)
8
Key Terms and Concepts
  • For operational air traffic communications, data
    link needs to be assessed using a
    performancebased communications approach to
  • Promote a competitive market for aeronautical
    communication services enabling costeffective
    alternatives (including different technologies)
    that meet business needs in a more timely manner
  • Provide means to demonstrate communication
    performance using a variety of acceptable methods
    in lieu of time consuming data collection and
    empirical analyses
  • Define needed operations based on communication
    performance levels that are not yet obtainable
    with current technology
  • Enable varying service levels in common airspace
    to a fleet of aircraft with varying communication
    capabilities and performances

9
Key Terms and Concepts
  • Performancebased communications approach
    establishes operational criteria
  • Determines capability and performance criteria
    based on intended operations in oceanic, en
    route, terminal, and airport domains, not based
    on any particular technology
  • Specifies Required Communication Performance
    (RCP) and other relevant operational factors
  • Considers voice and data communications
  • Considers global seamless operations
  • Performance-based (operational) criteria is used
    to
  • Determine viability of a particular technology
  • Qualify, certify, and approve various parts of an
    implementation
  • Manage performance levels needed to provide
    varying service levels to a fleet of aircraft
    with different capabilities in common airspace

10
Benefits
  • Increase in airspace/airport capacity and
    efficiency while meeting safety needs
  • Effective flight operations lower unit cost for
    the user
  • Effective air traffic services (ATS) lower unit
    cost for the ATS provider
  • Enabler for performance-based operations allows
    airspace users to equip based on their business
    needs
  • Enabler to realize Next Gen vision to meet
    projected demands on the National Airspace System
    (NAS)
  • Increased predictability
  • Reduced delays
  • Reduced separations
  • More flexible use of airspace
  • Saved fuel, reduced emissions
  • Improved decision support tools
  • Increased productivity
  • Reduced workload
  • More efficient use of spectrum
  • Reduced voice congestion
  • Reduced operational errors
  • Reduced pilot deviations

Safety needs
11
Recommendations (1 of 6)
  • Data link strategy expedite, continue voice,
    and establish target dates for implementation
  • Use performance-based communications approach
  • Priority 1 for near term operational capabilities
    (present to 2010)
  • Tailored arrival procedure (TAP) into SFO, LAX,
    JFK, and ANC airports
  • Terminal Area Pre-Departure Clearance (PDC) and
    Data Link Automated Terminal Information
    Service (D-ATIS)
  • Oceanic improved communications leading to
    reduced separations, user-preferred trajectories
    (UPRs), reroutes, dispatch relief of HF voice,
    increased airspace capacity
  • High priority for mid term ? domestic ATC data
    link (2011-2017)
  • Globally seamless operations (Oceanic, Europe)
  • Accommodate data link-capable aircraft, including
    a significant fleet of FANS 1/A aircraft, that
    will exist at the time of implementation

12
Recommendations (2 of 6)
NGATS
Near Term
Mid Term
Far Term
Existing Operational Capabilities
PDC DATIS
  • Air traffic data and voice communication
    applications for migration to NGATS are defined
  • ICAO agreements on the results of Future
    Communications Study are concluded
  • Stakeholder coordination has been completed

Viable to Standardize
14 Loc
New PDC functions
  • Operational Procedures
  • Aircraft Equipage
  • ATS provider and network Infrastructure

Taxi clearance via data link trials
Tailored Arrival Procedure
LAXJFK
ANC
SFO
Operational Status Update
Oceanic ATC Data Communications Procedures
Viable ITP
ANC
See Figure 3, implementation considerations, for
mid and far term implementation planning strategy
Pacific UPRs at all city pairs
Plan to regress HF voice
Plan for reroute
Global Seamless Operations
Oceanic, En Route, Terminal Data Link Services
Pacific Reroute
Oakland FIR Maintain current separations (100
NM/10 min, 50/50 NM), and reduce separations to
30/30 in all sectors
Ocean slot entry time
Domestic ATC Data Communications Procedures
Anchorage FIR Maintain current separations (100
NM/10 min, 50/50 NM), and reduce separations to
30/30
Accommodate FANS 1/A Fleet, ATC Communications
(partial), UPRs, Reroutes
present
2017
2010
2025
2009
2008
2007
13
Recommendations (3 of 6)
  • Highest priority Establish Performance-Based
    Communications Program Office
  • Coordinate, oversee, and ensure timely
    implementation of near term oceanic initiatives
  • By end of 2007, implement performance-based
    communications approach for near term oceanic
    implementation initiatives
  • By mid 2008, Define migration path and
    implementation strategy

14
Recommendations (4 of 6)
NGATS
Near Term
Mid Term
Far Term
Implementation Considerations
Performancebased Communications Program Office
Performancebased communications approach
See Figure 2, operational capabilities, for near
term implementation initiatives
Migration Path and Implementation Strategy
Implemented mid and far term operational
capabilities
present
2017
2010
2025
2009
2008
2007
Migration Path and Implementation Strategy Topics
Opportunities for Existing Aircraft
Infrastructure
Air Traffic Communication Applications
  • Cost/Benefit
  • Commitment
  • Investment
  • Priorities
  • Milestones
  • Policy, e.g.,
  • Aircraft Equipage
  • Operating Costs
  • Security
  • Working Relationships
  • Roles
  • Responsibilities

Viable Technologies
  • Enabling Criteria
  • Safety Management
  • Qualification
  • Certification
  • Approval

Evaluate use of shared IP Network
Integration Strategy, e.g., ERAM
Accommodation Strategy, e.g., FANS 1/A, ATN
Harmonization Initiatives
Research and Development
15
Recommendations (5 of 6)
  • In 2007, agree on rulemaking and guidance
    material initiatives considering
  • Performance-based approach to voice and data
    communications
  • Flight standards, aircraft type design, and Air
    Traffic Organization (ATO) oversight
  • Define capability and performance requirements
    based on intended use
  • Define requirements for recording of data link
  • Define policy and requirements on information
    security
  • Identify use of particular technologies
  • Define criteria to enable sharing communication
    systems for ATS and aeronautical operational
    control (AOC)

16
Recommendations (6 of 6)
  • Harmonization initiatives
  • ICAO Aeronautical Communications Panel (ACP)
  • Determine new venue to replace ICAO Operational
    Data Link Panel (OPLINKP)
  • ICAO Separation Assurance and Safety Panel (SASP)
  • ICAO Flight Plan Study Group (FPLSG)
  • RTCA SC-189/EUROCAE WG-53, Standards for Air
    Traffic Data Link Services
  • Continued operational safety - Planning and
    Implementation Regional Groups (PIRGs)
  • Other venues for harmonization

New RTCA/EUROCAE Group for Data Link Services
NAT/EUR Data Link Steering Group ATN
Accommodation Drafting Group
17
Status
  • Industry Coordination Draft (Final Draft,
    25-Jul-06)
  • PARC
  • RTCA ATMAC Planning and Requirements Group
  • ATA CNS Task Force (Formerly RNAV Task Force)
  • PARC submitted to FAA on July 31, 2006
  • FY-07 Business Plan objectives for offices within
    FAA Aviation Safety (AIR/AVS Core)
  • Aviation Safety (AVS-1) sent memo to Air Traffic
    Organization (AJO-0) on February 28, 2007
  • Next CWG meeting planned pending PARC receipt of
    response from FAA

18
Move forward strategy
  • FAA to publish PARC Roadmap for Data Link by
    early 2007
  • Signify FAA Commitment to ATC data link
  • Leading to gain industry support for PARC Work,
  • RCP and Performance-based communications
  • Certification basis for aircraft and operational
    approval
  • FAA/PARC/ATMAC to assess the Roadmaps
    recommendations by early 2007
  • Tie to FAA ATO Implementation Programs (airport,
    en route, terminal oceanic)
  • Tie to enabling criteria - FAA Aviation Safety
    (AVS) rulemaking, guidance material, etc
  • Tie to harmonization initiatives - ICAO, RTCA,
    EUROCAE, etc
  • FAA/PARC/ATMAC to follow-up on any issues
    resulting from the execution of the Roadmaps
    recommendations

19
Outlook
  • PARC to complete for submittal to FAA an
    industry-coordinated Roadmap for Performance
    Based Communications by September 2007
  • RCP
  • What standards are needed and schedule
  • Strategy for application to type certification
    and operational approval
  • Develop scenario outlines for operational uses of
    RCP
  • Voice and Data communications to increase
    capacity
  • Oceanic and domestic (en route, terminal area,
    airport)
  • Operating in airspace with a basic level of
    service and, for eligible operators, with higher
    levels of service
  • Some existing communication capabilities and
    performance are suitable only for basic level of
    service
  • Monitoring and alerting, based on RCP type

20
Next Steps
  • PARC and CWG is soliciting support from industry
  • Identify points of contacts for Lead operators
    and other aviation stakeholders for PARC CWG Core
    Group by April 2007
  • Commit to support PARC CWG
  • Attend meetings
  • Provide input
  • Provide leadership
  • Airlines, Manufacturers, Vendors, military
  • Will include FAA - Aviation Safety (Flight
    Standards, Aircraft Certification, ATO Safety
    Oversight) and Air Traffic Organization
    (Planning, Technical Operations, En Route and
    Oceanic Operations, Terminal Operations)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com