Fathom Modeling of Sprinkler System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Fathom Modeling of Sprinkler System

Description:

Fathom Modeling of Sprinkler System – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:188
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: network8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fathom Modeling of Sprinkler System


1
Fathom Modeling of Sprinkler System
  • Purdue University
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI
  • ME 414 Thermal Systems Design
  • Team Members
  • Natalie Ridao
  • Sara Stirn
  • Spring 2004

2
Project Introduction
  • Sprinkler System
  • Objectives
  • Minimum Time to Deliver 1 of Water
  • Minimum Amount of Wasted Water
  • Minimum Cost
  • Minimum Electric Utility Cost
  • Even Water Fall

3
Executive Summary
  • Water Flow Even
  • Time to Deliver 1 Water - 1.06 hour
  • Water Wasted - 8.72 of Water Used
  • Cost 830.01
  • Electric Utility Cost - 0.89 per Use

4
Area to Cover
5
Sprinkler Selection
Round Sprinkler Coverage Square
Sprinkler Coverage
6
Sprinkler Selection
  • Square Shooter Sprinkler
  • Up to 40 x 40 square
  • Up to 20 X 40 rectangle
  • Up to 40 X 40 L-shape

www.squareshooter.com
7
Sprinkler Layout
  • 13 Total
  • 4 40 x 40
  • 3 10 x 40
  • 1 L-shaped
  • 1 36 x 40
  • 1 35 x 40
  • 1 20 x 40
  • 1 18 x 40
  • 1 12 x 35

8
Flow Rates
  • 40 x 40 Square (4)
  • 17.00 GPM each
  • 10 x 40 Rectangle (3)
  • 4.25 GPM each
  • L-shape (1200 ft2) (1)
  • 12.75 GPM
  • 36 x 40 Rectangle (1)
  • 15.30 GPM

9
Flow Rates
  • 35 x 40 Rectangle (1)
  • 14.875 GPM
  • 20 x 40 Rectangle (1)
  • 8.5 GPM
  • 18 x 40 Rectangle (1)
  • 7.65 GPM
  • 12 x 35 Rectangle (1)
  • 4.4625 GPM
  • Total Flow Rate 144.2875 GPM

10
Fathom Modeling
11
Fathom Results
12
Pump Selection
  • Total Flow (from Fathom)
  • 156.67 GPM
  • Total Head
  • 90 Ft.

13
Pump Chosen
  • Pacer Pump
  • 5.5 HP Water Pump
  • Up to 200 GPM
  • Up to 125 Ft. Head
  • Northern Tool Equipment
  • Model SEB2ULE51C

14
Bill of Materials (Piping)
Menards
15
Total Costs
  • Piping 205.67
  • Pump 299.99
  • Sprinklers
  • 13 _at_ 24.95 324.35
  • TOTAL COST 830.01

16
Results
  • Water Flow EVEN!
  • Time to Deliver 1 Water - 1.06 hour
  • Water Wasted 12.3825 GPM
  • - 8.72 of Water Used
  • Cost 830.01
  • Electric Utility Cost - 0.89 per Use

17
Matlab Modeling of Heat Exchanger
18
Project Introduction
  • 4 Engines 650 HP Each
  • 1/3 of Energy Goes To Coolant
  • Engine Coolant Ethylene Glycol
  • 80 GPM Each Engine

19
Project Objective
  • Design Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
  • Cool Engine Coolant from 235 to 210F
  • Use City Treated Water at 65F
  • Minimize Shell Pressure Drop
  • Minimize Tube Pressure Drop
  • Minimize Weight

20
Executive Summary
  • Engine Coolant in Tubes
  • QCALC 1200 kW
  • Desired-to-Calculated Ratio 0.99
  • Shell Pressure Drop 605 Pa
  • Tube Pressure Drop 5875 Pa
  • Weight 602 kg

21
Specifications
  • Shell and Tube Fluid Water
  • Fouling Factors None
  • Baffles None
  • One Tube Pass
  • One Shell Pass
  • Shell and Tube Material
  • Stainless Steel AISI 304

22
Target
  • Heat Transfer Rate 1185 kW

23
Critical Parameters
  • Tube Outer Diameter
  • Shell Inner Diameter
  • Tube Length
  • Mass Flow Rate of Cooling Water
  • Tube Pitch

24
Main Effects Plot
25
Counter or Parallel Flow?
26
Minitab Optimization
27
Final Critical Parameters
  • Tube Outer Diameter
  • Shell Inner Diameter
  • Tube Length
  • Mass Flow Rate of Cooling Water
  • Specifications
  • Counter Flow
  • Rectangular Pitch

28
Different Directions
  • Engine Coolant in Shell
  • Cooling Water in Tubes
  • Engine Coolant in Tubes
  • Cooling Water in Shell

29
Optimization
  • With Engine Coolant in Shell
  • Tube Outer Diameter 12.7 mm
  • Shell Inner Diameter 0.254 m
  • Tube Length 5 m
  • Shell Mass Flow Rate 18 kg/s

30
Optimization Results
  • With Engine Coolant in Shell
  • QCALC 1177 kW
  • Desired-to-Calculated Ratio 1.01
  • Shell Pressure Drop 1539 Pa
  • Tube Pressure Drop 9051 Pa
  • Weight 599 kg

31
Optimization
  • With Engine Coolant in Tubes
  • Tube Outer Diameter 12.7 mm
  • Shell Inner Diameter 0.254 m
  • Tube Length 5 m
  • Shell Mass Flow Rate 12 kg/s

32
Optimization Results
  • With Engine Coolant in Tubes
  • QCALC 1200 kW
  • Desired-to-Calculated Ratio 0.99
  • Shell Pressure Drop 605 Pa
  • Tube Pressure Drop 5875 Pa
  • Weight 602 kg

33
Conclusion
  • Engine Coolant in Tubes
  • Satisfies Q
  • Minimum Shell Pressure Drop
  • Minimum Tube Pressure Drop
  • Minimum Weight

34
Lessons Learned
  • Not Every Problem Has a Clear Definition
  • Learn to Adapt
  • Not Every Problem Has a Clear Solution
  • May Not Be Able to Meet All Requirements
  • Sacrifice One Requirement to Meet Another

35
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com