School Safety and Security Audits: What Does the Law Require Presented by Catherine Toohey and John - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

School Safety and Security Audits: What Does the Law Require Presented by Catherine Toohey and John

Description:

... and technical assistance to reduce youth violence and promote safety in the State. ... Ensure schools participate in drills and all-hazards exercises. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:222
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: CSCS9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: School Safety and Security Audits: What Does the Law Require Presented by Catherine Toohey and John


1
School Safety and Security AuditsWhat Does the
Law Require?Presented byCatherine Toohey and
John Bremer
and
2
What is the districts responsibility to be in
compliance with TEC 37.108 (SB 11)
  • The district is responsible for the
    implementation of a security audit as required by
    Subsection (b).
  • At least once every three years, a school
    district shall conduct a security audit of the
    district's facilities. To the extent possible, a
    district shall follow security audit procedures
    developed by the Texas School Safety Center or a
    comparable public or private entity.
  • A school district shall report the results of the
    security audit conducted under Subsection (b) to
    the district's board of trustees.

3
The Texas School Safety Center
  •  The Texas School Safety Center (TxSSC) was
    created in 1999 by then Governor George Bush and
    authorized by the 77th Texas Legislature in 2001
    to serve as a central location in Texas for
    school safety information, and to provide schools
    with information including research, training,
    and technical assistance to reduce youth violence
    and promote safety in the State.

4
What does the Texas School Safety Center do?
  • 37.207. MODEL SAFETY AND SECURITY AUDIT
    PROCEDURE. The center shall develop a model
    safety and security audit procedure for use by
    school districts that includes (1) providing
    each district with guidelines showing proper
    audit procedures (2) reviewing each district
    audit, providing the results of the review to the
    district, and making recommendations for
    improvements based on the audit and (3)
    incorporating the findings of district audits in
    a statewide report on school safety made
    available by the center to the public. Added by
    Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 923, 1, eff. Sept. 1,
    2001.

5
THE TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGIC PLAN
2005-2010
  • 4. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE 2.4
  • ENHANCE THE SAFETY OF SCHOOLS IN TEXAS.
  • The Texas School Safety Center will
  • 2.4.1. Provide schools with a web-based tool to
    conduct vulnerability self-assessments and meet
    security audit requirements.
  • 2.4.2. Provide schools with a web-based
    emergency operations planning tool to develop
    school safety and emergency response plans.
  • 2.4.3. Develop a train-the-trainer program to
    educate school officials on homeland
    security-related school safety.
  • 2.4.4. Ensure schools participate in drills and
    all-hazards exercises.

6
What does the Center for Safe and Secure Schools
do?
  • The Center provides services to school districts
    in the Houston area as the districts liaison to
    emergency management agencies and specifically in
    coordinating hurricane evacuation and refuge
    operations. The Center provides training in
    safety, security and emergency management
    targeted to the school administrator, both
    central office and campus based. The Center will
    provide audits, staff training, table top and
    functional exercises and consulting on specific
    needs to school districts or ESCs.

7
What the Center for Safe and Secure Schools Brings
  • The Center for Safe and Secure Schools develops
    consensus standards based on advice from school
    districts federal, state, and local law
    enforcement and emergency response agencies
    non-governmental agencies universities and
    medical schools industry and business.
  • Since 1999 the Center has done in safety and
    security reviews in the largest to some of the
    smallest school districts in Texas as well as in
    private schools. The Center currently has
    projects in seven educational service centers and
    over twenty school districts.

8
Purpose of a Safety and Security Audit
  • The purpose of the audit is to work with
    schools to identify safety and security
    practices, policies and needs on a campus and to
    make recommendations to help the school create
    the safest environment possible for students.

9
Components of the Audit Process
  • Safety and Security of Site and Building Exterior
  • Access Control
  • Safety and Security of Building Interior
  • Type and Extent of Monitoring and Surveillance
  • Development and Enforcement of Policies
  • Development of Intervention and Prevention Plans
  • Level of Staff Development
  • Opportunities for Student Involvement
  • Level of Parent and Community Involvement
  • Role of Law Enforcement
  • Crisis Communication
  • Development of Emergency Operations Plans
  • School Climate and Culture

10
Access Control
  • Intruder Evaluation
  • Non-scheduled
  • Document date and time
  • Were exterior doors locked?
  • Was main entrance monitored by staff?
  • Are visitors asked for photo ID?
  • Did staff or students confront the intruder?
  • Were all students supervised by staff?

11
Access Control
12
On-Site Visit
  • Scheduled visit to gather data
  • Begins with entrance conference
  • During the visit, team members should follow
    checklists to ensure that all components of the
    audit are addressed.

13
Entrance Conference
  • The audit team should meet with staff that
    represent a cross-section of school personnel.
    This group might include
  • An administrator
  • A teacher
  • A school law enforcement officer
  • A food service or custodial staff member
  • Any other members the campus selects

14
Surveys or Interviews
  • Surveys or interviews may be utilized to gather
    data about real (and perceived) school safety
    concerns from all stakeholders
  • Students
  • Parents
  • Teachers and staff
  • Community

15
Assessment of School and Neighborhood Risk Factors
  • Vandalism
  • High Student Mobility
  • Graffiti
  • Gang Activity
  • Crime
  • Poverty
  • Adjudicated students
  • Trespassing
  • Withdrawal of students (safety)
  • Child abuse (home)
  • Effective student-staff relationships
  • High expectations for student learning

16
ATF Video from Bomb Threat CD
17
Walk-through of Site
  • Grounds and Building Exterior
  • Buses and Parking
  • Play/Outdoor Recreation Areas
  • BUILDING ACCESS

18
Walk-through of Building
  • Visibility
  • Adequate lighting
  • Ability to monitor students
  • Access to classrooms controlled
  • Access to hazards controlled
  • Building in good repair

19
School Climate and Culture
  • Look for clues in signage
  • Converse with staff and students if possible
  • listen carefully
  • What types of student programs or activities are
    there?
  • anger management
  • peer mediation
  • service learning
  • mentoring, etc

20
Student Belonging
  • Access to all programs and services by all
    students (low-achieving, disabled, minority)
  • School spirit or pride
  • Ownership of school by students and staff
  • No one predominate social group
  • Tolerance is emphasized or taught

21
School Climate
  • Do teachers and students have a positive rapport?
  • Do all staff feel responsible for all students?
  • Are staff visible in halls during transitions?
  • Are students monitored to prevent violence and
    bullying?

22
Do staff know how to spot trouble and how to
respond?
23
Emergency Operations Plan
  • Should be
  • Developed by the building safety team
  • Law Enforcement should be part of this team
  • Reviewed on an annual basis
  • Have a well-coordinated safety plan with MOUs
    with law enforcement and other emergency response
    agencies
  • Include detailed maps of facility

24
Evacuation Map
25
Detailed Map for EOP
26
Emergency Operations Plan
  • Safety Drills are in place and practiced
    regularly
  • After-Action Reviews are held after drills,
    exercises, and actual emergencies.
  • All staff are trained in the implementation of
    the EOP.

27
Mandatory Drills
  • Drills should be named and announced using plain
    language instead of code words in accordance with
    Incident Command Systems and NIMS
  • NO MORE CODES!
  • Drill should be taught to students before they
    are practiced including an explanation of why
    they are important

28
Why no more codes?
  • SOPHOMORE ZACK BARNES, 16, SAID HIS FIRST
    INDICATION THAT THERE WAS SOMETHING WRONG AT HIS
    SCHOOL WAS AN ANNOUNCEMENT OVER THE PUBLIC
    ADDRESS SYSTEM.
  • "WE WERE SITTING THERE IN MATH CLASS AND
    OVER THE INTERCOM THEY SAID 'STUDENTS AND
    TEACHERS WE HAVE A CODE WHITE. REPEAT, CODE
    WHITE. 'AND NOBODY REALLY KNEW WHAT A CODE WHITE
    WAS,
  • HE SAID HIS TEACHER CHECKED A SHEET OF PAPER
    FROM HER DESK AND THEN SAID THE CLASS HAD TO
    MOVE.

29
Recommended Drills
  • Evacuation (proposed minimum)
  • Building (one each month)
  • Site
  • Lock-down (three each year)
  • Shelter-in-place
  • Drop and cover (one each year)
  • Reverse evacuation

30
Incident Command System
  • Standard, on-scene, all-hazard incident
    management system based on best practices
  • Integrated management structure
  • Features
  • Common terminology
  • Organizational resources
  • Manageable span of control
  • Organizational facilities
  • Position titles
  • Incident Action Plan
  • Integrated communications
  • Accountability

31
Review of Documents
  • Visitor Procedures
  • Visitor policy/procedure signs are posted and
    visible at all entrance doors.
  • Access is limited to one main entry if possible.
  • Visitors are required to sign in and show valid
    ID.
  • Visitors are required to wear visible, dated
    identification.

32
Review of Documents
  • Emergency Communication Plan
  • Contact numbers for staff (home and cell)
  • Updated regularly
  • Student Code of Conduct
  • Clear expectations
  • Consistent consequences
  • Taught to students

33
Review of Documents
  • Discipline Data
  • of violent incidents
  • of expulsions or removals
  • Consistent consequences for offenses
  • Do these indicate a safety need on the campus?

34
What next?
  • Principal will use results of audit to create an
    action-plan for addressing items of concern
  • Action plan will address short-term plans for
    items that can be addressed through updated
    policy, practice or maintenance as well as items
    that require long-term planning

35
Results
  • Results reported to
  • School board
  • Possibly to Texas School Safety Center
  • State Report on School Safety

36
Deadline
  • All districts must have their first round of
    audits completed by August 31st, 2008

37
Resources
  • Texas School Safety Center Texas State
    University- San Marcos
  • Phone (512) 245.8082 Toll-free (877) 304-2727
  • www.cscs.txstate.edu/txssc.htm
  • Curtis Clay, Director cc36_at_txstate.edu
  • Catherine Toohey, ct21_at_txstate.edu
  • Center for Safe and Secure Schools
  • Harris County Department of Education Houston
  • Phone (713) 696-0770 Toll-free (866)
    713-2343
  • www.safeandsecureschools.org/
  • Karl Boland, Director kboland_at_hcde-texas.org
  • John Bremer jbremer_at_hcde-texas.org

38
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com