Kindergarten to Senior 4 Physical EducationHealth Education Manitoba Curriculum Framework of Outcome - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Kindergarten to Senior 4 Physical EducationHealth Education Manitoba Curriculum Framework of Outcome

Description:

Is the equipment adequate and suitably arranged? ... fitness test results should be communicated separately from the final percent mark or grades ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: HeatherWi3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kindergarten to Senior 4 Physical EducationHealth Education Manitoba Curriculum Framework of Outcome


1
Kindergarten to Senior 4Physical
Education/Health EducationManitoba
CurriculumFramework of Outcomes for.
  • Active Healthy Lifestyles

http//www.edu.gov.mb.ca/metks4/curricul/k-s4curr/
physhlth/k-s4framework.html
2
(No Transcript)
3
Five Interrelated General Learning Outcomes
(GLOs)
4
Aim
  • to provide students with planned and balanced
    programming to develop the knowledge, skill, and
    attitudes for physically active and healthy
    lifestyles

5
Research-based
  • focus on movement and social skill-based
    programs for lifelong physical activity
    participation and healthy living
  • design learning experiences based on best
    practices such as learner centred, inclusive,
    enjoyable, and developmentally/age appropriate
  • (See 13 Guiding Principles p. 6 for other
    examples)

6
  • promote partnership building among schools,
    families, and communities
  • address the 5 major health risks for children and
    youth

7
5 Major Health Risks
  • inadequate physical activity
  • unhealthy dietary behaviours
  • drug use, including alcohol and tobacco
  • sexual behaviours that result in sexually
    transmitted diseases or infections and unintended
    pregnancies
  • behaviours that result in intentional and
    unintentional injuries

8
Organizational Structure
  • Curriculum Map
  • Icon for each GLO
  • Summary Charts for each GLO
  • Scope and Sequence Charts for each GLO
  • Code for each SLO

9
Key Characteristics
  • Combined curriculum
  • Outcomes based
  • Integrated
  • Highly active and interactive
  • Delivery model is a local decision through a
    planning process
  • Treatment of potentially sensitive outcomes is
    determined by a local planning process

10
Recommended Minimum Time Allotments
  • Grades K-6 11 of the instructional time
  • 11 x 300 min/day x 6 day/cycle198 min.
  • 75 PE 150 min/6 day cycle
  • 25 HE 48 min/6 day cycle
  • Grades 7-8 9 of the instructional time
  • 9 x 330 min/day x 6 day cycle 178 min.
  • 75PE 134min/6 day cycle
  • 25HE 44 min/6 day cycle
  • S1-S2 2 credits with 50PE/50 HE reported as
    one full credit or 2 half credits
  • Additional health time through integration in
    various subject areas
  • Additional time through optional courses

11
Students with Special Needs (chart p. 14)
  • Modifications
  • Adaptations
  • Accommodations ( new policy related to adjustment
    of physical skill-based outcomes)
  • Rescheduling
  • Substitution

12
Safety and Liability
  • Safety and liability is the responsibility of
    school divisions/districts and its employees.
  • Teachers are expected to
  • be knowledgeable
  • anticipate hazards
  • minimize risks
  • demonstrate expertise in physical activity
    management
  • Teachers are expected to provide professional
    standard of care rather than the careful and
    prudent parent standard of care especially in
    high risk type of activities.

13
Safety and Liability Criteria (p.15)
  • The Supreme Court of Canada has established four
    criteria to determine the necessary and
    appropriate standard of care within the context
    of physical education
  • Is the activity suitable to the age, mental, and
    physical condition of participating students?
  • Have the students been progressively taught and
    coached to perform the activity(ies) properly and
    to avoid the dangers inherent in the
    activity(ies)?
  • Is the equipment adequate and suitably arranged?
  • Is the activity being supervised properly in
    light of the inherent danger involved?

14
Assessment Planning Guidelines
  • use the suggested 8 steps in planning assessment
    and evaluation strategies for outcomes (Appendix
    B, p.196)
  • start with the end in mind - the outcome

15
Reporting (p.197)
  • grades/marks should include information that
    indicates progress and achievement related to the
    student learning outcomes
  • behaviour can be part of the mark when it is
  • an integral part of the specific student learning
    outcomes
  • observable and measurable
  • serves as a performance descriptor

16
  • behaviour related to areas such as punctuality,
    attendance, dress and attitude should not be part
    of the mark but reported by using a separate
    anecdotal comment or checklist
  • fitness test results should be communicated
    separately from the final percent mark or grades
  • reporting on student learning outcomes that are
    potentially sensitive is a local decision through
    the SDDPP (Appendix C)

17
  • how integrated student learning outcomes should
    be assessed and evaluated is determined by the
    teachers involved through team planning and
    collaboration
  • for students with significant cognitive
    disabilities, refer to Individual Education
    Planning A Handbook for Developing and
    Implementing IEPs, Early to Senior Years (1998)
  • for students with special needs and medical
    problems, refer to page 10

18
Current Roll-Out Plan
19
Expectations
  • School divisions/districts are to determine best
    delivery model based on best practices for
    overall implementation of the Framework
  • A planning process must be used to determine
    local policy related to potentially sensitive
    content
  • Schools must seek parental involvement and
    provide a parental option prior to implementation
    of potentially sensitive content

20
Part A Potential Decisions for Overall
Implementation of the Framework
  • Timetabling
  • Delivery/Staffing Choice
  • Programming for non-sensitive outcomes that
    require special consideration
  • Programming for potentially sensitive outcome
  • Selection of Learning Resources for non-sensitive
    outcomes and potentially sensitive outcomes
  • Teacher Training

21
Overall Implementation of the Framework
(continued)
  • Safety Guidelines
  • Programming for Students with Special Needs
  • Programming for Students with Medical Problems
  • Reporting
  • Parental/Community Involvement
  • Extracurricular program
  • Healthy school environment and services
  • Other (e.g. budget, facilities, equipment)

22
Part B Potential Decision Areas For School
Division/District Planning (p. 205)
23
  • Physically Active and Healthy Lifestyles for All
    Students

24
Contact Information
  • English Programs
  • Heather Willoughby
  • W260-1970 Ness Avenue Winnipeg, MB. R3J 0Y9
  • Ph (204) 945-8143 Fax (204) 945-3042
  • Email hwilloughb_at_edu.gov.mb.ca
  • http//www.edu.gov.mb.ca/metks4/curricul/k-s4curr/
    physhlth
  • Français/French Immersion Programs
  • Jacques Dorge
  • 509-1181 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, MB. R3G 0T3
  • Ph (204) 945-6929 Fax (204) 945-1625
  • Email jdorge_at_edu.gov.mb.ca
  • http//www.edu.gov.mb.ca/manetfr/m-s4/pf/mat-scol/
    edu-phys/index.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com