Laredo Independent School District - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Laredo Independent School District

Description:

... in-school or after-school book club meetings or special events with at least ... Increase of 5% in Fitness Gram testing $150.00. Or. Tier III ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: Lared
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Laredo Independent School District


1
Laredo Independent School District
  • District Awards for Teacher Excellence
  • (D.A.T.E)
  • Plan
  • 2009 - 2010

2
Texas Education AgencyGrant Award Amount
  • 1,762,506.00

60 Part I Teachers and Principals -
1,057,504.00
40 Part II Teachers, Assistant Principals,
and Staff - 705,002.00
3
Assumptions
  • In order to remain within budget the following
    assumptions were made to formulate the payout
    amounts
  • All campus based Administrators, Teachers and
    Staff qualify for the maximum award amount for
    Part I or Part II.
  • All TAKS grade level Teachers 3rd 11th qualify
    for Part I or Part II.

4
Part I
  • As per the TEA grant guidelines 60 percent of
    the grant funds must be used to award classroom
    teachers who positively impact student academic
    improvement and/or growth and/or achievement and
    who meet the TEC definition of a classroom
    teacher.

60 Part I Teachers and Principals -
1,057,504.00
5
Part I - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Grades 3rd through 11th Grade
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
  • (TAKS, TAKS-M, TAKS-ACC, and TAKS-Alt)
  • Maximum Award Amount
  • 1,500.00

6
Part I - Tier Level Baseline
  • 2008-2009 TAKS Scores

7
Part I - Tier Levels Target
  • Tier I
  • Compare 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 TAKS Scores 30
    increase overall
  • Or
  • Tier II
  • Compare 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 TAKS Scores 20
    increase overall
  • Or
  • Tier III
  • Compare 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 TAKS Scores 15
    increase overall
  • Or
  • Tier IV
  • Compare 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 TAKS Scores 10
    increase overall
  • Or
  • Tier V
  • Compare 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 TAKS Scores 7
    increase overall
  • Or
  • Tier VI
  • Compare 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 TAKS Scores 5
    increase overall
  • Or
  • Tier VII

8
Part I - Tier Levels Cont.
  • Tier I (30)
  • 1,500
  • Tier II (20)
  • 1,250
  • Tier III (15)
  • 1,000
  • Tier IV (10)
  • 750
  • Tier V (7)
  • 550
  • Tier VI (5)
  • 350
  • Tier VII (1-4)
  • 250
  • All award amounts listed above include TRS
    benefits and Tax Deductions

9
Part I - Tier Levels Cont. Principals
  • Tier I
  • Met two of the performance targets listed below.
  • or
  • Tier II
  • Met three of the performance targets listed
    below.
  • or
  • Tier III
  • Met four or more of the performance targets
    listed below.
  • a. Campus received an exemplary state
    accountability rating.
  • b. Campus received a recognized state
    accountability rating.
  • c. Campus met TAKS standard for percentages of
    student groups that either 1) met annual
    performance targets (set by district prior to
    October 1, 2008), or 2) had at least 90 percent
    of students who met standard.
  • d. Campus met TAKS commended level for the
    percentages of student groups that either 1) met
    the annual commended performance target(s) (set
    by the state in the state accountability manual),
    or 2) had at least 30 percent of students with
    TAKS scale scores of at least 2200 points.

10
Part I - Tier Levels Cont. Principals
  • Tier I
  • 1,000
  • Tier II
  • 2,000
  • Tier III
  • 3,500
  • All award amounts listed above include TRS
    benefits and Tax Deductions
  • For Principals in Part I For eligibility
    requirements campuses cannot go down in rating.
  • Example If a campus is Exemplary the campus
    cannot fall to Recognized status. Therefore, if
    a campus falls from exemplary to recognized
    status or from recognized to acceptable the
    principals and/or asst. principals/career academy
    deans will be considered for only Tier I if they
    have met the other two criteria (i.e. Met TAKS
    standard and Met TAKS Commended).

11
Part I Additional Awards
  • 3rd 11th - Teachers in each core content TAKS
    assessed area that have current baseline scores
    in TAKS of 90 or Higher comparing 2008-2009 and
    2009-2010 overall percentage. Award Amount 3,000
    including benefits for all campuses.
  • 3rd 11th - Teachers in each core content TAKS
    assessed area that have current baseline scores
    in TAKS between 80 and 89 comparing 2008-2009
    and 2009-2010 overall percentage. Award Amount
    2,000 including benefits for all campuses.
  • 3rd 11th - Teachers in each core content TAKS
    assessed area that have current baseline scores
    in TAKS between 70 and 79 comparing 2008-2009
    and 2009-2010 overall percentage. Award Amount
    1,000 including benefits for all campuses.
  • Teachers are eligible for only one incentive
    award unless they have current baseline scores in
    TAKS of 70 or Higher in which case they are also
    eligible to receive an additional tier incentive
    as applicable.
  • Teachers teaching multiple subjects will be
    measured on an individual basis through an
    overall average of core content TAKS assessed
    area comparing 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 overall
    percentage.
  • Principals that maintain a campus rating of
    Exemplary status for 2009 2010. Award amount
    3,500 including benefits.

12
Part I Linkage System
  • The linkage system seeks to provide a fair and
    equitable distribution of funds in grade levels
    that are departmentalized or semi-departmentalized
    and core content non-TAKS assessed areas that
    are exclusive to 3rd 5th grade Elementary
    School/6th and 7th grade Middle School. Teachers
    that qualify for Linkage will receive 50 of the
    award amount received by the teacher of record.
    Science Teachers will Link to the Math Teacher of
    record and the Social Studies Teachers will link
    to the English Language Arts Teacher of record.

13
Part I Linkage System Cont.
14
Part I Contingency Plan
  • The district will redistribute un-awarded Part I
    funds equally among all teachers in Part I that
    met the required plan criteria.
  • The individual must have met their original plan
    criteria in the first place to even be considered
    for redistributed funds.
  • Teachers with Perfect Attendance 100 for school
    year 2009-2010 will receive un-awarded Part I
    funds not to exceed 2,500.00. (Only In-school
    district business, out-school district
    business, jury duty, and district mandated
    absence due to the H1N1 health concerns will not
    exclude teachers from perfect attendance.
    However, documentation is required.  In addition,
    if the absence is due to the health concern of
    H1N1 then a doctors excuse will be required
    documentation verifying that the absence was due
    to the diagnoses of H1N1.)
  • 2. Teachers with 98 continuous student
    attendance for school year 2009-2010 will receive
    un-awarded Part I funds not to exceed 1,500.00.
  • 3. Principals that maintain throughout the year a
    Campus Student Attendance Rate of 98 for School
    year 2009-2010 will receive un-awarded Part I
    funds not to exceed 2,500.
  • 4. If budgeted amount for teachers in Part I
    remain then the district will redistribute
    un-awarded Part I funds equally among all
    teachers in Part I that met the required plan
    criteria not to exceed 5,000.00 and local funds
    will not be used.

15
Part II
  • The alternative criterion as per the TEA grant
    guidelines allows school districts to use up to
    40 percent of the grant funds on other allowable
    activities, including stipends and awards.

40 Part II Teachers, Assistant Principals,
and Staff - 705,002.00
16
Part II - Tier Levels
  • For Grades Pre K thru 2nd
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Pre-IPT, C-PALLS, Texas Primary Reading Inventory
  • (TPRI), Tejas Lee
  • Criteria
  • Tier I
  • 90 of teachers individual students developed by
    EOY 2009-2010 TPRI/Tejas Lee
  • Amount 450.00
  • Tier II
  • 80 of teachers individual students developed by
    EOY 2009-2010 TPRI/Tejas Lee
  • Amount 250.00
  • Tier III
  • 70 of teachers individual students developed by
    EOY 2009-2010 TPRI/Tejas Lee
  • Amount 175.00

17
Part II - Tier Levels For Assistant Principals
  • Criteria
  • Tier I
  • Met two of the performance targets listed below.
  • 500.00
  • or
  • Tier II
  • Met three of the performance targets listed
    below.
  • 750.00
  • or
  • Tier III
  • Met four or more of the performance targets
    listed below.
  • 1,000.00
  • a. Campus received an exemplary state
    accountability rating.
  • b. Campus received a recognized state
    accountability rating.
  • c. Campus met TAKS standard for percentages of
    student groups that either 1) met annual
    performance targets (set by district prior to
    October 1, 2008), or 2) had at least 90 percent
    of students met standard.

18
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Teachers Grades 3rd through 11th Grade
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
  • (TAKS, TAKS-M, TAKS-ACC, and TAKS-Alt)
  • Criteria
  • Minimum of 50 or More students that met 2100
    scale score on TAKS comparing 2008-2009 and
    2009-2010 TAKS Scores overall percentage.
  • Maximum Award Amount
  • 175.00

19
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Special Education Teachers
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
  • (TAKS, TAKS-M, TAKS-ACC, and TAKS-Alt)
  • Criteria
  • Minimum of 50 or More students that met 2100
    scale score on TAKS comparing 2008-2009 and
    2009-2010 TAKS Scores overall percentage
  • and
  • 2008 2009 Evaluation.
  • Maximum Award Amount
  • 175.00

20
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Nurses
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Nursing Summary Reports
  • Criteria
  • Provides 12 Monthly Nursing Summary Reports for
    2009 - 2010.
  • Award Amount
  • 175.00

21
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Counselors
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Student Service Logs
  • Criteria
  • Provides 20 hours (within a 40 work week) of
    mentoring and/or counseling per selected student
    (at least 3 or more). Sessions are documented
    through sign-in logs during the school year.
  • Award Amount
  • 175.00

22
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Librarians, Library Aides, and Library
    Clerks
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Sign-in Logs
  • Criteria
  • Holds bi-weekly in-school or after-school book
    club meetings or special events with at least
    eight struggling readers within their 40hr. work
    week (identified by the Reading/Language Arts
    teacher) for two consecutive six week periods.
  • Award Amount
  • 175.00

23
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • Fine Arts Teachers Elementary, Middle and High
    School
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Agendas, Parent Sign-in Sheets, Programs, Flyers
  • Criteria
  • Performs at least one 30 minute (or longer)
    art/music lesson/activity at a minimum of 3
    family nights by the end of the school year 2009
    - 2010 .
  • Award Amount
  • 175.00

24
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For P.E. Teachers Middle Schools
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Fitness Gram
  • Criteria
  • Tier I
  • Increase of 7 in Fitness Gram testing
  • 175.00
  • Or
  • Tier II
  • Increase of 5 in Fitness Gram testing
  • 150.00
  • Or
  • Tier III
  • Increase of 2 in Fitness Gram testing
  • 75.00

25
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Custodians
  • Data Source/Measure
  • End-of-year Evaluation
  • Criteria
  • Receives an above satisfactory end-of-year
    evaluation and completes 90 percent (or more) of
    all repair /maintenance ticket items weekly, for
    at least 24 weeks during the school year.
  • Award Amount
  • 175.00

26
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • Head Custodians Elementary, Middle, and High
    School
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Conducts meetings with custodial staff at least
    once a month as documented
  • And
  • Receives an above satisfactory end-of-year
    evaluation 2008 2009 with no marks below
    expectations.
  • Criteria
  • Monthly Meeting Logs
  • and
  • Receives an above satisfactory end-of-year
    evaluation and conducts meetings with custodial
    staff at least once a month.
  • Award Amount
  • 175.00

27
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Teacher Aides
  • Data Source/Measure
  • Tutoring Logs
  • Criteria
  • Provides prescriptive classroom small group
    instruction (lasting no less than 40 minutes) to
    no less than two at-risk students (identified by
    the lead teacher) to improve skills and academic
    achievement for at least six consecutive weeks
  • and
  • Receives an above satisfactory end-of-year
    evaluation 2008 2009 with no marks below
    expectations.
  • Award Amount
  • 175.00

28
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Food Service Assistants
  • Data Source/Measure
  • End-ofyear Evaluations
  • Criteria
  • Earns an 85 or higher cafeteria cleanliness
    passing rate on kitchen health and safety
    inspection/evaluation bi-monthly for no less than
    24 weeks during the school year
  • and
  • Receives an above satisfactory end-of-year
    evaluation 2008 2009 with no marks below
    expectations.
  • Award Amount
  • 175.00

29
Part II - Tier Levels Cont.
  • For Non-Academic Teachers and Instructional
    Support Personnel
  • Data Source/Measure
  • End-ofyear Evaluations
  • Criteria
  • Receives an above satisfactory end-of-year
    evaluation 2008 2009 with no marks below
    expectations.
  • Maximum Award Amount
  • 175.00

30
Part II Contingency Plan
  • Part II funds if necessary will be used to cover
    additional amounts needed for Part I criteria if
    Part I funds are insufficient to cover teachers
    and principals qualifying for Part I funds.
  • The district will redistribute un-awarded Part II
    funds equally among all teachers and staff in
    Part II that met the required plan criteria.
  • The individual must have met their original plan
    criteria in the first place to even be considered
    for redistributed funds.
  • Teachers with Perfect Attendance 100 for school
    year 2009-2010 will receive un-awarded Part II
    funds not to exceed 2,500.00. (Only In-school
    district business, out-school district
    business, jury duty, and district mandated
    absence due to the H1N1 health concerns will not
    exclude teachers from perfect attendance.
    However, documentation is required.  In addition,
    if the absence is due to the health concern of
    H1N1 then a doctors excuse will be required
    documentation verifying that the absence was due
    to the diagnoses of H1N1.)
  • 2. Teachers with 98 continuous student
    attendance for school year 2009-2010 will receive
    un-awarded Part I funds not to exceed 1,500.00.
  • 3. Assistant Principals assigned to a school
    that maintains throughout the year a Campus
    Student Attendance Rate of 98 for School year
    2009-2010 will receive un-awarded Part II funds
    not to exceed 1,750.
  • 4. If budgeted amount for teachers and staff in
    Part II remain then the district will
    redistribute un-awarded Part II funds equally
    among all teachers and staff in Part II that met
    the required plan criteria not to exceed
    3,000.00 and local funds will not be used.

31
Qualifications
  • Class size reduction teachers are not eligible
    for Linkage.
  • Professionals, Administrators, Teachers, or
    Para-professionals must remain in good standing
    during their term of employment from September 1,
    2009 thru June 1, 2010 and must complete the
    current school year to remain eligible.
  • Professionals, Administrators, Teachers, or
    Para-professionals that are placed on leave
    whether paid or not for any reason are excluded.
    If exonerated these individuals will be
    reinstated for consideration of the award amounts
    they would have qualified for.
  • Teachers with less than 20 students assessed in
    TAKS are excluded from Part I. In order to
    qualify for Part I award amounts a teacher must
    have had a minimum of 20 students in the annual
    assessment of TAKS 1st administration (TAKS, TAKS
    ACC, TAKS-M, or TAKS-Alt). Teachers excluded from
    Part I will be considered for Part II based on
    their results in the annual assessment of TAKS
    1st administration (TAKS, TAKS ACC, TAKS-M, or
    TAKS-Alt) based on Part II criteria.
  • All TAKS grade level teachers qualify for Part I
    providing they have met the established criteria
    (1st Administration TAKS results) otherwise, they
    qualify for Part II providing they have met the
    established criteria (1st Administration TAKS
    results).
  • Exceptions
  • Special Ed. Self-contained teachers of record
    with more than 10 students, but less than 20
    testing TAKS areas qualify for Part I providing
    they have met the established criteria.
    Otherwise, they qualify for Part II providing
    they have met the established criteria.
  • Special Ed. Self-contained teachers of record
    with less than 10 students assessed in TAKS will
    qualify for Part II providing they have met the
    established criteria.
  • Regular Classroom teachers of record (Class-size
    reduction) who teach all subjects
    (Self-Contained) and are responsible for all TAKS
    areas having less than the 20 students, but more
    than 10 required for the grant qualify for Part I
    providing they have met the established criteria.
    Otherwise, they qualify for Part II providing
    they have met the established criteria.
  • Class-size reduction teachers, excluding
    pull-outs, qualify for Part I providing they have
    met the established criteria otherwise, they
    qualify for Part II providing they have met the
    established criteria.
  • Class-size reduction teachers (Pull-outs),
    qualify for Part I providing they have met the
    established criteria otherwise, they qualify for
    Part II providing they have met the established
    criteria. DDA documentation required (Report
    identifying students TAKS scores for the
    class-size reduction teacher).

32
Exclusions
  • New teachers to the district and staff are not
    eligible if hired after September 1, 2008.
  • Temporary substitute employees are not eligible.
  • Part-time employees are not eligible.
  • Tutors are not eligible unless they are full-time
    tutors.
  • Professionals, Administrators, Teachers, or
    Para-professionals who through voluntary or
    involuntary termination are not eligible.
  • If reassignment, transfer, or promotion occurs
    between September 1, 2009 and June 1, 2010 the
    individual will be paid based on their previously
    assigned position.
  • Main Office personnel are not eligible If
    individual employees do not receive their payroll
    checks at their assigned home campus then they
    are not eligible due to the fact that they can be
    reassigned at any time and are not considered
    part of the campus permanent staffing.
  • Professionals, Administrators, Teachers, or
    Para-professionals that have left the district
    prior to June 1, 2010 are not eligible.

33
Cost/Benefit Analysis
Higher Teacher Attendance Less Substitute Pay.
Thereby, increasing cost savings to the
district. Increased Student Attendance
Increased funding for Average Daily Attendance.
Thereby, increasing funding provided to the
district.
34
Employee Acknowledgement
1 ERO credit for acknowledging the presented
D.A.T.E. Grant Plan for 2009 2010. Campus
Visits beginning in February 2010
35
QA Discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com