Leading Virtual Meetings Internet for the Teaming Masses - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Leading Virtual Meetings Internet for the Teaming Masses

Description:

Application Sharing. Information Access Tools. File Transfer. File Storage / Document Repository ... Document Management Systems. Project Management Systems ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Dan5278
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leading Virtual Meetings Internet for the Teaming Masses


1
Leading Virtual Meetings Internet for the
Teaming Masses
  • Daniel Mittleman
  • DePaul CTI
  • danny_at_cti.depaul.edu

2
Let me start by telling you things you
already know
3
We generate a lot of paper
  • 15 trillion pieces of paper were processed by US
    businesses in 2000
  • 1.37 billion copies were made each day in 2000
  • and 37 of those copies (481 million) were
    considered unnecessary
  • Per capita consumption of paper in the US is
    currently over 748lbs. about 217 billion lbs.
    total

4
Managers Executives spend most of their time
communicating
  • Managers spend about 85 of their day
    communicating
  • Executives spend 75 of their time communicating
    orally
  • Managers spend almost half their day in meetings
  • The average worker has 36 hours of work stacked
    up to do

5
Most meetings are bad
  • Someone dominates
  • Others are afraid to speak
  • Poor or no! agenda
  • Hidden agendas
  • Key person missing
  • No ability to close
  • Or close to soon
  • Bad meeting room

6
And, its harder to meet over a distance
  • Technology is a pain to set up and get
    synchronized
  • You lose non-verbal cues
  • Feedback loops take longer
  • Free riding increases
  • And, this isnt the full list

7
The Workforce is going Virtual
Gartner predicts by 2009, 70 of knowledge work
will occur in locations where workers will depend
on a wireless and remote-access infrastructure
that is outside the enterprise's direct control.
Source Bureau of Labor Statistics (September
2006) and Gartner (October 2006)
8
Products are being developed to support this
  • Web 1.0
  • Static (HTML)
  • Single surfer
  • BC ecommerce
  • Informational sites
  • Web 2.0
  • Dynamic (Ajax)
  • Collaborative
  • PP community
  • Social network sites

Web 1.0
Web 2.0
Web 3.0 ?
9
Within the landscape of collaboration
technologies. New Web2.0 collaboration tools
are Falling out of the skies
10
So, my research looksat what we can do to make
sense of this
How do we improve the process of meetings as
organizations go virtual?
11
We notice
  • People who want to collaborate come at it by
    asking one of three questions

12
They ask
I have to remotely staff a document. How do I do
it?
My team needs to collaborate virtually, what
should I do?
13
They ask
I need a phone bridge, what is out there for me
to use?
I need a collaboration capability, what are my
choices?
14
They ask
RSS?
Wiki?
Skype?
Blog?
What is this new product/ technology and why
might I want one?
15
Four Entry Pointsto get to the Solution
ExecuteSolution
Select Product
Define Technology
Define the Collaboration Affordance
Define the Business Problem
16
How do we make sense of this mass of web 2.0
virtual products?
  • First Problem
  • Figuring out the right point of entry to the
    solution cycle
  • Second Problem
  • Massive overlap of among classes of products

17
The Big Breakthrough
  • Distinguishing
  • Products
  • Bundles of instances of technologies
  • AIM, ICQ
  • Technologies
  • A way of doing something useful
  • Instant Messaging

are things you can buy
From
provide affordances
18
Affordance Matrix
Products
Technologies
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
19
Caveat
  • Simply adding technology alone never solves a
    significant problem

20
Categorization of Technologies
  • What factors best differentiate among
    collaboration technology in the marketplace today
    (and tomorrow)

21
How did we figure this out?
  • We collected up all the groupware products we
    could find
  • We started categorizing them into buckets as best
    we saw fit
  • Then we looked at the buckets we had, tried to
    label them, and got into discussion about what
    made each bucket unique
  • Then we organized the buckets into a
    classification
  • Then we tried to break our classification AND WE
    DID
  • So we went back to figure out why it didnt work,
    and kept rearranging until we found a
    classification scheme we could not break
  • Something to notice here
  • This was a virtual collaborative effort.
  • We used the tools of which we speak
  • We had a goal
  • We had a process
  • Our process had stages to it
  • We had interim deliverable
  • But it all existed to lead us to our goal

22
Collaboration Technology Classes
  • Streaming Tools
  • Information Access
  • Jointly Authored Pages
  • Aggregated Systems

23
Streaming Tools
  • Audio Only
  • Data Presentation Only
  • Video plus Data Presentation and/or Video
  • Application Sharing

24
Information Access Tools
  • File Transfer
  • File Storage / Document Repository
  • Search Engines
  • Socialware Social Tagging
  • Syndication (RSS) Tools

25
Jointly Authored Page Tools
  • Different Time Communication
  • Same Time Communication
  • Shared Document Authoring
  • List, Outline
  • Document, Wiki
  • Presentation
  • Spreadsheet
  • Whiteboard
  • Shape-and-line diagrams
  • Calendaring

26
Bob Hi there!
Danny Hi back at you!
Bob Do you think weve said enough?
Danny Yes.
Chat Interface
27
1. Groucho
2. Harpo
3. Chico
4. Zeppo
5. Gummo
List Interface
28
Here is a text contribution.
And here is another contribution.
This contribution is the third sentence in this
document.
Editor Interface
29
Aggregated Systems
  • Social Environments
  • Recommender Systems
  • Enterprise Virtual Workplaces
  • Work Process Systems
  • Group Support Systems
  • Workflow Management Systems
  • Document Management Systems
  • Project Management Systems
  • Content Management System
  • Customer Relationship Management

30
Characteristics and Features
  • Affordances What capabilities does the tools
    have?
  • Media Channels How do people communicate when
    using the tool?
  • Interrupts How do people signal they wish to
    take control of conversation or product?
  • Synchronicity Feedback How quickly (and how
    richly) do you receive feedback from teammates?
    Do you know what work others have done?
  • Access Control At what level of granularity can
    you block out portions of the document to work
    in? Can you manage ACL by person, by section, by
    role? How does the software handle contention
    and conflict?
  • Archival How are version histories maintained?
    How does undo work?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com