Referendums - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Referendums

Description:

The frequency of elections means that the short term and changing nature of ... California stands alone of the large industrial and urban States in offering the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:216
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: dom17
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Referendums


1
Referendums
  • By Jonathan Sankey

2
  • Referendums are a device of direct democracy or
    in other words they are one of its mechanisms.
    However, they can and have been used widely
    within representative democracies. In each case
    of the use of referenda, states have used
    different rules and fitted them into the
    political system in different ways.
  • The referendum in terms of electoral systems is a
    relatively rare form.
  • - only a few countries use it as a long
    established and frequently used device.
  • Switzerland, the USA and Australia in that order
    use them most frequently.

3
  • Athenian version of Direct Democracy 
  • The Assembly of the Demos
  • -all male citizens could come here to listen,
    discuss and vote on decrees that affected every
    aspect of Athenian life.
  • The Council of 500.
  • -this represented the full time government of
    Athens.
  • -it consisted of 500 citizens, 50 from each of
    the ten tribes. Serving on a 1 year term.
  • -the council had some independent legislative
    power
  • -its main role however was preparing the agenda
    and drafting the legislation for the assembly to
    debate and vote on.
  • -a preliminary decree would be passed and this
    would go forward to be voted on by the Assembly
    of the Demos.
  • -interestingly Athens lacked a mechanism known as
    the initiative

4
  • Other countries use Referenda on a more sporadic
    basis.
  • -only on referendum has ever been put to the
    entire UK electorate 1975 vote on whether not
    to stay in the EEC.
  •  
  • In the UK referendums are not binding.
  • -even when a referendum bill is passed by
    Parliament, Parliamentary sovereignty and is
    right to reverse its own bulls means that
    referenda can never be binding here.
  • The first used in this country was the 1973 vote
    on the status of Northern Ireland.
  • -8 have been held since but they have been on
    regional issues devolution to Wales and Scotland
    and the setting up of the London Assembly.

5
  • Ireland uses Referendums much more.
  • -it has a codified constitution i.e. there is a
    singular document which contains its constitution
    rather than a plethora of legal and statutory
    bills that make up the British system. which
    means it has a provision made for the use of
    referendums.
  • -as well as the NI peace agreement it has held
    referendums on
  • -many EU related issues
  • -abortion and divorce
  • -other constitutional issues
  • Although the use of referendums has risen sharply
    in the last century across the democratic world,
    most representative democracies use them
    relatively seldomly. The reasons for this are
    that politicians are wary of employing their use
    as they might have the effect of eroding
    representative democracy and their own role as
    representatives.

6
  • Australia
  • -Australians have held 44 national referendums
    since the first one in 1906 and they have become
    accepted as the standard means by which their
    constitution can be amended.
  • -in addition 3 referendums on non constitutional
    matters which included the national song and
    conscription.
  • -the individual states have held many referendums
    as well as the national Government

7
  • The process in Australia needs the consent of
    both houses of Parliament by a majority before it
    can be put to a referendum across the country.
  • -the proposal must receive an absolute majority,
    nationally, and,
  • -a majority in all 4 of the 6 states.
  • The reason for this system according to Don
    Aitkin is that the framers of the constitution
    wanted
  • one that would last but they wanted hurdles
    that would trip the badly thought out or the
    ephemeral but would still allow useful changes.
  • He goes on to say that.
  • it is unlikely that they intended the test to be
    as difficult as it has proved to be.

8
  • Of the first 80 proposals for referendums, only
    36 got Parliamentary approval of which 8 were
    approved by the people. That's just a 10 success
    rate for proposals.
  • This is probably due to three main factors

9
  • The Height of The Hurdles
  • -the nature of the 6 State system
  • -the states were originally colonies and like in
    the USA ceded power to the Federal Government /
    Commonwealth
  • -this means that nearly all referendums on
    constitutional matters are diminutive of State
    power and as such are resisted by state
    politicians.
  • -this makes the severity of the requisite 4/6
    majority in the states all the more difficult to
    surpass. There have been examples of referenda
    where a national majority has been gained but
    where only 3/6 states had majorities.

10
  • Australians take part in, on average, 1 election
    per year
  • -A referendum offers a difficult constitutional
    question which need an unqualified yes or no.
  • -Aitkin suggests that because the Constitution is
    a legal rather than a political document, it is
    extremely difficult for the electorate to make a
    well educated decision, -sometimes the referendum
    issue can be over one word or a sentence in a
    document making the consequences almost
    unknowable
  • -as a result, puzzled by the wording and battered
    from both sides by the politicians, they often
    just vote no.

11
  • Partisan Politics - Aitkin suggests that although
    procedural difficulties are important, part
    politics is often the greater hurdle.
  • -the party system is old and extremely stable
  • -party discipline is very string, coalitions are
    unknown and politicians never cross the floor of
    the houses
  • -because of the frequency of elections, parties
    are geared towards election winning.

12
  • There needs to be an agreement between the
    parties in order to secure a referendum on a
    proposal. That is obviously going to be difficult
    in this partisan environment.
  • -indeed agreement between federal parties has
    usually been short-lived
  • -parties have often opposed extension of powers
    which they initially proposed when, out of
    office, their opponents proposed them.

13
  • The frequency of elections means that the short
    term and changing nature of party welfare makes
    an opposition reluctant to agree with anything
    proposed by the Government.
  • -the parties are also suspicious of how their
    opponents would use any extensions of their
    powers when in office.

14
  • The Electorate
  • Australians generally have high levels of
    partisanship with low levels of political
    interest.
  • -the party position on an issue tends to
    determine that of the citizen
  • -in contrast to the USA, the Australian
    constitution is not a well known document, nor is
    it taught in schools.
  • Referendum campaigns are short affairs, due to
    restraints on the time between proposal and vote
  • -each citizen is provided, by law, with
    statements written on behalf of the supporters
    and opponents.
  • -these serve are the basis of campaigns
  • -exaggeration and distortion of the issues are
    common place and often the intellectual level of
    debates on the issues at stake are appalling

15
  • Aitkin says that because often opponents reduce
    the issue to one of either
  • -more or less powers to politicians or to
  • -centralism vs. federalism
  • people often make up their minds on the basis of
    intuition and guesswork.

16
  • The USA and the Initiative.
  •  
  •  
  • The Initiative - this essentially where a private
    member of the public initiated the process of a
    referendum, bringing their own policy ideas to
    the table.
  • -this method is used in varying amounts across
    the USA and in Switzerland.
  •  
  • The Recall - this is where a piece of legislation
    can be reversed if a sufficient number of people
    believe it to be wrong.
  • -normally a referendum can be called if enough
    people petition the state or national government.

17
  • The USA is one of the very few democracies that
    has never had a national referendum. Nonetheless,
    it is second only to Switzerland as the country
    that has the most experience of direct democracy.
  • -the States themselves are the bodies that employ
    direct democracy. This is rooted in tradition as
    many of them used it to ratify and approve their
    state constitutions in their early days

18
  • In the USA, the use of Initiatives has exploded
    and citizens have remained supportive of the
    process
  • - recent surveys reveal that familiarity with
    direct democracy does not breed contempt for its
    expanded use.
  • - 78 of people in Washington state said that the
    use of initiatives were a good thing as did 69
    of Californians.
  • - 57 of people support having initiatives at the
    national level.

19
  • The populist movement in the USA has been the
    main supporter of the expanded use of
    initiatives.Their outlook consists of three main
    tenets
  • 1) a concern for individual self interest and the
    common persons aspiration for political equality
    and social and economic opportunity.
  • 2) an assumption that the common people are
    trustworthy and competent, and
  • 3) a mistrust of a concentration of power in the
    hands of elites.
  • It was thought that the increased use of
    initiatives would fix the problems of
    representative government by diminishing the
    influence that special interests and party
    machines had over legislatures.

20
  • Of 1000 Californians asked why they support
    direct democracy
  • 445 said it Gives people a voice
  • 113 Allows direct participation
  • 107 Allows for policy change
  • 71 Forces issues onto the agenda
  • 41 Makes voters aware of issues
  • 19 Gets attention of politicians
  •  
  • In the USA, referendums are seen as a process
    whereby ordinary citizens can to some degree
    control law making directly by their own votes
    rather than through the usual process of
    representative democracy.
  • -it is therefore a supplement to representative
    democracy.

21
  • The initiative and referendum are different
    things in the USA.
  • -Referendums are used to approve legislation or
    constitution changes led by politicians.
  • -Initiatives allow people or groups to draft
    their own, and have it voted on in a referendum.

22
  • There are four main types of direct democracy
    used in the States.
  • Constitutional Referendum -Delaware is the only
    State out of 50 not to use this.
  • Statutory Referendum - 24 states use this system
    where a referendum is held on normal legislation
    and provided a set number of people petition for
    one. This is similar to the recall.
  • Statutory Initiative - used in 22 states where a
    petition places a statute on the ballot without
    any action by the State Legislature.
  • -another 7 use a system where petition puts the
    bill in front of the legislature for action
    within a standard time limit
  • -if it rejects the measure or takes to long then
    the statute is placed on the voting card at the
    next election.
  • The Constitutional Initiative - is used in very
    few states but allows for petition to be used to
    start constitutional change.

23
  • California
  •  
  • California has a very weak party system and the
    formal political structure is divided and
    diffuse. Voters increasingly call themselves
    independents and even candidates that are
    nominated by parties tend to develop a personal
    campaign and to some extent distance themselves
    from their party.
  •  
  • Complementing and contributing to this is the
    widespread use of direct democracy, in
    particular, the initiative. California stands
    alone of the large industrial and urban States in
    offering the constitutional amendment initiative
    and direct statutory initiative without recourse
    to the legislature or the governor.

24
  • For example, in 2005 Governor Arnie placed an
    initiative on the legislative election ballot
    that control over constituency boundaries be
    place in the hands of retired State Judges in
    order to combat gerrymandering a problem that is
    rife in California. This was defeated along with
    every other initiative placed on the ballot that
    year. Laws, amendments and regulations that find
    themselves on to the initiative range from the
    trivial to the very important. Like the
    regulation of chiropractors to that of nuclear
    power plants and a law on obscenity to tax
    regulations and the death penalty. It seams to
    cover any aspect of the political.

25
  • Direct Democracy in Switzerland
  •  
  • Between 1848 and 1993 Switzerland held 414
    referendums on nearly every aspect of political
    life.
  • Between 6 and 12 referendums per year.
  • The 1848 constitution set in place obligatory
    referendums for all constitutional amendments and
    enabled citizens to petition for a total
    rewriting of the document.

26
  • There are four types of Referendum at the federal
    level
  • the constitutional referendum - government
    proposed amendments are submitted to a popular
    vote
  • the constitutional initiative - publicly proposed
    votes on amendments
  • the optional or facultative referendum on
    legislation - citizens can reject legislation
  • the optional treaty referendum - international
    agreements need popular ratification

27
  • Federal Assembly - Legislature
  •  
  • Switzerland's Bicameral Parliament,
  • the Council of States - 46 constituency seats
    from the Cantons
  • the National Council - members are elected by
    popular vote on a basis of proportional
    representation to serve four-year terms)

28
  • Problems
  •  
  • The whole process can take a very long time,
    sometimes more than 9 months.
  • As a result there are two things the government
    can do to speed up the process.
  • - they can initiate urgent legislation -
    unconstitutional decrees

29
  • Kobach does describe three major problems with
    the system however
  • - delay as a means of destroying a bill
  • - citizens have no way of making straight forward
    bills
  • - purchased democracy as with any kind of
    electoral campaign, resources play a major factor
    in determining outcomes.

30
  • Turnout and Referendums
  •  
  • Evidence shows that voter participation can vary
    much more widely in referendums than it does in
    elections.
  • - in recent years the average turnout in many
    Swiss referendums has tended to be well below 50
    .
  • - in US state referendums turnout is notoriously
    low and may be subject to even more extreme
    fluctuations.
  • These fluctuations occur because occasionally
    there will arise an issue of much greater
    importance.
  • - for example, referendum turnout in Ireland
    usually hangs around the 50-60 turnout level
    whereas the European entry vote had a turnout of
    71.

31
  • Butler and Ramney (1994) found that turnout over
    a large number of referendum cases in various
    nations averaged 15 lower than turnout for
    general elections in the same countries.
  • Cronin (1989) found a clear drop off from the
    number of people who voted for a candidate and
    those that voted in an initiative when they were
    place on the same ballot in the USA.
  • It is clear that if the vote is of sufficient
    importance to the electorate then they will
    turnout in greater numbers.

32
  • Advantages
  •  
  • - it increases the influence that the citizenry
    have over their own lives and
  • - some argue that it makes them better-informed
    and more politically sophisticated
  • - it also removes the need for self serving
    politicians and legitimises any laws passed.

33
  • Disadvantages 
  • - Critics say that direct forms of democracy are
    too unwieldy in large populations and
  • - They enable officials to pass the buck and
    therefore
  • - They de-legitimate their roles as the
    representatives of the people who are charged
    with making decisions for us.
  • - some people believe that the majority of
    members of the general public are not
    sufficiently wise to be making constant
    decisions, instead, this should be the role of
    elected officials who are.
  • - the public are also extremely susceptible to
    campaigns which means that if someone has the
    money, especially in the case if the initiative,
    they may be able to pass legislation that they
    want which cant be good for democracy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com