Title: The United States should become increasingly involved in the Darfur crisis
1The United States should become increasingly
involved in the Darfur crisis
- Philip Suh
- CIS1055 Sec 621
2A. Background of the Conflict
31) How did the conflict start?
- The conflict began early in 2003 after a rebel
group began attacking government targets, saying
the Darfur region was being neglected by Khartoum
(capital of Sudan). - Darfur inhabitants have faced many years of
conflict over land and grazing rights between the
mostly nomadic Arabs. The rebels said that the
government was oppressing black Africans in favor
of Arabs.
42) What is the government doing?
- It admits mobilizing "self-defense militias"
following rebel attacks but denies any links to
the Janjaweed, accused of trying to "cleanse"
black Africans from the territory. - Refugees from Darfur say that following air raids
by government aircraft, the Janjaweed ride into
villages on horses and camels, slaughtering men,
raping women and stealing whatever they can find.
- Sudan's government denies being in control of the
Janjaweed and President Omar al-Bashir has called
them "thieves and gangsters".
53) What has happened to Darfur's civilians?
- Millions have fled their destroyed villages, with
many heading for camps near Darfur's main towns.
But there is not enough food, water or medicine. - Some 200,000 have also sought safety in
neighboring Chad, but many of these camps remain
vulnerable to attacks. - Many aid agencies are working in Darfur but they
are unable to get access to vast areas because of
the fighting. - The latest research published in September 2006
in the journal Science puts the numbers of deaths
at "no fewer than 200,000".
64) Is anyone trying to stop the fighting?
- About 7,000 African Union troops are deployed in
Darfur on a very limited mandate. - Experts say the soldiers are too few, and the AU
says it does not have the money to fund the
operation for much longer. - The new, larger joint UN-AU force should be in
place by early 2008
7B. Arguments For/Against Increasing International
Involvement
81) For Save Lives and Increase International
Reputation
- a. Save Lives
- Campaign by the Sudanese government against
Darfuri civilians has already claimed as many as
400,000 lives and 2.3 million have been
displaced. - Approximately 1 million more Darfuris still live
in their villages, under the constant threat of
being attacked. (nytimes.com)
91) For Save Lives and Increase International
Reputation cont.
- b. Increase International Reputation
- U.S. popularity has plunged across much of the
world due to the popular opinion that United
States acts as a tyrant over other nations and
doing too little to help poor countries. - Additionally, Growing numbers of Muslims see the
anti-terror campaign as a way for the United
States to bully its Islamic foes. - This growing anti-Americanism will make it
increasingly difficult for leaders of democratic
nations to support controversial U.S.
initiatives. It also threatens the stability of
governments that back and exercise U.S. policies. - Key findings of the report released by the Pew
Research Center for the People and the Press, a
widely respected public opinion outfit.
(people-press.org)
102) Against Countries act in their own interests
when they get involved with foreign affairs.
- a. China and Russian Arming of the Sudanese
Government - Amnesty International has recently published a
report that has accused China and Russia of
arming the Sudanese government. - In the report, photos of Russian Mi-24s
(helicopter gunships) and Chinese Fantan (fighter
jets) have been seen in Sudanese government
property. (nytimes.com)
112) Against Countries act in their own interests
when they get involved with foreign affairs.
Cont.
- b. America, Belgium and Frances involvement in
the Rwandan Genocide of 1998 - Where nearly 800,000 minority Tutsis were killed
by the Hutu majority - America The Clinton administration signed a
decree limiting U.S. involvement in U.N.
peacekeeping and pressured the U.N. to limit its
own role -- perhaps fearing it might reflect
poorly on themselves - US failed to deliver upon their promise to send
fifty armored personnel carriers to aid
intervention instead placing a price of fifteen
million dollars for our vehicles - Belgium and the U.N. Hutus killed 10 Belgian
soldiers. Because of this Belgium withdrew its
troops, who had been keeping 2,000 Tutsi refugees
safe from Hutus. The refugees are immediately
slaughtered. - France In mid-June, the French government billed
a military expedition into Rwanda as a
"humanitarian" mission and carried it out under
the U.N. flag. When France enters the country
they protected their genocidal Hutu allies from
the Tutsi RPF, and even supported them in the
slaughter Opération Turquoise was eventually
credited with rescuing at least ten thousand
Tutsis in western Rwanda, but thousands more
continued to be killed in the French-occupied
zone.
12C. The Right Choice Intervention
13C. The Right Choice Intervention
- As mentioned before
- Tens of thousands of civilians have been murdered
and thousands of women raped. - About 2 million civilians have been driven from
their homes, their villages torched and pillaged.
- Thousands die each month from the effects of
inadequate food, water, health care, and shelter.
14C. The Right Choice Intervention
- These atrocities are real and are happening now
in the western region of Sudan know as Darfur
where the war between Sudanese government and
rebel groups has transformed the landscape into
one of the most brutal and horrifying places in
the world today. - This is a major atrocity that should not be
tolerated in the world we live in today. - As one of the main leaders of the world, we
Americans have a duty to our fellow man to
alleviate them from their current plight. - We have the resources and we have the power, all
that is left now is the will. Americans must come
together to bring change in Darfur.
15C. The Right Choice Intervention
- At the minimum, by increasing support of
humanitarian efforts in Darfur America will be
able to provide safety for thousands of people. - The humanitarian situation in Darfur is critical
workers and operations are constantly being
harassed by both government and fragmented rebel
movements. - According to saveddarfur.com, Vehicles are being
hijacked and robbed, aid workers are assaulted
and intimidated while carrying out their work and
offices are broken into and looted. - Officials say that if the current fragile
humanitarian efforts to the flow of humanitarian
aid were to collapse, it could lead to death
rates as high as 100,000 per month.
16C. The Right Choice Intervention
- If we wanted to save Darfur to the fullest
capabilities, an armed peace keeping force should
be sent to Darfur in order to protect innocent
civilians. - United States The United States Congress, the
United States House of Representatives, President
Bush, and two U.S. Secretaries of State have all
labeled the current situation in Darfur as
genocide. This is the first time in history that
a conflict has been labeled genocide while it was
ongoing. - If the U.S. views Darfur as a true genocide, why
have we been so inactive? Do we wish to repeat
the events of the Rwandan Genocide in 1998 that
led to the genocide of 800,000 people?
17C. The Right Choice Intervention
- Should Americans take action to increase
humanitarian aid in Darfur, or to send an armed
peace keeping force in to protect civilians we
will be able to give the gift of peace and safety
to our fellow man. - No longer will civilians be killed and raped,
driven from their homes, or die from the effects
of inadequate food, water, health care, and
shelter. We will be able to save thousands of
lives, should we choose to act now. - Americas reputation will be brought up by the
peace we have provided to thousands. In contrast
to the uncaring and bully-like image we hold in
the world today.
18C. The Right Choice Intervention
- It is time to act now, the atrocities of Darfur
should have been eliminated a long time ago, but
still continue today. - Get involved within the world as intelligent
college students and save lives. - We have the power to help these people, lets get
it done.
19Bibliography
- US House calls Darfur 'genocide News. 3 October
2007. lt http//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3918765.
stmgt - Darfur Conflict. Wikipedia. October 4, 2007.
lthttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darfur_conflictgt - Educate Yourself! DarfurGenocide.org. October
31, 2007. lthttp//www.darfurgenocide.org/learn.php
Genocidegt - Genocide in Darfur, Sudan. Darfurscores.org.
October 31, 2007. lthttp//www.darfurscores.org/dar
furgt - QA Sudan's Darfur conflict. BBC News. October
3, 2007. lthttp//news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/349673
1.stmgt - September Briefing Paper The Genocide in
Darfur. Save Darfur. October 4, 2007.
lthttp//www.savedarfur.org/newsroom/policypapers/s
eptember_briefing_paper_the_genocide_in_darfur/gt - U.N. Report Darfur not genocide. Cnn.com.
October 31, 2007. lthttp//edition.cnn.com/2005/WOR
LD/africa/01/31/sudan.report/index.htmlgt - Sudan massacres are not genocide, says EU
Guardian.co.uk. October 31, 2007.
lthttp//www.guardian.co.uk/sudan/story/0,14658,127
9835,00.htmlgt - China Invests Heavily In Sudan's Oil Industry.
Washington Post. December 23, 2004.
lthttp//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21
143-2004Dec22.htmlgt - China and Darfur - The Genocide Olympics?
washingtonpost.com. December 14, 2006.
lthttp//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti
cle/2006/12/13/AR2006121302008.htmlgt - Report Accuses China and Russia Of Arming
Sudan. The New York Times. May 9, 2007.
lthttp//query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res9A
06E7DC1731F93AA35756C0A9619C8B63gt - Death Rates in Darfur Rising, WHO Says.
Washingtonpost.com. May 9, 2007.
lthttp//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21
435-2004Sep14.htmlgt - Darfur Death Estimates Inaccurate. Darfur
Death Estimates Inaccurate. coalitionfordarfur.bl
ogspot.com. December 12, 2006 lthttp//coalitionfor
darfur.blogspot.com/2006/12/darfur-death-estimates
-inaccurate.htmgt