Blueprints%20for%20RtI%20Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

View by Category
About This Presentation
Title:

Blueprints%20for%20RtI%20Implementation

Description:

Blueprint Authors. The Link Between IDEA and RtI ... Response to Intervention (RtI): Blueprints for Implementation at the State, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 63
Provided by: Chris1810
Learn more at: http://www.casecec.org
Category:

less

Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Blueprints%20for%20RtI%20Implementation


1
Blueprints for RtI Implementation
  • Bill East, Ed.D
  • Nancy Reder, Esq.

2
Acknowledgements
  • NASDSE Satellite Conference Response to
    Intervention (RtI) Blueprints for Implementation
    at the State, District and Local Levels
    December 6, 2006
  • Presenters Sharon Kurns, Diane Morrison and
    George Batsche
  • David Tilly, Ph.D. Coordinator of Assessment
    Services Heartland AEA 11 Iowa
  • Blueprint Authors

3
The Link Between IDEA and RtI
  • IDEA focus is on providing services in the
    least restrictive environment (LRE)
  • Late 90s shift to a focus on outcomes
  • IDEA 04 says
  • to improve the academic achievement and
    functional performance of children with
    disabilities including the use of scientifically
    based instructional practices, to the maximum
    extent possible (20 U.S.C. 1400(c)(5)(E))

4
The Link Between IDEA and RtI
  • IDEA also says
  • In determining whether a child has a specific
    learning disability, a local education agency may
    use a process that determines if the child
    responses to scientific, research-based
    intervention(20 U.S.C. 1414(b)(6)(B)
  • Early intervening

5
The Link Between ESEA (NCLB) and RtI
  • NCLB focuses on proficiency for all students
  • Requires access to general education curriculum
  • Requires exposure to grade-level content (no
    out-of-level testing
  • Opportunity with reauthorization to insert RtI
    language

6
What Is RtI?
  • An ongoing process of using student performance
    and other data to guide instructional and
    intervention decisions

7
What Is RtI?
  • the practice of providing high-quality
    instruction and intervention matched to student
    needs and using learning rate over time and level
    of performance to make important educational
    decisions

8
RtI Core Principles
  • We can effectively teach all children
  • Effective instruction (academic AND behavior) in
    general education is foundation for all
    decision-making
  • Intervene early
  • Use a multi-tier model of service delivery

9
RtI Core Principles
  • Use a problem-solving methodology
  • Use research-based, scientifically validated
    interventions/instruction
  • Data guide decisions regarding core, supplemental
    and intensive interventions

10
More Than One Way To Do RtI
  • School-wide v. District-wide
  • 3, 4 or more tiers
  • Problem solving strategy
  • Standard treatment protocol

11
Standard Treatment Protocol
  • Students who are not progressing at acceptable
    rates are provided with a standard treatment.
    These protocols typically are more structured and
    intensive than general education instruction and
    are typically delivered in small groups of 3-6
    children on a pull-out basis.
  • In RtI, standard treatment protocols are
    typically used as a secondary step in a
    multi-tier model.

12
Problem Solving
  • A process that uses the skills of professionals
    from different disciplines to develop and
    evaluate intervention plans that improve
    significantly the school performance of
    individual and/of groups of students

13
Problem Solving Process
Define the Problem Defining Problem/Directly
Measuring Behavior
Problem Analysis Validating Problem Identify
Variables that Contribute to Problem Develop Plan
Evaluate Response to Intervention (RtI)
Implement Plan Implement As Intended Progress
Monitor Modify as Necessary
14
Key Features
  • Effective instructional/intervention programs
  • Core
  • Supplemental
  • Intensive
  • Frequent assessment of student performance
  • Screening
  • Diagnostic
  • Progress Monitoring
  • Use of data to make instructional/intervention
    decisions

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Guiding Questions (1)
  • Is the core program sufficient?
  • If the core program is not sufficient, why isnt
    it?
  • How will needs identified in the core be
    addressed?
  • How will the effectiveness and efficiency of the
    core be monitored over time?
  • Have improvements to the core been effective?
  • For which students is the core program
    sufficient or not sufficient and why?

18
Guiding Questions (2)
  • What specific supplemental and intensive
    instruction is needed?
  • How will supplemental and intensive instruction
    be delivered?
  • How will effectiveness of supplemental and
    intensive instruction be monitored?
  • Which students need to move to a different level
    of instruction?

19
Stages of Implementing Problem-Solving/RtI (1)
  • Consensus
  • Belief is shared
  • Vision is agreed upon
  • Implementation requirements understood

20
Stages of Implementing Problem-Solving/RtI (2)
  • Infrastructure Development
  • Regulations and/or policies
  • Training/Technical Assistance
  • Model (e.g., Standard Protocol)
  • Core, Strategic, and Intensive instruction Tier I
    and II intervention systems
  • Data Management
  • Technology support
  • Decision-making criteria established

21
Stages of Implementing Problem-Solving/RtI (3)
  • Implementation

22
Blueprints for Implementation
  • State Level

23
What Are the Desired Outcomes of a Successful
State Plan?
  • State-Level Outcomes
  • This is an ALL EDUCATION initiative
  • Strategic Plan to Guide Implementation
  • Inclusive Participation in Plan Development
  • Policies to Guide Effective Practice
  • Technical Assistance and Training Initiatives
  • Technology Support
  • Comprehensive Evaluation Plan
  • Dynamic Communication and Dissemination Plan

24
Consensus Building State (1)
  • PSM/RtI is an All Education Initiative-Not Just
    Special Education
  • Improving the effectiveness of core instruction
    is basic to this process
  • NO Child Left Behind Really Means NO
  • Assessment (data) should both inform and evaluate
    the impact of instruction
  • Regulations must be consistent with beliefs
  • Beliefs must be supported by research
  • How do you spell AYP? RtI!

25
Consensus Building State (2)
  • Identify staff that will be involved in the
    implementation of PSM/RtI
  • General and Special Education
  • Student Support Staff
  • Advocacy Liaisons/Parents
  • Identify critical stakeholders and create a
    communication network
  • Identify a group of leaders within the state,
    district or school to lead the PSM/RtI initiative

26
Consensus Building State (3)
  • Develop a shared vision and values
  • Create and implement a communication plan that
    will keep all stakeholders informed about the
    state plan
  • Policy makers
  • Educators
  • Instructional support staff
  • District Leaders
  • Advocacy Leaders
  • Parents
  • Develop and disseminate a strategic plan

27
Infrastructure Development State (1)
  • Develop regulations policies that guide
    implementation of PSM/RtI
  • Develop clear criteria that support
    decision-making rules regarding intervention
    evaluation AND eligibility determination
  • Modify and/or develop due process and procedural
    safeguard policies/procedures specific to PSM/RtI
  • NASDSE Publication
  • Procedural safeguards focus on integrity of the
    problem-solving process

28
Infrastructure Development State (2)
  • Make a decision regarding the role (leadership
    and support) of the SEA regarding
  • Technology support
  • Technical assistance and training
  • Program evaluation
  • Demonstration/evaluation sites

29
Implementation State (1)
  • Identifies demonstration sites to monitor
    implementation, collect and analyze data on
    student outcomes.
  • Provides on-going technical assistance and
    training
  • Incorporates PSM/RtI competencies into
    certification criteria and pre-service education
    programs
  • Provides incentives to develop, implement and
    support technology necessary for data management
    and analysis

30
Implementation State (2)
  • Convenes a statewide advisory group consisting of
    all stakeholders to monitor outcome data and
    advise SEA on recommended practices
  • Creates and implements a statewide evaluation
    plan to assess student outcomes
  • Implements a dissemination and communication
    system with all school districts

31
Blueprints for Implementation
  • District Level

32
What Are the Desired Outcomes of a Successful
District Plan?
  • District Outcomes
  • Led by General Education, Supported by Special
    Education
  • Infrastructure for a 3-Tiered Model
  • Problem-Solving Model Implemented with Integrity
  • Effective Collection and Use of Data
  • Decision Rules for Intervention Evaluation and
    Eligibility Determination
  • Technology to Manage and Document Data-Based
    Decision Making
  • Improved Academic and Behavior Outcomes for
    All Students
  • Consumer Confidence and Satisfaction

33
Consensus Building District (1)
  • Analysis of how existing policies support RtI
  • Analysis of which policies must be modified to
    incorporate PSM/RtI
  • Analysis of how RtI concepts interface with
    currently existing initiatives within district
  • Reading First
  • Positive Behavior Support
  • Early Intervening Services

34
Consensus Building District (2)
  • Analysis of how to fit PSM/RtI into district
    school improvement framework
  • Critical stakeholders have been identified
  • General Education
  • Special Education
  • Student Services
  • Administration
  • Parents

35
Consensus Building District (3)
  • A group of leaders has been identified and formed
    to lead the effort
  • State, district and building implementation
    groups should be similar
  • General Education Program Supervisors (Teachers)
  • Reading, Math, Science
  • Special Education Program Supervisors (Teachers)
  • Student Services Supervisors (Personnel)
  • Psychology, Social Work, Counseling, others
  • Leadership (Asst. Supt./ Principal)
  • Data Management
  • Professional Development
  • Parent/Advocacy

36
Infrastructure Development District (1)
  • District policies/procedures clearly define how
    to implement problem-solving/RtI
  • Data management systems are developed or selected
    to support RtI implementation
  • Existing Federal, State, and District initiatives
    are re-examined and integrated to provide
    sustained support of RtI

37
Infrastructure Development District (2)
  • Connections are made and networks expanded to
    existing RtI-related initiatives (e.g., reading
    first)
  • A plan is in place that clearly defines how the
    LEA, at all levels, will support the
    implementation of RtI through systemic technical
    assistance and professional development

38
Implementation District
  • The LEA has the necessary systemic supports in
    place to ensure that the District is able to
    successfully implement RtI in a way that benefits
    students and supports teachers and parents
  • The implementation of RtI results in increased
    student achievement and/or improved behavior
  • The LEA has a multi year implementation and
    professional development plan that provided
    on-going sustained support for RtI
  • The LEA has an evaluation plan to assess the
    impact of RtI on student, site, district, and
    personnel outcomes

39
Role of District Leaders
  • Give permission for model
  • Provide a vision for outcome-based service
    delivery
  • Reinforce effective practices
  • Expect accountability
  • Provide tangible support for effort
  • Training
  • Coaching
  • Technology
  • Policies

40
Blueprints for Implementation
  • School Level

41
What Are the Desired Outcomes of a Successful
School Plan?
  • Support for individuals experiencing the change
  • Professional development to provide the needed
    knowledge and skills
  • Building level leadership (shared leadership)
  • Efficient structures for ongoing data collection,
    analysis, and decision making
  • Effective system of instruction to meet the needs
    of all students
  • Improved achievement and outcomes for students

42
Consensus Building School (1)
  • Coordinate with district administration
  • This assumes consensus building work and analysis
    has been done at district level
  • If not, analysis and alignment with existing
    initiatives must be done
  • School leadership must coordinate with district
    leadership
  • Provide information to school staff
  • Why RtI
  • What is it?
  • Benefits of RtI
  • What will it take?
  • Identify the consensus level among staff
    that is necessary for implementing RtI
  • What of agreement is needed?

43
Consensus Building School (2)
  • Determine next steps
  • If consensus has been reached, form leadership
    team and begin to plan
  • If consensus has not, continue activities to
    build consensus among staff
  • Plan to support change initiative
  • Align with building vision, values, mission
  • Set goals
  • Identify elements of change process
  • Plan for ongoing communication

44
Infrastructure Development School
  • Infrastructure developed by leadership team
    answering a series of questions
  • One way to develop infrastructure at school level
    in use in Iowa
  • Each school must develop their own answers
  • Doesnt tell them what to thinkinstead it is
    what to think about
  • Based on a continuous improvement model

45
Implementation School
  • Provide professional development and ongoing
    supports to those conducting assessments and
    those providing instruction
  • Implement logistics of assessments and periodic
    data analysis
  • Implement logistics of core, supplemental and
    intensive instruction
  • Monitor implementation of instruction/intervention
  • School-based coaches
  • Adjust as needed

46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
Process of Systems Change
  • Until, and unless, consensus (understanding the
    need and trusting in the support) is reached, no
    support will exist to establish the
    infrastructure. Until, and unless, the
    infrastructure is in place, implementation will
    not take place
  • A fatal flaw is to attempt implementation without
    consensus and infrastructure
  • Leadership must come from state, district and
    building level

50
NASDSEs Role In RtI
  • Providing tools for implementation

51
Response to Intervention Policy Considerations
and Implementation
52
PowerPoint Presentation on RtI
  • Can be customized for your audience
  • Download at www.nasdse.org

53
NASDSE/CASE White Paper
  • Download at www.nasdse.org

54
RtI Myths Paper
  • Download at www.nasdse.org

55
Visits With National Organizations
  • CCSSO
  • AASA
  • NSBA
  • AAFT

56
NASDSEs IDEA Partnership
  • RtI Workgroup IDEA/NCLB CoP
  • 18 partner organizations
  • 5 state teams
  • 5 TA centers
  • www.sharedwork.org

57
NASDSEs Project Forum
  • Policy Forum on RtI and Early Intervening
    Services

58
NASDSE Satellite Conferences
  • Addressing the Needs of Students with Learning
    Difficulties Through the Response to Intervention
    (RTI) Strategy
  • Aired November 17, 2004
  • Making Response to Intervention (RTI) Work in
    Schools
  • Aired November 9, 2006
  • Response to Intervention (RtI) Blueprints for
    Implementation at the State, District and Local
    Levels
  • Aired December 6, 2006

59
NASDSE Satellite Conferences
  • Response to Intervention (RtI) Strategies for
    Reading and Math
  • Aired March 14, 2007
  • Response to Intervention (RtI) Non-Academic
    Barriers to Achievement Addressing School-Based
    Mental Health and Positive Behavioral
    Interventions and Supports
  • Airing May 9, 2007

60
NASDSEs Coming Attractions
  • RtI Bibliography
  • Blueprints
  • Scheduling RtI
  • Comprehensive Evaluation and Procedural
    Safeguards Document
  • RtI Summit
  • NCLB reauthorization work

61
Resources
  • Proposed RtI Center
  • www.nasdse.org
  • www.sharedwork.org

62
Contact Information
  • Bill East
  • P 703.519.3576
  • bill.east_at_nasdse.org
  • Nancy Reder
  • P 703.519.3800 x334
  • nancy.reder_at_nasdse.org

NASDSE 1800 Diagonal Rd. Suite 320 Alexandria VA
22314 Fax 703.519.3808 www.nasdse.org
About PowerShow.com