Emerging Areas: The Environment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Emerging Areas: The Environment

Description:

Past and current support for SBE environmental research ... Lawrence Baker, U of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 'Integration of Human Choice into ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: thomasb59
Learn more at: http://www.nsf.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Emerging Areas: The Environment


1
Emerging AreasThe Environment
  • Robert E. OConnor
  • Decision, Risk and Management Sciences
  • November 8, 2007

2
Organization
  • Past and current support for SBE environmental
    research
  • The Big Success in integrated SBE / natural
    science environmental research
  • Two unpleasant expirations
  • Lessons learned
  • Opportunities
  • The Big Gap

3
The Funding Mix
  • Most SBE awards for environmental projects always
    have come from regular competitions in the
    standing programs.
  • Many special competitions have focused primarily
    on the SBE sciences.
  • More recent special competitions have aimed to
    foster interdisciplinary research spanning the
    natural and SBE sciences.

4
Support in Standing SBE Programs
  • Some programs actively support environmental
    research because of the major theoretical
    emphases in their communities.
  • Geography Decision, Risk, and Management
    Sciences Anthropology
  • Other programs tend to see the environment as an
    "application domain."
  • A third group of programs provides some support
    for theoretically driven work in environmental
    settings

5
Special Competitions I Focusing Largely on the
SBE Sciences
  • Mid-1990s to early 2000s Human Dimensions of
    Global Change (HDGC), centers and teams
  • 2004- Decision Making Under Uncertainty (DMUU)
    centers, part of the Climate Change Research
    Initiative
  • Centers at Arizona State, Carnegie Mellon, and
    Columbia.
  • Smaller teams at RAND and Colorado, Boulder.

6
Special Competitions II Integrating the SBE and
Natural Sciences
  • Methods and Models for Integrated Assessment
    competition in the late 1990s.
  • Small support for SBE science involvement in work
    of the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites
    and network.
  • Core support for Urban LTER sites, supplemental
    support for other integration-building activities
  • The big success CNH

7
Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems
(CNH)
  • Dynamics of
  • Coupled
  • Natural and Human Systems

8
Origins of CNH
  • A component of the Biocomplexity in the
    Environment Priority Area, FY2001-05
  • A free-standing CNH competition in FY2007with
    BIO, GEO, and SBE support

9
CNH Is Now a Standing, Multi-Directorate Program
  • An MOU signed by the ADs of BIO, GEO, and SBE
    provides a long-term commitment.

10
The 12 CNH Awards Resulting from the FY2007
Competition Continue the Tradition
  • Two awards effectively are renewals of previous
    CNH awards
  • David Campbell,Michigan State U, "Dynamic
    Interactions Among People, Livestock,and
    Savanna Ecosystems Under Climate Change "

11
  • Jianguo Liu, Michigan State U, "Effects of
    Cross-Boundary Processes on Human-Nature
    Dynamics in Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant
    Pandas"

12
  • Other awards examined human-natural system
    interactions in urban environments
  • Nicolas Brozovic, U of Illinois-Urbana/Champaign,
    "Coupling Hydrologic, Economic, and Social
    Network Models to Improve Understanding of
    Surface Water-Groundwater Interactions for
    Protection of Instream Flows"

13
  • Colin Polsky, Clark U, "Suburbanization, Water
    Use, Nitrogen Cycling, and Eutrophication in the
    21st Century Interactions, Feedbacks, and
    Uncertainties in a Massachusetts Coastal Zone"

14
  • Lawrence Baker, U of Minnesota-Twin Cities,
    "Integration of Human Choice into Models of
    Biogeochemical Cycling in Urban Ecosystems"

15
Two Unfortunate Expirations
  • Human and Social Dynamics Priority Area
  • 1/3 of awards are environmentally related
  • Much work is interdisciplinary within the social
    sciences
  • Decision Making Under Uncertainty for Climate
    Change
  • E.g., DCDC at ASU integrates GIS, ECON, SOC,
    POLSCI, PSY
  • E.g., CRED at Columbia integrates lab and
    international empirical work

16
Lesson LearnedGround Activities Firmly in Theory
  • The most significant advances in SBE research
    related to the environment have resulted with
    research and related activities are firmly
    grounded in and contributing to the enhancement
    of fundamental theory in and across the SBE
    sciences.
  • "Applied" or "reactive" research may serve
    short-term needs, but rarely contributes to
    sustained community engagement.

17
Experience with "Big Science"
  • SBE sciences traditionally have been "cottage
    industries" rather than "factory production."
  • Experience with HDGC, DMUU, and other centers has
    shown synergies and contributions of
    participating in larger-scale coordinated
    activities.
  • The most successful activities have been those
    whose origin has been grounded in fundamental
    theoretical inquiries.
  • Activities focused on serving the immediate needs
    of stakeholders, decision makers, and/or other
    "users" have worked only when strong theoretical
    emphasis has been maintained (often with external
    pressure from NSF).

18
Opportunities Lead from Other Directorates
  • NEON Observatory
  • WATERS Network Observatory
  • LTERs

19
Opportunities SBE Lead
  • Resilience Observatories
  • DRMS, IMHR, and USGS funded workshop
  • Sustainable Development
  • SBE funded workshop (Columbia)
  • DMUU for Climate Change
  • Extend, then re-compete?
  • Valuation of Ecological Services
  • Co-funded conference with USGS?
  • Warnings
  • DRMS, IMHR, and NOAA funded 2008 solicitation

20
The Big Gap
  • Multi-Disciplinary research within the social
    sciences
  • Solution Create a new program within SBE

21
The Environmental Campaign Theme The
Environmental CampaignTo increase knowledge
ofhow humancognition, structure, and action
interact with the natural environment over
spatial, temporal, and organizational scales.
22
Spatial scale
Cognition
Action
Structure
Temporal scale
Natural Environment
Organizational scale
23
For Example Perceptions Beliefs Attitudes Values
Language Culture Ethics Morals Spirituality Neural
processes Memory Attention Knowledge Creativity I
ngenuity Personality Emotions
For Example Government Policy Economy Law Religio
n Language Technology Educational systems Health
care Traditions Infrastructure Housing Built
environment Formal organizations Informal
organizations Interest groups
For Example Behaviors Innovation Conflict Consume
rism Development Observation Exploration Research
Education Consumption Exploitation Conservation Re
production Migration Decision making
Cognition
Action
Structure
24
For Example Perceptions Beliefs Attitudes Values
Language Culture Ethics Morals Spirituality Neura
l processes Memory Attention Knowledge Creativity
Ingenuity Personality Emotions
For Example Government Policy Economy Law Religio
n Technology Educational systems Language Health
care Traditions Infrastructure Housing Built
environment Formal organizations Informal
Organizations Interest groups
Cognition
For Example Behaviors Innovation
Conflict Revolution Consumerism Development Obser
vation Exploration Research Education Consumption
Exploitation Conservation Reproduction Migration E
volution Decision making
Action
Structure
Natural Environment
25
Work on the Campaign
  • Develop multiple approaches, methods, and tools
  • Identify types of data to respond to crucial
    questions
  • Understand transformations
  • Explore the quality of life and environmental
    management options
  • Ascertain the role of resilience, robustness, and
    sustainability
  • Learn how to address inter-generational equity

26
  • Topics and perspectives that seem to excite SBE
    scientists include
  • Dynamics of human activity
  • Population
  • Resource consumption
  • Technological capabilities
  • Cognition, attitudes, perceptions, values, and
    beliefs
  • Informal arrangements, formal structures, and
    organizations
  • Interactions across scales spatial, temporal,
    and organizational
  • Adaptation, resilience, robustness,
    sustainability
  • Uncertainty
  • Quality of life and environmental management
    options
  • Inter-generational equity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com