Preparing for the Coming Medicaid Debate: Defending the Single Most Important Program for Meeting th - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Preparing for the Coming Medicaid Debate: Defending the Single Most Important Program for Meeting th

Description:

Largest source of financing for long-term services and covers nearly 70% of ... Relies on Medicaid to finance half the care for low-income beneficiaries (even ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: NewU257
Learn more at: https://www.aucd.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preparing for the Coming Medicaid Debate: Defending the Single Most Important Program for Meeting th


1
Preparing for the Coming Medicaid Debate
Defending the Single Most Important Program for
Meeting the Health and Long-Term Services Needs
of People with Disabilities
CCD Co-Chairs Meeting January 6, 2005
  • Jeffrey S. Crowley, M.P.H.
  • Project Director
  • Health Policy Institute, Georgetown University
  • 2233 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 525
  • Washington, DC 20007
  • (202) 687-0652/(202) 687-3110 F
  • jsc26_at_georgetown.edu

2
Medicaid is being set up as a bogeyman
  • Medicaids detractors and critics have
    selectively used facts to claim
  • Medicaid is broken
  • Medicaid spending is out of control
  • Medicaid is crowding out other state
    prioritiessuch as education
  • Medicaid provides a Cadillac benefits package
    when the nation can only afford a Chevy
  • Medicaid, in its current form, is unsustainable

3
Proposals to restructure Medicaid will be raised
during the year ahead
  • Federal Changes
  • Entitlement Caps (across the board cuts in
    entitlement programs)
  • Block Grants (Global Caps, Per Capita Caps)
  • Waivers (could used to achieve policy objectives
    on a state-by-state basis that Congress would not
    support)
  • Federal Processes
  • Presidents Budget Submission (indication of
    Presidents priorities)
  • Budget Resolution (blueprint to determine
    spending and revenue levels for the federal
    budget may require spending reductions without
    naming Medicaid adopted with simple majority
    vote, no filibuster)
  • Budget Reconciliation (can pass legislation with
    simple majority vote, no filibuster)
  • State Level Changes
  • Additional cost containment strategies
  • 1115 Waivers

4
Certain policy options may frame the debate about
Medicaid restructuring
  • Entitlement Cap
  • Policy proposed in the 108th Congress to limit
    federal spending on entitlement programs (i.e.
    Medicaid and Medicare) to require across the
    board reductions in spending. Coming after a
    period of successive years of greater efforts to
    control Medicaid spending, even a seemingly small
    cut could be devastating
  • Block Grant
  • Policy that would change Medicaid from an
    open-ended financing system to one that limits
    the level of federal funding. Could result in a
    huge cost shift to states and could harm
    beneficiaries by leading to severe benefits cuts
    or extreme eligibility restrictions
  • Waivers
  • Authority given by Congress to the Secretary of
    HHS to waive (or disregard) provisions of the law
    (such as requirements that services be comparable
    or statewide, or that services must be sufficient
    in amount, duration, and scope)
  • Waivers have been used to innovate in the
    delivery of health care (i.e. Home- and
    Community-Based Services (HCBS) waivers) and to
    expand Medicaid coverage to previously uninsured
    populations. Recently, waivers have been used to
    limit coverage or weaken protections for current
    beneficiaries

5
To address Medicaids real challenges, we need a
new narrative
  • We need to tell the story of Medicaids success
  • Medicaid works for people with disabilities
  • Medicaid supports national health policy goals
  • Medicaid allows other parts of the health system
    to function
  • Medicaid is a good deal for states
  • Even in tight fiscal times, Medicaid is a good
    investment

6
Medicaid Works forPeople with Disabilities
  • While improvements are needed, no major public
    program has been more responsive to the needs of
    people with disabilities than Medicaid
  • Provides health care coverage to more than 52
    million low-income people in the United States,
    including more than 8 million people with severe
    disabilities
  • Largest source of financing for long-term
    services and covers nearly 70 of nursing home
    residents and pays for nearly half of all nursing
    home spending
  • EPSDT benefit provides for screening, early
    detection, and treatment of disabilities and
    other health conditions in children
  • Largest source of health coverage for people with
    HIV/AIDS and largest funder for state and local
    spending on mental health services
  • Medicaid covers services needed by people with
    disabilities that the private market, Medicare,
    and SCHIP do not cover (So-called optional
    services are generally disability services)
  • Open-ended financing and flexibility in the
    Medicaid law has permitted states to innovate and
    improve the delivery of services to people with
    disabilities (e.g. Katie Beckett option, HCBS
    waivers, Medicaid buy-in programs)
  • Enforceable right to coverage ensures access to
    critical services

7
The current Medicaid financing structure supports
national health care objectives
  • Current Medicaid Financing
  • Federal state governments share financial
    responsibility and risk
  • States set spending levels
  • Incentives for states to control costs
  • Federal government reimburses states based on the
    match rate
  • Federal matching funds are guaranteed entitlement
    to states
  • No set limits helps states manage unpredictable
    economic conditions and demographic changes
  • Supports entitlement to coverage
  • Not subject to federal appropriations
  • Matching system plays an vital role
  • Creates incentives for states to take up federal
    options
  • Discourages cuts in Medicaid
  • National Healthcare Objectives
  • Provides health coverage to low-income families
  • Fills in the gaps in Medicare coverage
  • Serves as the nations principal source of
    coverage for long-term care and mental health
    services
  • Helps states respond to economic downturns and
    public health epidemics and disasters like
    HIV/AIDS
  • Provides essential financing for urban and rural
    health care providers and disability services
    providers

K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N
O N Medicaid and the Uninsured
8
Medicaid enables all other parts of the
healthcare system to work
Private Health Insurance Relies on Medicaid to
help keep premiums lower by covering high-cost
cases and services
Medicare Relies on Medicaid to finance half the
care for low-income beneficiaries (even after
Medicare Part D is implemented)
MEDICAID
Safety-Net Hospitals and Clinics Rely on Medicaid
to support ER capacity and for revenues from
beneficiaries and direct subsidies
Public Health Infrastructure Relies on Medicaid
to support immunization programs, respond to
pressing epidemics (like HIV/AIDS) and
bioterrorism
K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N
O N Medicaid and the Uninsured
9
Federal Medicaid financing is a good deal for
states
  • The federal government matches state spending.
  • Depending on the relative wealth of the state,
    the federal governments share of Medicaid costs
    ranges from 50 up to a statutory maximum of 83.
  • In 2005, 13 states had a 50 Federal Medical
    Assistance Percentage (FMAP) of 50 (CA, CO, CT,
    DE, IL, MA, MD, MN, NH, NJ, NY, VA, and WA). In
    these states, 1 of state Medicaid spending
    produces 1 of federal Medicaid support for the
    state.
  • In 2005, Mississippi has the highest FMAP of
    roughly 77. In MS, 1 of state Medicaid
    spending produces roughly 3.35 of federal
    Medicaid support for the state.
  • Best deal states have, and largest source of
    federal funding for states. Matched financing
    has led states to shift health care spending to
    Medicaid to maximize federal support.

10
Criticisms distort Medicaids true record
  • Critics have said
  • MYTH Spending is out-of-control
  • FACT Medicaid spending has been increasing more
    slowly than the private market. From 2002-2004,
    per person Medicaid spending rose 6.7, almost
    half the rate of the private market (12.5)
    despite serving a sicker and needier population
    (CBO estimates and Kaiser Family Foundation/HRET
    survey of employer-sponsored health benefits,
    2004)
  • MYTH Medicaid eclipses state spending on
    education
  • FACT In FY 2003, Medicaid spending comprised
    16.5 of state general fund expenditures, less
    than half of state spending on elementary and
    secondary education (35.5). (State Expenditure
    Report 2003, National Association of State
    Budget Officers, October 2004) States often
    exaggerate Medicaid spending by counting federal
    Medicaid payments.
  • MYTH Medicaid is a drain on state resources
  • FACT A review of 17 studies on the economic
    impact of Medicaid showed that every study found
    that Medicaid generates state and local economic
    activity. (The Role of Medicaid in State
    Economies A Look at the Research, Kaiser
    Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, April
    2004.) Using a Department of Commerce model,
    Families USA found that in 2005, the return on
    every state dollar spent on Medicaid results in
    1.92 to 6.22 in new economic activity,
    depending on the state. On average, Medicaid
    generates nearly 70,000 jobs per state.
    (Medicaid Good Medicine for State Economies,
    2004, Families USA, May 2004)

11
Most current challenges arebigger than Medicaid
  • The major financing issues facing Medicaid
    programs stem from problems that are bigger than
    Medicaid and call for broader national solutions.
    Unresolved issues include
  • Controlling health costs (across all payers) that
    consistently rise faster than inflation
  • Controlling escalating prescription drug costs
  • Financing access to new medical technology
  • Establishing a system for financing long-term
    services for moderate income people (which would
    take the pressure of Medicaid, thereby allowing
    it to focus on the low-income population)
  • Adapting to demographic changes that are
    increasing the demand for public services when
    fewer workers are able to support such services

12
Opportunities exist to improve Medicaid
  • While Medicaid requires a continued large
    investment of public resources, opportunities
    exist to make Medicaid stronger and take pressure
    off the program. Bipartisan efforts could be
    focused on
  • Controlling rising drug costs by increasing
    rebates and building on successful state efforts
    to manage pharmacy costs
  • Rebalancing the long-term care system to comply
    with the Olmstead mandate and to employ cheaper
    and better models of delivering long-term
    serviceswithout undermining core Medicaid
    protections
  • Taking pressure off states by shifting more costs
    to Medicare for services for dual eligibles

13
About 42 percent of all Medicaid spending
forbenefits is for dual eligibles
Financing services for Medicare beneficiaries is
a burden on states
Non-Prescription (82.7 Billion)
36
Spending on Dual Eligibles 42
Spending on Other Groups (136.7 Billion)
59
6
Prescription Drugs
(13.4 Billion)
6
2002 Total Spending on Benefits 232.8 Billion
SOURCE Urban Institute estimates prepared for
KCMU based on an analysis of 2000 MSIS data
applied to CMS-64 FY2002 data.
14
Medicaid defenders have a few factors working in
their favor
  • Medicaid is a critical program that serves the
    national interest. People working to protect the
    program can be heartened by
  • Our track record
  • Efforts have been made to block grant Medicaid in
    1981, 1995, and 2003. Medicaids defenders have
    succeeded in protecting the program by working
    together and reminding policy makers of the
    important role of Medicaid
  • Broad range of stakeholders
  • Past efforts to weaken or restructure Medicaid
    have been thwarted, in part, by the collective
    efforts of a large number of stakeholders and
    interests affected by the program. In addition
    to beneficiaries, doctors, hospitals, clinics,
    pharmaceutical manufacturers, medical supplies
    providers, health care workers, and others have
    spoken out in support of Medicaid
  • We have the better story to tell
  • While we can defend Medicaid by telling
    innumerable stories of the lives saved or
    improved by Medicaid, proponents of restructuring
    cannot promise something better. Rather, they
    argue that the program is broken, Medicaid is too
    generous, or poorly runwithout offering a more
    positive alternative

15
Success will require anunprecedented response
  • CCD should be proud of the work of the Health and
    Long-Term Services Task Forces. Nonetheless, we
    must still do things we have never done before.
  • Every disability organization must make defending
    Medicaid a priority. Not just health staffers,
    but senior leadership must be prepared to
    continually tell the positive story of Medicaids
    essential role for people with disabilities
  • New resources are needed. This includes money
    and staff time
  • State groups are critical. In addition to
    day-to-day legislative work, federal lobbyists
    must support state and local groups to become
    engaged in federal (and state) Medicaid issues
  • Reaching out to the mediaand giving state and
    local affiliates the tools to reach out to the
    mediawill be critical
  • Whether it is in the context of a budget battle
    or a block grant fight, we need to make the
    debate about Medicaidand make it personal
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com