ASL Stories Test - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

ASL Stories Test

Description:

ASL Stories Test. ASL Stories Test Structure. Similar to WMS ' ... Prepare DVDs of stories and instructions. Future Research Ideas. Why is Kidnap story easier? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: rpol
Category:
Tags: asl | stories | test

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ASL Stories Test


1
ASL Stories Test
2
ASL Stories Test Structure
  • Similar to WMS logical memory subtest
  • Two stories conceived in ASL
  • Train story ( 1 30), 43 scoreable elements
  • Kidnap story ( 2 07), 63 scoreable elements
  • (WMS-R logical memory stories have 25)

3
VideoInstructions and Stories1. Train Story
2. Kidnap Story
4
Examples of Scoreable Elements
  • THREE-WEEK-AGO
  • WITH DOG
  • 2
  • (2H) SCLV jumpingth, PLAY
  • SIT-IN WHEELCHAIR
  • (2H) DCLf holes in eyes
  • and nose areas
  • WITH NUMBER 4-5-3 (downwards)
  • PRINCIPAL (nod)

5
Method
  • Same healthy participants as SPAT study
  • N 41
  • Mean age 27.6 (s.d., 4.7, range 18-34)
  • 54 male, 46 female
  • Mean PIQ 104 (s.d. 12.8, range 75-128)
  • Administered ASL Stories, SPAT, PIQ

6
Method (cont.)
  • First story learning trail, immediate recall
  • Second story learning trial, immediate recall
  • 20 delay period (non-verbal tasks)
  • Delayed recall (both stories)
  • Three-step cueing quiz, 20 elements (each)
  • Freely recalled, recalled w/ question, 3 choices
  • Recall videos scored by 3 ASL-fluent assists.

7
Inter-Rater Reliability (ICC)
  • These are good intra-class correlation figures,
    suggesting reliable scoring results regardless of
    (sign-fluent) rater
  • Train story scoring was slightly more reliable
    probably due to fewer elements (43 vs. 63)

8
ASL Stories Norms (averaged over three raters)
Train story 34 scoreable elements Kidnap story
64 scoreable elements
  • Train vs. Kidnap immediate recall percentages
    significantly different (p .0013)
  • Train vs. Kidnap delayed recall percentages
    significantly different (p .0235)
  • Despite 20 fewer elements, Train story is
    significantly harder

9
No Age Correlation
  • Age range was restricted, as in SPAT study (18
    34)

10
PIQ Correlation
  • Train story is harder
  • Restricted score range (no clinical sample)
  • PIQ consists of non-verbal tasks
  • WMS-3 verbal tasks correlate .39 with PIQ

11
SPAT ASL Stories Correlations
12
Next Steps
  • Review, complete data analyses
  • Draft manuscript for publication
  • Prepare DVDs of stories and instructions

13
Future Research Ideas
  • Why is Kidnap story easier?
  • Why were so many elements necessary?
  • Can it differentiate a clinical sample?
  • Correlation with non-verbal tests?
  • Correlation with hearing verbal tests?
  • How much ASL fluency is needed?
  • Alternate administration methods?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com