Agenda

1
Agenda

• Preliminary results of  ThoughtLink, Inc survey
• Survey of executive departments and agencies that
  contribute staff to the Joint Interagency
  Coordination Groups
• Sponsored by ITEA and JFCOM J9
• Seeks to obtain perspective of contributing
  agencies for educational program
• DOD Training Transformation Initiative
• Update on OSD Policy efforts to transform DOD to
  holistic view of joint that includes interagency,
  inter-governmental, and multinational
• Working to find appropriate counterparts on other
  USG departments to coordinate efforts
• Long term approach
• Results of Improving Cooperation among
  Interagency, Multinational and Multilateral
  Partners Workshop
• Sponsored by JFCOM J9 and IDA
• Hosted by Foreign Service Institute

2
Agenda II

• HLS Response Action Model
• Sponsored by the Joint Forces Staff College
• Provides common relevant operational picture /
  situational awareness for interagency
  coordination
• The Way Ahead
• JFCOM Experimentation Milestones
• Prototype of full spectrum JIACG - demonstrating
  capability through Combatant Command exercises,
  experimentation on multinational and multilateral
  role of JIACG
• Military transformation - bringing all
  instruments of national power to bear on crises
• Pre-conflict management tool - unclassified
  database of indicators (social, economic,
  religious) of potential conflict
• Potential Conferences, Workshops and Simulations
• JIACG Orientation Conference (20-22 Jan)

3
JIACG Survey Results -The Short Form
Presented to the ITEA Interagency Steering
Group 10/29/03

• Marcy Stahl
• mstahl_at_thoughtlink.com
• Julia Loughran
• loughran_at_thoughtlink.com

4
Purpose

• Survey USG agencies here in DC to determine
• Their perspectives on the JIACG concept and
  execution
• Their thoughts on training and education (TE)
  needs
• NDU has conducted interviews at the commands

5
The Survey Audience
years of government experience 1-33 years
years at organization 1-29 years
Interviewees included Lt. Cols, Cols,
Commanders, Desk Officers, Chiefs, Deputy
Directors, Directors, and Deputy Assistant
Administrators.
6
Sample Questions

• Your job
• Whats your relationship to the JIACG concept?
• Pros and cons of the JIACG concept?
• Your Agency JIACGs
• How is the JIACGs utility perceived within your
  agency?
• JIACG HR Issues
• Whats the selling point to potential JIACG
  recruits?
• Training and Education
• What kind of TE do JIACG participants need to be
  effective?

A copy of the questionnaire is in the handout.
7
JIACG Training Education

• Interagency 101 wrt counter-terrorism
• Agencies capabilities, authorities and
  restrictions
• Current programs in the context of the Global War
  on Terrorism
• Military 101
• Command structure and how the Js interact
• Military planning process (cannot overstate
  importance of knowing that nothing happens if
  its not in the plan)
• Overview of military culture
• JIACG 101
• Mission statement general to all JIACGs
  specific to a single JIACG
• Organizational structure
• Civilian role in JIACGs
• Command-specific training
• Top priorities (based on geographic, pol/mil and
  other factors)
• Programs and other efforts to address these
  issues
• Commands expectations of the JIACG
• Value in 360 TE (to others around JIACG)
• Command staff seniors at USG agencies

8
Widely Varying Perspectives at Agencies

• State
• Problems finding people JIACG position is not
  career-enhancing
• Lack of internal funding
• FBI
• No problems finding people extra pay, GS-15,
  fewer hours
• No funding problems
• Treasury/Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
• Handpicking people
• Adamant about CT mission (vice full-spectrum)

9
Common Areas of Concern

• What is the JIACGs mission?
• CT or full-spectrum
• How does the JIACG fit into the command
  structure?
• What do the JIACG members do?
• Liaison? Targeting? Advisory?
• Who can task them?
• What are the selling points of the JIACG to an
  Assistant Secretary?

10
Selected Recommendations

• Take advantage of current interest and momentum!
• Workshop for those related to JIACG
• Networking for them
• Opportunity to develop success stories and
  lessons learned
• NDU as clearinghouse for all relevant IA TE
• Virtual consortium of TE providers
• Leverages from many existing courses
• Communities of practice for JIACG members
• Return to Agenda

11
Overview Briefingfor Interagency Planning
Meeting
Transforming DoD Training Joint Forces Ready to
Fight

• Colonel Pat Kelly
• Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for
  Policy
• T2 Lead for Joint Interagency, Intergovernmental,
  and Multinational Operations

12
Training Transformation Background

• 9/11 Wake-up call Defense Planning Guidance
  provided specific direction
• Strategic Plan for the Transformation of DoD
  Training SecDef Approved March 02
• Broader, more inclusive definition of Joint
  beyond Multiple Service to include Interagency,
  Intergovernmental, and Multinational Operations
• Implementation Plan for the Transformation of
  DoD Training Approved June 03 contains three
  capabilities and Action Plans with milestones for
  accomplishment thru FY09

13
T2 Program Capabilities

• Joint Knowledge Development and Distribution
  Capability
• Preparing forces individually
• Joint National Training Capability
• Preparing forces collectively
• Joint Assessment and Enabling Capability
• Enabling Joint training and guiding T2
• Management and Studies
• Providing policy guidance and programming

14
DoD Must Transform Training to Enable the
Transformed Force

• Transformed Training
• Joint/Multinational Focus- Schools, distributed,
  embedded
• - Live and/or Simulated - Joint
  interoperability tasks- More flexible-diverse
  missions
• Networked capabilities
• Training measured and reported
• Linked, integrated, and accessible ranges
• Total Force integration

DoD Training

• Current Training
• Service Focus- Schoolhouse-based- Mostly live-
  Service core tasks- Less flexible (2 MTWs)
• Unit capabilities
• Service-centric SORTS reporting
• Independent test and training ranges
• Some AC/RC integration

Interagency and Intergovernmental
Joint / Multinational
Tomorrow
Today
Interoperability
Service
Goal Transform military training to
enable Joint Forces to perform future operations
14
15
Whats Our Requirement?

• Develop a common set of Interagency,
  Intergovernmental, and Multinational Joint
  Mission Essential Tasks (JMETs)
• This is how DoD establishes the tasks,
  conditions, and standards to which individuals,
  units, and staffs are to be trained to be
  prepared to properly accomplish their mission
• From these JMETs, education and training
  programs will be developed or modified to support
  these tasks most of the individual education
  will be available online (anytime, anywhere) to
  those that need it both in and outside of DoD
• This is a two-way, collaborative effort DoD
  needs your help to identify what we must know
  about your agency and how to work with it and we
  want you to understand how to work effectively
  with DoD

16
The Way Ahead

• Getting ready now research, coordination,
  organization
• Task Force Convening Conference Jan/Feb 2004
• Form Working Groups Interagency WG four
  others
• Preliminary assessments develop and refine
  JMETs
• Determine education and training requirements
  and methods Initiate courseware development,
  modification
• Implement education and training for JMETs
  supporting Interagency, Intergovernmental, and
  Multinational Operations
• IOC Oct 05 FOC Oct 07

17
Task Force

• Interagency Working Group
• Multinational Working Group
• Intergovernmental Working Group
• Integration Working Group
• Technical Working Group

18
Interagency Working Group

• Interagency Working Group
• OIF Lessons Learned
• Focus on development of Annex V of Warplans
• Strategic Options focus on assurance, dissuasion,
  and deterrence tasks
• Phase IV tasks
• Expand JS-led Interagency Operations Conference
  Framework for Desired Operational Capabilities
  (DOC)
• Use JIACG as Surrogates when necessary
• JFCOM efforts
• NDU Survey and January 2004 JIACG Conference
• Second Priority is Homeland Defense Interagency
  tasks

19
Multinational Working Group

• Multinational Working Group
• OIF Lessons Learned
• Focus on interoperability training and
  international education
• Build upon Regional Support Center activities
• Integrate ongoing NDU initiatives
• NII2 Regional International Outreach (RIO)
  initiative
• Expand JS-led Interagency Operations Conference
  Framework for Desired Operational Capabilities
  (DOC)
• Link to Theater Security Cooperation
• Balance among theaters
• Incorporate centers of excellence for application
  in other theaters
• NATO, SAC Transformation initial focus

20
Intergovernmental Working Group

• Intergovernmental Working Group
• Focus on Homeland Defense and Homeland Security
  Implementation Execution
• Bridge to Interagency
• Stagger behind previous two working groups

21
Integration Working Group

• Integration Working Group
• Synthesize other working groups
• Link to other T2 activities
• JNTC
• JKDDC
• JAEC
• Link with Interoperability initiatives

22
Technical Working Group

• Technical Working Group
• Focus on Interoperability
• Translate Data Mining and METL Data Bases
• Build upon existing JFCOM led UJTL efforts

23
Training Transformation Summary

• SecDef and DepSecDef support T2
• A new requirement and recognized mission
• Funding established for FY 04-09
• No fixed solutions or directed guidance
• Open for and needs your agencys perspective,
  assistance, and collaborationIA community effort
• Shared results, education, and training
• Benefits for all agencies, helps do our jobs
  better, and supports USG Interagency operations
  worldwide

24
Points of Contact

• Colonel Patrick (Pat) Kelly, ODASD/Resources
  Plans
• 2900 Defense Pentagon (Room 4B940)
• Washington, DC 20301-2900
• 703-614-4535 patrick.kelly_at_osd.mil
• Mr. Henry (Hank) Richmond, ODUSD/Readiness (Spt
  Tm)
• 1800 N. Beauregard Street, Suite 300
• Alexandria, VA 22311
• 703-575-2817 hrichmond_at_alionscience.com
• Return to
  Agenda

25
The IA, MN, and ML Workshop

• Event co-sponsored by Department of State and
  JFCOM, held at Foreign Service Institute from 7
  to 9 October, and involved more than 70
  pro-active participants
• Interagency DoS, DoJ, DoD, USAID, and CIA
• Multinational Australia, Canada, France, New
  Zealand, and United Kingdom
• Multilateral UN System (OCHA, WFP, and UN Joint
  Logistics Center) and International Committee of
  the Red Cross
• Results of the Workshop
• Introduced the wider community to the
  experimentation effort and invited further
  participation
• Gained insights into the planning processes used
  by the community members recognition that the
  USG interagency community has a long way to go
• Identified additional key players across the full
  spectrum of activities in various geographic
  regions
• Identified challenges to
• Establishing a collaborative information
  environment
• Educating and training for USG community
• Collected useful information to be integrated
  into subsequent experiments and concept
  development

9/24/2009-25
26
Preliminary Workshop Findings

• USG needs a standard and transparent process for
  planning and managing complex contingencies (new
  PDD-56 equivalent)
• Partners link theirs to the UN system
• USG operates in an ad hoc mode without NSPD
• Authority and responsibility of the JIACG need to
  be clarified
• Within the USG process
• With other multinational and multilateral
  entities
• Collaborative information environment is
  difficult
• National and organizational disclosure policies
• Sensitivity of decisions
• Decision support tools (automated or
  non-automated) are needed to
• Meet the requirements of all JIACG functional
  capabilities
• Account for the wide range of tasks and resources
  of potential civilian partners
• Support JIACG requirements for
• Strategic-theater engagement deliberate, crisis,
  and transition planning
• Civilian contributions to Operational Net
  Assessments and Effects-Based Operations
• Return to Agenda

9/24/2009-26
27
Homeland Security-Response Action Model V1.56

• Govt owned provided to OGA by MOU with
  NDU/JFSC
• User-friendly PC based system (Win NT / 2000)
• Runs on one laptop - LAN version ready to test on
  Win 2000 OS
• DoD HLA compliant, standards-based, open
  architecture (XML, C)
• Scaleable view strategic, operational or
  tactical level
• Provides common relevant operational picture /
  situational awareness for interagency
  coordination
• Enables course of action planning, analysis,
  comparison validation of existing plans, plan
  execution, mission rehearsal
• Supports air/land/sea missions/operations
  including WMD
• Models resources/availability of resources
  furnishes unit report data
• Distributes message traffic (currently using MP
  News) automatically or via manual triggers
• Flexible event scripting or play/change
  on-the-fly
• Drawing tools to support command and control
• Information link course/exercise/web reference
  data
• Variable run speed - 11 to 36001
• Allows for after action review of exercise
• POC Claire Marie - mariec_at_jfsc.ndu.edu

28
Current Support
JFSC Joint Combined Warfighting School Senior
Int. Major - Colonel
JFSC
Homeland Security Planners Course
Interagency
Homeland Security IA Exercises
Purple Guardian
Purple Island
NDU - NSGC Olympic Guardian Greek Ministers
NDU CAPSTONE FO/GO
29
Strategic Support

• Provides situational awareness for multiple
  ongoing scenarios
• View other Govt, State, Local agency roles /
  missions / locations
• Map data, status / movement of forces,
  specialized unit capability data

• Provides information links, video injects,
  event triggers to simulate variety of scenario
  options e.g. what if the plume changes
  direction, goes over the border and it becomes an
  international situation, etc.

30
Interagency Play

• Common Relevant Operational Picture
• DoD and other govt agency unit data, to include
  First Responders
• Information tab provides link to exercise data
  and real-world links to web sites for additional
  unit capabilities

Purple Guardian
Participants Role Play USNORTHCOM Staff
Purple Island
Roles Missions
Interagency
COA Comparison
Coordination
COA Analysis
Request For
Information / Forces
COAs

• Multiple map views
• Message traffic dropped to workstations
  simulates data flow
• WMD event plumes enhance crisis urgency similar
  to real-world

31
Future Virtual Interagency Capabilities Module
FEMA LNO
JDOMS LNO
Common Relevant Operational Picture (CROP)
DoJ / FBI LNO
DHHS LNO
DOE LNO
32
Example What Role Does the FBI Have During the
St. Louis Train Incident?
FBI LNO
Two ways to get info
Info Portal
Interactive
1. Learning Tool
2. Exercise Driven (each exercise accessed
separately)

7 messages from RAM generates xx messages from
FBI on ops in Norfolk
Specific feedback on selected scenario
Purple Island

• Norfolk (ERD in containers)

Or choose another scenario
St. Louis (Train derailment/explosion) San
Diego (Truck bomb) Jacksonville
(Potential rogue LNG ship)
Purple Guardian
51 messages from RAM generate xx messages from
FBI on details of operations at incident site
Return to Agenda