Title: Searching where there is light : a rough guide to evidence based practice
1Searching where there is light ? a rough guide
to evidence based practice
- Andrew Booth Reader in Evidence Based
Information Practice, School of Health and
Related Research (ScHARR), University of
Sheffield
2Outline
- Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Where Have We
Come From? - What are the Strengths and Limitations of EBP?
- EBP The Challenges that lie ahead
- Making our own Practice Evidence-Based
3Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Where Have We
Come From?
4Brief Chronology - 1
- 1972 Cochrane - Effectiveness and efficiency
Random reflections on health services - 1980s - Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials
- 1986 - Levels of evidence
- 1991 - Clinical Epidemiology McMaster Uni
- 1992 - First use of term Evidence Based
Medicine - 1993 - First Cochrane Colloquium and establishing
of Cochrane Collaboration
5Brief Chronology - 2
- 1994 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and
UK Cochrane Centre, Centre for Evidence Based
Medicine, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme - Late 1990s Centres for Evidence Based Nursing,
Pathology, Mental Health, Dentistry
6Other significant achievements
- NHS Research and Development programme
- NHS Health Technology Assessment
- National Institute for Health and Clinical
Excellence (NICE) - Clinical Evidence
- National Library for Health
- Campbell Collaboration
7Evidence based medicine is
- "the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use
of current best evidence in making decisions
about the care of individual patients.integrating
individual clinical expertise with the best
available external clinical evidence from
systematic research. - Sackett, D.L. et al. (1996) Evidence based
medicine what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312
(7023), 71-72).
8The Five As
- Ask a focused question
- Acquire the evidence
- Appraise the studies
- Apply the findings
- Assess the impact
- ...and your own development
9What are the Strengths and Limitations of EBP?
10A Triumph of Marketing!
- Clinical Epidemiology how sexy is that??!!
11Achievements
- Paradigm that has migrated across healthcare
- Approach adapted and adopted across other sectors
e.g. Education, Social Services etcetera - Makes decision-making more explicit and more
rational - Attempts to tackle postcode lotteries and other
inequalities
12Criticisms of EBM
- EBM elevates experimental evidence over other
forms of knowledge - Definition of evidence within EBM is narrow and
excludes information important to clinicians. - EBM is not evidence-based it does not meet
its own empirical tests for efficacy - Usefulness of applying EBM to individual patients
is limited - EBM limits patients right to choose what is best
in their individual circumstances
Cohen et al (2004)
13These Criticisms are
- Criticisms of EBM 1.0
- No longer appropriate to EBHC Vista
14EBP The Challenges that lie ahead
15The Challenges
- Wider definition of evidence
- Greater variety of research designs and question
types - Increasing use of question-led (and
solution-focused) approaches - Increased utilisation of mixed methods
approaches - More varied toolbox of evidence products
- More tailoring of evidence to individuals
16Wider definition of evidence
- e.g. Clinical decisions require
- empirical evidence,
- experiential evidence,
- pathophysiologic rationale,
- patient goals and values,
- knowledge of system features.
17Greater variety of research designs and question
types
- Continued expansion of included research designs
- Needs questions - What do people want or need?
- Process questions - Why/how does it work?
- Implementation questions - What is required to
make it work? - Correlation questions - What relationships are
seen between phenomena? - Attitude questions - What do people think? What
are their experiences? - Economic questions - How much does it cost and
with what benefit/harm?
18Increasing use of question-led (and
solution-focused) approaches
- Closer match between research priorities and
research commissioning (possible elimination of
own account research)
19Focusing on Uncertainty
20Database of Uncertainties about the Effects of
Treatments (DUETs)
- Draws on 3 main sources to identify uncertainties
about effects of treatments - patients', carers' and clinicians' questions
about the effects of treatments - research recommendations in reports of systematic
reviews and clinical guidelines - ongoing research, both systematic reviews in
preparation and new 'primary' studies
21Exact Nature of Uncertainty
22Important Distinction
- Knowledge Support
- Knowledge support syntheses summarize research
evidence and strive for greater general
applicability and contribution to the knowledge
pool. Cochrane-style systematic reviews are
examples of high quality knowledge support
syntheses.
- Decision Support
- Decision support syntheses include summarizing
evidence as well as other tasks required to
support decision-making in a particular context,
such as determining recommendations for action
and considering factors relevant to implementing
change.
The Oil Platform
The Gas Station
23The Rise and Rise of Systematic Reviews
24Epidemiology of Systematic Reviews (SRs)
- 8,633 reviews published (1996-2003)
- Four reviews per day (2003)
- One in five SRs published by Cochrane
Collaboration, HTA reports (2/5) and academic
literature (2/5) - Only Cochrane reviews are regularly updated.
- Since 2001 rate of updated reviews has plateaued
at 200 p.a. - 1,000 updated reviews required p.a. to achieve
2-year update time.
258
Average Cochrane Review includes 6
studies Covering all RCTs on Cochrane Trials
Register (300,000 references 270,000 trials)
requires 25,000-45,000 Reviews
Excludes new drugs and procedures
This only includes RCT based reviews excludes
diagnostic, qualitative, observational designs
Source Mallett Clarke, 2003
26Increased utilisation of mixed methods
approaches
- More holistic approaches to include satisfaction,
quality, costs and patient value
27More varied toolbox of evidence products
- Increasing numbers of decision aids enabled by
technology - Continued growth of integrated care pathways
movement - Rapid Evidence Assessments
- http//www.gsr.gov.uk/professional_guidance/rea_to
olkit/how_to_do_an_rea/index.asp
28More tailoring of evidence to individuals
- More utilisation of large patient/population
datasets - More tailoring to individual patient context
- More tailoring to individual clinician context
29mYGoodlife
pages from your personal data
- Clinical Trial Opportunities
- Whipps Farm Hospital is recruiting for patients
with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in your Region.
You are eligible!!
- Latest Health Evidence
- YOU will have a 23 reduced risk of stroke if you
change your medication to Xocetil - YOUR blood pressure can be lowered by 5 with
Lochol
- My Appointments
- Optician 15/05/08
- My Medications
- Atenolol 70mg renewal due 08/04/2008
30A Challenge for/from EBM
- Evidence based practice's biggest future
challenge is one of knowledge translation,
ensuring that practitioners base their
day-to-day decision making on the right
principles and on current best evidence. - All too often practitioners are unaware of the
available evidence or fail to apply it. Because
practitioners values often differ from those
of users, even those who are aware of the
evidence risk making the wrong recommendations if
they do not involve users in the decision making
process. (Guyatt et al, 2004)
31Making our own Practice Evidence-Based
32'and even evidence-based librarianship!
Dont get mad, get rid of the even!
33A brief chronology
- 1995 First mention of Evidence Based
Information Practice - 1997 First mention of Evidence Based
Librarianship - 2001 - First EBL Conference, Sheffield
- 2003, 2005, 2007 2nd , 3rd and 4th EBL(IP)
Conferences (Canada, Australia, USA) - 2005 - Evidence Based Practice A Handbook for
Information Professionals (Textbook) - 2006 Evidence Based Library and Information
Practice (Open Access Journal)
34What is EBLIP?
- an approach to information practice that
promotes the collection, interpretation, and
integration of valid, important and applicable
user-reported, practitioner-observed and
research-derived evidence. - The best available evidence moderated by user
needs and preferences, is applied to improve the
quality of professional judgements. Booth,
2004 After McKibbon, 1995
35Implementing Research in Practice
- "Individuallibrarians must apply the results of
research routinely to library and information
service practice, to the development of
information policy, and to other information
issues important to..institutions - Using Scientific Evidence to Improve Information
Practice The Research Policy Statement of the
Medical Library Association
36So what about uptake?
- Lindsay Glynn, then Editor of EBLIP, posted
message in 2006 asking for EBL success stories
hoping to hear how people had used evidence to
assist in their decision making as well as
whether the applied evidence has a positive or
negative result once implemented (Glynn, 2006,
p. 1). - Responses were minimal - EBL still has a way to
go before it is practised regularly and
systematically (Glynn, 2006 2).
37Is EBLIP what we want/need?
- 1. Evidence based library and information
practice (EBLIP) is not relevant. - 2. EBLIP is learning from experience.
- 3. EBLIP is service improvement.
- 4. EBLIP is all consuming.
c.p. early experience of Sackett in UK
Partridge, HL. et al (2007)
38The evidence For and Against
- Yet another thing to think about
- I dont have time to do it
- I have no capacity to work harder
- There is no evidence
- We should be doing it anyway
- I cant afford not to do it
- Then work smarter
- Then make it
39Hill Review
- there is a fear that healthcare libraries will
have difficulty in surviving unless librarians
can show that they support the mission of the
organisation and be part of the evidence based
health care movement. Ultimately all NHS
organisations exist to provide the best possible
patient care. The challenge for health care
librarians is to demonstrate that the services
they provide actively support clinical care. - Hill, P. (2007) Report of a National Review of
NHS Health Library Services in England From
knowledge to health in the 21st Century.
40Future roles for information professionals?
- Emphasis on Knowledge Transfer
- Getting research implications to policy makers,
clinicians, patients - Providing decision support not simply knowledge
support - Tailoring knowledge to the audience, context and
individual patient - (c.p. outreach/clinical librarian/info specs in
context)
41New models for the next decade?
- EBPLIB1.0 helping others with their information
search and retrieval - --------------------------------------------------
--------------- - EBPLIB2.0 helping others with their knowledge
translation - EBLIP2.0 - helping ourselves with our own
knowledge translation - EBPLIB3.0 fully interacting as genuine members
of the EBP team - EBLIP3.0 fully interacting to address genuine
information practice concerns of our users
42References - 1
- Booth, A., and Brice, A. (2004). Evidence-Based
Practice for Information Professionals A
handbook. London, Facet Publishing. - Cohen AM, Stavri PZ, Hersh WR. A categorization
and analysis of the criticisms of evidence-based
medicine. Int J Med Inf 2004 73(1) 35-43
43References - 2
- Guyatt G et al (2004) Evidence based medicine has
come a long way (Editorial) BMJ. 329(7473)990-1. - Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically
reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence
to inform management and policy making in the
health field. Journal of Health Services
Research Policy 2005 10(Suppl 1) 620 - Partridge, HL. et al (2007) The practitioners
experience and conception of evidence based
library and information practice an exploratory
analysis. In Proceedings 4th International
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Conference, Chapel Hill-Durham, NC, USA.