Searching where there is light : a rough guide to evidence based practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Searching where there is light : a rough guide to evidence based practice

Description:

Increased utilisation of 'mixed methods' approaches. More varied 'toolbox' of evidence products ... More utilisation of large patient/population datasets ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: boo52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Searching where there is light : a rough guide to evidence based practice


1
Searching where there is light ? a rough guide
to evidence based practice
  • Andrew Booth Reader in Evidence Based
    Information Practice, School of Health and
    Related Research (ScHARR), University of
    Sheffield

2
Outline
  • Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Where Have We
    Come From?
  • What are the Strengths and Limitations of EBP?
  • EBP The Challenges that lie ahead
  • Making our own Practice Evidence-Based

3
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Where Have We
Come From?
4
Brief Chronology - 1
  • 1972 Cochrane - Effectiveness and efficiency
    Random reflections on health services
  • 1980s - Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials
  • 1986 - Levels of evidence
  • 1991 - Clinical Epidemiology McMaster Uni
  • 1992 - First use of term Evidence Based
    Medicine
  • 1993 - First Cochrane Colloquium and establishing
    of Cochrane Collaboration

5
Brief Chronology - 2
  • 1994 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and
    UK Cochrane Centre, Centre for Evidence Based
    Medicine, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme
  • Late 1990s Centres for Evidence Based Nursing,
    Pathology, Mental Health, Dentistry

6
Other significant achievements
  • NHS Research and Development programme
  • NHS Health Technology Assessment
  • National Institute for Health and Clinical
    Excellence (NICE)
  • Clinical Evidence
  • National Library for Health
  • Campbell Collaboration

7
Evidence based medicine is
  • "the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use
    of current best evidence in making decisions
    about the care of individual patients.integrating
    individual clinical expertise with the best
    available external clinical evidence from
    systematic research.
  • Sackett, D.L. et al. (1996) Evidence based
    medicine what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312
    (7023), 71-72).

8
The Five As
  • Ask a focused question
  • Acquire the evidence
  • Appraise the studies
  • Apply the findings
  • Assess the impact
  • ...and your own development

9
What are the Strengths and Limitations of EBP?
10
A Triumph of Marketing!
  • Clinical Epidemiology how sexy is that??!!

11
Achievements
  • Paradigm that has migrated across healthcare
  • Approach adapted and adopted across other sectors
    e.g. Education, Social Services etcetera
  • Makes decision-making more explicit and more
    rational
  • Attempts to tackle postcode lotteries and other
    inequalities

12
Criticisms of EBM
  • EBM elevates experimental evidence over other
    forms of knowledge
  • Definition of evidence within EBM is narrow and
    excludes information important to clinicians.
  • EBM is not evidence-based it does not meet
    its own empirical tests for efficacy
  • Usefulness of applying EBM to individual patients
    is limited
  • EBM limits patients right to choose what is best
    in their individual circumstances

Cohen et al (2004)
13
These Criticisms are
  • Criticisms of EBM 1.0
  • No longer appropriate to EBHC Vista

14
EBP The Challenges that lie ahead
15
The Challenges
  • Wider definition of evidence
  • Greater variety of research designs and question
    types
  • Increasing use of question-led (and
    solution-focused) approaches
  • Increased utilisation of mixed methods
    approaches
  • More varied toolbox of evidence products
  • More tailoring of evidence to individuals

16
Wider definition of evidence
  • e.g. Clinical decisions require
  • empirical evidence,
  • experiential evidence,
  • pathophysiologic rationale,
  • patient goals and values,
  • knowledge of system features.

17
Greater variety of research designs and question
types
  • Continued expansion of included research designs
  • Needs questions - What do people want or need?
  • Process questions - Why/how does it work?
  • Implementation questions - What is required to
    make it work?
  • Correlation questions - What relationships are
    seen between phenomena?
  • Attitude questions - What do people think? What
    are their experiences?
  • Economic questions - How much does it cost and
    with what benefit/harm?

18
Increasing use of question-led (and
solution-focused) approaches
  • Closer match between research priorities and
    research commissioning (possible elimination of
    own account research)

19
Focusing on Uncertainty
20
Database of Uncertainties about the Effects of
Treatments (DUETs)
  • Draws on 3 main sources to identify uncertainties
    about effects of treatments
  • patients', carers' and clinicians' questions
    about the effects of treatments
  • research recommendations in reports of systematic
    reviews and clinical guidelines
  • ongoing research, both systematic reviews in
    preparation and new 'primary' studies

21
Exact Nature of Uncertainty
22
Important Distinction
  • Knowledge Support
  • Knowledge support syntheses summarize research
    evidence and strive for greater general
    applicability and contribution to the knowledge
    pool. Cochrane-style systematic reviews are
    examples of high quality knowledge support
    syntheses.
  • Decision Support
  • Decision support syntheses include summarizing
    evidence as well as other tasks required to
    support decision-making in a particular context,
    such as determining recommendations for action
    and considering factors relevant to implementing
    change.

The Oil Platform
The Gas Station
23
The Rise and Rise of Systematic Reviews
24
Epidemiology of Systematic Reviews (SRs)
  • 8,633 reviews published (1996-2003)
  • Four reviews per day (2003)
  • One in five SRs published by Cochrane
    Collaboration, HTA reports (2/5) and academic
    literature (2/5)
  • Only Cochrane reviews are regularly updated.
  • Since 2001 rate of updated reviews has plateaued
    at 200 p.a.
  • 1,000 updated reviews required p.a. to achieve
    2-year update time.

25
8
Average Cochrane Review includes 6
studies Covering all RCTs on Cochrane Trials
Register (300,000 references 270,000 trials)
requires 25,000-45,000 Reviews
Excludes new drugs and procedures
This only includes RCT based reviews excludes
diagnostic, qualitative, observational designs
Source Mallett Clarke, 2003
26
Increased utilisation of mixed methods
approaches
  • More holistic approaches to include satisfaction,
    quality, costs and patient value

27
More varied toolbox of evidence products
  • Increasing numbers of decision aids enabled by
    technology
  • Continued growth of integrated care pathways
    movement
  • Rapid Evidence Assessments
  • http//www.gsr.gov.uk/professional_guidance/rea_to
    olkit/how_to_do_an_rea/index.asp

28
More tailoring of evidence to individuals
  • More utilisation of large patient/population
    datasets
  • More tailoring to individual patient context
  • More tailoring to individual clinician context

29
mYGoodlife
pages from your personal data
  • Clinical Trial Opportunities
  • Whipps Farm Hospital is recruiting for patients
    with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in your Region.
    You are eligible!!
  • Latest Health Evidence
  • YOU will have a 23 reduced risk of stroke if you
    change your medication to Xocetil
  • YOUR blood pressure can be lowered by 5 with
    Lochol
  • My Appointments
  • Optician 15/05/08
  • My Medications
  • Atenolol 70mg renewal due 08/04/2008

30
A Challenge for/from EBM
  • Evidence based practice's biggest future
    challenge is one of knowledge translation,
    ensuring that practitioners base their
    day-to-day decision making on the right
    principles and on current best evidence.
  • All too often practitioners are unaware of the
    available evidence or fail to apply it. Because
    practitioners values often differ from those
    of users, even those who are aware of the
    evidence risk making the wrong recommendations if
    they do not involve users in the decision making
    process. (Guyatt et al, 2004)

31
Making our own Practice Evidence-Based
32
'and even evidence-based librarianship!
Dont get mad, get rid of the even!
33
A brief chronology
  • 1995 First mention of Evidence Based
    Information Practice
  • 1997 First mention of Evidence Based
    Librarianship
  • 2001 - First EBL Conference, Sheffield
  • 2003, 2005, 2007 2nd , 3rd and 4th EBL(IP)
    Conferences (Canada, Australia, USA)
  • 2005 - Evidence Based Practice A Handbook for
    Information Professionals (Textbook)
  • 2006 Evidence Based Library and Information
    Practice (Open Access Journal)

34
What is EBLIP?
  • an approach to information practice that
    promotes the collection, interpretation, and
    integration of valid, important and applicable
    user-reported, practitioner-observed and
    research-derived evidence.
  • The best available evidence moderated by user
    needs and preferences, is applied to improve the
    quality of professional judgements. Booth,
    2004 After McKibbon, 1995

35
Implementing Research in Practice
  • "Individuallibrarians must apply the results of
    research routinely to library and information
    service practice, to the development of
    information policy, and to other information
    issues important to..institutions
  • Using Scientific Evidence to Improve Information
    Practice The Research Policy Statement of the
    Medical Library Association

36
So what about uptake?
  • Lindsay Glynn, then Editor of EBLIP, posted
    message in 2006 asking for EBL success stories
    hoping to hear how people had used evidence to
    assist in their decision making as well as
    whether the applied evidence has a positive or
    negative result once implemented (Glynn, 2006,
    p. 1).
  • Responses were minimal - EBL still has a way to
    go before it is practised regularly and
    systematically (Glynn, 2006 2).

37
Is EBLIP what we want/need?
  • 1. Evidence based library and information
    practice (EBLIP) is not relevant.
  • 2. EBLIP is learning from experience.
  • 3. EBLIP is service improvement.
  • 4. EBLIP is all consuming.

c.p. early experience of Sackett in UK
Partridge, HL. et al (2007)
38
The evidence For and Against
  • Yet another thing to think about
  • I dont have time to do it
  • I have no capacity to work harder
  • There is no evidence
  • We should be doing it anyway
  • I cant afford not to do it
  • Then work smarter
  • Then make it

39
Hill Review
  • there is a fear that healthcare libraries will
    have difficulty in surviving unless librarians
    can show that they support the mission of the
    organisation and be part of the evidence based
    health care movement. Ultimately all NHS
    organisations exist to provide the best possible
    patient care. The challenge for health care
    librarians is to demonstrate that the services
    they provide actively support clinical care.
  • Hill, P. (2007) Report of a National Review of
    NHS Health Library Services in England From
    knowledge to health in the 21st Century. 

40
Future roles for information professionals?
  • Emphasis on Knowledge Transfer
  • Getting research implications to policy makers,
    clinicians, patients
  • Providing decision support not simply knowledge
    support
  • Tailoring knowledge to the audience, context and
    individual patient
  • (c.p. outreach/clinical librarian/info specs in
    context)

41
New models for the next decade?
  • EBPLIB1.0 helping others with their information
    search and retrieval
  • --------------------------------------------------
    ---------------
  • EBPLIB2.0 helping others with their knowledge
    translation
  • EBLIP2.0 - helping ourselves with our own
    knowledge translation
  • EBPLIB3.0 fully interacting as genuine members
    of the EBP team
  • EBLIP3.0 fully interacting to address genuine
    information practice concerns of our users

42
References - 1
  • Booth, A., and Brice, A. (2004). Evidence-Based
    Practice for Information Professionals A
    handbook. London, Facet Publishing.
  • Cohen AM, Stavri PZ, Hersh WR. A categorization
    and analysis of the criticisms of evidence-based
    medicine. Int J Med Inf 2004 73(1) 35-43

43
References - 2
  • Guyatt G et al (2004) Evidence based medicine has
    come a long way (Editorial) BMJ. 329(7473)990-1.
  • Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically
    reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence
    to inform management and policy making in the
    health field. Journal of Health Services
    Research Policy 2005 10(Suppl 1) 620
  • Partridge, HL. et al (2007) The practitioners
    experience and conception of evidence based
    library and information practice an exploratory
    analysis. In Proceedings 4th International
    Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
    Conference, Chapel Hill-Durham, NC, USA.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com