Virginia Association and Supervision and Curriculum Devlopment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Virginia Association and Supervision and Curriculum Devlopment

Description:

... provide intensive daily interventions that include ... Minimize the changes and resulting confusion in the daily schedule. WJCC. VASCD Presentation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: drdianna
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Virginia Association and Supervision and Curriculum Devlopment


1
(No Transcript)
2
IntroductionDr. Mathews
3
The RtI WJCC Implementation Model
  • Dr. Regina Yitbarek

4
Guiding Questions for Each Tier
  • What do we want students to learn?
  • How do we authentically engage students in the
    learning?
  • How do we know if students learn what we intend?
  • What do we do with students who have learned the
    curriculum and those who have not?

5
(No Transcript)
6
Fidelity of Implementation
  • RtI process will occur in three phases over
    five years
  • Exploration
  • Implementation
  • Sustainability and Evaluation

7
I. Exploration Phase
  • Will last 1-2 years and consist of
  • Understanding RtI and reviewing best practices
  • Identifying materials
  • Analyzing and administering universal screening
    assessment tools
  • Providing professional development on RtI ,
    progress monitoring, and curriculum based
    measurement (CBMs)
  • Creating and devising monitoring forms
  • Determining professionals to serve on the RtI
    school team

8
2. Implementation Phase
  • Will last 1-2 years and consist of
  • Administering the identified universal screening
    assessments in reading and mathematics
  • Ensuring that instruction is intentional and
    evidence based
  • Using data to determine instructional
    interventions
  • Monitoring progress regularly

9
3. Sustainability and Evaluation Phase
  • Will be ongoing and consist of
  • Ensuring that instruction is intentional and
    evidenced based
  • Evaluating faculty performance to include use of
    research-based instructional strategies
  • Supporting data driven assessment systems
  • Providing ongoing professional development
  • Monitoring ongoing student performance by both
    school and central office

10
Elementary School Plan
11
Response to Intervention Three Tiers of
Instruction Elementary School Plan
  • Tier I gtWhole School Faculty uses research-based
    instructional strategies and provides re-teaching
    as needed with different methods.
  • Tier IIgtSmall Group Specialists provide
    additional supplemental services.
  • Tier IIIgtIndividual Student Specialists provide
    intensive daily interventions that include
    curriculum based measurements and progress
    monitoring.

12
Year One
  • Identify school intervention team
  • Administer universal screening instruments such
    as
  • PALS (Grades K-3)
  • Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (Grades 1-5)
  • Use research-based instructional strategies for
    all students

13
Year One
  • Re-teach as needed using different approaches
  • Implement flexible groupings
  • Use common assessments to monitor progress
  • Analyze benchmark assessments
  • Meet in Professional Learning Communities to
    discuss students progress

14
Sample Benchmark Test Results
  • First Quarter Benchmarks
  • Grade 5 GT students on Grade 6
  • Mathematics Curriculum

15
(No Transcript)
16
Year One
  • School intervention team to meet on a regular
    basis to
  • determine interventions for Tier II and Tier III
    students
  • coordinate the ordering of materials to use with
    Tier II and Tier III students
  • devise forms for monitoring progress
  • Meet frequently to analyze CBMs and progress
    monitoring

17
Middle School Plan
  • Dr. Dianna M. Lindsay

18
The Charge
  • To review
  • The current use of time at the middle school
    level
  • Best Practices at the middle school
  • Ideals for the middle school concept
  • WJCC current practices and the impact on learners

19
Impetus for the Study
  • The following concerns have been expressed by
    faculty, administrators, parents,and board
    members
  • 1. The complexity of the wheel
  • 2. The inconsistency of content rigor
  • 3. Remediation, enrichment, and planning
    activities within the current school day

20
The Process
  • Conversations at the middle school level with
    school leaders and the principal
  • Conversations with the principals at Berkeley
    Middle School, James Blair Middle School, Toano
    Middle School, Executive Directors, and
    consultant and author Dr. Steven Kussin

21
A priori Assumptions about a Master Schedule at
the Middle School Level
  • Provide teaming in all core subjects
  • Optimize learning time for all students
  • Minimize disruptions

22
A priori Assumptions about a Master Schedule at
the Middle School Level
  • Use schedule to enhance an integrated curriculum
    with a flexible use of core time by the faculty
    as well as added interdisciplinary opportunities
  • Address remediation systemically for students
    needing such services

23
A priori Assumptions about a Master Schedule at
the Middle School Level
  • Expand World Language to meet high school
    expectations in this academic content area
  • Provide alternatives for gifted and talented
    learners
  • Offer a developmentally enhanced plan for
    students as they move from grades five to six,
    six to seven, seven to eight, and eight to nine

24
A priori Assumptions about a Master Schedule at
the Middle School Level
  • Provide more opportunities for faculty-student
    interaction
  • Minimize the changes and resulting confusion in
    the daily schedule

25
A priori Assumptions about a Master Schedule at
the Middle School Level
  • Increase opportunities for student wellness in
    grade six
  • Sound educational rationale for change in an age
    of accountability

26
Our Recommendations
  • Grade Six

27
Grade Six
  • AVID and technology instruction for all faculty
    members to ensure best practices at all levels of
    instruction
  • Common planning period for each team to ensure
    professional learning communities with common
    assessment and data analysis

28
Grade Six
Time within the sixth grade team reflects the
elementary school day to facilitate a smooth
transition from elementary school to middle
school.
Time provided for effective home and school
communications.
29
Grade Six
  • CORE SUBJECTS English, Mathematics, Science,
    Social Studies each meets for 72 minutes
  • Lunch for 30 minutes
  • Enrichment A/B schedule for 90 minutes

30
Grade Six
31
Grade Six
  • The A and B Day concept is a transitional idea
    allowing for consistency within the four core
    subjects-- while also introducing the younger
    learner to the academic choices embedded within a
    rigorous core plan.

32
Grade Six Summary
  • Four 72 periods for core subjects
  • One 30 lunch period
  • A days Wellness options
  • B days one 90 elective or combination of two
    45 electives

33
Our Recommendations
  • Grade Seven

34
Grade Seven
  • English, Math, Social Studies, Science and new
    enrichment period are 66
  • Core classes increase from four to five
  • A and B days remain for encore subjects
  • AVID and technology instruction for all faculty
    members

35
Grade Seven
36
Grade Seven
  • Students may begin
  • High school World Language sequence
  • High school Math sequence

37
Grade Seven Summary
  • English, Math, Social Studies, and Science
    classes are now all 66
  • World Language or RtI or Family Consumer
    Science becomes a fifth core subject and is also
    taken for 66
  • Lunch remains at 30
  • The additional 60 per day alternates between
    Wellness a choice of Visual and Performing Arts
    electives

38
Our Recommendations
  • Grade Eight

39
Grade Eight
  • Five core subjects continue
  • Wellness continues
  • Arts electives continue
  • AVID and technology instructional strategies for
    all faculty members

40
Grade Eight
41
Grade Eight Summary
  • The seventh and eighth grade programs are
    identical
  • Technology Education replaces Family and Consumer
    Sciences as one of the elective options

42
Time for
  • Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com