Cognitive Linguistics Croft - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Cognitive Linguistics Croft

Description:

A: It is the presence of various meanings associated with a single linguistic unit. ... construal of a word on different occasions of its use'; 'the process of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: unc
Learn more at: http://www.unc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cognitive Linguistics Croft


1
Cognitive Linguistics CroftCruse
  • 5 Polysemy the construal of sense boundaries,
    pt. 1

2
5.1 Introduction
  • Q What is polysemy?

3
5.1 Introduction
  • Q What is polysemy?
  • A It is the presence of various meanings
    associated with a single linguistic unit. It is
    manifested as variation in the construal of a
    word on different occasions of its use the
    process of isolating a portion of meaning
    potential

4
5.2.1 Homonymy and polysemy
  • Q What is the difference between homonymy and
    polysemy?

5
5.2.1 Homonymy and polysemy
  • Q What is the difference between homonymy and
    polysemy?
  • Homonymy is when two words are (etymologically)
    distinct, but sound the same due to historical
    accident
  • Polysemy is when one word has multiple meanings
    (and supposedly only one etymological antecedent)

6
5.2.1 Homonymy and polysemy
? vs. ?
  • But is it so cut-and-dry? Consider flour vs.
    flower. They have one etymological source
    (meaning best part). Do you want to call this
    polysemy? Or Czech prepositions s off of vs. z
    from etymologically distinct, but now
    semantically identical Do you want to call that
    homonymy?

7
5.2.2 Entrenchment
  • Dictionaries tend to present only the most
    entrenched meanings

8
5.2.3 Boundary effects
  • Note that there can be some autonomy of senses
    within ambiguity.

9
5.2.3.1 Antagonism attentional autonomy
  • If one sense excludes the other, the senses are
    in a relationship of antagonism

10
5.2.3.2 Relational autonomy
  • Basically, what CC are saying here is that
    sometimes some of the submeanings are related to
    each other rather than being fully autonomous. So
    old vs. new is not fully autonomous from old vs.
    young.

11
Hyperonyms and meronyms
  • Q What are they?

12
Hyperonyms, hyponyms, and meronyms
  • Q What are they?
  • Hyperonym a superordinate category that subsumes
    items in lower categories. For example, furniture
    subsumes chairs, sofas, tables, etc.
  • Hyponym a subordinate category, that names more
    specific items. For example beanbag chair,
    barstool, lounger in relation to chair.
  • Meronym a word that names a part of a larger
    whole leg, seat, back, upholstery, cushion, etc.
    are meronyms of chair.

13
5.2.3.3 Compositional autonomy
  • Here the issue is what sense is selected by the
    construction a word is in. For example, an
    adjective might select for only one of the
    meanings of a polysemous noun, as in steep bank.

14
5.2.4 The nature of full sense units
  • Q Why are full sense units antagonistic?

15
5.2.4 The nature of full sense units
  • Q Why are full sense units antagonistic?
  • A They often have few components in common and
    belong to different domains. They also resist
    unification (one cannot be subsumed by the other,
    nor can they both be members of the same
    category). But they can be quite close, as in
    month, which can designate either 4 weeks or a
    calendar month.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com