Modeling Sand Ripple Evolution Under Wave Boundary Layers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling Sand Ripple Evolution Under Wave Boundary Layers

Description:

Office of Naval Research and the Sand Ripple DRI project ... Engineering Education and the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:130
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: Alli223
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling Sand Ripple Evolution Under Wave Boundary Layers


1
Modeling Sand Ripple Evolution Under Wave
Boundary Layers
Allison M. PenkoUniversity of Florida
2
Acknowledgements
  • Office of Naval Research and the Sand Ripple DRI
    project
  • American Society of Engineering Education and the
    National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate
    Research Fellowship
  • Dr. Don Slinn, Dr. Tian-Jian Hsu, and Dr. Dan
    Hanes
  • Fellow grad students
  • Family and friends

3
Motivation
  • Sand ripples significantly affect the dynamics of
    the nearshore
  • acoustic properties
  • of seabed
  • sediment transport
  • beach erosion
  • scour
  • bottom friction
  • near-bed turbulence
  • BBL flow

4
Objective
  • Adapt 3D Sheet Flow Mixture model (Slinn 2006)
  • Demonstrate the model can produce and maintain
    ripples
  • Compare model results with lab data
  • Determine applicability of the model
  • Show the effect of suspended/bed load transport
    on ripple growth/decay

5
Mixture Approach
Separate Species Sand Particles Water
Mixture Theory Sand Water Combination
Sand-Water Mixture
Water
Viscosity f(C) Density f(C)
time
6
Comparing Approaches
7
Mixture Density
  • mixture
  • density
  • ?s sand density
  • 2.65 g/cm3
  • ?f water density
  • 1.0 g/cm3
  • C volumetric
  • concentration
  • of sand

8
Mixture Viscosity
  • mixture
  • viscosity
  • ?f water
  • viscosity
  • 0.0131 g/cm/s
  • Cp maximum
  • packing
  • concentration

9
Governing Equations - Sediment
Sediment Continuity
advection
diffusion
settling
10
Governing Equations - Mixture
Mixture Momentum
where
11
Governing Equations - Mixture
Mixture Continuity
12
Particle Pressure
  • Normal force between sand grains
  • Represented with a bed stiffness coefficient

13
Bed Stiffness Coefficient
  • Acts as a particle pressure at high concentration
  • Opposes resultant forces
  • Rigidity Function
  • Forces ? Cn
  • umix ? 0

14
Solution Strategy
  • Discretization Method
  • Control volume approach on a staggered grid
  • One-sided differences
  • Time advancement Methods
  • Third-order Adams-Bashforth
  • Pressure solver
  • Projection method

15
Solution Strategy
Staggered Grid
16
Initial and Boundary Conditions
  • Boundary Conditions
  • x- and y-Directions periodic
  • z-direction

Initial Conditions C f(x,y,z) ui 0
Bottom
Top
17
Steady-State Ripples (Nielsen, 1981)
  • Ripple Height
  • Ripple Length

where
18
Flow Simulation Parameters
19
Model Simulations
Oscillatory Flow
Example of Initial Bed State
d50 0.4 mm
Quasi-two-dimensional
20
Ripple Amplitude Simulations
Initial Bed States (1) sinusoidal ripple with
varying heightsDomain Size 12 cm x 8
cm Flow Parameters Uo 40 cm/s T 2 s
21
Growing ripple ?o 1 cm
Slightly decaying ripple ?o 2 cm
Rapidly decaying ripple ?o 3 cm
22
Ripple Height Evolution
23
Ripple Shape
Growing ripple
Rapidly decaying ripple
Slightly decaying ripple
24
Bed and Suspended load fluxes
Growing ripple
Rapidly decaying ripple
Slightly decaying ripple
25
Sediment fluxes
Growing ripple
Rapidly decaying ripple
Slightly decaying ripple
26
Horizontally- and time-averaged sediment
fluxes
Growing ripple
Rapidly decaying ripple
Slightly decaying ripple
27
Ripple Height Simulation Results
28
Ripple Amplitude Flow Velocity Simulations
Initial Bed States (1) sinusoidal ripple with
similar heights and varying maximum
free-stream velocitiesDomain Size from 8-16
cm x 8-16 cm Flow Parameters Uo 20-120
cm/s T 2-4 s
29
Low energy ?o 2.2 cm Uo20 cm/s
T2 s
Mid energy ?o 1.6 cm Uo60 cm/s
T2 s
High energy ?o 1.6 cm Uo120 cm/s
T4 s
30
Ripple Height Evolution
31
Ripple Amplitude Flow Velocity Simulation Results
32
Two-Ripple Wavelength Simulations
Initial Bed States A double-crested ripple and
(2) sinusoidal ripples Domain Size 12 cm x
8 cm Flow Parameters Uo 40 cm/s T 2 s
33
Double-crested ripple ?o 1.4
cm
Two ripples ?o 1.6 cm
34
Ripple Height Evolution
35
Two-Ripple Wavelength Simulation Results
36
One- and Three-Ripple Wavelength Simulations
Initial Bed States (1) and (3) sinusoidal
ripples Domain Size 24 cm x 8 cm Flow
Parameters Uo 40 cm/s T 2 s
37
One- ripple ?o 0.8 cm ?o 12 cm
38
Three- ripple ?o 0.8 cm ?o 12 cm
39
Ripple Height Evolution
40
One- and Three-Ripple Wavelength Simulation
Results
41
Flatbed Simulation
Initial Bed State Flat bed with small
perturbation Domain Size 8 cm x 4 cm Flow
Parameters Uo 20 cm/s T 1 s
42
(No Transcript)
43
Ripple Height Evolution
Flatbed
44
Flatbed Simulation Results
45
Bed and Suspended load fluxes
Instantaneous Load Fluxes
Cumulative Load Fluxes
46
Three-Dimensional Simulation
Initial Bed State (1) 2 cm sinusoidal ripple
Domain Size 12 cm x 6 cm x 8 cm Flow
Parameters Uo 40 cm/s T 2 s
47
(No Transcript)
48
Ripple Height Evolution
Three-dimensional ripple
49
Three-Dimensional Simulation Results
50
Ripple Height SimulationSummary
51
Ripple Length Simulation Summary
52
Conclusions Model Applicability
  • Basic modeling approach is capable of producing
    realistic ripple behavior and features
  • 2-D 3-D simulations produce different bed
    responses
  • Computational time needs to be decreased

53
Conclusions Ripple Shape
  • Transitions from sinusoidal ripple to more
    peaked, steeper ripple shape
  • Ripple height comes within 75 of predicted
    height for two-dimensional cases reaching a
    steady-state
  • Ripple length comes within 99 of predicted
    length for cases reaching a steady-state
  • Model shows a trend towards equilibrium when the
    ripple is not initialized near the equilibrium
    height or length

54
Conclusions Ripple Shape
  • Steady-state ripple shape, amplitude, and
    wavelength are independent of initial ripple
    state
  • Ripples forming on a flat bed have wavelengths
    about half as long as in equilibrium
  • Running the simulations until ripples are in a
    steady-state is necessary for further model
    investigations

55
Conclusions Ripple Morphology
  • Predicts a steady-state
  • Bed load transport dominant mechanism in ripple
    growth and decay
  • Suspended sediment is considerable in in higher
    energy simulations but does not necessarily cause
    ripple growth or decay
  • Advective fluxes are the significant mechanism
    driving sediment
  • Model has the potential to advance the present
    knowledge of coastal sediment transport and
    morphology

56
Thank you for your time!Questions?
57
Future Work
  • Compare concentration and velocity fields with
    lab data
  • Ripple fields
  • Add mean current
  • Parallelize code
  • Scour around objects

58
Bed and Suspended Load Definition
  • Bed Material Packed bed, no motion
  • Cbed gt 0.57 cm3sed/cm3
  • Bedload Intergranular Forces
  • 4.6 grain diameters thick (above immobile bed)
  • Suspended load Fluid Drag
  • gt 4.6 grain diameters above stable bed
  • Threshold debatable but reasonably chosen
  • Previous research
  • Visual inspection of model output

59
(No Transcript)
60
Flux Calculations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com