FY02 RDT

1

FY 2006 Presidents Budget Request for
the Defense ST Program
Mr. Robert W. Baker April 19, 2005 Deputy
Director, Plans Programs, ODDRE
2
DDRE Priorities for CY 2005

• Support Global War on Terrorism
• Support Transformation
• Comprehensive ST Review and Integrated DoD ST
  Investment
• National Aerospace Initiative, Energy and Power
  Technologies, Surveillance and Knowledge Systems
• Enhance Technology Transition
• Enhance National Security SE Workforce
• Expand Outreach to Combatant Commands
  Intelligence Community

3
Changing Security Environment - Four Challenges -

• Irregular
• Unconventional methods adopted by non-state and
  state actors to counter stronger state opponents.
• (e.g., terrorism, insurgency, civil war, and
  emerging concepts)

• Catastrophic
• Acquisition, possession, and use of WMD or
  methods producing WMD-like effects against
  vulnerable, high-profile targets by terrorists
  and rogue states.
• (e.g., homeland missile attack, proliferation
  from a state to a non-state actor, devastating
  WMD attack on ally)

Higher

VULNERABILITY
Lower
Higher

• Disruptive
• International competitors developing and
  possessing breakthrough technological
  capabilities intended to supplant U.S. advantages
  in particular operational domains.
• (e.g., sensors, information, bio or cyber war,
  ultra miniaturization, space, directed-energy,
  etc)

• Traditional
• Military capabilities and military forces in
  long-established, well-known forms of military
  competition and conflict.
• (e.g., conventional air, sea, land forces, and
  nuclear forces of established nuclear powers)

Lower
LIKELIHOOD
Uncertainty is the defining characteristic of
todays strategic environment
4
Shift to Transformational Technologies-Investme
nt Priority Changes from PBR05 to PBR06-

• Irregular
• IED Mitigation Technology
• Non-Lethal Weapons
• Chem Bio Defense

• Catastrophic
• Laser / Directed Energy
• Detection / Protection against WMD
• Network Defense

Higher
VULNERABILITY
Lower
Higher

• Disruptive
• Hypersonic scramjet
• Fuel Cells / Energy and Power
• Nanotechnology
• Net Centric Warfare
• Autonomous Systems

Traditional
Lower
LIKELIHOOD
5
FY06 RDTE Budget Request
(B)
FY06 RDTE request 69.36B (Budget Activities
1-7)
BA7 Operational Systems Development
(21.16B)
(BA6 BA7 24.93B)
BA6 RDTE Management Support (3.77B)
BA5 System Development Demonstration
(19.75B)
Development (BA4 BA5 33.89B)
BA4 Advanced Component Development
Prototypes (14.14B)
Science and Technology (BA1 BA2 BA3 10.52B)
BA3 Advanced Technology Development (5.06B)
15 of RDTE
BA2 Applied Research (4.14B)
BA1 Basic Research (1.32B)
6
PBR06 Top 10 Investment Programs- RDTE
Procurement -
UNCLAS / FOUO
CVN-21
F/A-18E/F
V-22
C-17A
DD(X) Destroyer
F/A-22
SSN-774
FCS
JSF
BMDS
FY06-11 Cumulative Total 231B Approximately
23 of total Investment consumed by Top 10
Programs
UNCLAS / FOUO
7
FY06 DoD ST Budget Request
Total FY06ST request 10.52B
Billions
8
FY06 Presidents Budget Request
9
DoD ST Budget Request -FY06 vs. FY02-
Total FY06 ST request 10.5B Total FY02 ST
request 7.8B
Then Year Billions
10
Technology InvestmentCompared to Other DoD
Categories
The DoD Doesnt Fix Today's Problem by
Reducing ST
Today
Next Force
FY 2006 Budget Request (B)
Force After Next
Navy/USMC
Army
AF
DW
Future
Modernization
Readiness
11
FY06 DoD ST Budget Facts

• DoD FY06 ST Request is 10.522B roughly
  equivalent to PBR05 of 10.550B (in then year
  dollars)
• Adjusted for inflation (2.0), down about 240M
  from PBR05
• Services account for ST 52.2 of total DoD ST
  request
• FY05 DoD ST appropriation was 13.057B
• ST is 2.51 of the total Defense Budget Request
  (compared to 2.62 in FY05)

12
FY06 ST Budget Highlights

• New Initiatives
• NDEP (PE 0601120D8Z) 10M to build US citizen
  science, math and engineering workforce 160M
  over FYDP
• TRANSCOM ST Funding (PE 0603713S) 10M for
  quick-turn projects to enhance distribution and
  transportation systems 25M in FY06-07
• JCTDs (PEs 0603648D8Z, 0604648D8Z, 0605648D8Z,
  0902198D8Z) Restructured ACTD process and
  realigned funding to enhance technology
  transition 40M inFY06, 240M over FYDP
• Defense Acquisition Challenge (PE 0604051D8Z)
  Realigned to new PE under BA 5 29M in FY06

13
FY06 ST Budget Highlights (Contd)

• Increased funding for
• Quick Reaction Special Projects, Rapid
  Reaction/New Solutions for GWOT (50M)
• Chem Bio defense (166M in BAs 1-3)
• Hypersonics (35M to Navy and Air Force in BA 3)
• Joint Experimentation (23M)
• Moved J-UCAS from DARPA to Air Force to enhance
  transition opportunities - 78M remains in
  Advanced Technology Development

14
DoD STMacro Scale-In FY06 Constant Dollars-
Appropriations
Presidents Budget Request (FY06)
In FY03, includes 203M allocated to Def
Emergency Response Fund ST in a separate DoD
transfer account
15
DoD ST Programs as Percentage of ST Budget
FY05 PBR 12.7 Basic Research 36.4 Applied 50.9
Advanced

48.1
39.3
12.5
16
Integrated Annual Defense STPlanning Process
Quadrennial Defense Review
Joint Operations Concepts
Budget POM

T A R A R E V I E W
Defense ST Strategy
404 Defense Technology Objectives (DTOs)
Basic Research Plan
Joint Warfighting ST Plan
Defense Technology Area Plan
Service/Agency ST Plans
17
ST Strategy and Plans

• Defense Science and Technology Strategy and Plans
• Defense ST Strategy (Being Updated)
• Basic Research Plan (6.1) - BRP -(Biennial)
• Defense Technology Area Plan (6.2, 6.3) - DTAP -
  (Biennial)
• Joint Warfighting Science and Technology Plan -
  JWSTP (Annual)
• Defense Technology Objectives (DTO) Volume that
  supports JWSTP and DTAP (Annual)

18
Basic Research Plan (BRP)

• BRP-- A strategic plan to link longer term
  research to broad, revolutionary warfighter
  capabilities

• Basic Research Areas
• Physics
• Chemistry
• Mathematics and Computer Science
• Electronics
• Materials Science
• Mechanics
• Terrestrial and Ocean Sciences
• Atmospheric and Space Sciences
• Biological Sciences
• Cognitive and Neural Science

A Strategic plan guiding new technology
development built around Basic Research Areas
19
Defense Technology Area Plan (DTAP)

• DTAP -- A detailed plan focusing DoD science on
  militarily significant technologies in specific
  functional areas

JSF
Example DTO AP.08 Fighter/Attack Propulsion
F-22
An agreement between the ST Community and
Acquisition Customers
20
Defense Technology Area Plan

• Twelve technology focus areas in February 2005
  edition
• Provides a horizontal perspective across Service
  and Defense Agency efforts, thereby charting
  total DoD investment for a given technology area

• Air Platforms
• Chemical-Biological Defense
• Nuclear Technology
• Information Systems
• Materials Processes
• Weapons

• BioMedical
• Battlespace Environments
• Sensors, Electronics and Electronic Warfare
• Space Platforms
• Human Systems
• Ground Sea Vehicles

21
FY06 Defense Technology Areas
in Thousands
22
Joint Warfighting ST Plan (JWSTP)
JWSTP-- Focus to blend emerging technology into
warfighter needs
An agreement between Joint Warfighters and ST
Community
Required annually by Congress on 1 March a plan
for ensuring that the science and technology
program of the Department of Defense supports
the development of future joint warfighting
capabilities identified as priority requirements

23
Joint Functional Concepts
BATTLESPACE AWARENESS Collect and analyze
battlespace information COMMAND AND
CONTROL Develop alternatives and disseminate
orders FORCE APPLICATION Cause effects on the
enemy PROTECTION Prevent an enemys effect on
us FOCUSED LOGISTICS Sustain and support the
force NET-CENTRIC ENVIRONMENT Networks all
elements of the force JOINT TRAINING Training
based on joint doctrine, techniques, and
procedures
24
Feb. 2005 JWSTP DTO Funding
Joint Functional Concepts
Total FY06 DTO Investment 666.7M
Joint Training
Net-Centric
Focused Logistics
Protection
Force Application
Command Control
Battlespace Awareness
FY06 Funding ( in millions)
25
Research and Engineering Goals

• Signed in Feb 2005, the goals define higher
  priority items in three broad areas
• Process goals
• Technical capability goals
• Enabling technology goals
• Each goal can be decomposed to lower order
  objectives with metrics
• Basis for Comprehensive ST Review
• Two year cycle that is consistent with PPBE
  process
• Odd years review consists of Investment Strategy
  Review and Assessment conducted by ODUSD(ST)
• Even years review consists of Technology Area
  Review and Assessments conducted by TARA teams

26
Research and Engineering Goals-Process Goals-

• Focus on Transitioning Military Relevant
  Technology
• Support the Education of More Scientists and
  Engineers in Technical Disciplines Critical to
  the DoD
• Sustain an Investment in University Research
• Increase Emphasis on Near-term (under 2 years)
  Technologies and Far-term (gt15 years)
  Technologies
• Archive and Reuse Information from the Global RE
  Community
• Support Investment in Irregular, Catastrophic,
  and Disruptive Technology Development
• Improve Affordability Through Systems
  Engineering, DTE, Process and Manufacturing
  Technology Enhancements

27
Research and Engineering Goals-Technology
Capability Goals-

• Cross Cutting Initiatives
• National Aerospace Initiative
• Energy and power technologies
• Surveillance and knowledge systems
• Protection
• Detect, identify, track and mitigate WMD
• Extend the safe zones around bases and critical
  infrastructure with range of lethality
• Provide effective cruise and ballistic missile
  defense
• Situation Awareness
• Provide robust, reliable, survivable, and secure
  multi-level networks
• Increase capability to find, fix, track and
  identify friendly and enemy forces
• Strike
• Support fielding of alternative strike weapons
  (high speed)
• Force Sustainment
• Reduce logistics or manpower demands
• Enable rapid force projection and deployment
• Other
• Reduce time and cost for space launch
• Enhance realism, effectiveness, and accessibility
  of training

28
Research and Engineering Goals-Enabling
Technology Goals-

• Nanotechnology
• Biotechnology
• Unmanned and Autonomous Systems
• Quantum Communications/Computing Technology
• Networked Systems
• Advanced Materials
• Intellectual Capital (Workforce)
• DoD RE Infrastructure
• Modeling, Simulation, Computation, and Software
  for Complex Systems

29
Quick Reaction Special Projects (QRSP)

• Technology Transition Initiative For DoD ST
  Community
• - Establishes a Technology Transition Council
• - Jump starts selected components/subsystems
  into systems
• - Bridges the Valley of Death
• Quick Reaction Fund
• - Provides flexibility to respond to emergent
  DoD needs within budget cycle
• - Takes advantage of technology breakthroughs in
  rapidly evolving technologies
• Completion of projects within a 6-12 month period
• Rapid Reaction Fund
• Develops, procures, tests, and fields critical
  force protection needs in Iraq
• Enhances force protection to counter Improved
  Explosive Devices (IEDs)

30
QRSP Funding Profile (PE 0603826D8Z)
31
Summary

• DoD ST budget remains a good news story
• Budget requests up about 35 (then year dollars)
  under current Administration
• DoD ST program is addressing new security
  challenges
• ST Enterprise has reacted quickly to the Global
  War on Terrorism
• Plan in place for enhancing SE workforce (NDEP)

32
Back-Up Charts
33
DoD Cross-Cutting Initiatives

• National Aerospace Initiative
• Energy and Power Technologies
• Surveillance and Knowledge Systems

34
National Aerospace Initiative
Space Technology

• Microsats
• Multifunctional Sats.

Access To Space

• 2 Stage-to-Orbit
• 1st Stage Air Breathing
• 2nd Stage Rocket
• Single Stage-to-Orbit

Hypersonics

• Suborbital Vehicles
• Strategic Strike
• Fast Transport
• Time Critical Targets

35
Total NAI Investment Portfolio, PB-06 (M)
FY 11
FY 10
FY 09
FY 08
FY 07
FY 06
FY 05
Service/Agency
924
858
775
666
626
Air Force
1,025
1,001
90
80
69
75
96
Navy
73
90
40
44
38
31
50
Army
42
41
297
282
308
288
285
DARPA
321
316
1,352
1,264
1,190
1,060
1,057
TOTAL
1,461
1,448
36
Energy and Power Technologies
More Electric Aircraft
Space Based Radar
Electric Warship
Electric Warship
Power Needs
High Power Microwave
FY02 FY12
Warrior
Hybrid/Electric Combat Vehicle
New Operational Capabilities
Electric/Hybrid Weapons
37
Total EPTI Investment Portfolio, PB-06 (M)
FY 11
FY 10
FY 09
FY 08
FY 07
FY 06
FY 05
Service/Agency
35
32
31
29
27
Air Force
36
36
64
66
57
40
51
Navy
65
65
98
112
115
112
75
Army
103
103
0
0
80
79
75
DARPA
0
0
197
210
283
260
228
TOTAL
204
204
38
Surveillance Knowledge Systems

• High Bandwidth Communications / Information
  Assurance
• Sensors and Unmanned vehicles (Robotics,
  UAVs, etc.)
• Information / Knowledge Management Systems
• Cyber Warfare

39
Total SKS Investment Portfolio, PB-06 (M)
FY 11
FY 10
FY 09
FY 08
FY 07
FY 06
FY 05
Service/Agency
181
174
181
161
158
Air Force
181
181
103
82
117
118
181
Navy
129
105
96
101
119
117
92
Army
106
105
590
570
515
551
494
DARPA
603
598
971
927
932
947
925
TOTAL
1019
989