Internet Engineering Course - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Internet Engineering Course

Description:

Incredibly confused directory structure and its adverse impact on system recovery ... responds in a reasonably timely fashion to reported and serious security ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: ZhiLi7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Internet Engineering Course


1
Internet Engineering Course
  • OS Selection

2
Servers vs. Desktop Systems
  • Servers
  • Should not contain functionality not required for
    the intended function
  • Minimal service set
  • Dont install anything unless you really need it
  • Avoid unnecessary exposure to new risks
  • Faster with redundant components
  • Increased reliability
  • Has more of everything
  • Much more customizable
  • To perform specific tasks and optimizing them to
    do so
  • Administration and maintenance requires special
    training
  • Security, Reliability, Stability and are highly
    critical
  • Standardizing on a single OS for all purposes is
    not a goal!

3
Operating Systems we will study
  • Mainly
  • Microsoft Windows Server family
  • Linux
  • Somewhat
  • OpenBSD from BSD family
  • There are many others that we do not study here
  • Other variants of UNIX
  • Solaris, HP/UX, AIX
  • Other variants in BSD category FreeBSD, NetBSD,
  • Other variants in GNU category GNU/Hurd,
    GNU/Mach,
  • And so many other OSs out there

4
Evaluation criteria
  • Applications
  • Stability and Reliability
  • Security
  • Scalability
  • Usability
  • Staff Issues
  • Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

5
Applications
  • OS must support the application you will run!
  • e.g. Exchange Server ? OS Windows
  • A constraint for choosing OS
  • If needs are identified but no specific product
  • Look for the product and OS that supports it side
    by side
  • You are not limited to some specific OSs.
  • Will not result in an OS that is difficult to
    support or costly.
  • Less diversity in OSs is desirable (standardizing
    server OSs)
  • For selecting OS
  • Look at what is generally available on the
    platform.
  • What is included in the OS by default?

6
Applications cont.
  • Supplementary applications
  • Intended to supplement a function of OS
  • Resource Kit/Support Tools for Microsoft Windows
  • Unix tools for windows
  • Native OS completeness
  • There are no functions that an administrator
    (skilled in Perl/shell scripting) cannot do in
    UNIX systems
  • Windows administrators have difficulty doing
    management tasks without third party or
    supplementary utilities
  • OS vendor is not supposed to support third party
    utilities and the side effects they may have!

7
Applications cont.
  • Niche Area Support
  • Greater diversity of applications available on
    Windows
  • Windows is great from this point of view
  • Diversity in Windows and Linux family
  • Specific products may not run across the entire
    family
  • Enough high quality server products for Linux
  • Newer system now necessarily backward compatibe
  • OpenBSD
  • A lot less third party products than either
    Windows or Linux
  • Includes compatibility modes with several OSs
  • It should not be used extensively (e.g. Many
    Linux applications ? OS should be Linux)

8
Applications cont.
  • Application Integration
  • Difference between integrated and integrable!
  • Features of Microsoft products works better
    with/only with Microsoft products!
  • Usage of one Microsoft product will lead to use
    of other Microsoft products
  • Less tension to be compliant with other products.
  • Their implementations are not fully compliant
    with standards and therefore other
    implementations.
  • Other products should try to be integrable!
  • Application support
  • Windows is the best, Linux is second and OpenBSD
    is third.

9
Applications cont.
  • Market Products
  • Small vendors cannot afford to support various
    OSs
  • They are pulled towards Windows Server family
  • Cause Growth of various Windows based market
    applications
  • Windows NT started with a target bellow the
    high-end commercial UNIX systems
  • Enhancements in each release ? Higher performance
    market
  • Reducing costs of an application
  • Major advantage for small businesses
  • Linux entering the server market
  • Linux will be a more obvious choice for small
    businesses.

10
Applications cont.
  • Included With Core OS
  • Windows
  • File and print services, DNS, DHCP, IIS, FTP and
    other additional components
  • Linux and OpenBSD
  • Includes much more standard Internet servers
  • Even support for Microsoft file and print sharing
  • As open source operating systems are free, one
    might say that any free software that runs on the
    OS is part of it.

11
Applications cont.
  • open source Applications
  • Majority of these projects have been developed on
    Linux
  • Unless they are platform neutral, theyll run on
    Linux with less effort than any other OS
  • Microsoft repeatedly made system design decisions
    that
  • Make little or no technical sense, but make
    excellent business sense, i.e. they make it more
    difficult and expensive for a developer to port a
    Windows application to other OSs.
  • open source is by no means a UNIX only phenomena,
    but
  • Most open source development has been done on
    UNIX systems
  • With the UNIX like open source operating systems,
    Linux and BSD family, playing the leading roles

12
Applications cont.
  • open source Applications
  • Some open source applications (visit
    www.sourceforge.net)
  • Apache
  • BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain)
  • DHCPd (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol )
  • PHP, Perl, Python
  • Web traffic analysis packages like Webalizer,
    Analog
  • MySQL, PostgreSQL
  • Snort, PF, IP Filters, GuardDog
  • NTP
  • vsFTPd
  • OpenOffice (replacement for Microsoft Office
    Suite)
  • GIMP (replacement for Adobe Photoshop)

13
Applications cont.
  • OS Versions and Fragmentation
  • Every several years, Microsoft introduces a
    fundamentally different operating environment or
    system with major changes in the UI.
  • Windows is designed to hide technical details,
    but these changes introduces a major learning
    curve!
  • Technical users may effectively loose a
    significant part of their knowledge of how
    Windows works and need start over with the new
    system
  • These differences are mostly seamless from one
    version of UNIX to another

14
Applications (Summary)
  • There are many more applications for Windows
  • Not all needed functionalities are included in
    the OS
  • Enough products available for the cost of the OS
    that some businesses can run mostly on open
    source solutions
  • As Linux is eating into Windows server market
    share, expect the application advantage for
    Windows servers to shrink and perhaps disappear.
  • Maintaining an application for Linux and other
    UNIX variants is minor compared to Windows.

15
Reliability and Stability
  • Both are related to bugs.
  • Stability
  • Relative resistance to crashes and lessening
    their affects
  • Bugs and incompatibilities may cause crashes
  • Reliability
  • Specific functions stop responding or return
    invalid results
  • Odd behavior!
  • Availability
  • Affected by thing related to reliability and
    stability
  • To do and keep doing what they are supposed to do

16
Reliability and Stability cont.
  • Reboot required even for minor changes
  • Microsofts origins in single user systems
  • Is not a part of UNIX or mainframe environments
  • Some systems become less stable for longer
    uptimes
  • Rarely necessary for UNIX systems
  • Windows flaws in architectural design
  • Windows registry
  • Incredibly confused directory structure and its
    adverse impact on system recovery
  • System management functions contained in large
    complex GUI programs mostly with no command-line
    counterparts

17
Reliability and Stability cont.
  • Windows registry
  • Central repository for configuration data and
  • The fallacy is that registry data is accessed by
    key name.
  • Little fundamental difference between accessing
    entries in registry and files in different
    directories with different filenames
  • Numerous binary tree lookups, in a large deeply
    nested structure, become quite resource intensive
  • Confirmed by the fact that Windows systems slow
    with age as software is added
  • UNIX systems do not slow with age due to software
    installs.

18
Reliability and Stability cont.
  • Windows GUI Interface Hampers Administrators
  • Complex GUIs contributes to reliability issues
  • Such programs are harder to write and more likely
    to have their own bugs
  • Often, no alternative interface is provided
  • Bug in management interface will result in
    inability to perform some administrative tasks
  • In the UNIX world, essentially all administrative
    tasks are performed by relatively simple command
    line programs that do only one specific thing.

19
Reliability and Stability cont.
  • Linux Stability
  • There is no need to ever reboot except for a
    kernel or hardware upgrade or change.
  • Registry problem is not applicable to Linux
  • OpenBSD
  • Said to be the most stable and most reliable OS
  • Clean code base
  • Development model

20
Security
  • File Systems
  • FAT lacks primary permissions and security
    facilities needed for a server environment.
  • UNIX allows controls only by owner, group and
    other. Each of these can be set to any
    combination of read, write and execute.
  • chmod
  • NTFS is much more customizable and provides
    flexible access control list capabilities.
  • Windows GUI, xcacls (Extended Change Access
    Control List ) provided in Windows Support Tools

21
Security cont.
  • Password Hashes
  • Windows passwords are weaker and easier to break.
  • LANMAN hash
  • BSD MD5 is one of the strongest hashes
  • Novice administrators really dont know what they
    are doing! Making things easy is not that good!
  • Default Installations
  • Previously default installation of Windows Server
    and related network services made it much more
    easier to attack and exposed the system to many
    risks.
  • Unix default installation has basic security
    provisions.
  • You have to enable anything you want.

22
Security cont.
  • Development Model, Bug Fixes, Security and
    Reliability
  • Linux
  • The kernel appears to be under pretty much
    continuous development and more than one version
    is being developed simultaneously.
  • Development is a purely volunteer, non-commercial
    activity.
  • Windows
  • Microsoft is the largest software company in the
    world and is purely commercial.
  • Microsoft responds in a reasonably timely fashion
    to reported and serious security bugs. It's
    primarily such bugs that their security alerts
    describe.

23
Security cont.
  • OpenBSD
  • OpenBSD is the most secure OS available
  • They try to find simple software bugs and they
    believe that they are the origin of security
    issue.
  • Secure by default
  • All non-essential services are disable by default
  • Four years without a remote hole
  • Outstanding open implementation of security
    standards.
  • Unix Signal Handler and Open Software Fixes
  • Fix was available the day after the problem was
    announced publicly!

24
Scalability
  • Meanings
  • How many processors/How much memory in a single
    machine, an operating system is capable of
    supporting.
  • Cluster of machines that work together to solve a
    common problem.
  • Recent projects of this type have consisted of
    hundreds to thousands of Intel CPUs running
    Linux.
  • System Performance
  • Confusing benchmarks about performance.
  • No general statement on this issue.

25
Scalability cont.
  • Hardware Requirements
  • Windows has GUI in its kernel
  • It need reasonably high hardware specifications.
  • Most Linux servers installations do not have
    X-Windowing System.
  • Hardware specifications of Linux is much smaller
    than Windows.
  • Price Performance Ratio
  • The starting software cost for a public, Windows
    2000 web server, is effectively over 4000.
  • There exists free Linux distributions and also
    commercial ones which costs much less than
    Windows servers

26
Usability
  • Ease of Use, Ease of Learning
  • Ease of use often regarded as one of the most
    important characteristics of any software
    product.
  • Ease of learning is not often used.
  • Ease of use is nearly always used to mean that a
    product is easy to learn to use.
  • Normally means how easily a user new to a product
    can figure out how to perform a specificaction.
  • Documentation, architecture, support, training
    and design
  • GUI tools
  • May also make system administration tasks easy to
    learn.
  • May make repetitive task very burdensome
  • Such tasks can make use of a system scheduler.

27
Usability cont.
  • Windows Lacks Automation
  • Automating the task in Linux by scripts
  • In Windows also possible but is very cumbersome
    in comparison with Linux
  • Automating the procedures that has no counterpart
    other than GUI interface should be done with e.g.
    emulating mouse events or scripting utilities
    like AutoIt that does somehow ease this job!
    (Surely not reliable)
  • Easy to use Windows tools, become cumbersome to
    use as the tasks become more repetitive.
  • There are no scripting skills that are routine
    part of Windows administration
  • Even batch programming skills, as simple (and
    limited) as that "language" is, have largely
    fallen into disuse.

28
Usability cont.
  • Most Windows administrators are entirely
    dependent on the GUI management interface, and
    even where it should be obvious that something
    should be automated, do not have the knowledge or
    skills to do it.
  • UNIX administrators, in contrast, are normally
    skilled in at least one scripting language, and
    routinely expect to automate repetitive parts of
    their jobs.
  • Windows server systems have a pro novice bias and
    that UNIX systems have an anti-novice bias.

29
Usability cont.
  • Support Options
  • Windows
  • Microsoft Knowledge Base, Customer Support,
    Consultants
  • Most of the things are solved easily if you have
    employed a guru consultant. The really good ones
    can solve seemingly very difficult problems, with
    ease
  • Gurus are expensive to employ and cheap ones
    learn on your job.
  • Linux
  • Community Support, Commercial Support (e.g.
    RHEL), Gurus
  • After gaining mastery and enough experience you
    are relaxed.
  • It does not hide anything from you, so you can
    come up with the solution.
  • Google your problem and there should be a
    discussion about it in a community

30
Staff Issues
  • UNIX administrators cost more than Windows ones.
  • Main factor Cost per machine
  • From all previous discussions it is resulted that
    maintaining a Linux server needs less effort that
    Windows one.
  • So the staff cost is not a major factor as might
    be considered at first

31
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
  • Microsoft says TCO of Windows is much lower than
    Linux
  • Factors
  • License
  • Support
  • Staff
  • Windows license price
  • How many simultaneous client connections?
  • What server applications?
  • UNIX systems require more up-front learning
    effort.
  • Security, Stability and Reliability
  • Moving to security, Linux is more secure in a
    default install
  • Given normal installs by typically trained
    administrators Windows systems are much less
    stable than Linux installs.

32
Summary
  • No operating system is perfect or even close,
    even when limited to server only or desktop only
    roles.
  • Tradeoff
  • Windows servers
  • With sufficient resources, they can be made
    stable.
  • Because of variety of third party applications ,
    it may be possible to "do more" on Windows
    servers than other platforms.
  • As a particular matter, they rarely live up to
    their promise.
  • Contain enormous array of unused features (may
    not be easy to disable, for instance kernel
    customization).

33
Summary cont.
  • Comparatively unreliable, and thus resource
    intensive to maintain.
  • Given the complexity of Windows, tools and
    middleware used to build the applications, and
    the applications themselves, it's absurd to think
    that all the security related bugs can be found
    and fixed.
  • Only hope that the holes that exist are
    sufficiently difficult and obscure, that no
    skilled malicious intruder actually finds them.
  • Best hardware support among other OSs.

34
Summary cont.
  • Linux
  • The default security characteristics of Linux
    depend on the distribution and install options
    chosen.
  • Linux has been used to build powerful parallel
    supercomputers so it unquestionably clusters well
  • The newest kernels should be comparable to
    Windows on multiprocessor systems.
  • Linux has a very large range of applications,
    both commercial (proprietary) and open source.
  • Linux has by far the largest number of open
    source applications.
  • All business needs can be met by Linux
    applications.
  • Linux has the best and most diverse free support
    available, which is often better than traditional
    commercial support.

35
Choosing a Linux Distribution
  • Some server candidates
  • Commercial
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux
  • SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
  • Mandriva Corporate Server
  • Non-commercial
  • Gentoo
  • Debian
  • Fedora
  • Slackware
  • Arch

36
Choosing a Linux Distribution cont.
  • Differences
  • Base operating system
  • Some customization, e.g. init scripts, kernel
  • Generally binary compatible
  • Software management and updating
  • YUM
  • APT
  • Smart
  • Synaptic
  • Hardware management
  • Kudzu of Red Hat
  • Non-commercial distros never contain proprietary
    drivers.
  • Proprietary extras

37
Choosing a Linux Distribution cont.
  • Support from server manufacturers mainly
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux
  • SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
  • Challenging
  • Gentoo
  • Debian
  • Slackware
  • Arch

38
Choosing a Linux Distribution cont.
  • Red Hat
  • Founded in 1994 by Bob Young and Marc Ewing
  • Leader in development, deployment and Management
    of Linux and open source solutions for Internet
    infrastructure
  • Last version in the Red Hat Linux product line ?
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
  • Replaced by Fedora Core in late 2003, officially
    sponsored by Red Hat
  • Developed with community participation
  • Serves mainly as a testing base for Red Hat
    Enterprise Linux
  • Widely used, excellent community support, lots of
    innovation
  • up2date and YUM as package managers (RPM)
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux products best supported
    by hardware vendors among other Linux
    distributions
  • Very good commercial support

39
Choosing a Linux Distribution cont.
  • SUSE (formerly SuSe)
  • Established by a group of German developers in
    1992
  • Adopted RPM package management format
  • Easy to use YaST configuration tool
  • Frequent releases
  • Excellent documentation
  • Acquired by Novell in late 2003
  • Professional attention to detail

40
Choosing a Linux Distribution cont.
  • Gentoo
  • Created by Daniel Robbins, a former Stampede
    Linux and FreeBSD developer
  • A source-based distribution
  • Various levels of pre-compiled binary packages to
    get a basic Linux system up
  • The idea is to compile all source packages on the
    user's computer
  • Highly optimized for the computer architecture it
    is built on
  • Long and tedious system installation
  • Occasional instability and risk of breakdown
  • Software packages kept in a central repository
  • Usually kept highly up-to-date and available
    within days
  • Painless installation of individual software
    packages
  • Highly up-to-date
  • Superb documentation
  • Distribution tailored to user's needs

41
Choosing a Linux Distribution cont.
  • Debian
  • Started by Ian Murdock in 1993
  • Totally free, completely non-commercial
  • Complete package set (about 16000 packages)
  • Community support
  • Most advanced package manager available
  • APT (DEB)
  • Needs knowledgeable, hands-on user
  • Three release branches
  • Stable
  • Long period between stable releases
  • The stable version tends to be out-dated
  • Testing
  • Unstable

42
References
  • GeodSoft Linux, OpenBSD, Windows Server
    Comparison
  • http//geodsoft.com/opinion/server_comp/
  • Software in Review The differences between
    Linux distributions
  • http//www.softwareinreview.com/cms/content/view/2
    6/1/
  • DistroWatch.com
  • http//distrowatch.com/

43
Miscellaneous
44
Miscellaneous cont.
  • BSD Family
  • OpenBSD was an outgrowth of NetBSD
  • Split later with the goal of creating a reliable
    and secure OS
  • OpenBSD is the most secure OS available
  • NetBSD is known for running on more hardware
    platforms
  • FreeBSD split from NetBSD
  • Developers wanted to optimize the system for
    perfomance on Intel processors
  • Fastest OS that runs on Intel systems
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com