Great Game in Central Asia and Implications for the U.S. Policy Symposia Series: Global Competition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Great Game in Central Asia and Implications for the U.S. Policy Symposia Series: Global Competition

Description:

The Russian Empire won this competition because it had direct land routes to the ... Asia was desirable for the British Empire, but the region was too remote and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:547
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: AhadZ3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Great Game in Central Asia and Implications for the U.S. Policy Symposia Series: Global Competition


1
Great Game in Central Asia and Implications for
the U.S. Policy Symposia Series Global
Competition for Energy Wyoming and the World
  • Ahad Abdurahmonov
  • March 5th, 2009 Sheridan, WY

2
Great Game
  • Rivalry and competition between the British
    Empire and the Russian Empire to colonize Central
    Asia 19th and 20th centuries
  • The Russian Empire won this competition because
    it had direct land routes to the region
  • Controlling Central Asia was desirable for the
    British Empire, but the region was too remote and
    it was difficult and expensive to control the
    area.

3
The New Great Game
  • It is widely speculated that there is a new Great
    Game among world powers over Central Asia
    particularly because it has huge energy
    resources.
  • However
  • The current super-powers of the world are too
    much interconnected and interdependent with each
    other that makes direct competition and rivalry
    unattractive choice
  • The states of Central Asia also have some choices
    and leverages and they are not stationary objects
    to vie for.

4
Central Asias Role in the Global Energy Market
  • Energy resources as strategic commodity and the
    new wealth
  • Oil in Central Asia accounts for 2-3 of the
    worlds known resources
  • Gas in Central Asia accounts for 4-5 of the
    worlds known resources
  • Limited options for alternative routes of export
  • They can play big powers off each other in
    order to pursue their own agendas

5
Map of Central Asia and Russia
6
Major Stakeholders Russia
  • Virtually all of the Central Asian oil and gas
    exports goes to (or through) Russia via
    still-functioning Soviet-era pipeline systems
  • The Russian oil and gas companies have large
    shares in oil and gas reserves of Central Asia
  • The Russian oil and gas companies have big and
    long term energy contracts with their Central
    Asia partners.
  • Due to the common Soviet past, Russia and Central
    Asia share a common transportation and
    communication infrastructure.

7
(No Transcript)
8
Major Stakeholders The European Union
  • The European Union is the largest natural gas
    market in the world that accounts for 46 of the
    worlds total natural gas imports.
  • The EU relies on Russian supply for about 40 of
    its natural gas supply
  • Needs to diversify suppliers in order to create
    competition among them for the EU gas market, but
    not to get rid of the Russian gas, because it is
    impossible to entirely replace the Russian
    supply.
  • Nabucco pipeline project that would bring
    additional sources of natural gas (and oil) from
    the Middle East, North Africa, and Central Asia
    is currently seen as the way of diversification.

9
Nabucco Diversification for the EU
10
Major Stakeholders United States
  • The U.S. itself has about the same amount of
    natural gas 7 bcm (vs. 8.3 bcm)
  • Political and economic feasibility of importing
    oil and gas from Central Asia are low (location,
    difficulty of extraction, transportation, and
    limited amount of resources)
  • Russia, EU, and Chinas access to Central Asian
    energy resources is not a loss for the U.S.
  • Open competition for energy resources in the
    region can jeopardize the United States policies
    directed towards fighting terrorism and drug
    trafficking in the region as well as promoting
    democracy.

11
Conclusion
  • Russia, EU, and Chinas access to Central Asian
    energy resources is not a loss for the U.S.
  • Russia and Central Asia have natural and
    pre-existing conditions that encourage
    cooperation among them.
  • It is impossible for one player to have full
    control over the region without huge political
    and financial commitments and worsening its
    relations with the rest of the world.
  • EU (and Chinas) involvement as new importers of
    Central Asian energy resources can create
    additional options them all and diversify energy
    import-export routes.
  • United States should have limited engagement and
    mainly support the policies directed towards
    diversification of energy exports and imports.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com