Strategic Directions of the National Science Foundation and the CISE Directorate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Strategic Directions of the National Science Foundation and the CISE Directorate

Description:

Encourage emerging CI while maintaining and transitioning extant CI ... All working together in an integrated fashion. 36. Hardware. Integrated Cyberinfrastructure... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: seanja
Learn more at: http://bit.csc.lsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategic Directions of the National Science Foundation and the CISE Directorate


1
Strategic Directionsof the National Science
Foundationand theCISE Directorate
  • Peter A. Freeman
  • Assistant Director U.S. National Science
    Foundation
  • for Computer and Information Science and
    Engineering (CISE)
  • August 2004

2
Agenda
  • NSF context
  • The CISE Directorate
  • Focus for Computing Research in 2004
  • Long-term Challenges for Computing Research

3
The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)

4
NSF Mission
  • National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (Public
    Law 810507)
  • To promote the progress of science
  • to advance the national health, prosperity, and
    welfare
  • to secure the national defense
  • and for other purposes.

5
NSF Organization
6
NSF OrganizationDirectorates
  • Office of the Director
  • Acting Director Arden Bement
  • Deputy Director Joe Bordogna
  • Office of Integrative Activities Nathaniel
    Pitts
  • Office of Polar Programs Karl Erb
  • Biological Sciences Mary Clutter
  • Computer and Information Science and Engineering
    (CISE) Peter Freeman
  • Education Human Resources Judith Ramaley
  • Engineering John Brighton
  • Geosciences Margaret Leinen
  • Mathematics Physical Sciences Michael Turner
  • Social, Behavioral, Economic Sciences Wanda
    Ward (acting)

7
NSF Activities
  • basic scientific research research fundamental
    to the engineering process
  • programs to strengthen scientific and engineering
    research potential
  • science and engineering education programs at all
    levels and in all the various fields of science
    and engineering and
  • an information base for science and engineering
    appropriate for development of national and
    international policy.

8
NSF Strategic Focus
  • People to develop a diverse, internationally
    competitive and globally-engaged workforce of
    scientists, engineers, and well-prepared citizens
  • Ideas to provide a deep and broad fundamental
    science and engineering knowledge base
  • Tools to provide widely accessible,
    state-of-the-art science and engineering
    infrastructure
  • Organization to develop an agile, innovative
    organization that fulfills its mission through
    leadership in state-of the-art business practices

9
NSF Crosscutting Initiatives for 2005
  • Biocomplexity in the Environment
  • Nanoscale Science and Engineering
  • Mathematical Sciences
  • Human and Social Dynamics
  • Information Technology Research - ended as an
    initiative in 2004

10
The NSF Directorate for Computer Information
Science Engineering (CISE)

11
CISE Mission
  •  
  • to enable the United States to remain competitive
    in computing, communications, and information
    science and engineering
  • to promote understanding of the principles and
    uses of advanced computing, communications, and
    information systems in service to society and
  • to contribute to universal, transparent, and
    affordable participation in an information-based
    society.

CISE has three goals
12
CISE Responsibilities
  • Support basic computer and information science
    and engineering research education
  • Support a shared cyberinfrastructure for all of
    science and engineering

13
The New CISE

14
New CISE Organization
15
Key Concept Clusters
  • Comprehensive activity in a coherent area of
    research and education
  • Teams of Program Officers and Staff working
    closely with the community
  • Initially groups of existing programs
  • Eventually one program per cluster

16
Key Concept Emphasis Areas
  • Focused areas of research that cut across
    clusters and divisions
  • Address scientific and national priorities
  • Have program announcements and funds
  • Examples
  • Cybertrust
  • Education and workforce
  • Information Integration
  • Science of design

17
Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF)
  • Formal and Mathematical Foundations
  • Computer science theory numerical computing
    computational algebra and geometry signal
    processing and communication
  • Foundations of Computing Processes and Artifacts
  • Software engineering software tools for HPC
    programming languages compilers computer
    architecture graphics and visualization
  • Emerging Models for Technology and Computation
  • Computational biology quantum computing
    nano-scale computing biologically inspired
    computing

18
CCF Competitions
  • FY 2004
  • Responsible for about 2030 proposals
  • Heavy mortgages and commitments
  • Decent success rates for CAREER (15) but
    terrible success rates for clusters (5)
  • FY 2005 and FY 2006
  • CAREER competitions both years
  • Formal and Mathematical Foundations, and Emerging
    Models for Technology and Computation November
    2004 but no competition in FY 2006
  • Foundations of Computing Processes and Artifacts
    May 2005 with funds from FY 2006 budget
  • FY 2007 Fall deadlines for all three clusters

19
Computer and Network Systems (CNS)
  • Computer Systems
  • Distributed systems embedded and hybrid systems
    next-generation software parallel systems
  • Network Systems
  • Networking research broadly defined plus focus
    areas in programmable wireless networks and
    networks of sensor systems
  • Computing Research Infrastructure
  • Research infrastructure minority institutional
    infrastructure research resources
  • Education and Workforce
  • Curriculum development/educational innovation IT
    workforce special projects cross-directorate
    activities (e.g., REU sites)

20
CNS Competitions
  • FY 2004
  • Responsible for about 2035 proposals
  • Good success rates on CAREER and infrastructure
    (30)
  • Fair success rates on most other programs
    (10-15)
  • FY 2005 One solicitation per cluster
  • CAREER July deadline as usual
  • Computer systems November 2004
  • Network systems December 2004
  • Computing Research Infrastructure late August
    deadline (late July for letters of intent for
    large proposals)
  • Education and Workforce January 2005
  • FY 2006 Same deadlines as in FY 2005

21
Information and Intelligent Systems (IIS)
  • Systems in Context
  • Human computer interaction educational
    technology robotics computer-supported
    cooperative work digital government
  • Understanding, Inference, and Data
  • Databases artificial intelligence text, image,
    speech, and video analysis information
    retrieval knowledge systems
  • Science Engineering Informatics/Information
    Integration
  • Bioinformatics geoinformatics cognitive
    neuroscience

22
IIS Competitions
  • FY 2004
  • Responsible for about 2590 proposals
  • Success rates 17 CAREER, 5 regular.
  • FY 2005
  • Raise acceptance rate of 2004 to 12-15
  • CAREER in July as normal
  • Science Engineering Informatics/Information
    Integration and Universal Access December 2004
  • Data, Inference, and Understanding and Systems in
    Context May 2005 with most funding from FY 2006
  • FY 2006 Same deadlines as in FY 2005

23
Shared Cyberinfrastructure (SCI)
  • Infrastructure Development
  • Creating, testing, and hardening next-generation
    deployed systems
  • Infrastructure Deployment
  • Planning, construction, commissioning, and
    operations

24
SCI Competitions
  • FY 2004
  • NSF Middleware Initiative (NMI) 140 proposals
    expected success rate of 10-15
  • International Network Connections in panels
  • FY 2005
  • Continuing support for centers (PACI, ETF)
  • Cyberinfrastructure Teaching, Education,
    Advancement, and Mentoring (CI-TEAM) early 2005
  • NSF Middleware Initiative (NMI) spring 2005
  • Leveraging and coordinating shared and
    domain-specific cyberinfrastructure contact a
    program director if you have ideas for leveraging
    CISE research
  • Some programs with other agencies/directorates

25
Cross-Cutting Emphasis Areas
  • Characteristics
  • cuts across clusters and divisions
  • addresses scientific or national priority
  • FY04 Emphasis Areas
  • Cyber Trust 488 proposals
  • Science of Design 182 proposals
  • Information Integration 250 proposals
  • FY 2005 Emphasis Areas
  • Cyber Trust January 2005
  • Science of Design spring 2005
  • Information Integration December 2004
  • Broadening Participation late winter/early
    spring 2005
  • Possibly one more

26
CISE BudgetFY05 Request (M)
27
Cyber Trust
28
National Cyber Security Context
Homeland Security Critical Infrastructure
ProtectionCyber Security Cyber Trust
29
Cyber Trust Theme
  • Vision A society in which
  • Computing systems operate securely and reliably
  • Computing systems protect sensitive information
  • Systems are developed and operated by a
    well-trained and diverse workforce
  • Research on foundations, network security,
    systems software, and information systems
  • Integrated education and workforce activities

30
NSFs Cyber Trust Emphasis
  • Coordinated effort for research and education in
  • Security
  • Reliability
  • Privacy, etc.
  • Essentially, all the attributes so that a
    computing, communication, or information system
    can be trusted
  • First awards to be announced soon

31
Cyberinfrastructure

32
Guiding Principles for Shared Cyberinfrastructure
(SCI) at NSF
  • Serve all of science engineering
  • Firm and continuing commitment to providing the
    most advanced cyberinfrastructure (CI), with
    high-end computing (HEC) at the core
  • Encourage emerging CI while maintaining and
    transitioning extant CI
  • Provide balance in CI equipment
  • Strong links to ongoing fundamental research to
    create future generations of CI

33
History of NSF CI Investments
34
Looking to the Future
  • Science frontiers as the drivers
  • Balance capability and capacity
  • the Extensible Terascale Facility (ETF)
  • Emerging importance of data-intensive paradigms

35
Cyberinfrastructure consists of
  • Computational engines (supercomputers, clusters,
    workstations capability and capacity)
  • Mass storage (disk drives, tapes, ) and
    persistence
  • Networking (including optical, wireless,
    ubiquitous)
  • Digital libraries/data bases
  • Sensors/effectors
  • Software (operating systems, middleware, domain
    specific tools/platforms for building
    applications)
  • Services (education, training, consulting, user
    assistance)

All working together in an integrated fashion.
36
Integrated Cyberinfrastructure
Applications
Domain Specific Cybertools
DevelopmentTools Libraries
Education Training
Discovery Innovation
Grid Services Middleware
Shared CI
Hardware
37
Broadening Participation
38
Vision
  • A discipline in which
  • Graduates are well-prepared relative to a
    well-defined core of knowledge and are prepared
    for life-long learning
  • There are no under-represented groups
  • There is a strong and productive mix of domestic
    and foreign students
  • There is balance between demand and supply
  • Educational institutions, government
    organizations, and private industry work together
    to achieve the vision
  • NSFs role is seed efforts, model programs,
    dissemination, and research into success factors

39
Moving Forward
  • Increased staff and dollars in CISE focused on
    EWF action
  • Build on research results and encourage action
  • Help successful efforts mature
  • Focus new efforts on selected areas sequentially
  • Encourage computing community to participate in
    NSF-wide programs (ADVANCE, LS-AMP, etc.)

40
Conclusion
  • NSFs role is fundamental to all areas of our
    society - the most basic future investment
  • Computer science and related disciplines are
    hugely important in their own right and essential
    to advancement in all areas of SE
  • NSF and our field are facing unprecedented
    pressures that can only be overcome by concerted,
    cooperative action

41
(No Transcript)
42
Contact Information
  • Dr. Peter A. Freeman
  • NSF Assistant Director for CISE
  • Phone 703-292-8900
  • Email pfreeman_at_nsf.gov
  • Visit the NSF Web site at
  • www.nsf.gov

43
Former CISE Organization
44
CISE ReorganizationDrivers
  • Scientific changes to the field
  • Current organization is essentially the same as
    in 1985
  • Administrative proposal pressure
  • Up 125 since 1997 (vs. 16 for NSF)
  • Financial end of ITR
  • How to invest those funds

45
CISE ReorganizationStrategic Objectives
  • Realign divisions for coherence and to mirror the
    field
  • Cluster similar programs
  • Support cross-cutting themes
  • Build on success of ITR to invigorate the CISE
    core

46
CISE ReorganizationGoals
  • Increase productivity and efficiency for
    investigators and program officers
  • Increase grant size and duration
  • Sharpen focus of CISE programs
  • Increase agility in the CISE organization
  • Integrate education and research
  • Broaden participation in CISE activities
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com