Measuring the Quality of Decisionmaking and Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring the Quality of Decisionmaking and Planning

Description:

IBC provides the framework for the discussion on measuring decisionmaking. ... Will have multiple perspectives. 15. Discussion Time. Thoughts? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: lew696
Learn more at: http://www.dodccrp.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring the Quality of Decisionmaking and Planning


1
Measuring the Quality of Decisionmaking and
Planning
  • Framed in the Context of IBC Experimentation
  • February 9, 2007
  • Evidence Based Research, Inc.

2
Todays Ground Rules
  • IBC provides the framework for the discussion on
    measuring decisionmaking.
  • This is not an IBC brief.
  • The briefer does not have the answers!
  • The purpose is to explore how one measures the
    quality of decisionmaking in complex environments
    this is a discussion session.

3
Background Regarding IBC
  • Focus
  • Visualization, operational assessment, and
    planning tools for EBO.
  • Multiphased effort
  • Phase 0 Proof of concept using ad hoc suite of
    tools.
  • Phase I Demonstrated improvement potential of
    federated tool sets developed by two contractors.
  • Phase II Evolve tool set to expanded
    capabilities for transition to JFCOM COCOMS.

4
Objectives of Phase II Experimentation
  • Establish the operational utility of the tools.
  • Learn which tools can be helpful under what
    circumstances and for what purposes.
  • Explore novel approaches throughout the spiral
    development process.
  • Measure progress in increasing readiness of the
    technology.
  • Facilitate early transition to operational users.

5
Challenges
  • Complex operational problem
  • Wide range of situations,
  • Multiple knowledge domains, and
  • Poorly understood relationships.
  • Major technical challenges
  • Variation in maturity of underlying models and
    tools,
  • Limitations in availability of relevant data, and
  • Composability of federated capability from
    continually expanding set of tools.
  • Transition hurdles
  • Operational risk due to high potential for
    limitations in fidelity and possible
    misapplication.

6
Option Exploration Tool (1)
  • Comprehensive family of models.
  • Action-to-effect and effect-to-action.
  • Generates the distribution of plausible
    outcomes.
  • Visualization assist leaders to understand and
    act.

7
Option Exploration Tool (2)
Modeling Paradigm
Conceptual Models
Spread Sheet
Political/Economic Model
Concept Map
Statistical Models
Social Network
Differential Equations
Influence Diagram
Political/ Religious Model
Causal Models
Petri net
Bayesian Network
Social/ Culture Model
Object Models
Economic/Infrastructure Model
Event-based Simulation
Agent Based Simulation
DIME Dimensions
Social Information Model
PMESII Dimensions
Religious Model
Military Model
Enables What-if Analysis, Answers Why
Distribution authorized only to US Government
Agencies and their contractors involved in Phase
2 of the Integrated Battle Command Program
8
Campaign Planning Tools (1)
  • Supports modular development of multiple lines of
    effort.
  • Automatically detects and displays
    interdependencies, assumptions, resources,
    actions, duration of effects, metrics, and next
    state.
  • Ability to modify plans, actions,
    interdependencies, models, and next states based
    on measured performance.

9
Campaign Planning Tools (2)

Political/ Strategy
Security Strategy
Interdependencies
Assumptions

Political-Economic Strategy
Actions
Next State
Visualization
Resources
Measured Performance
Allows the leader to visualize complex plans
Distribution authorized only to US Government
Agencies and their contractors involved in Phase
2 of the Integrated Battle Command Program
10
Network Centric Operations
11
Decisionmaking Quality
  • Two approaches
  • Quality of the process
  • How the decision was made, and
  • Elements in the process.
  • Quality of the decision
  • Was it right or at least not wrong?
  • Did it have the desired effect?

12
Quality of the Process
  • Correct sequence of actions.
  • Complete set of choices.
  • Assumes an observable process.
  • Repeatability.
  • Outcome is irrelevant.

13
Quality of the Decision
  • Applicability to the solution space.
  • Compatibility with other SMEs.
  • Desired outcome/effects.
  • Outcome is relevant.

14
Measuring Quality
  • The field needs a way to measure the quality of
    a product
  • What does it mean to do good?
  • What does it mean to make a good decision?
  • A simple problem
  • Has a correct answer.
  • A complex problem
  • Has no right answer,
  • May have not wrong answers, and
  • Will have multiple perspectives.

15
Discussion Time
  • Thoughts?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com