MOBILE6 A Revised Model for Estimation of Highway Vehicle Emissions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

MOBILE6 A Revised Model for Estimation of Highway Vehicle Emissions

Description:

Less dependent on record order. External Data Files. Registration and ... Tier 1 Normal Emitter Composite Emission Effects Based on Regression Coefficients ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:198
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: denizk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MOBILE6 A Revised Model for Estimation of Highway Vehicle Emissions


1
MOBILE6A Revised Model for Estimation of Highway
Vehicle Emissions
  • David J. Brzezinski and Terry P. Newell
  • U.S. EPA Office of Mobile Sources
  • Assessment and Modeling Division

2
Background
  • MOBILE5 originally released in 1992.
  • MOBILE5 last updated in 1997.

3
Changes for MOBILE6
  • Emissions, fleet and activity data
  • Structural changes
  • Input and output formats

4
Basic Exhaust Emissions
  • Update in-use deterioration estimate
  • New emission standards
  • Effects on in-use program benefits

5
Off-Cycle Effects
  • Air conditioning effects
  • Non-FTP driving behavior
  • Effects of the Supplemental FTP rule

6
Effects of Fuel Composition
  • Updated effects of oxygenated fuels on CO
    emissions
  • Explicit effects of sulfur on exhaust emissions

7
Effects of Driving Behavior
  • Facility-based speed corrections
  • New in-use driving cycles
  • Separate estimates for freeway ramps

8
Real-Time Diurnal Emissions
  • Old one-hour diurnal data not used
  • New data collected in real time (24 hours)
  • Multiple day measurements
  • Hourly measurements

9
Hot Soak Emissions
  • Old laboratory measurements still used
  • New data for fuel RVP less than 9 psi
  • New data based on real world conditions
  • Evaluation of hot soak time distributions

10
Heavy Duty Emissions
  • New emission standards
  • New conversion factors
  • Light heavy-duty engine start effects

11
Fleet Characterization
  • New national average mileage accumulation
    estimates
  • New national average registration (age)
    distributions
  • New national vehicle class counts

12
Vehicle Activity
  • New trip length estimates
  • Engine start soak time distributions
  • Diurnal soak time distributions
  • Trip start and trip ends
  • VMT by time of day (temporal)

13
Engine Start and Running
  • Effect of engine start in grams per start
  • Hot running emissions in grams per mile
  • Composite emissions using activity data

14
Expanded Vehicle Classes
  • Four light-duty truck subcategories
  • Heavy-duty truck subcategories
  • Same eight MOBILE5 composite categories

15
Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles
  • Data from the Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition
  • Assumes non-exhaust emissions are zero
  • Default number of vehicles is zero

16
Hourly Emission Factors
  • All emissions calculated hourly
  • Composite daily output as in MOBILE5
  • Detailed hourly output available

17
Labeled Input
  • Eliminates the need for control flags
  • Reduces the amount of required input
  • Expanded use of user-supplied comments
  • Less dependent on record order

18
External Data Files
  • Registration and mileage accumulation
  • In-use program descriptions
  • Local activity data

19
Modified Output Formats
  • Eliminate most existing options
  • Descriptive (120 column) output
  • Electronic (database) output

20
Stakeholder and Peer Review
  • Extensive documentation
  • Expanded formal peer review
  • Stakeholder review
  • MOBILE Workshops
  • EPA list server

21
EPA Website
http//www.epa.gov/oms/m6.htm
22
Data - FTP
  • EPA Emission Factors Database (n3,208) - mostly
    pre-1990
  • Manufacturers (n2,256) - 1990-93 model years
  • API (n157) - high mileage 1981-93
  • Representativeness questioned due to voluntary
    sampling

23
Dayton, Ohio IM 240
  • 181,018 from model years 1981-93
  • 142,044 cars
  • 38,974 trucks
  • Considered more representative than FTP samples
  • Unreliable odometer

24
Wisconsin IM 240
  • Random selection of vehicles for full 240 second
    test
  • 3,206 cars and 1,193 trucks
  • Used to predict full 240 second emissions from
    fast-pass

25
Other Data
  • Hammond/Phoenix
  • 938 tests of lane and lab IM240 matched with lab
    FTP
  • used to convert IM240 to LA4
  • Hot Running 505
  • 77-car program to measure no-start condition
  • used to estimate running and start emissions from
    FTP bags

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
General I/M Model
High
Waiver
Repaired
Emissions (g/mi)
Average
Normal
Mileage
33
General I/M Model (Continued)
Before I/M (Average)
Emissions (g/mi)
After I/M
Mileage
34
I/M Parameters
  • Normal Emitters (Tier0)
  • Generated from EPA / AAMA FTP Dataset
  • Vehicles less than 2x standards for HC NOx 3x
    for CO
  • Analysis - Linear Regression of the Data versus
    Mileage
  • High Emitters (Tier0)
  • Generated from EPA / AAMA FTP Dataset
  • Vehicles greater than 2x standards for HC NOx
    3x for CO.
  • Analysis - Mean Emission Value Used - No
    Regression
  • Fraction of Highs in the Fleet.
  • Average Emission Level (Tier0)
  • Based on FTP Data and Ohio High Emitter
    Adjustment Factor
  • After Repairs (Tier0 and Tier1 Non OBD)
  • Generated from Arizona IM240 Test Lane Data

35
I/M Parameters (Cont)
  • Waivers
  • Assumed 20 percent Emission reduction from
    Repairs
  • I/M Identification Rate (IDR) (Tier0)
  • I/M Tests Ability to Identify Excess Emissions
  • Based on Data and Assumptions
  • Non Compliant Vehicles
  • Represents Vehicles which Disappear Prior to
    Completion of the I/M Process.
  • Full Loss of Credit
  • I/M Participation Rate
  • User Input Ranging from 0 - 100
  • I/M Credit is Directly Proportional to the
    Participation Rate.

36
New I/M Features for MOBILE6
  • Internal Calculation of I/M Effects - No external
    I/M Credit files to attach to the main program.
  • I/M Reductions given for IM240, ASM, Idle and OBD
    programs
  • Custom User supplied IM240 cutpoints can be
    entered directly into the program. Only 207(b)
    Idle and Two Speed Idle cutpoints are available.
  • Annual, Biennial and change of ownership I/M
    testing frequency can be modeled.
  • MOBILE6 will have the ability to model up to five
    different I/M programs simultaneously.

37
New I/M Features for MOBILE6 (Cont)
  • Non Periodic Identification of High Emitters by
    Remote Sensing can now be modeled.
  • Ability to model RSD Clean Screening and High
    Emitter Profiling exemptions.
  • Ability to model the exemption of the first n
    model years / ages in an I/M program.
  • I/M Credits given for cost waivered vehicles.
  • I/M Technician Training Effects are available in
    MOBILE6

38
What are Off-Cycle Emissions?
Off-Cycle emissions are the portion of actual
in-use emissions which will be affected by the
Supplemental FTP regulations.
Does not include air conditioning effects.
39
MOBILE6 Exhaust Emissions
  • Basic running exhaust emission rates do not
    include off-cycle emissions.
  • MOBILE6 speed adjustments include off-cycle
    emission effects.
  • The Supplemental FTP will reduce off-cycle
    emissions from future vehicles.

40
National Average Vehicle Miles Traveled
Driving Cycle Weight Driving Cycle Weight Freew
ay 63.2 0.0062 Arterial/Collector
24.8 0.1944 Freeway 59.7 0.1999 Arterial/Collect
or 19.2 0.0175 Freeway 52.9 0.1548 Arterial/Coll
ector 11.6 0.0058 Freeway 30.5 0.2344 Arterial/C
ollector 7.1 0.0135 Freeway 18.6 0.0109 Local
Roadways 12.9 0.1304 Freeway 13.1 0.0025 Freeway
Ramps 34.6 0.0298 All 1.0000
41
Tier 1 Vehicle Results
(grams per mile) THC CO NOx NMHC Average
LA4 0.033 0.795 0.180 0.019 Weighted
Cycles 0.048 1.729 0.274 0.035 Off-Cycle
Difference 0.015 0.934 0.094 0.016
42
INTRODUCTION
  • Most modern gasoline-fueled vehicles use
    catalysts to reduce HC, CO, and NOx emissions
  • Sulfur is a catalyst poison. Increased sulfur
    levels in fuels thereby increase emissions
    through catalyst deactivation

43
INTRODUCTION
  • Current MOBILE model does not have the capability
    to estimate sulfurs impacts on emissions.
    Current basis of MOBILE is results of emissions
    testing using Indolene, a low-sulfur fuel. An
    adjustment factor is used to account for emission
    differences between sulfur levels in Indolene and
    in-use fuels.

44
Tier 1 Normal Emitter Composite Emission
Effects Based on Regression Coefficients
HC
NMHC
CO
NOx
45
LEV Normal Emitter Composite Emission Effects
Based on Regression Coefficients
NOx
CO
HC
NMHC
46
What are Speed Corrections for?
  • Adjust for different average speeds
  • Adjust for different roadway types
  • Adjust for aggressive driving behavior

47
Calculation of Speed Correction Factors
Freeway Emissions speed
SCF speed
Freeway Emission 19.6 mph
48
Adjustment of the Basic Emission Rate
  • Calculate the basic running exhaust emission rate
    (19.6 mph).
  • Calculate the freeway emission rate at 19.6 mph.
  • Calculate the difference for each
    emission/technology level.

49
Major Differences from MOBILE5
  • Based on new facility specific cycles
  • Include the effects of aggressive driving
    behavior
  • Vary by emission level
  • Apply to all model year light-duty vehicles and
    trucks

50
Facility Specific Driving Cycles
  • Freeway (6 from 13.1 to 63.2 mph)
  • Arterial/Collector (4 from 7.1 to 24.8 mph)
  • New York City Cycle (NYCC)
  • Freeway Ramp
  • Local Roadway

51
Difficulties Comparing MOBILE6 with MOBILE5
  • M6 depends on emissions, M5 depends on model
    years
  • M6 split by roadway type, M5 is combined roadways
  • M6 apply to hot running emissions, M5 include
    starts
  • M6 includes aggressive driving effects

52
MOBILE6 versus MOBILE5
53
MOBILE6 versus MOBILE5
54
MOBILE6 versus MOBILE5
55
MOBILE5 Hot Soak emission rates
  • Based on laboratory testing, one-hour soaks
  • Typically at 82F, 9.0 psi RVP fuel, 40 tank
    fill
  • Corrections made for other temperatures, RVP
    levels

56
Newer data considered
  • Auto/Oil program (1993) Almost 300 LDVs and
    LDTs, MY 1983-93
  • EPA testing Almost 200 LDVs and LDTs, MY
    1981-94
  • Above testing at Mesa AZ (recruited from I/M
    lanes)
  • All tested as received (in-use fuel,
    uncontrolled tank fill levels)

57
Stratification for Each SourceFor each type of
source, the evaporative emissions were estimated
separately for each of the following four strata
  • ALL gross liquid leakers
  • NOT gross liquid leakers
  • Passing both purge pressure
  • Failing the pressure test
  • Failing only the purge test

58
Weighting FactorsFor each of the
four strata, the incidence of its occurrence
(frequency) is estimated as a logistic growth
function of vehicle age.
59
Gross Liquid LeakersThese are vehicles
with substantial leaks of liquid gasoline (as
opposed to vapor leaks) and having
  • Resting Loss Emissions gt 2.0 grams/hr, or
  • Diurnal Emissions gt 25.0
    grams/day, or
  • Hot Soak Test gt 10.0
    grams/test, or
  • Running Loss Test gt 7.0 grams/mile

60
Gross Liquid Leakers
Mean Emissions Mean emissions from each source
are
  • Resting Loss Emissions 9.16 grams /
    hr
  • Diurnal Emissions 104.36 grams
    / day
  • Running Loss Test 17.65 grams /
    mile
  • Hot Soak Test
  • Carbureted 16.95 grams /
    test
  • TBI 45.00
    grams / test
  • PFI 57.14
    grams / test
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com