Framework%20for%20Metric%20Composition%20 %20Spatial%20Composition%20of%20Metrics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Framework%20for%20Metric%20Composition%20 %20Spatial%20Composition%20of%20Metrics

Description:

Add that metrics can be composed from dissimilar metrics (see new sentence in ... For instance, is it preferred to compose sub-path R-factor or MDI metrics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: almo4
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Framework%20for%20Metric%20Composition%20 %20Spatial%20Composition%20of%20Metrics


1
Framework for Metric Composition Spatial
Composition of Metrics
  • Al Morton many others
  • December 3, 2007

2
draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-05.txt
draft-ietf-ippm-spatial-composition-04
and maybe others
3
Types of Composition
  • Complete/Sub-Path (or Concatenation in Space)
  • Aggregation in Time (12x5min stats -gt1hr)
  • Aggregat. in Space

4
Framework 05 Comments from Alan Clark - make the
draft a little more generic and apply beyond IPPM
  • Add that metrics can be composed from dissimilar
    metrics (see new sentence in 3.4 and Spatial
    draft Scope of Work 3.1)
  • Add new definition of Index, e.g., R-factor (see
    new 3.6)
  • Add a new requirement in Section 5, to state the
    (statistical) model of the process being measured
    (and the validity of the assumption) if
    applicable (RFC 2330 Sec 12 guides this to some
    degree).
  • Describe an Intermediate Model in Section 4
    capable of representing some key aspect of the
    performance of a class of applications using
    metrics on the system of interest. gtgt This seems
    different from our composition/aggregation scope.
    It might take one or more complete path metrics
    and estimates some reaction at higher layers ltlt

5
Recent Comments on 05
  • Reza Fardid
  • Section 3.6 R-factor is a valid example of an
    index as defined here, however, it is composed of
    both IP performance metrics and analog metrics.
    On this basis, is it within scope of this draft?
  • Agree some refinement is needed here
  • There is a packet-performance subset of the
    E-model, where all the analog metrics are fixed
  • Lokis point Scope is Loss, Delay, and Delay
    Variation
  • Another relevant index composed of IP performance
    metrics is MDI, per rfc4445
  • Lets just say NO to referencing REF Editor
    submissions

6
Recent Comments on 05
  • Reza Fardid
  • Section 4.1 Is the comment referring to
    forecasting of one metric from another, whose
    temporally aggregated measurements are available?
  • Al believes what was meant here is like weather
    forecasting prediction of future
  • If so, then I fail to see how this is feasible
    given that the primary metrics have been defined
    to be orthogonal.
  • Agreed

7
Recent Comments on 05
  • Reza Fardid
  • Section 4.5 Higher-order Composition
  • Another example will be helpful here.
  • In particular, if a composed metric is derived
    from dissimilar metrics, e.g., R-factor or MDI,
    then can one make a general statement or provide
    guidance with respect to the order of
    composition to minimize measurement error?
  • For instance, is it preferred to compose sub-path
    R-factor or MDI metrics (assuming their
    composition functions are defined) derived from
    primary metrics, or compose the sub-path primary
    metrics first, followed by R-factor or MDI
    composition?
  • Is there statistical or empirical evidence to
    support either order in general?

8
Recent Comments on 05
  • Loki Jorgenson
  • Section 3.2 - there is a reference to "true
    path" with no entry under Terminology to define
    it. Is it related to "ground truth" (which is
    defined)? If it is not intended to be a unique
    term but only a descriptor, I would suggest
    changing it to something more like "actual (as
    used in "ground truth").
  • Section 4.1 - with regard to weighting function
    and transient vs. intransient measures (see
    comments further down).
  • Section 4.5 - second sentence has "would be a the
    delay"
  • Section 5. - As I was dealing with IP issues
    today and aspects of viral licensing, is it
    appropriate to include in any composition metric
    description IP references to embedded proprietary
    metrics and/or use of standards?
  • Otherwise, I note, most of the requirements in
    section 5. are technical.
  • (a longer discussion on time varying and
    steady-state categories for ground truth that I
    havent had time to summarize)

9
Status of Framework 05
  • Next Steps
  • Address the recent comments
  • Consider this text sufficiently stable?
  • If so, Convince more folks to Read and Comment on

10
Status Spatial Composition 05
  • Revisions to Outline to keep in step with
    Framework Modifications up 05
  • Statement of Conjecture and Assumptions
  • Added Assumptions in each of the re-titled
    sections
  • NEXT STEPS
  • Need Volunteers to read and comment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com