Borderless Higher Education: Challenges Ahead - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Borderless Higher Education: Challenges Ahead

Description:

If we look over the whole period of 1965-2005, what is most striking are the numbers. ... If we look at the % of foreign students as part of total enrolment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: uva69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Borderless Higher Education: Challenges Ahead


1
Borderless Higher Education Challenges
Ahead Dr. Hans de Wit Dean Windesheim Honours
College, VU University Amsterdam/Windesheim
University of Applied Science, Zwolle, the
Netherlands Editor of the Journal of Studies in
International Education (Sage/ASIE) Kuala
Lumpur, December 3-5, 2007
2
Internationalisation of Higher
Education Traditional Meanings Diversity of
Related Terms to Internationalisation of Higher
Education 1. Curriculum related International
studies, global studies, multicultural education,
intercultural education, peace education,
etc. 2. Mobility related Study abroad,
education abroad, academic mobility, etc. Most
frequently used synonym International Education
3
Emerging factors/rationales
  • Standards, Status and profile
  • Ranking
  • Strategic alliances
  • Regionalisation (Bologna Process)
  • National Security (9/11)
  • Other Political and Ideological influences
  • Higher education increasingly more an actor than
    re-actor to globalisation, trade in educational
    services
  • Revenue Generation
  • Skilled Migration

4
New cross border delivery of education related
  • Borderless education
  • Education across borders or cross-border
    education
  • Global education
  • Offshore education
  • International trade of educational services
  • Also refered to as Transnational Education

5
Borderless Higher Education
  • Athough it is not a new phenomenon, it is its
    rapidly increasinging scale since the 1990s that
    makes it a relevant phenomenon
  • The privatisation and deregulation of higher
    education has stimulated traditional public and
    private higher educaiton get involved
  • New private for profit providers have entered
    the market
  • GATS (1995), including trade in educational
    services, became a highly debated response to
    this increasing phenomenon
  • International trade in education services
    accounts for app. 3 of global services exports,
    primarily through student mobility
  • Trade is already more important than aid in
    higher education

6
Globalisation and its link to Higher Education (1)
  • Increasing Unmet Demand for Higher Education
  • Demographic Trends
  • Degree and Diploma Programmes
  • Lifelong Learning

7
Globalisation and its link to Higher Education (2)
  • Growth in Numbers and Types of new Providers
  • Corporate Universities
  • For-profit private institutions
  • Media Companies
  • Education Brokers

8
Globalisation and its link to Higher Education (3)
  • Innovative Delivery Methods
  • Distance and e-learning
  • Franchises
  • Satellite Campuses
  • Twinning / Joint Degree programmes

9
We see
  • A shift in paradigms of internationalisation
    from cooperation to competition (Van der Wende,
    2001)
  • But this does not imply that
  • All institutions of higher education play the
    same active competitive role, and that
  • It always happens at the cost of the more
    common approach to international cooperation
    and exchange

10
Types of Cross-Border Education Activities
  • 1.People
  • Students/Trainees Student Mobility
  • Professors/Trainers Academic/Trainer Mobility
  • 2. Programmes
  • Educational Programmes Academic Partnerships
  • 3. Institutions/Providers
  • Foreign Campuses
  • Foreign Investments
  • (Knight, 2003, OECD)

11
Modes of supply Source OECD
12
Four Approaches to cross-border post-secondary
education, OECD, 2004, 232
  • Import Strategies Export Strategies
  • Strong
  • Economic
  • Rationales
  • Weaker
  • Economic
  • Rationales

13
Crossborder supply
  • Crossborder supply means the provision of a
    service where the service crosses the border but
    does not require the physical movement of the
    consumer.
  • Examples in higher education are distance
    education, E-learning and virtual universities.

14
Size and impact
  • Potential due to new technologies
  • Limitations due to lack of access to these
    technologies and limitations in learning
    methodologies
  • Potentials still primarily national (Open
    Universities) and in Continuing Education
    (University of Phoenix)
  • Still limited in scope, no reliable global data
    available

15
Presence of Natural Persons
  • Presence of natural persons means persons
    travelling to another country on a temporary
    basis to provide service
  • Such as professors, teachers and researchers
    working abroad in higher education.
  • (Knight, 2006c, 63).
  • Although happening quite frequently, exact
    numbers are not known and impact neither. Will
    continue to be an important factor, with
    different implications in North and South.
  • USA is an overwhelming brain gainer in
    relation to the rest of the world, whereas most
    nations face a net loss of research personel to
    the USA. And The USA at the doctoral and
    postdoctoral stage has by far the most postitions
    worldwide. (Marginson/Van der Wende, 2007, OECD)

16
Commercial Presence
  • Commercial presence means that the service
    provider establishes or has presence of
    commercial facilities in another country in order
    to render service.
  • Examples are local branch or satellite campuses
    twining partnerships, articulation programmes,
    and franchise arrangements.

17
Size and Impact I
  • Difficult to document the extent of institution
    and programme mobility
  • Definitions and sources are not always the same
  • Much information is still based on anecdotal
    evidence
  • There is still a lot of trial and error, see for
    instance recent Australian withdrawals, and not
    always is clear what is closed and what is
    (still) in operational existence
  • Not all countries maintain an official list
    (China, India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore and
    Thailand do)
  • (Naidoo, 2007)

18
Size and Impact II
  • Asia-Pacific region, Middle East, Eastern Europe
    and South America in that order are facing
    strongest commerical presence
  • Australian, British and US institutions the main
    ones operating them.
  • Wholly-owned branch campuses and joint venture
    operations represent a very small share.

19
Size and Impact III
  • Examples of such wholly-owned and joint venture
    operations indicate potential
  • Laureate Education Inc. 209.000 students in 19
    offshore operations
  • Others Apollo International (5 campuses), DeVry
    Inc. (Canada and Carribean), and Career Education
    corporation (France, UK, Canada and UAE)

20
Size and Impact IV
  • Programme mobility is much larger and established
    than institutional mobility estimated
    3.500-4.500 programmes.
  • Australia is the most active exporter 1569
    programmes and 37 institutions involved (42.4
    programmes per institution), followed by the U.K.
    (1002, 79, 12.7), the USA (333), New Zealand
    (137, 29) and Canada (81,16).
  • The largest importing places are Singapore (966),
    Hong Kong (827) and Malaysia (490), with China
    (410) and India (249) as emerging markets.
    (Naidoo, 2007)

21
Size and Impact V
  • For Australia, enrollment in programme mobility
    accounts in 2006 for 30 of all international
    students, compared to 18 in 1996. forecast for
    2025 is 47.
  • Primarily postgraduate (56), in business
    administration and economics (51), and a mean
    enrolment of 40 students of which 54 full-time
    students (Davis et all, 2000).

22
Size and Impact VI
  • For Canada, a recent AUCC survey indicated that
    Canadian institutions are engaged in 194
    programmes and that in these 10,798 students
    involved. Of these, 58 were franchises, 37
    twinning programmes, 34 distance education.
  • As top motives for involvement in knowledge
    export were mentioned Enhanced Reputation as an
    international institution opportunities for
    international student recruitment alternate
    source of income generation and new
    national/international partnerships.
  • As main barriers were mentioned lack of
    financial support to offset the upfront costs
    lack of faculty and professional staff and lack
    of internal institutional support. (AUCC, 2007)

23
Size and Impact VII
  • Emerging exporters are France, Germany, Italy,
    Portugal and Spain in Europe and Russia in former
    Soviet territories Malaysia, Singapore, China
    and India in Asia.
  • Emerging importers are Mauritius, Qatar, UEA
    andVietnam.
  • China, India, Malaysia and South Africa are
    examples of countries that have recently
    introduced restrictions on institution and
    programme mobility.

24
Consumption Abroad
  • Consumption abroad is the provision of the
    service involving the movement of the consumer to
    the country of the supplier
  • In higher education it means students going to
    another country to study.
  • It is at present the most common of the four
    modes of supply.
  • The other three are still marginal and in a phase
    of trial and error, although as indicated
    programme mobility is increasing rapidly.

25
Summary picture of Consumption Abroad
International Student Circulation
  • If we look over the whole period of 1965-2005,
    what is most striking are the numbers. India
    alone sends in 2005 more students abroad than the
    total number was for 1950 (107.500), and the ten
    countries with the largest number of students
    abroad in 2005 equals the number of all
    international students of 1985 (939.000).
  • Secondly we see an increase in students from
    emerging countries, but relatively spoken mainly
    from China, India and South Korea. The Western
    European and North American countries stabilize
    their numbers and see a reduction in percentages,
    and the other developing countries increase but
    in variations and not with the big numbers as do
    the other three.

26
Summary picture of International Student
Circulation 2
  • The top receiving countries remain to a large
    extent the same, only Australia has been able to
    come close to the top 4 U.S.A., United Kingdom,
    Germany and France.
  • If we look at the of foreign students as part
    of total enrolment and we do not include the
    students that move around within Europe (46 of
    their mobility), Australia has a far higher
    number of international students (17.7 of the
    total student body) than the U.S.A. (4.6) and
    Europe (3.2).
  • The Arab States which had a high position as
    receiving countries in the sixties and seventies
    see their position go down after that and become
    more active in sending than receiving students.
    Only very recently one can observe efforts by
    states as Jordan, Dubai and Qatar to become
    higher education hubs in the region, but the
    effect of their investments still have to become
    clear over the years.

27
Summary picture of International Student
Circulation 3
  • The efforts of other countries to increase the
    number of incoming students, such as China,
    Japan, Malaysia and Singapore are already paying
    off, as is the new role that South Africa plays
    as receiving country for Sub-Sahara Africa.
  • Where North-North circulation is stabilizing, the
    South-North flows are still on the rise and a
    second flow of South-South circulation is taking
    place, with the receiving countries being those
    who Cummings describes as late-development and
    the sending countries being early-development.
  • In this also a regionalisation of South-South
    circulation is taking place for instance
    Malaysia concentrating on Southeast and West Asia
    as well as China and Singapore, and South Africa
    on Sub-Saharan Africa.
  • For the top receiving countries, skilled
    migration is becoming an increasingly more
    important rationale. Easier visa and work permit
    regulations are becoming available.
  • At the same time, higher cost related tuition
    fees for non-national/regional students are
    introduced.

28
Three different Approaches of national strategies
for Cross-border education in Asia
  • Government-Regulated Approach
  • Examples China, Malaysia and Korea
  • Market-Oriented Approach
  • Examples Australia and Hong Kong
  • Transitional Approach from state-controled to
    free-market approach
  • Examples Japan and Taiwan (Futao Huang, 2006,8)

29
Regulations regarding foreign providers
  • Several countries have made new regulations,
    Example of China
  • Joint ventures must not be operated for profit as
    main objective
  • Tuition Fees may not be rasided without approval
  • Half of the Board of Directors of joint ventures
    must be Chinese
  • Development plans must be approved by two-thirds
    or more of the board members
  • The chief administrative officer responsible for
    hiring and firing staff must be a Chinese
    national
  • Joint venture must have a Chinese partner
  • Foreign religious institutions cannot be partners
  • The programmes must follow Chinas educaitonal
    policy and be in line with Chinese public morals
    and ehtics
  • Curriculum outline and list of teaching materials
    to be submitted to the ministry for approval
  • Bashir, 2007

30
UNESCO/OECD Guidelines on Quality Provision in
Cross-border Higher Education
  • Objectives of the guidelines endorsed by OECD and
    UNESCO
  • Students/learners protection from the risks of
    misinformation, low-quality provision and
    qualifications of limited validity.
  • Qualifications should be readable and transparent
    in order to increase their international validity
    and portability. Reliable and user-friendly
    information sources should facilitate this.
  • Recognition procedures should be transparent,
    coherent, fair and reliable and impose as little
    burden as possible to mobile professionals.
  • National quality assurance and accreditation
    agencies need to intensify their international
    cooperation in order to increase mutual
    understanding.
  • (OECD, 2004, 17) (www.oecd.org/edu/internationalis
    ation/guidelines

31
Risks of increasing trade in higher education (in
particular for developing countries)
  • Opposition is higher to institution and programme
    mobility than to student mobility, even though
    the last one is more substantial and creates
    potentially more negative impacts (such as brain
    drain)
  • Loosing sovereignty over the education sector
  • Excessive concentration on job-related training
  • Growing inequity in access to higher education
  • Vulnerability to aggressive not-regulated (not in
    the home nor in the host country), low quality
    foreign providers
  • Unequal access to higher education markets
  • (Bashir, 2007)

32
Opportunities
  • Competition will increasingly be based on quality
    and price. This provides opportunities for
    intradeveloping trade, similar to what has been
    described for student mobility. Examples are
    Malaysia, Singapore, Dubai and Qatar.
  • Low- and middle income countries with a need to
    increase higher education, can look at commercial
    presence as an option, also to reduce study
    abroad and brain drain. Regulation and quality
    control as maintaining a minium of quality public
    funding and provision is required.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com