: Survival of the fittest: A new look at cardiac exercise test - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

: Survival of the fittest: A new look at cardiac exercise test

Description:

(His contribution : exercise protocol rather than use of ECG. ) 8/29/09. 5. ???????? ... Number of people having abnormal ECG. 2. 5. 2. Number of people taking ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:138
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: rndTc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: : Survival of the fittest: A new look at cardiac exercise test


1
??????????????Survival of the fittest A new
look at cardiac exercise test
?????
  • 2007???????????
  • ????????????
  • ??????????????????

2
????
  • ????????(cardiac ex test,CET)???????????????????
  • ????????????????????????????????,?????
  • ?????????????????
  • ???????????????

3
Cardiac exercise test CET
Cardiac pulmonary exercise test CPET
4
????????
  • ??the discovery that exercise in pt with
    coronary disease produced ST segment depression
  • Feil Siegel (1928) exercised pt with angina to
    bring about pain.
  • They performed stress test by sit-ups.
  • Master(1929) published paper using pulse and BP
    to evaluate the cardiac capacity. (His
    contribution exercise protocol rather than use
    of ECG. )

5
????????????1
  • Goldhammer Scherf (1932) ST depression was
    present in 75 pt with angina and proposed the
    use of exercise to confirm the diagnosis of
    coronary ischemia.
  • Katz Landt (1935) lead 5 is better in terms of
    discrimination than lead 4. Use of anoxia to
    bring changes in ST segment.

6
????????????2
  • Missal (1938) having pt run up 3-6 flights of
    stairs and he might be the first to use a max
    stress test and to the point of pain and
    emphasized the necessity of taking the recording
    as quickly as possible thereafter.

7
????????????3
  • Riseman et al (1940) the first to use continuous
    monitoring and discovered that ST depression
    appeared before the onset of pain and persisted
    for a time after the pain subsided.
  • They concluded that exercise was of little value
    because of its poor discrimination between the
    normal and the abnormal subjects.

8
????????????4
  • Johnson et al (1942) developed Harvard Step
    Test. Use pulse counts during recovery and
    provide an index of physical fitness.
  • Hellerstein katz (1949) ST depression is
    primarily a diastolic injury current manifested
    during the TQ interval.

9
????????????5
  • Wood et al Push the pt to the max level of
    their capacity
  • The amount of work should not be fixed, but
    adjusted to the individual
  • The more strenuous work would produce a higher
    percentage of positive tests
  • Recommend the use of the stress test to uncover
    latent myocardial ischemia.

10
????????????6
  • Bruce (1956) work test performed on a treadmill
    and established guideline that would more or less
    group pt into the NYHDC I through IV
  • Astrand Ryhming max oxygen uptake could be
    predicted by the HR at submax exercise

11
????????????7
  • Blackburn (1969)90 of the ischemic changes
    could be demonstrated in the CM5 or V5 lead. So
    spread the use of test outside the research lab.
  • Conventional exercise test, done with a
    treadmill, is being supplemented by many other
    techniques to improve the disgnostic certainty
    and help localize the disease vessels.

12
??????????
  • ???(functional capacity)???????????????
  • ????????????????????
  • ??????(chronotropic imcompetence)??????(heart
    rate reserve)???????

13
??????????1
  • Greater fitness results in longer survival (Myers
    et al, NEJM 2002)
  • 3679 men with CVD V.S. 2534 men without CVD on
    treadmill max ET
  • After adjusting for age, peak exercise capacity
    measured in METs is the strongest predictor of
    the risk of death in both groups.
  • Absolute peak ex ca is a stronger predictor than
    age-predicted value achieved.
  • Risk of death doubled among those MET less then 5
    when compared to whose MET more than 8

14
  • Exercise capacity is a more powerful predictor of
    mortality among men than other established risk
    factors for CV disease

15
(No Transcript)
16
??????????2
  • Abnormal heart rate recovery and risk of death
  • HRR after ex as a predictor of mortality(Cole et
    al, NEJM 1999)
  • Slow HRR after ex is associated with carotid
    atherosclerosis (Jae et al, Atherosclerosis)
  • Prognostic value of HRR in pt with HF (Arena, Am
    H J )
  • HRR after ex is a predictor of mortality,
    independent of the angiographic severity of CD
    (Vivekananthan et al, J Am Col Cardio)
  • HRR improved as a result of ex training during CR
    (MacMillan et al, Heart Lung)

17
?????????????
Cole et al, NEJM 1999
12 bpm, 26 abnormal HRR, No further improvement
for value above 20
18
A strong association between ? ex ca and ab HRR
19
??????????3
  • Chronotropic incompetence(??????)????????????????
    ??
  • Peak HR is related to age referred as CI when
    lt85 of the age-predicted HR is achieved.
  • HR reserve(?????, HRR)???????????
  • Azarbal et al found that failure to reach 85 of
    the age-predicted maximum HR was predictive of
    death but that failure to use 80of HRR was a
    stronger predictor of risk.

20
????????????
  • The prognostic value of a normogram for ex ca in
    women (Gulati et al, NEJM 2005)
  • Ex ca an independent predictor of mortality
  • 5721 asymptomatic women underwent a
    symptom-limited max ex test.
  • A nomogram established on the basis of age and ex
    ca
  • Use the nomogram to determine the of original
    women and another 4471 women with CVD

21
? 14.7-(0.13age) ? 14.7-(0.11age)
22
Active ?17.9-(0.16age) Sedentary ?
14.7-(0.12age)
23
(No Transcript)
24
??????????3
  • HR reserve approach should be used when
    assessing HR to ex
  • The ex test provides critical prognostic
    information beyond that provided by nuclear
    imaging
  • Azarbal et al also found that chronotropic
    response predicts outcome over and above
    functional capacity, one of the most powerful
    predictors of all-cause and cardiac death.

25
??CET V.S. ??CET
26
??CET V.S. ??CET
27
?????????????
??
  • ?????????????,???????????????????????
  • ?????????????????????????????????????????????????
    ?
  • ????????????????????,?????????????????????

28
?????????????1
????
  • Cole et al 19992428 subjects without HD history
    undergoing symptom-limited ex test. Heart rate
    recovery (HRR) was defined as the reduction in
    the HR from the peak ex to one min after the
    cessation of ex
  • An abnormal HRR was found using log-rank
    chi-square test statistic. HRRlt12 beats per min
    is considered abnormal

29
?????????????2
????
  • ???????????????????????,???????????
  • Rapid HRR is due to high vagal tone associated
    with fitness and good health
  • HRR is prognostic usually at 1 or 2 min after ex
    in populations related to ex test
  • Vivekananthan et al HRR predicts mortality,
    independent of the angiographic severity of CD

30
?????????????3
???????
31
?????????????4
????
  • ??????????????????????
  • ???????(autonomic imbalance)?????????????????????
    ????
  • ???????,??????,????????
  • ???baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate
    variability, and heart rate recovery

32
?????????????
  • ??????????,???????????????????(????????????????)
  • ?????????????(Mona Lisa Hypothesis most
    obesities known are low in sympathetic activity)
  • ??????????????????
  • ??????,??????????????????

33
?????????????
  • ?????????????????????????????
  • ????? symptom-limited maximal treadmill
    exercise(Bruce protocol),?90 age-predicted
    maximal heart rate reserve?????????
  • ?????????????????????3??

34
?????????????
  • ?????????(two way ANOVA)?????? ??( BMI body mass
    index)????????
  • ?????below average(BA), average (A), above
    average (AA) ??
  • ????NOR(BMIlt25), OW(25 ? BMI lt30 ), OB(BMI?30)??
  • ????????????????????????????????????????,??HRR1,
    HRR3, HRR5

35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
?????????????
  • ????????
  • ????????(F (2,45) 3.66, plt.05)
    ,LSD??????AA??A??HRR1? HRR3????BA?
  • ??????????

42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
?????????????
  • ??????????????,??????????????????
    ?????,??????????????
  • ???????, ???????????
  • ??????????, ?????????,?????????, ???????????,
    ??????

45
?????????????
  • ????????????????????????
  • ????????????,????????????
  • ????????????BMI, ???BMI?????????????
  • ??????, ????????????????, ???????????????
  • ?????, ????????

46
?????????????
  • ??????????????????, ????????, ?90 ????????????,
    ??????????????????
  • ???BMI????????, ??????????????????????
  • ????????????????????????????, ????????????????????
    ??

47
????????
  • The amount, intensity, and duration of physical
    activity required to reduce the risk of coronary
    heart disease is debated.
  • Harvard Alumni Study no further reduction in
    events associated with CAD in men with an energy
    expenditure of more than 2000 Kcal per week.
  • Either a threshold effect or a progressive
    decline with progressive activity, possibly
    because of differences in the range of activity
    in the populations.

48
????????
  • ????????????6MET?????,???????????????50????????
  • ???????????????????,?????????????????????
  • ACSM?????????,???????????More vigorous exercise
    is probably more beneficial, but also carries a
    cardiovascular risk, especially for those who are
    usually inactive.

49
Survival of the fittest????
  • Cardiorespiratory fitness enables a person to
    perform physical activity and is influenced by
    several other factors, including age, sex,
    heredity, and medical status.
  • A nearly linear reduction in mortality was
    observed as fitness levels increased, and each
    increase of 1MET in exercise capacity conferred a
    12 improvement in survival.

50
??
  • The lowest threshold for a dose and an intensity
    that would confer specific survival and
    cardiovascular benefits is not known.
  • To compel the clinician to go beyond the
    identification of risk to the initiation of
    interventions, such as the prescription of
    increased physical activity and exercise to
    modify risk, particularly in patients with low
    levels of fitness.

51
??
  • ????????,????????????????????????,??????????HDL??
    ????????????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com