Mitochondrial Analysis From Hair Examinations to DNA Sequencing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Mitochondrial Analysis From Hair Examinations to DNA Sequencing

Description:

Why Is Hair Good Evidence? Abundant; the average person has 100,000 hair follicles on their head alone ... Microscopic characteristics of hair include: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:380
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: jlio
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mitochondrial Analysis From Hair Examinations to DNA Sequencing


1
Mitochondrial Analysis From Hair Examinations to
DNA Sequencing
  • State of Connecticut
  • Forensic Laboratory

2
Trace Evidence
  • Trace evidence items or debris found in the
    process of investigating a crime
  • Generally small in size, may be transferred when
    physical contact occurs between two individuals
    or an individual and an object.
  • Hairs a commonly encountered example of trace
    evidence.

3
Hair
  • A biological outgrowth from the skin of mammals.
  • Three areas of a hair Root, Shaft, Tip
  • Three cross-sectional regions of a hair Cuticle,
    Cortex, Medulla

4
Hair Evidence
  • Found in many crimes, submitted to the
    laboratory.
  • Can include homicides, hit and runs, sexual
    assaults, kidnappings, burglaries, etc.
  • Can associate a suspect to a victim, weapon
    and/or a crime scene.

5
Why Is Hair Good Evidence?
  • Abundant the average person has 100,000 hair
    follicles on their head alone
  • Easily transferable the average person loses 100
    hairs per day
  • Considerable variability comparing body area
    alone, human hair can be from the head, pubic,
    anal, eye, nose, ear, underarm, leg, arm, chest,
    trunk, or beard area, not including the fine hair
    covering the entire body except on a persons
    palms and soles.
  • Durable hairs have been recovered from mummies
    dating back 2,000 years

6
Steps of Analysis
  • Hairs are collected from evidence submitted
  • Hairs are identified and preserved onto glass
    microscope slides
  • Hairs are examined both macroscopically and
    microscopically
  • If a known standard exists, hairs are compared
  • A report containing all the results of the
    comparison is written
  • Examiner testifies in a court of law to the
    results written in the report.

7
Processing
  • Type of evidence submitted is anything on which a
    hair could possibly be found includes clothing,
    letters, guns, knives, bomb devices, bedding, car
    parts, furniture, carpets, flooring, tape, etc.
  • Hairs are collected by either scraping, picking,
    taping or vacuuming.
  • Hairs are identified from the
  • collected debris and mounted onto glass
    microscope slides

8
Examination
  • Macroscopic characteristics of hair length,
    coloration, shaft shape, and texture.
  • Microscopic characteristics of hair include
  • The hair shaft (optical cross section, diameter
    variation, tip appearance, buckling, artifacts,
    other)
  • The cuticle (thickness, appearance, color,
    damage)
  • The cortex color, pigment granule size, pigment
    granule shape, pigment granule distribution,
    pigment granule density, cortical inclusions,
    cortical fusi (size, distribution, and density),
    ovoid bodies (size, distribution, and density),
    cortical texture
  • The medulla (color, thickness, texture,
    continuity pattern, abnormalities)
  • The hair root (condition, color, tissue, cortical
    fusi)

9
Results
  • A qualified hair examiner can provide the
    following information
  • from a hair examination and comparison
  • 1. Whether there is hair(s) recovered from the
    item(s) submitted.
  • 2. What the racial origin of the hair is
    (Caucasian-type, Negroid-type, Mongoloid-type)
  • 3. The area of the body that the hair came from
    (head, pubic, body)
  • 4. The nature of the hairs removal from the
    body
  • 5. Whether the hair has been artificially
    treated
  • 6. Whether there has been damage done to the
    hair
  • 7. Whether there are similarities and/or
    differences between the questioned hair and known
    sample.
  • How much information an examiner can provide
    depends upon the suitability of the hair.

10
Hair Examination Conclusions
  • A hair examiner can conclude the following
  • 1. The questioned hair exhibits similar
    characteristics (no significant differences are
    present) to the known sample. Thus, the source
    of the known sample cannot be excluded as being
    the source of the questioned hair.
  • 2. The questioned hair exhibits dissimilar
    characteristics to the known sample. Thus, the
    source of the known sample can be excluded as
    being the source of the questioned hair.
  • 3. The questioned hair exhibits both
    similarities and differences to the known sample.
    Thus, no conclusion can be reached as to whether
    the questioned hair can or cannot be excluded as
    coming from the same source as the known sample.
  • 4. The known hairs are insufficient or
    unsuitable for comparison purposes.
  • 5. The questioned hair(s) are insufficient or
    unsuitable for comparison purposes.

11
Further Testing A Complement To Forensic Hair
Examinations
  • Hair examinations can not identify a specific
    individual
  • Results can be supplemented by performing other
    independent analyses
  • Further testing will not change conclusions
    stated by the hair examiner
  • Can provide alternative and additional
    information about the hair Further testing is
    deemed suitable and/or probative based upon
  • If the hair root has tissue attached, Nuclear DNA
    analysis
  • If there is no tissue and/or root, Mitochondrial
    DNA analysis

Nuclear DNA
Mitochondrial DNA
12
Mitochondrial DNA Analysis
  • Mitochondria are considered the powerhouse of
    the cell
  • Where the energy to run cellular functions (ATP)
    is made
  • Has its own DNA (mtDNA)

13
Nuclear DNA vs. Mitochondrial DNA
  • NUCLEAR DNA
  • Linear
  • 2 Copies per cell
  • Very large (3 billion base pairs)
  • Inherited from both parents
  • Unique to the individual (except identical twins)
  • MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
  • Circular
  • Thousands of copies per cell
  • Small (Just over 16,000 base pairs)
  • Inherited only from the mother
  • Not unique

14
When Would We Use Mitochondrial DNA?
  • Hairs missing the Root
  • Old Bones, Teeth
  • Missing persons cases
  • Mass Disasters
  • Since mitochondrial DNA has a high copy number,
    it is more resistant to degradation

15
Why Isnt Mitochondrial DNA Unique?
Mother
All Yellow Same mtDNA type as Mother
Female
Male
16
How Is Mitochondrial Testing Done
  • Extraction of DNA from sample
  • Amplification of extracted DNA, to make many
    exact copies of the DNA we extracted
  • Quantitation of amplified DNA, to determine how
    much DNA is there
  • Determine the sequence of two specific regions of
    the mitochondrial genome

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Now What?
  • Compare sequences of questioned items to known
    sequences
  • Are they different?

Case 1 Case 2 Questioned GCATATTGCGCCTA
GCATATTGCGCCTA Known GCACATTACGTCTA
GCATATTGCGCCTA EXCLUSION CANNOT
EXCLUDE
This is a simplification, the regions
scrutinized are larger, and analysis is far more
complicated. This is meant to assist in a very
basic understanding.
20
And Last
  • Compare the attained sequence with the
    Mitochondrial CODIS Database
  • How many times does the sequence weve attained
    appear in the database
  • From that number, we can estimate the frequency
    of that sequence in the general population

21
Interesting Forensic Casework Involving
Mitochondrial DNA
  • Tsar Nicholas II Romanov
  • Did we find Anastasia?
  • NO
  • Anna Alexander claimed to be the missing child of
    Nicholas Romanov
  • Her mitochondrial DNA did not match those of
    unearthed bones, or of maternal relative Philip
    of Edinburg

22
Interesting Forensic Casework Involving
Mitochondrial DNA
  • Tennessee Vs. Ware
  • First case in US where mitochondrial testing was
    introduced.
  • September, 1996
  • Murder case in which the only evidence found was
    red hairs in throat of victim and on the victims
    bed
  • Paul Ware could not be excluded as the source of
    the hairs.

23
Interesting Forensic Casework Involving
Mitochondrial DNA
  • Connecticut Vs. Pappas
  • Robbery, first CT case in which mitochondrial DNA
    analysis was allowed in the courts
  • Mitochondrial DNA analysis on two head hairs from
    sweatshirt found on train tracks adjacent to
    where some of the robbed money was located
  • The defendant could not be excluded as the source
    of the questioned hair sample
  • Case appealed up to CT Supreme Court, who ruled
    that this type of testing is acceptable

24
Interesting Forensic Casework Involving
Mitochondrial DNA
  • Connecticut Vs. Torres
  • Murder/Sexual Assault, verdict March, 2002
  • Amount of DNA recovered not sufficient for
    nuclear DNA testing
  • Mitochondrial profile from semen matched that of
    the suspect
  • For more detail on this case, click here to see
    description from the laboratorys trace section,
    who had a major contribution to the outcome.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com