Integrated care pathways and Patientcentered care a costeffective combination - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Integrated care pathways and Patientcentered care a costeffective combination

Description:

A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compare an intervention treatment ... of Gothenburg, Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, 41345 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: johanth
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Integrated care pathways and Patientcentered care a costeffective combination


1
Integrated care pathways and Patient-centered
care a cost-effective combination
  • Objective
  • To perform an economic evaluation of two
    treatment approaches in participants with an
    acute hip fracture.
  • Design
  • A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to
    compare an intervention treatment (treatment A)
    with standard care (treatment B)1. The
    intervention treatment was an integrated care
    pathway (ICP)2. Participants were selected
    consecutively and the treatment study used a
    before-and-after design.
  • Setting
  • An orthopaedic ward at a hospital southwest of
    Sweden.
  • Participants
  • 112 independently living participants, aged 65
    years or older and admitted to hospital with a
    hip fracture, were included. The exclusion
    criteria were pathological fracture and severe
    intellectual impairment (Pfeiffer's test lt 3
    points).
  • Outcome
  • The main outcome was hospitals total treatment
    costs for each participant undergoing surgery for
    a hip fracture, where effectiveness was measured
    using the Katz ADL index.
  • Results
  • The main result was a 40 reduction for each
    participant in the average total cost for
    treatment A 9,685 vs. 16,002 for treatment B
    (p0.000). Moreover, effectiveness was
    significantly improved. The cost-effectiveness
    ratio for treatment A was 14,840 vs. 31,908
    for treatment B. In addition, 75 of the
    participants in treatment A were successfully
    rehabilitated vs. 55 in treatment B.
  • Conclusion
  • The use of an ICP was cost-effective, with the
    greatest reduction in hotel costs. A longer
    hospital stay was related to more investigation
    costs, which appeared to be unrelated to the
    participants medical condition. The cost of
    developing the ICP had already been covered after
    three partici-pants. No 30-day re-admission was
    recorded in either group and the one-year
    mortality rate was 16 in both groups.
  • References
  • Olsson L-E, Karlsson J, Ekman I. The integrated
    care pathway reduced the number of hospital days
    by half a prospective comparative study of
    patients with acute hip fracture. Journal of
    Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 20062513.
  • Olsson L-E, Karlsson J, Ekman I. Effects of
    nursing interventions within an integrated care
    pathway for patients with hip fracture. Journal
    of Advanced Nursing 200758(2)116-25.

Authors Lars-Eric Olsson PhD Sahlgrenska
University Hospital/Mölndal, Orthopaedic
Department, Göteborgsvägen 43130 MÖLNDAL,
Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg,
Institute of Health and Care Sciences S-405 30
Göteborg Sweden Elisabeth Hansson PhD
Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg,
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical
Sciences, 41345 Göteborg, Sweden Inger Ekman
Professor Sahlgrenska Academy at University of
Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences
S-405 30 Göteborg Sweden Jón Karlsson Professor
Sahlgrenska University Hospital/östra,
Orthopaedic Department, Smörslottsgatan 41685
Göteborg, Sweden Corresponding author
lars-eric.olsson_at_vgregion.se/ lars-eric.olsson_at_gu.
se
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com