Effective Intervention for Children with Literacy Difficulties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 96
About This Presentation
Title:

Effective Intervention for Children with Literacy Difficulties

Description:

What do we know about teaching literacy? Components of Good Practice ... Standard score gains of 14 points on Woodcock Word Identification ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1025
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 97
Provided by: MaryN4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effective Intervention for Children with Literacy Difficulties


1
Effective Intervention for Children with
Literacy Difficulties
  • Dr Mary Nugent
  • NEPS

2
An Overview
  • What do we know about teaching literacy?
  • Components of Good Practice
  • Whats out there that works?
  • What do I need to do?

3
West Dunbartonshire Literacy Initiative
  • McKay (2007)
  • Something that has never been done before
  • the eradication of illiteracy from an entire
    education authority

4
West Dunbartonshire
  • A 10 year project
  • In the second most disadvantaged local authority
    in Scotland
  • In 2007 only 3 children left secondary school who
    were not functionally literate

5
Need for Structured Interventions
  • It can be argued that teaching anything in a
    systematic way will be more successful than much
    existing practice, particularly when the
    intervention targets reception chidlren, where
    teaching approaches are less formal than with
    other children
  • Solity et al (2000)

6
Focus on Intervention
  • We are only at the beginning point in
    systematic, controlled research on intervention
    methods for children with severe reading
    disabilities. Torgesen et al 1997

7
Swanson and Hoskyn 1998
  • Meta-analysis
  • Considered over 900 studies from 1972-1997
  • Eventually included only 180 studies

8
Swanson and Hoskyn Findings
  • Not all treatments are equally effective
  • A combined model of direct instruction and
    strategy instruction is relatively more effective
    than other methods
  • Small group settings and individual tuition is
    more effective than larger groups
  • Structured, specialist tuition is more effective
    than eclectic approaches

9
Vaughan, Gersten Chard 2000
  • Reviewed 68 studies
  • Reiterated findings reported above and
  • Suggest that small interactive groups and pairs
    with highly qualified teachers may be as
    effective as a one to one model
  • Using a student with a disability as a cross age
    tutor is the most effective form of peer reading

10
National Reading Panel
  • An initiative of the federal government of the
    USA
  • A national panel to assess the status of
    research-based knowledge, including the
    effectiveness of various approaches to teaching
    children to read.
  • Reported in 2000

11
Findings from the National Reading Panel
  • Phonemic awareness
  • Phonics instruction
  • Fluency
  • Comprehension
  • Teacher Education
  • Computer Instruction

12
Phonemic Awareness (PA)(sounds in spoken
language)
  • Teaching children to manipulate phonemes in words
    was highly effective
  • The effects of PA instruction on reading lasted
    well beyond the end of training
  • Most effective PA included explicit systematic
    teaching

13
Phonics Instruction(how written letters relate
to sounds)
  • Systematic synthetic phonics instruction works
    better than other approaches for children from
    low social economic groups and those with
    specific reading disability
  • Explicit, systematic phonics instruction is a
    valuable essential part of a successful
    classroom reading programme
  • Phonics teaching is a means to an end
  • It is only part of a total reading programme

14
Fluency (speed and accuracy)
  • Guided Reading Aloud
  • Repeated oral reading, that included guidance
    from others had a significant positive impact
    on word recognition, fluency and comprehension
  • Independent Silent Reading
  • Not sufficient research evidence that such
    efforts reliably increase how much students read
    or improve their reading skills

15
Comprehension
  • Vocabulary Instruction
  • Does lead to gains in comprehension, but must be
    appropriate to age and ability of the reader
  • Teaching Comprehension Strategies
  • (Summarising, generating/ answering questions/
    mind maps)
  • Specific programmes to generate definite benefits

16
Teacher Education
  • In-service professional development produced
    significantly higher student achievement

17
Computer Instruction
  • All studies reported positive results
  • Use of word processors may be very useful, given
    that reading instruction is most effective when
    combined with writing instruction

18
West Dunbartonshire-10 Strands of Intervention
  • Phonological awareness and the alphabet
  • A strong and structured phonics emphasis
  • Extra classroom help in the early years
  • Fostering a literacy environment
  • Raising teacher awareness thru focussed
    assessment
  • Increased time spent on reading
  • Identification and support of children failing
  • Lessons from research in interactive learning
  • Home support for encouraging literacy
  • Changing attitudes, values and expectations

19
What works best?
  • Systematic, structured teaching of phonics
    (National Reading Panel 2000)
  • Synthetic (or small unit) approaches to phonics
    are preferable to analytic (or large unit)
    approaches (Macmillan 1997, McGuinness 1997)
  • Frequency of teaching with distributed rather
    than massed practice (Solity 2002)
  • A declaration of the intention to achieve (McKay
    2007)

20
What works best cont.
  • A multi-element approach
  • exposure to high quality books
  • emphasis on language development
  • importance of fluency and comprehension
  • developing a sight vocabulary
  • including spelling and writing skills
  • shared reading experiences

21
What about spelling?
  • Even the best, most effective literacy
    interventions have a modest impact of spelling
  • Children with dyslexia tend to make most progress
    in the area of reading comprehension, some
    progress in word reading and relatively poor
    progress in spelling

22
3 components of Evidence Based Practice
  • The aim of evidence based practice is to help
    professionals to base their practice on best
    current evidence Fox 2003
  • Research should provide the evidence on which
    professional practice is based
  • Professionals will change and adapt their
    practice on best available research evidence
  • By keeping accurate outcome measures, services
    can monitor the effects of their interventions

23
Interventions
  • We are only focusing on literacy interventions
    for children with literacy difficulties, not
    preventative approaches
  • The interventions can be used with children of
    low ability and/ or with children with dyslexia
    and/ or children where the origin of the reading
    difficulty is unknown

24
Key Text
  • What Works for Children with Literacy
    Difficulties-
  • The Effectiveness of Intervention Schemes
  • By Greg Brooks National Foundation for
    Educational Research (Nfer) (2007)
  • Published by the Department for Children, Schools
    and Families. Ref 00688-2007 BKT-EN

25
Quality of Research
  • Importance of
  • Pre and post intervention data
  • Use of control groups
  • Longitudinal studies
  • Use of standardised tests
  • Tests of reading (not just component elements,
    such as blending)

26
How much progress should we expect?
  • Shiel,Morgan Larney (1998) found that Irish
    children receiving remedial teaching made gains
    of 3.41 standard score points
  • However, some made little or no progress, and
    children attending schools designated as
    disadvantaged did not improve, but maintained
    their relative position in achievement.

27
Brooks (2007)
  • Good Impact- sufficient to at least double the
    standard rate of progress- can be achieved and it
    is reasonable to expect it

28
Ratio Gains
  • The gain in reading during a chronological time
    span, expressed as a ratio of that time span
  • A ratio gain of 1.0 is exactly standard progress
  • A ratio gain of 1.4 is impact of educational
    significance
  • A ratio gain of less that 1.4 is impact of
    doubtful educational significance

29
Effect Sizes
  • The average gain of the experimental group, minus
    the average gain of the control group, expressed
    as standard deviation.
  • All standardised tests have an implied control
    group, so the effect size is the gains of the
    group, divided by 15
  • An effect size of 0.25 or above is impact of
    educational significance
  • An effect size of less than 0.25 is impact of
    doubtful significance

30
Key Points (Brooks 2007)
  • Ordinary teaching is not enough
  • Working on Childrens self-esteem and reading in
    parallel has definite potential
  • ICT approaches only work if precisely targeted
  • Large scale schemes (expensive and requiring
    teacher training) can give good value for money
    (Phono-graphix, Reading recovery)

31
Key points cont.
  • Where reading partners are available and can be
    trained and supported, partnership approaches can
    be very effective
  • Success with some children with the most severe
    difficulties is elusive, therefore the need for
    skilled, intensive 11 intervention
  • Interventions for longer than 1 term do not
    necessarily produce proportionally greater
    benefits.

32
Interventions
  • Jolly Phonics
  • Toe by Toe
  • Paired Reading
  • Phono-Graphix
  • Acceleread/ Accelewrite
  • Precision Teaching (SNIP)
  • Reading Recovery

33
Jolly Phonics- Consists of
  • Photocopiable Master Handbook
  • Readers
  • Videos
  • Grammar Book
  • Involves quite a lot of initial organisation and
    photocopying
  • Is relatively cost effective

34
Jolly Phonics-Suitable for
  • A whole class approach to teaching phonics in the
    early years
  • An alternative to Letterland
  • Suitable for use with children accessing learning
    support/ resource
  • Best suited to younger children, (up to 2nd
    class)

35
Jolly Phonics- A Multi-sensory Method
  • A story
  • A picture
  • An action
  • A sound
  • Tracing of letter
  • Intensive blending and segmentation

36
Jolly Phonics
  • Involves very rapid learning of letters
  • Includes homework component
  • It as synthetic phonics approach
  • Minimises sound learning, with an emphasis on
    blending

37
Jolly Phonics- Research
  • Tends to rely on research about synthetic
    phonics, rather than research explicitly about
    Jolly Phonics
  • After 16 week programme children were
  • 7 months ahead of CA in reading
  • 8 months ahead of CA in spelling
  • After a year of Jolly Phonics
  • 11 months ahead of CA in reading
  • 1 month ahead of CA in spelling
  • (Johnston and Watson 1999)

38
Toe by Toe, suitable for
  • An individualised approach
  • Suitable for children from the age of 6, but more
    appealing to older primary/ secondary students
  • Has been used effectively in the prison service
  • Use of one workbook, provides both teacher
    direction and student programme
  • Each book costs approx. 40

39
Toe by Toe
  • Highly structured phonics programme
  • Involves teaching skills to a level of fluency
  • Use on non-words puts focus on underlying skills
    of decoding
  • Considerable emphasis on recording progress

40
Claims Made (Toe by Toe)
  • Any student who successfully completes the Toe
    by Toe scheme will have dramatically improved
    reading age. Their spelling will also have
    improved and most importantly- their
    self-esteem will have been transformedIt is not
    an exaggeration to say that this book changes
    lives..

41
Toe by Toe- Research Evidence
  • Pre- and post data over one year
  • 24 secondary aged pupils
  • Matched pairs
  • Experimental group- Toe by Toe
  • Control Group- normal learning support
  • Toe by Toe group were taught individually for 20
    minutes per day, five days per week, for average
    of 3 months

42
Toe by Toe research findings cont.
  • The results were definitive. The experimental
    group made average gains of three and a half
    years. The control group made average gains of
    five months
  • MacKay Cowling
  • Literacy Today, March (2004)

43
Paired Reading
  • Largely based on the work of Keith Topping,
    Centre for Paired Learning, University of Dundee
  • PAL-Peer Assisted Learning
  • It is clear that PAL is not a diluted and
    inferior substitute for direct professional
    teaching- it has quite different strengths and
    weaknesses and to deploy it to maximum effect
    teachers need to be aware of these. Topping
    (2001)

44
Paired reading /Duolog reading
  • A specific and structured technique
  • Selecting a book
  • Reading aloud together
  • The tutee gives prompt when ready to read alone
  • Tutor supplies difficult words directly (no
    sounding out/ guessing)
  • The tutor praises the tutee

45
Paired Reading
  • A range of formalised approaches
  • Considered cost-effective
  • Needs on-going organisation including
  • Training of tutors
  • Monitoring of progress
  • Maintenance
  • (some form of reward system?)

46
Paired reading-research findings
  • Brooks (2007) reports studies involving 2,372
    children in 155 projects in 71 schools
  • Ratio Gains of 3.3 in reading and
  • 4.3 in comprehension
  • (effect sizes of .87 for reading and .77 for
    comprehension)
  • Social gains also widely reported

47
Paired reading/ Duolog Reading
  • The general picture in published studies is that
    Paired readers progress at about 4.2 times
    normal rates in reading accuracy during the
    initial period of commitment. Follow-up studies
    indicate that gains are sustained and do not
    wash out over time.
  • Topping 2004

48
Peer Reading in Ireland
  • The Reading Partners Programme in a special
    school (See Nugent 2001, British Journal of
    Special Education)
  • Helpers made 17.4 months progress (control
    group made 7.16 months progress)
  • Learners made 6.55 months progress
  • (compared to typical gains of 3 months progress)

49
Paired Reading
  • Cross-aged tutoring seems particularly effective
  • Practical applications
  • Transition students reading with first year
    partners
  • Traveller child, reading with younger (settled)
    child
  • Older sibling reading with younger sibling

50
Phono-Graphix, suitable for
  • Also known as Reading Reflex
  • Can be used throughout the age range
  • Intended for use in one to one or small group
    tuition
  • Uses a teacher/ parent manual, 40 approx.
  • Highly structured and directed delivery

51
Phono-Graphix, content
  • A synthetic phonics approach
  • The premise is that letters are pictures of
    sounds
  • Teaches the basic code
  • Lots of sound bingo, auditory processing,
    spelling practice, word lists and some short
    readings.

52
Phono-Graphix-Research
  • 87 children, aged 6-16 years
  • 12 hours of Phono-Graphix therapy (or less)
  • Standard score gains of 14 points on Woodcock
    Word Identification
  • These gains were phenomenal, representing gains
    that equalled and surpassed other methods that
    took seven to fourteen times longer to achieve.
  • Phono-Graphix Website

53
Phono-Graphix -Research
  • The impact measures were substantial, including
    the largest ratio gain for reading of all the
    studies reviewed in this report (Brooks 2002)
  • 230 children in 13 schools, after 20 week
    intervention
  • Ratio Gains of 7.0 in word reading and 6.3 in
    comprehension and 3.3 in spelling (ratio gains
    for younger children, ages 5-6 years, were more
    modest, at 2.2 for reading)
  • Appears to work well even with severely dyslexic
    children, ratio gains of 4.5 reported in a
    special school

54
Acceleread/ Accelewrite
  • An individual approach
  • Requires 11 teaching, 20 minutes per day for 4
    weeks
  • Uses computer and voice feedback
  • Suitable for ages 7-18 (but best progress is made
    with those of 10 years plus)

55
Acc/Acc Research
  • In the age group 10-14, average gains of 37
    months reading progress have been reported after
    6 months of intervention (see dyslexic.com)
  • In a study of 30 children, using the programme
    for 4 weeks, the average gains were of 16
    standard score points in reading and 10 in
    spelling, representing ratio gains of 16.0 in
    reading and 9.8 in spelling (Martin Miles/ Devon
    Study)

56
Acc/ Acc research cont
  • Brooks (2007) reported on the Jersey Project,
    involving 61 students in 15 primary schools and 4
    secondary schools
  • After 4 week intervention students made ratio
    gains of 8.3 in reading and 4.0 in spelling with
    further increases reported over time.
  • The Bristol Study (Sue Derrington) involved 60
    children in 13 primary schools.
  • After 8 weeks of intervention students made
    ration gains of 2.3 in reading accuracy, 2.9 in
    comprehension and 2.0 in spelling.

57
Acc/ Acc research cont.
  • Research by Theresa Tierney of NEPS (2004) found
    that, after an average of just 14 sessions,
    students made an average of 10 months progress
    with reading
  • Research by Pat Devanney (2007) showed that class
    teachers could deliver the programme and after 4
    weeks, the 7 participants had made 5 standard
    score points progress (about 9 months progress)
    while the control group (who received learning
    support) made no progress

58
Precision Teaching
  • Precision teaching is based on rigorous research
    in the area of instructional psychology
  • Precision teaching emphasises the importance of
    fluency
  • Precision teaching techniques can be used to
    teach sight words, phonics (or other skills)
  • Puts the focus of learning failure on
    instructional methods and not on students
  • Outcomes suggest at least twice the normal rate
    of progress

59
Precision teaching cont.
  • Sets time-based mastery criteria for each
    curriculum step
  • Provides daily opportunities for practice and
    timed measurement
  • Charts the student performance (and involves the
    student in this monitoring)
  • Advances to the next step when criteria are met
  • Changes procedures if chart shows inadequate
    progress

60
Direct Instruction
  • Very familiar to those using SRA reading lab
  • Detailed scripting of teacher behaviour
  • Uses the most effective methods of teaching to
    help children catch-up
  • Teaching of the general case (the smallest
    possible number of examples to produce the
    largest possible amount of learning)

61
SNIP
  • This is a precision teaching package
  • It can be downloaded free!
  • Precision teaching is based on very rigorous
    research in the area of instructional psychology
  • This approach is best suited to students whose
    literacy difficulties are more mild (learning
    support rather than resource)

62
SNIP
  • Contains lists of word to be learnt as sight
    vocabulary
  • Appropriate for top end primary and early
    secondary school
  • Includes essential curriculum words
  • Plus irregular words that often confuse students

63
SNIP cont.
  • Emphasises fluency
  • Daily practice of 5 minutes
  • The reading aloud of word lists is timed
  • Using this pack we have achieved measurable
    gains of three years in an academic year with
    some of our pupils
  • Carol and Phil Smart

64
Precision teaching cont.
  • The same precision teaching techniques can be
    used to teach sight words
  • Free prompt sheets can be made up using the
    website johnandgwyn.co.uk
  • Probe sheets can have anything from 4 to 24 words
    on them

65
Reading Recovery
  • The Marie Clay method
  • Developed in New Zealand in 1970
  • Now widely available in schools in US, UK, Canada
    and Australia
  • 85 schools in Ireland use the method, under
    initiatives to tackle disadvantage

66
Reading Recovery
  • Short-term intervention, for those falling behind
    after one year of instruction (best with senior
    infants and first class)
  • Half-hour lesson each day for 12-20 weeks (or
    until they reach class level)
  • Teachers are specially trained

67
Reading Recovery
  • Begins with comprehensive diagnostic assessment
  • Data is collected about letter identification,
    sight vocabulary, concepts of print, phonemic
    awareness and reading and writing skills
  • The first two weeks then focuses on what the
    child can do, building their confidence and
    establishing rapport with the teacher

68
Reading recovery cont.
  • Highly structured sessions
  • Reading familiar stories
  • Rereading a story read the day before
  • Working with letters/ words using magnetic
    letters
  • Writing a story
  • Assembling a cut-up story
  • Preparing and reading a new story

69
Research Findings
  • Most researched initiative in the UK,
  • London and Surrey, 89 children in 22 schools,
    average 21 weeks of intervention, Ratio gains of
    2.0 (effect size of .70) See Hurry and Sylva
    (1998, 2007)
  • Bristol, 145 children in 21 schools, after 20
    weeks, ratio gains of 2.9 in reading (Fudge 2001)

70
Reading recovery in Ireland
  • Connolly (2003) reports on the initiative over
    three years (2000-2003)
  • In the first year 51 out of 76 children (aged
    5.9-6.6) were successfully returned to the
    average band in their class after 20 weeks
  • In the second year 95 out of 131 were
    successfully returned after 20 weeks
  • In both cases further children were returned
    after more intervention

71
  • Large-scale evaluation in Northern Ireland (Munn
    and Ellis 2001)
  • Consistent finding of effectiveness, but may not
    have enough phonemic/ phonological elements to
    effectively target children with severe dyslexia

72
What about PAT?
  • Daily 10 minute intensive phonics work
  • Identifying sounds
  • Blending phonemes together
  • Segmenting or isolating sounds in words
  • Worksheet based, with specific rimes, reading
    lists and sentences for dictation

73
PAT, research findings
  • The results were not clear cut. The children in
    the experimental group did make significantly
    more progress than those in the control group
    but the children in the experimental group made
    scarcely any more progress than would have been
    expected from ordinary classroom teaching and
    development Brooks 2002

74
PAT
  • 24 children in 3 schools
  • 20 week intervention
  • Ratio Gains of 0.16 for experimental group

75
A word of caution
  • Research cited here indicates that some
    interventions work for some children in some
    settings and we need to be cautious about
    interpreting findings. Some interventions were
    not shown to be highly effective, but may need
    further analysis.

76
Next Big Thing?
  • ARROW, Dr Colin Lane
  • Read Write Inc, Ruth Miskin

77
Waterford Reading ProjectsPrimary
2006-7Secondary 2007-8
78
Overview of Action Research
  • Primary- Involved 48 children in 12 schools
  • Secondary- Involved 55 children in 10 schools
  • Lasted 4 months
  • Explored the effectiveness of reading
    interventions
  • Implementation of named programmes
  • Pre and post intervention reading data
  • Logs and review data from teachers

79
Intervention Programmes
  • Primary
  • Acceleread/ Accelewrite
  • Barton-Gillingham
  • Sound Linkage
  • Paired Reading
  • Precision Teaching (sight vocabulary)
  • Toe by Toe
  • Secondary
  • Acceleread/ Accelewrite
  • Paired Reading
  • Precision Teaching (SNIP)
  • Toe by Toe

80
Table 1 , Primary ResearchInterventions,
Participants, and Teaching Inputs
81
Overall result word reading
82
Overall result sentence reading
83
(No Transcript)
84
(No Transcript)
85
Secondary Reading Gains
86
(No Transcript)
87
(No Transcript)
88
(No Transcript)
89
Other progress
  • Teachers felt that the children had made progress
    which the tests given did not readily capture.
  • Confidence greatly improved. LS teacher for
    maths reports Child A is able to read more
    problems
  • Her mother said that she felt the AA programme
    had improved her reading as well as her
    confidence
  • Significant difference made in Child Bs
    automatic sight vocabulary (from 40 known to
    93)

90
A Framework for School Wide Intervention
  • Although there are no short-cuts to accelerating
    the literacy of older struggling readers, it is
    possible to close the literacy gap by providing a
    coherent and co-ordinated school-wide literacy
    acceleration programme that systematically
    increases the amount of time, teaching and
    practice available to all struggling readers
  • Feldman (2004)

91
Feldmans Framework(2004)
  • Assess all struggling readers
  • Match length / intensity of intervention to
    severity of need
  • Select a research-based, validated curriculum as
    the programme anchor
  • Assign knowledgeable and enthusiastic teachers
  • Support teachers with curriculum specific
    professional development
  • Monitor the progress of students

92
Assessing Literacy
  • Word reading
  • Reading comprehension
  • Spelling
  • Pseudoword reading and spelling
  • Samples of written work
  • Dictation
  • Information from teachers (esp re oral skills)
  • Assessment of general ability

93
And then what?
  • Rethink your timetable
  • Emphasis on short-term intensive intervention
  • Individual or very small groups
  • Evidence based interventions
  • Collect your own pre and post intervention data
  • Monitor and review

94
Then what?
  • Come back and tell us all about it..

95
Support Pack for Schools
  • List of resources for assessing literacy
  • List of evidence based interventions, with
    contact details and costs, including information
    on free downloads
  • Rough Guide to Precision Teaching, with SNIP
    references and supporting checklists
  • Rough Guide to Reading Partners, with supporting
    templates

96
Thanks
  • With thanks to children, parents, teachers and
    psychology colleagues who have informed this
    presentation in so many ways.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com