Title: Global cities as centers of cultural influence: a focus on Istanbul, Turkey
1Global cities as centers of cultural influence
a focus on Istanbul, Turkey
- Michael A. McAdamsGeography Department
- Fatih University
- Istanbul, Turkey
2Introduction
- Cities have been highly influential in the
development of world culture - Fordist and Post-Fordist periods, primary global
culture transmitters have been centered in New
York, Los Angeles, Paris, Tokyo and London - It is inevitable that new global cultural centers
will surface to challenge, replace or augment
these existing centers
3- The driving forces behind the predominance of
these global cultural centers are vibrant
cultural economy well connected to
communications network level/quality of
capital accumulation
4Istanbul A New Cultural Center?
- Candidate for one of these new cultural centers
could be Istanbul due to 1) the recent regional
changes in the economic and geo-political
climate and 2) its unique geographical location,
being at the crossroads of Europe, the Middle
East and Central Asia.
5Cities and Cultural Influence
- Foci where the human and material resources of
civilizations have been concentrated. - Artists, musicians, architects, philosophers,
scientists and writers have gravitated toward
certain cities due to numerous forces such as
patrons, community of artists, universities,
clients, and a skilled workforce - Elusive environment of certain cites also seem to
play a significant factor in drawing creative
individuals to them - Urban centers of culture have changed throughout
the centuries mostly based on their
economic/political strength with the outside
world.
6Cites as the transmitters of culture
- In the past, cultures may have been contained
within regions or national borders - World as cultural supermarket where
individuals pick and choose - Culture is innately geographical
- Cities remain to be where culture is repackaged
or created
7Financial Centers and Cultural Centers
- First Tier Alpha Cities London, Paris, New York
and Tokyo - Second Tier Alpha cities Chicago, Frankfurt,
Hong Kong, Los Angeles, Milan, Singapore - Primary Cultural CentersNew York, Los Angeles,
London, Paris, Milan, Tokyo
8 Cultural Economy of Cities
- A cultural urban center is somewhat based on the
number of people, but is also based on the
composition of the city. - Cultural products are only writing, art, music,
theater, but als other industries such as
furniture, automobiles, multi-media, computer
graphics, book publishing, music recording etc. - Creative Cites are those where there is
interaction in the physical space of the city
9Technology Transforming Cultural Centers Role
- Global communications network places most places
within the reach of global cultural centers - Rapidity of exchange of ideas facilitated more
than any other time
10Geographical basis for Cultural Centers
- Culture emanates from one place or another.
- Culture may be based in a peripheral area, but is
packaged or reformulated by cultural centers for
distribution into the global cultural network. - Cities have always been the place where those who
are creative gravitate - Not all cities are cultural transmitters
11Cities as global financial centers and as
cultural centers
- The connection between capital accumulation in
certain key cites can be linked with the
dissemination of cultural goods such music,
clothes, film and food
12Global City Ranking(Beaverstock et al)
- First Tier Alpha cities are London, Paris, New
York and Tokyo - Second Tier Alpha cities are Chicago,
Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Los Angeles, Milan,
Singapore - Cultural Centers areLondon, New York, Paris,
Los Angeles, Milan
13Istanbul Potential Cultural Center?
14Istanbul some brief facts
- Over 10 million population
- Key position between Europe, Middle East and
Central Asia - Lies at one of the most important transportation
links in the world
15A history of decline and rebirth
- Capital of three major empires Roman, Byzantine,
Ottoman - All elements of these civilizations are seen in
Istanbul - First time in almost 2,000 years that Istanbul
has not been a capital -
16(No Transcript)
17Contributions to status of modern Istanbul
- After the Republic of Turkey established, capital
moved to Ankara - Istanbul pushed to the backdrop of world culture
- Loss of diversity due to migration of Greeks,
Armenians, Bulgarians after the establishment of
Republic - The Cold War closed many of the former links
established during Ottoman times (i.e., Balkans,
Central Asia)
18- In 1980s, Turkey opened up to foreign investment
- Population grew very rapidly drawing people from
rural areas of Turkey - Istanbul became the primate city of Turkey
- All creative arts and media concentrated in
Istanbul, but for a Turkish market and not
internationally oriented
19New Opportunities
- Opening up of markets in Balkan and Central Asian
and Russia - Vibrant and developed cultural arts in music,
art, writing and publishing - European membership talks started in 2005
- Nomination of Istanbul as the Cultural Capital of
Europe in 2010
20A Bright Future?
- Istanbul aspires to the title of world city. It
wants to be classed with New York, London, Paris,
Rome. With its 9 million inhabitants at the
beginning of the millennium, it has size on its
side. It also has history and the monuments to
prove it. Its Byzantine walls and churches,
Ottoman mosques and palaces, and modern
skyscrapers bear witness to its importance since
330 AD, when Constantine the Great chose it as
the capital of the Roman empire. Its setting at
the junction of Europe and Asia is incomparable.
For Turks, the pearl of the Bosphorus is a
symbol of their glorious past and the embodiment
of their present vigor (Mango)
21Trapped in the Past Hüzün?
- ..in Istanbul the remains of a glorious past and
civilization are everywhere visible. No matter
how ill-kept they are, no matter how neglected or
hemmed in they are by concrete monstrosities, the
great mosques and other monuments of the city, as
well as the lesser detritus of empire in every
side street and corner-the little arches,
fountains and neighborhood mosques inflict
heartache on all who live amongst them....But for
the citys more sensitive and attuned residents,
these ruins are reminders that the present city
is so poor and confused that it can never again
dream of rising to the same heights of wealth,
power and culture. (Pamuk)
22Is Istanbul a world cultural center?
- At present, Istanbul is a receptor of culture
- Tied to its economic status of Istanbul which is
connected to Turkish market, but not very well to
International market - Cultural economy is likewise oriented toward
Turkish market and not international
23Cultural Economy of Istanbul
- Very robust and sophisticated media
- Venues for original performances (clubs, theaters
etc.) - Numerous international festivals (music, theater,
film) - World status symphony and opera
- New Museum of Modern Art an indication of
developing awarenessLondon - Numerous firms involved in design
- Influences upon Turkish, Middle Eastern and
European culture - Location of several major Turkish universities
- Vibrant artistic area (e.g., Taksim) which are
similar to those in Paris, New York,
24Can Istanbul transform itself to a leading world
cultural center
- Revitalization of the central city
- Encouragement of cultural entrepreneurship
- Development of an outward vision seeing Istanbul
as a city-state connected to global cultural
network - Increased state sponsorship of cultural arts in
universities and schools of the arts - Improvements to telecommunication networks and
- Sponsorship (private or public) of artists having
exhibitions, galleries concerts in key
international locations (i.e., New York, Paris,
London, Milan etc.)
25Conclusion
- The catalysts that make a city a cultural center
are elusive and complex - Cultural centers are at the crossroads and where
different cultures interact - Istanbul has the necessary conditions for entry
into this global cultural network as a
transmitter of culture - The question is what elements will project it
into this status? - Need for further study