From NARS to a Thinking Machine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

From NARS to a Thinking Machine

Description:

NARS (Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System): a project aimed at ... crow. feathered_creature [1.00, 0.90] [1.00, 0.90] [0.00, 0.90] [1.00, 0.90] [1.00, 0.90] ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: agi5
Learn more at: https://www.agiri.org
Category:
Tags: nars | machine | thinking

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From NARS to a Thinking Machine


1
From NARS to a Thinking Machine
  • Pei Wang
  • Temple University

2
Content
  • NARS (Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System) a
    project aimed at building a general-purpose
    intelligent system, or a thinking machine
  • The main ideas behind the project
  • The development plan of the project
  • The past, present, and future of the project

3
Observations
  • Intelligence is a capability possessed by human
    beings, but not by animals and ordinary
    computers.
  • The major difference not in what it can do,
    but in what it can learn to do.
  • Key features
    adaptivity, generality, creativity, flexibility,
    but not absolute optimity.

4
Methodology
  • Minimalism not to maximize the systems
    performance, but to minimize its theoretical
    assumptions and technical instruments, while
    still achieving desired performance.
  • There are scientific and engineering reasons for
    following such an approach.
  • Many such attempts have failed, but they might
    have followed wrong ideas.

5
Basic Principle
  • Intelligence is the capability of a system to
    adapt to its environment and to work with
    insufficient knowledge and resources.
  • The system should
  • rely on constant processing capacity,
  • work in real time,
  • open to unexpected tasks,
  • learn from experience.

6
Framework
  • NARS is built within the framework of a reasoning
    system, with a language for knowledge
    representation, a semantics of the language, a
    set of inference rules, a memory architecture, a
    control mechanism.
  • Advantages being domain-independent, combining
    the justifiability of individual steps and the
    flexibility of processes.

7
Categorical Language
  • A typical sentence
  • bird ? animal 1.0, 0.9
  • Term bird and animal are names of concepts
  • Inheritance relation ? special-general
  • Truth value frequency, confidence

8
Experience-Grounded Semantics
  • The truth value of a sentence is determined by
    available evidence in the experience
  • f w/w, c w/(w1)
  • Truth value uniformly represents randomness,
    fuzziness, and ignorance.
  • The meaning of a term is defined by its
    experienced relations with other terms.

9
Basic Inference Rules
abduction
revision
10
Memory as a Belief Network
Cbird
11
Control Strategy
  • In each step, a task is processed by interacting
    with a belief, according to certain rules.
  • The task and belief are selected
    probabilistically, according to priority
    distributions among related tasks and beliefs.
  • Factors influence the priority of an item
    quality of the item, usefulness of the item in
    history, and relevance of the item to the current
    context.

12
Compound Terms
  • Compound terms sets, intersections, differences,
    products, and images.
  • Variants of the inheritance relation similarity,
    instance, and property.
  • New inference rules are added to carry out
    compound composition and decomposition.
  • Related changes in memory and control.

13
Higher-Order Reasoning
  • Two higher-order relations, implication and
    equivalence, are defined between statements.
  • Compound statements negations, conjunctions, and
    disjunctions.
  • The implication relation is used to carry out
    conditional and hypothetical inferences.
  • Variable terms are used to carry out general and
    abstract inferences.

14
Procedural Reasoning
  • Events as statements with temporal relations
    (sequential and parallel). Prediction and
    explanation as temporal inferences.
  • Operations as statements with procedural
    interpretation. Skill learning and planning as
    procedural inferences.
  • Goals as statements to be realized. Decision
    making as the making of new goals.

15
Development Progress
  • DONE language definition
  • semantics specification
  • basic inference rules
  • rules for compound terms
  • rules for higher-order
    inference
  • basic memory and control
  • DOING rules for temporal/procedural inference
  • refined memory and control

16
NARS Plus
  • Optional extensions of NARS
  • sensorimotor interface
  • natural language interface
  • education procedure
  • socialization procedure
  • special hardware
  • evolution process

17
Conclusions
  • An AI system should follow the same principles as
    the human mind, though it may have different
    internal structure, external behavior, practical
    ability, etc.
  • To see intelligence as adaptation with
    insufficiency explains mental processes, guides
    system design, and distinguishes AI from other
    disciplines.

18
Information about NARS
  • Website containing 30 publications and on-line
    demonstrations (a Java Applet and a Prolog
    program) of NARS (Version 4.2).
    (http//www.cogsci.indiana.edu/farg/peiwang/papers
    .html)
  • Book Rigid Flexibility The Logic of
    Intelligence, Springer, ISBN 1402050445,
    Available September 15, 2006.
    (Wang-Contents-Preface.pdf)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com