Bulges of Spiral Galaxies: Stellar Populations, Structure, and Kinematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Bulges of Spiral Galaxies: Stellar Populations, Structure, and Kinematics

Description:

Early-typed bulges: Similar to ... B/P bulges bars (eg: Chung & Bureau 2004; ... Selected galaxies whose bulges are very similar in color to their ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: astr4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bulges of Spiral Galaxies: Stellar Populations, Structure, and Kinematics


1
Bulges of Spiral Galaxies Stellar Populations,
Structure, and Kinematics
  • Bhasker Moorthy
  • Jon Holtzman
  • Anatoly Klypin
  • New Mexico State University

2
Motivation Why Bulges?
  • Key to understanding origin of Hubble sequence
  • Bridge together properties of disks and
    ellipticals
  • Provide insight into a wide range of mechanisms
    involved in the formation and evolution of
    galaxies
  • Merging and accretion
  • Star formation
  • Feedback from SN II and SN 1a
  • Galactic winds
  • Secular processes - bar formation, vertical and
    radial transport, disk heating, new star
    formation, bar destruction?

3
Early-typed bulges Similar to ellipticals
Late-types Similar to disks
  • Correlation in scale lengths (eg MacArthur et
    al. 2003)
  • Small Sersic indices (eg Balcells et al. 2003)
  • Smaller SSP ages than ellipticals (Proctor
    Sansom 2002)
  • Similar colors (eg MacArthur et al. 2004)
  • Emission lines (Prugniel et al. 2001)
  • B/P bulges bars (eg Chung Bureau
    2004 Athanassoula 2005)
  • Rotational support (eg Kormendy Illingworth
    1982)
  • Same or similar fundamental plane relation
    (Falcón-Barroso et al. 2002)
  • Similar light profiles (eg Baggett et al. 1998
    Carollo et al. 1997)
  • Similar luminosity-weighted (SSP) ages and Mg-s
    relations (eg Idiart et al. 1996)
  • Color and line strength gradients (Balcells
    Peletier 1994 Fisher et al. 1996)
  • Milky Way bulge stars are predominantly old with
    larger Mg/Fe ratios than disk stars (eg Feltzing
    Gilmore 2000 Fulbright et al. 2004)

4
Stellar Populations and Formation Mechanisms
  • Luminosity-weighted ages and abundance ratios
    (eg. Mg/Fe) constrain epochs and duration of star
    formation
  • Similarities between bulge and disk populations
    suggestive of secular evolution
  • Dissipationless Secular Evolution
  • Decrease in scale length might amplify
    metallicity gradients while increase in velocity
    dispersion might wash them out
  • Disk-driven evolution with gas funneling
  • Could trigger new star formation, producing a
    negative metallicity gradient (Friedli et al.
    1994)
  • Not necessarily secular

5
Our Project
  • Study stellar populations, structure, and
    kinematics of bulges as a means of constraining
    their formation mechanisms
  • Particularly interested in seeing
  • whether or not stellar populations
  • show evidence for secular evolution
  • Long-slit spectroscopy with
  • ARC 3.5m/DIS at APO
  • Wavelength coverage 4000-8000 Å at
  • 6-8 Å resolution
  • Absorption (Lick indices) and emission
  • lines
  • Rotation curves and velocity dispersion profiles
  • Imaging with ARC 3.5m/SPIcam
  • Bulge-to-disk decomposition to determine disk
    contamination and obtain structural properties

6
The Galaxy Sample
  • 38 nearby (vreslt7000 km/s) mostly isolated
    galaxies spanning a wide range in Hubble type
    (S0-Sc)
  • Selected galaxies whose bulges are very similar
    in color to their disks and a control sample with
    redder bulges (Balcells Peletier 1994 de Jong
    van der Kruit 1994)
  • Included 3 other galaxies previously identified
    as having disk-like bulges based on their
    structure and kinematics (Erwin et al. 2003 de
    Zeeuw et al. 2002 Silchenko et al. 2003
    Pinkney et al. 2003 Kormendy Kennicutt 2004)

7
Rotational Vs. Pressure Support
(Vmax/s)bulge
(Vmax/s)bulge
Bulge Ellipticity
Based on Binney (1978) and Kormendy Kennicutt
(2004)
Bulge Ellipticity
8
Central Line Strengths
Hb
Hb
MgFe
SSP Models from Thomas, Maraston, Bender
(2003) Crosses from Trager et al. (1998)
MgFe
MgFe
9
Central Line Strengths Vs. Kinematics and
Dynamics
MgFe
Mgb/ltFegt
s
Vmax
10
Metallicity Gradients
Sa
S0
S0
MgFe
S0
MgFe
Sb
Sc
Sa
Sb
Radius (kpc)
Radius (kpc)
11
Gradients in a/Fe
Sa
S0
S0
Sb
S0
Mgb/ltFegt
MgbltFegt
Sc
Sb
Sa
Radius (kpc)
Radius (kpc)
12
Main Results
  • Red bulges are similar to luminous ellipticals in
    their central stellar populations
  • Hubble types S0-Sb
  • Intermediate-large SSP age
  • Super-solar Z/H
  • Super-solar a/Fe
  • Blue bulges exhibit larger scatter and appear
    similar to low-luminosity ellipticals in their
    central stellar populations
  • Uniformly solar a/Fe
  • Metal-poor class Sb-Sc, emission lines
  • Young metal-rich class all Hubble types
  • Central metallicity and a/Fe are sensitive to s
    and Vmax
  • Barred galaxies add scatter to Metallicity-Vmax
    relation but not a/FeVmax relation
  • Gradients support disk-driven evolution picture
    for many galaxies
  • Bulges of barred galaxies, boxy/peanut bulges,
    and bulges with disk-like kinematics are more
    often similar to their disks in their stellar
    populations

13
Additional Hints
  • Galaxies with largest central metallicities are
    barred or have b/p bulges
  • Extra enrichment from bar-driven gas inflow?
  • NGC 2599 and late-typed blue bulges Unbarred
    but bulge stellar populations nearly identical to
    those of disk
  • Secular evolution with bar destruction?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com