Fighting poverty in segregated cities: the case of South Africa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Fighting poverty in segregated cities: the case of South Africa

Description:

the case of South Africa. by. Dr Harris Selod (INRA and ... of urban stratification in South Africa: Barriers to human capital ... in South Africa. 13 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:232
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: world93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fighting poverty in segregated cities: the case of South Africa


1
Fighting povertyin segregated cities the case
of South Africa
  • by
  • Dr Harris Selod
  • (INRA and CREST, France)

2
Introduction
  • City structure can deteriorate social outcomes
  • Mismatch between residences and job opportunities

  • (Kain, 1968).
  • Residential segregation (Benabou, 1993).
  • South African cities are characterized by
  • Sprawl.
  • Extreme segregation.
  • Objectives
  • Understand the poverty-enhancing structure.
  • Formulate adapted policies.

3
This presentation
  • 1. Some facts about South African cities
  • 2. Models of urban stratification in South
    Africa
  • Barriers to human capital formation.
  • Policy recommendations.
  • 3. Future research
  • Barriers to work.

4
1. Facts about South African cities
  • Apartheid organized racial segregation

5
  • Stark inequalities between population groups

Table 1. Indicators of social stratification in
Cape Town
6
  • High level of income and human capital
    stratification

7
  • Inequitable and inefficient city structure
  • Geographical concentration of poverty exacerbates
    poverty and social deviances (epidemic theory of
    ghettos, Crane 1991).
  • Poor services and housing shortage in peripheral
    areas confronted to rural in-migration.
  • Sprawl high mobility costs borne by the poor.
  • Divided geography (i) lack of social
    interactions
  • (ii) tensions between the demands of the main
    tax base and the majority poor population.

8
TO SUMMARIZE A structure and form which agg
ravates poverty and inequality, () which uses
resources inefficiently (City of Cape Town,
1999). Market forces have replaced race and
state control in shaping the pattern of urban
development (Turok, 2000).
9
2. Models of urban stratification
  • 2.1 J. Brueckner (1996)
  •  Welfare gains from removing land-use
    distortions An analysis of urban change in
    post-Apartheid South Africa , Journal of
    Regional Science, 36, 91-109.
  • Comparison of city structures under and after
    Apartheid efficiency gains.
  • Segregation remains (market driven).

10
  • 2.2 H. Selod and Y. Zenou (2001)
  •  Location and Education in South African Cities
    under and after Apartheid , Journal of Urban
    Economics, 49, 168-198.
  • Does the abolition of Apartheid suffice to reduce
    human capital imbalances?
  • (i.e. Can township kids benefit from school
    integration by attending the better-resourced
    former white schools
  • located in white central areas?)
  • Because the segregated urban structure remains
    after Apartheid, we show that

11
Racial integration in schools
is restricted by long and costly commuting trips
from peripheral to central areas.
12
  • Main message subsidizing transport costs
  • (or busing) can increase welfare.
  • 2.3 H. Selod and Y. Zenou (2003, forthcoming)
  •  Private versus public schools in post-Apartheid
    South African cities theory and policy
    implications , Journal of Development
    Economics.
  • The increase in the number of private schools,
    mostly located in white areas, and charging
    soaring school fees, is perceived as as barrier
    to school integration.

13
  • We model the increase in private-school fees and
    analyze the efficiency of education policies.
  • We consider an urban model with school choice and
    residential choice. White families control a
    representative private school and choose its
    school fee, taking into account
  • school quality effect (per-pupil spending and
    exclusion)
  • marginal cost effect (paying the fee)
  • land rent effect

14
  • The market solution is suboptimal (whites
    overprice education so as to reduce the negative
    human capital externalities incurred by their
    children). Some Coloureds and Asians can afford
    private schools but few Blacks can.
  • We consider education policies subject to the
    constraint that private schools may freely choose
    their fees
  • Transportation subsidies
  • Private-school vouchers
  • Public-school spending

15
  • RESULTS
  • Inefficient policies
  • (countered by a raise in school fees)
  • Uniform vouchers
  • Restricted vouchers decreasing with income
  • ?? Welfare-enhancing policies
  • Restricted vouchers increasing with income
  • Public-school spending
  • Transport subsidies or busing

16
3. Future research barriers to work
  • Spatial Mismatch in South African cities

17
  • How does distance to job opportunities
    deteriorate labor-market outcomes (Gobillon,
    Selod, Zenou, 2002)?
  • The issue of data availability
  • ? Levy database
  • ? Census data at the neighborhood level
  • ? Migration study

18
Conclusion
  • Space matters city-structures can be
    inefficient. There is room for economic
    policies.
  • The spatial organization of cities can be key to
    analyzing problems such as education inequality
    and unemployment, especially in developing
    countries.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com