Title: Sow%20Longevity%20
1Sow Longevity Its Improvement and Economic
Importance
- Ken Stalder
- Department of Animal Science
- Iowa State University
2(No Transcript)
3Reported Averages
- Replacement Culling Avg. Parity
Death - Rate, Rate,
At Culling Loss, - PigCHAMP 60 42 3.8
7.8 - Pigtales 53 47 Not
Reported
4Worldwide Replacement Rates
- Australian average 63.8 replacement from 1992
through 2002 - Brazil 2002 averaged 55 replacement rate, 43
culling rate, 5.5 death loss, and average parity
of culled sows of 4.16. - Canada 2002 averaged 58 replacement rate, 39.5
culling rate, 6.5 death loss, and average parity
of culled sows of 4.71. - Japan 2000 averaged 47.6 replacement rate, 28.6
culling rate, 5.3 death loss, and average parity
of culled sows of 3.8.
5How Do Top Herds Perform?
- 2002 PigCHAMP data Upper 10 Percentile
- Replacement rate 32.7
- Culling rate 22
- Death Loss 2.8
- Average parity at culling 5.5
- Koketsu et al. (1999)
- A cohort of females born in 1990
- Average lifetime pig production 67.2 pigs
- Average parity at removal was 5.6 parities
6Why should we be concerned with longevity?
- Performance differences
- Number born alive
- Litter weaning weight
- Grow Finish Performance
- Better protection from disease??
- Introduction of more gilts
- Associated costs
- Welfare issue
7Reasons For Culling
Reason
Percentage Culled
- Reproductive failure 30 - 35
- Old age 15
- 20 - Performance 15 - 20
- Feet and leg problems 10 - 15
- Death
5 - 10 - Post-farrowing problems 3 - 5
- Other
5 - 10
8Cost of Replacing a Sow
- Replacement gilt
- Facility, feed, and labor during isolation and
acclimation - Vaccination and other veterinary expenses
- Disease risk
- Opportunity cost (interest rate)
- Performance difference between a gilt and mature
sow.
9Ideal Parity Distribution
10Impact of Distribution on Productivity
- Average parity of sow herd 3.6 (industry) and
3.86 (book)
11National Swine Improvement Federation Parity
adjustment factors for number born alive
- Parity Number born alive
- 1 1.2
- 2 0.9
- 3 0.2
- 4-5 0
- 6 0.2
- 7 0.5
- 8 0.9
- 9 1.1
12National Swine Improvement Federation Parity
adjustment factors for 21-day Litter Weight
- Parity 21-day Litter Weight Adj.
- 1 16.2
- 2 0
- 3 1.0
- 4 3.8
- 5 6.2
- 6 9.5
- 7 11.6
- 8 15.2
- 9 21.5
13Given 10.2 pigs born alive from an average parity
of sows farrowed of 3.5
Maximum Parity Number Born Alive Number Born Alive Per 100 Sows Value of Pigs Produced _at_ 30 / pig Value Per Year, Difference from Maximum, / Year
2 9.79 979 29,370 1,527,240 87,360
3 10.05 1005 30,150 1,567,800 46,800
4 10.21 1021 30,630 1,592,760 21,840
5 10.31 1031 30,930 1,608,360 6,240
6 10.35 1035 31,050 1,614,600 0
7 10.35 1035 31,050 1,614,600 0
8 10.33 1033 30,990 1,611,480 3,120
14Ideal Distribution
- Given
- Maximum Parity
- Culling per parity at 15 or 35 per year
15Take Home Point Economic Importance of Sow
Longevity
- Reduced sow longevity (parity of sow at culling)
results in fewer litters in which a sow has an
opportunity to be sufficiently productive in
order for her purchase to be profitable. - Because of the cost of replacement females and
short herd life, commercial swine producers
should economically evaluate their replacement
breeding herd decisions.
16How do you evaluate how long a sow needs to
remain in
- the breeding herd to be a profitable investment?
17Development of the Sow Longevity Calculator
- Farrow-to-Finish and Breed-to-Wean custom
spreadsheets available - Uses Net Present Value analysis
- Version 2.0 Now Available
- Operation specific financial information
- Herd specific production data
- Income
- Fixed and variable costs
18Data Entry Sheet
19Feed Data Entry
20(No Transcript)
21Adjusting for Parity Performance Differences
22Parity Adjustment Caution
- Only make these adjustments if you are extremely
confident in the production numbers by parity. - Do not adjust if values from your herd are based
on small numbers - Within a parity
- Across all parities
23What does all of this get you?
- Net Present Value Analysis
- What does the NPV number mean?
- gt 0 means the investment is profitable in the
long term. - lt 0 means the investment will lose money in the
long term.
24Sensitivity Analyses Gilt Purchase Price (F-F)
25Sensitivity Analyses
Number
Born Alive
26Sensitivity Analyses
Market
Hog Price
27Sensitivity Analyses
Feed Costs
Per Market Hog
28Take Home Points Factors Influencing Net Present
Value of a Breeding Herd Replacement Female
Take Home Points
- Major Factors
- Pigs produced (number born alive, mortalities at
all levels, and substandard pigs at marketing) - ½ pig changes parity at which positive NPV is
reached - 5 change in number born alive
- Price received for pigs marketed
- 2 - 4 changes parity at which positive NPV
is reached - 4.5 to 9 change in price
- Feed costs (feed efficiency and ingredient cost)
- 3 per head changes parity at which positive
NPV is reached - 4.8 change in feed costs
29Take Home Points Factors Influencing Net Present
Value of a Breeding Herd Replacement Female
- Relatively Minor Factors
- Replacement Gilt Cost
- 50 change in gilt price required to change
parity at which positive NPV is reached - 25 change in number born alive
- Interest Rate
- Operation Equity
- Cull Animal Market Price
30Factors Influencing Sow Longevity
- Host of management effects
- feed intake, lactation length, gestation housing,
etc.
- Factors under some genetic control
- Backfat of gilt at selection effects sow longevity
31Summary
- Improved longevity can increase profitability
- Focus on management practices that improve
longevity - More sows should be culled because of poor
performance rather than reproductive reasons.
32Those Interested in The Spreadsheet
- Spreadsheet designed to evaluate the investment
in a replacement gilt available at - Iowa Pork Industry Center 515-294-4103
- Iowa Pork Industry Center Web Site
- http//www.extension.iastate.edu/ipic
- Porkline (Iowa Only) 800-808-7675
- e-mail me at stalder_at_iastate.edu
33Thank You for Your Time and Attention