Sow%20Longevity%20 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sow%20Longevity%20

Description:

– PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: iowapork
Learn more at: https://www.iowapork.org
Category:
Tags: 20longevity | sow

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sow%20Longevity%20


1
Sow Longevity Its Improvement and Economic
Importance
  • Ken Stalder
  • Department of Animal Science
  • Iowa State University

2
(No Transcript)
3
Reported Averages
  • Replacement Culling Avg. Parity
    Death
  • Rate, Rate,
    At Culling Loss,
  • PigCHAMP 60 42 3.8
    7.8
  • Pigtales 53 47 Not
    Reported

4
Worldwide Replacement Rates
  • Australian average 63.8 replacement from 1992
    through 2002
  • Brazil 2002 averaged 55 replacement rate, 43
    culling rate, 5.5 death loss, and average parity
    of culled sows of 4.16.
  • Canada 2002 averaged 58 replacement rate, 39.5
    culling rate, 6.5 death loss, and average parity
    of culled sows of 4.71.
  • Japan 2000 averaged 47.6 replacement rate, 28.6
    culling rate, 5.3 death loss, and average parity
    of culled sows of 3.8.

5
How Do Top Herds Perform?
  • 2002 PigCHAMP data Upper 10 Percentile
  • Replacement rate 32.7
  • Culling rate 22
  • Death Loss 2.8
  • Average parity at culling 5.5
  • Koketsu et al. (1999)
  • A cohort of females born in 1990
  • Average lifetime pig production 67.2 pigs
  • Average parity at removal was 5.6 parities

6
Why should we be concerned with longevity?
  • Performance differences
  • Number born alive
  • Litter weaning weight
  • Grow Finish Performance
  • Better protection from disease??
  • Introduction of more gilts
  • Associated costs
  • Welfare issue

7
Reasons For Culling
Reason
Percentage Culled
  • Reproductive failure 30 - 35
  • Old age 15
    - 20
  • Performance 15 - 20
  • Feet and leg problems 10 - 15
  • Death
    5 - 10
  • Post-farrowing problems 3 - 5
  • Other
    5 - 10

8
Cost of Replacing a Sow
  • Replacement gilt
  • Facility, feed, and labor during isolation and
    acclimation
  • Vaccination and other veterinary expenses
  • Disease risk
  • Opportunity cost (interest rate)
  • Performance difference between a gilt and mature
    sow.

9
Ideal Parity Distribution
10
Impact of Distribution on Productivity
  • Average parity of sow herd 3.6 (industry) and
    3.86 (book)

11
National Swine Improvement Federation Parity
adjustment factors for number born alive
  • Parity Number born alive
  • 1 1.2
  • 2 0.9
  • 3 0.2
  • 4-5 0
  • 6 0.2
  • 7 0.5
  • 8 0.9
  • 9 1.1

12
National Swine Improvement Federation Parity
adjustment factors for 21-day Litter Weight
  • Parity 21-day Litter Weight Adj.
  • 1 16.2
  • 2 0
  • 3 1.0
  • 4 3.8
  • 5 6.2
  • 6 9.5
  • 7 11.6
  • 8 15.2
  • 9 21.5

13
Given 10.2 pigs born alive from an average parity
of sows farrowed of 3.5
Maximum Parity Number Born Alive Number Born Alive Per 100 Sows Value of Pigs Produced _at_ 30 / pig Value Per Year, Difference from Maximum, / Year
2 9.79 979 29,370 1,527,240 87,360
3 10.05 1005 30,150 1,567,800 46,800
4 10.21 1021 30,630 1,592,760 21,840
5 10.31 1031 30,930 1,608,360 6,240
6 10.35 1035 31,050 1,614,600 0
7 10.35 1035 31,050 1,614,600 0
8 10.33 1033 30,990 1,611,480 3,120
14
Ideal Distribution
  • Given
  • Maximum Parity
  • Culling per parity at 15 or 35 per year

15
Take Home Point Economic Importance of Sow
Longevity
  • Reduced sow longevity (parity of sow at culling)
    results in fewer litters in which a sow has an
    opportunity to be sufficiently productive in
    order for her purchase to be profitable.
  • Because of the cost of replacement females and
    short herd life, commercial swine producers
    should economically evaluate their replacement
    breeding herd decisions.

16
How do you evaluate how long a sow needs to
remain in
  • the breeding herd to be a profitable investment?

17
Development of the Sow Longevity Calculator
  • Farrow-to-Finish and Breed-to-Wean custom
    spreadsheets available
  • Uses Net Present Value analysis
  • Version 2.0 Now Available
  • Operation specific financial information
  • Herd specific production data
  • Producer supplies
  • Income
  • Fixed and variable costs

18
Data Entry Sheet
19
Feed Data Entry
20
(No Transcript)
21
Adjusting for Parity Performance Differences
22
Parity Adjustment Caution
  • Only make these adjustments if you are extremely
    confident in the production numbers by parity.
  • Do not adjust if values from your herd are based
    on small numbers
  • Within a parity
  • Across all parities

23
What does all of this get you?
  • Net Present Value Analysis
  • What does the NPV number mean?
  • gt 0 means the investment is profitable in the
    long term.
  • lt 0 means the investment will lose money in the
    long term.

24
Sensitivity Analyses Gilt Purchase Price (F-F)
25
Sensitivity Analyses
Number
Born Alive
26
Sensitivity Analyses
Market
Hog Price
27
Sensitivity Analyses
Feed Costs
Per Market Hog
28
Take Home Points Factors Influencing Net Present
Value of a Breeding Herd Replacement Female
Take Home Points
  • Major Factors
  • Pigs produced (number born alive, mortalities at
    all levels, and substandard pigs at marketing)
  • ½ pig changes parity at which positive NPV is
    reached
  • 5 change in number born alive
  • Price received for pigs marketed
  • 2 - 4 changes parity at which positive NPV
    is reached
  • 4.5 to 9 change in price
  • Feed costs (feed efficiency and ingredient cost)
  • 3 per head changes parity at which positive
    NPV is reached
  • 4.8 change in feed costs

29
Take Home Points Factors Influencing Net Present
Value of a Breeding Herd Replacement Female
  • Relatively Minor Factors
  • Replacement Gilt Cost
  • 50 change in gilt price required to change
    parity at which positive NPV is reached
  • 25 change in number born alive
  • Interest Rate
  • Operation Equity
  • Cull Animal Market Price

30
Factors Influencing Sow Longevity
  • Host of management effects
  • feed intake, lactation length, gestation housing,
    etc.
  • Factors under some genetic control
  • Backfat of gilt at selection effects sow longevity

31
Summary
  • Improved longevity can increase profitability
  • Focus on management practices that improve
    longevity
  • More sows should be culled because of poor
    performance rather than reproductive reasons.

32
Those Interested in The Spreadsheet
  • Spreadsheet designed to evaluate the investment
    in a replacement gilt available at
  • Iowa Pork Industry Center 515-294-4103
  • Iowa Pork Industry Center Web Site
  • http//www.extension.iastate.edu/ipic
  • Porkline (Iowa Only) 800-808-7675
  • e-mail me at stalder_at_iastate.edu

33
Thank You for Your Time and Attention
  • Are there any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com