National Association for College Admission Counseling The Statement of Principles of Good Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

National Association for College Admission Counseling The Statement of Principles of Good Practice

Description:

Peter Caruso, CHAIR. Boston College. Cherie E. A. Andrade ... Frank Sachs. The Blake School. Pete Caruso. Boston College. Robin Brown. Willamette University ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: mgil58
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: National Association for College Admission Counseling The Statement of Principles of Good Practice


1
National Association for College Admission
Counseling The Statement of Principles of Good
Practice
  • Phase II of the Work of the Steering Committee
    on Admission Standards
  • 2005

2
Introduction
  • Founded in 1937, National Association for College
    Admission Counseling (NACAC) has been committed
    to maintaining high standards that foster ethical
    and social responsibility among those who serve
    students in the transition process from secondary
    school to college.
  • The Statement of Principles of Good Practice
    (SPGP) articulates the values that structure this
    work in the college admission process.

3
STEERING COMMITTEE ON ADMISSION STANDARDS
  • Appointed in 2003 to conduct a comprehensive
    review of the SPGP.
  • Appointees representative of NACAC membership.
  • The committee sought to bring greater clarity,
    consensus and organization to the document.
  • Maintained the spirit and ethical commitment of
    the original document.

4
National Association for College Admission
Counseling
  • Vision
  • To be the recognized leader and preeminent voice
    in shaping the counseling,admission and
    enrollment management professionals.
  • Mission
  • To promote ethical, student-centered transition
    to postsecondary education.

5
Proposed Core Values
  • Professionalism
  • We believe our work in counseling, admission and
    enrollment management is only professional to the
    extent that we subscribe and practice ethical
    behavior. We are responsible for the integrity
    of our actions and, insofar as we can affect
    them, the actions of our institutions and
    organizations.
  • Collaboration
  • We believe the effectiveness of our profession
    is enhanced when we work together to promote and
    protect students and their best interests.
  • Trust
  • We believe our profession is based upon trust,
    mutual respect and honesty, with one another and
    students.

6
Proposed Core Values
  • Education
  • We believe in and are committed to educating
    students, their families, the public, fellow
    professionals, and ourselves about the transition
    to and within postsecondary education.
  • Fairness and Equity
  • We believe our members have a responsibility to
    treat one another and students in a fundamentally
    fair and equitable manner.
  • Social Responsibility
  • We believe we have a duty to serve students
    responsibly, by safeguarding their rights and
    their access to and within postsecondary
    education.

7
Proposed Member Conventions
  • All members of NACAC agree to abide by the
    following
  • Members will make protecting the best interests
    of all students their primary concern in the
    admission process.
  • Members will evaluate students on the basis of
    their individual qualifications and strive for
    inclusion of all members of society in the
    admission process.
  • Members will strive to provide equal access for
    qualified students through education about
    financial aid processes and institutional
    financial aid policies.
  • Members will honor students decisions regarding
    application and enrollment.
  • Members will be ethical, respectful and lawful in
    their counseling, recruiting and enrollment
    practices.

8
Proposed Member Conventions
  • Members will be ethical, respectful and lawful in
    their counseling, recruiting and enrollment
    practices.
  • Members will provide accurate admission and
    financial aid information to students.
  • Members will abide by local, state and federal
    laws regarding the treatment of students and
    confidential information.
  • Members will support a common set of
    admission-related definitions and deadlines.
  • Members will support and enforce the Statement of
    Principles of Good Practice.

9
Revised Statement of Principles of Good Practices
  • Membership Segments Changes
  • All Members
  • Postsecondary Members
  • This category includes members who work in a
    variety of areas including admission, enrollment
    management, recruitment and/or community
    outreach, minority or diversity offices,
    counseling centers or dean of students or
    financial aid offices.
  • Counseling Members
  • This category includes all individuals who
    provide direct college counseling services to
    students and families.

10
Revised Statement of Principles of Good Practices
  • Membership Segments Counseling Members Category
  • The Steering Committee on Admission Standards
    and the Admission Practices Committee recognize
    the distinct differences among school-based
    secondary school counselors, independent
    counselors, paraprofessionals and other
    counselors and advisors in their educational
    backgrounds, certifications, credentialing, and
    knowledge of the college transition process. All
    serve a vital role in the educational experience
    of students and, for that compelling reason, the
    committees propose categorizing them together.
  •  

11
Revised Statement of Principles of Good Practices
  • Changes in Articles
  • The current Statement of Principles of Good
    Practice includes five
  • different articles or sections
  • Admission Promotion and Recruitment
  • Admission Procedures
  • Standardized College Admission Testing
  • Financial Aid
  • Advanced Standing Students and the Awarding of
    Credit
  • These articles or sections have now been
    consolidated into two articles
  • Promotion and Recruitment
  • Admission, Financial Aid and Testing Policies and
    Procedures

12
Revised Statement of Principles of Good Practices
  • Proposed Changes to SPGP
  • Mandatory Practices
  • Interpretations of Mandatory Practices
  • Best Practices

13
Revised Statement of Principles of Good Practices
  • Mandatory Practices
  • Mandatory Practices are behaviors that members
    are expected to follow.
  • In the current SPGP, these are the will
    statements. All members are
  • expected to comply with the practices under
  •  
  • Promotion and Recruitment
  • Admission, Financial Aid and Testing
  •  
  • NACAC considers all Mandatory Practices so
    central to the ethical and
  • social responsibility of the admission process
    that they require monitoring
  • and enforcement by the entire membership through
    clearly established
  • procedures.

14
Revised Statement of Principles of Good Practices
  • Interpretations of the Mandatory Practices
  • A more extensive explanation of the Mandatory
    Practices is included in the interpretations
    section.
  • Significantly , after the Steering Committee
    completed its work, the Natl. AP committee added
    statements and definitions from the Definitions
    of Admission Options document to this
    section.(In response to Assembly direction from
    2004 Assembly)

15
Definition of Admission Decision Options
Previously a separate referenced documentNow
included in Interpretations of Mandatory Practices
  • Non-restrictive application plans
  • Regular Decision
  • Rolling Admission
  • Non-restrictive Early Action
  • Restrictive application plans
  • Early Decision
  • Restrictive Early Action (THIS IS A NEW CATEGORY)

16
Revised Statement of Principles of Good Practices
  • Best Practices
  • NACAC recommends a set of Best Practices for
    adoption by its members. In the current SPGP,
    these are the should statements.
  • Whereas the mandatory practices (and
    interpretations section) will be monitored and
    enforced, the best practices section will be held
    up as a desirable standard and educational tool.

17
Revised Statement of Principles of Good Practices
  • Future Considerations
  • The Steering Committee on Admission Standards
    recommends that
  • The Core Values and Member Conventions statements
    will become the foundation of the associations
    ethical practices and will not change annually.
  • Recommendations for future changes to clarify or
    enhance our understanding of Mandatory Practices
    will likely fall under the Interpretations
    section of the document.
  • Members are invited to offer additions to the
    Best Practices section, but these are
    recommended practices and will not be intensely
    monitored for compliance.

18
SPGP Education, Monitoring Procedures and
Penalties
  • Included in the handout to promote awareness of
    and compliance with the SPGP.
  • The Admission Practices and Steering Committee
    members have revised the language to comply with
    references to the Mandatory, Interpretation and
    Best Practices sections.
  • Most notable change is under Penalties where
    censure has been changed to statement of
    noncompliance.

19
What Happens Now?
  • The Steering Committee on Admission Standards and
    the AP Committee asks for feedback on the
    proposed SPGP. At all S/R meetings.
  • S/R AP Committees have been asked for response.
  • Feedback will inform further dialogue.
  • The changes will be considered by the NACAC
    Assembly at the National Conference in Tampa,
    Florida, September 2005.

20
YOUR MEMBERSHIPRESPONSIBILITY
  • Refamiliarize yourself with current SPGP.
  • Review new SPGP format and content
  • Provide feedback using todays evaluation form or
    by going to www.nacac.com/spgpsurvey.htm.
  • Let your IACAC voting delegates know your
    thoughts/concerns/reactions to the new SPGP
    document.
  • The SPGP is only strong to the extent that it
    reflects the consensus of all members.

21
2005 Admission Practices Committee
Betty M. Jones Norfolk Collegiate
School   Sonali Perera Mount St. Marys
College   Robin Brown Willamette
University   Joyce Smith, Staff Liaison NACAC
Executive Director
  • Peter Caruso, CHAIR
  • Boston College
  •  
  • Cherie E. A. Andrade
  • Hawaii Pacific University
  •  
  • Mary Lou Bates
  • Skidmore College
  •  
  • Ken Fox
  • Ladue Horton Watkins High School
  •  
  • Susan Hallenbeck
  • Hood College
  •  

22
2005 Steering Committee on Admission Standards
  • William McClintick, Chairperson
  • Mercersburg Academy
  •  
  • Arlene Cash
  • Spelman College
  •  
  • Gordon Chavis
  • University of Central Florida
  •  
  • Katherine Fretwell
  • Amherst College
  •  
  • Scott Goplin
  • Tri-State University
  •  
  •  

Mary Lee Hoganson Homewood-Flossmoor High
School   Jerome Lucido University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill   Amy (Mersinger)
Roser Illinois State University   Patrick
OConnor Oakland Community College  
23
2005 Steering Committee on Admission Standards
  • Richard Powell
  • Oak Hall School
  •  
  • Doug Thompson
  • University of Aberdeen
  •  
  • Scott White
  • Montclair High School
  •  
  •  

Ex-officio Members   Frank Sachs The Blake
School   Pete Caruso Boston College   Robin
Brown Willamette University  
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com