Corporate Governance in Thailand: Glancing Behind and Looking Forward - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Corporate Governance in Thailand: Glancing Behind and Looking Forward

Description:

... political and Social Challenges Lack of law enforcement means CSR does ... in finance and securities and property family-control declined in banking, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Deun
Learn more at: https://www.oecd.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Corporate Governance in Thailand: Glancing Behind and Looking Forward


1
Corporate Governance in Thailand Glancing
Behind and Looking Forward
  • CG Development in Thailand The Three
    Disciplines
  • September 13, 2006
  • Deunden Nikomborirak
  • Thailand Development Research Institute

2
Outline of presentation
  • 1. The face of Thai corporate governance
  • ownership structure
  • corporate conduct
  • governance performance
  • 2.State and private sector initiatives in
    promoting good governance the 3 disciplines
  • 3. Economic, political and Social Challenges
  • 4. Conclusions

3
1. The Face of Thai Corporate Structure
Governance
4
Ownership Structure
  • Concentrated ownership
  • family-control was prominent particularly in
    finance and securities and property
  • family-control declined in banking, finance and
    securities and property
  • foreign banks share increased in both banking
    and finance

5
Corporate practices
  • Most common abuses were connected lending,
    connected transactions (siphoning of corporate
    funds).
  • More recent abuses insider trading and share
    prices manipulations through custodian ot nominee
    accounts. According to Achavanuntakul (2006),
    21.4 of total SET market capitalization is
    accounted for by nominees.

6
Doing Business in Thailand (2006) by The World
Bank
7
Corporate Governance Report of Thai Listed
Companiesby Thai Institute of Directors
8
2. Initiatives taken to promote Good Corporate
Governance
9
3 pillars supporting corporate governance
  • Regulation (SEC/SET)
  • Market discipline (SRI)
  • Self-restraint ( firm-level corporate conduct
    code)

10
Regulations
  • Many legal loopholes exist (definition of
    connected transactions, connected persons,
    definition of price manipulation, lack of
    regulatory authority to demand disclosure of
    UBOs)
  • legal procedures not conducive to prosecution
    (criminal sanctions only, reliance on police
    force for investigation and attorney for to file
    a lawsuit)
  • legal amendments in the pipeline.
  • The SEC had resorted to preventive measures and
    administrative sanctions.

11
Regulations
  • Examples of preventive measures for connected
    transactions requirements for submission of
    transactions that received shareholders
    resolutions, review of connected transactions and
    auditors reports.
  • For illegal operation through nominees know
    your customer (KYC) customer due diligence
    (CDD) requirement for brokers
  • Example of administrative sanctions fines and
    black-listing.

12
Regulations
  • Shortcomings of administrative measures lack of
    transparency, social sanctions, market
    discipline, case precedence and prone to
    discriminatory treatment

13
Regulations
  • SET imposes many regulations governing
    disclosures and board structure -- i.e., audit
    committee, independent directors, governance
    assessment and shareholders resolution required
    for large connected transactions .
  • Shortcomings of SET measures no clear penalties.

14
Market-discipline
  • corporate governance rating (by TRIS)
  • good governance awards, disclosure awards,
    popular awards.
  • reduction in fees and compensation for rating
    fees.
  • But too few companies participated.
  • Establishment of Institutional Investor Club and
    Investor Association.
  • IIC still has no investment criteria and IA
  • lacks personnel to pursue governance work

15
Self-restraint
  • Only a handful of Thai companies have governance
    code. According to Corporate Governance Report
    of Thai Listed Companies 2005
  • 3/4 of surveyed listed companies explicitly
    mentioned obligations to shareholders
  • 2/3 mentioned obligations to customers
  • lt 1/3 mention safety and welfare of employees
  • 1/5 mentioned environmental issues and compliance
    in their public communications

16
3. Economic, political and Social Challenges
  • Lack of law enforcement means CSR does NOT pay
    (although according to Corporate Governance
    Report of Thai Listed Companies 2005 firms with
    higher governance scores performed better)
  • Certain government policies inconsistent with
    good corporate governance (Foreign business Act,
    Ministers Equity Share act,etc.)
  • Culture of patronage contribute to widespread use
    of nominees.

17
Major Obstacles to Business Growth
A Survey on Corruption and Bribery in the
Business Sector University of Thai Chamber of
Commerce, 2000
18
Economic, political and Social Challenges
  • Limited long-term investment and active
    institutional investors means Socially
    Responsible Investment is RARE. (12
    Institutional investor)
  • Lack of regulatory independence
  • government political agenda versus SECs
    regulatory agenda
  • investigation in cases involving politicians or
    large companies with strong political connections

19
Economic, political and Social Challenges
  • More recently, boycotting and social pressures,
    rather than SRI, are playing increasing role in
    fostering CSR .

20
4. Conclusion
  • Independence of regulatory body and legal
    amendments are crucial for effective law
    enforcement.
  • SECs authority should be broadened with respect
    to prosecution and identification of UBOs.
  • soft measures can go a long way in regulation
    and in promotion of self-discipline, but has
    limited bite.
  • Market-discipline requires (1) disclosures of
    corporate misconduct and abuses and (2) SRI

21
4. Conclusion
  • In the absence of market-discipline, the task
    will inevitably fall heavily on SEC and SET.
  • SRI to be spearheaded by large state pension and
    investment funds.
  • NGOs and civil society can play very important
    roles in providing social discipline where
    regulatory oversight and SRI are absent or
    ineffective.

22
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com