Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria

Description:

Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria Business 2039 1 K. Hartviksen ... IRR Example IRR Example IRR vs. NPV Both methods use the same basic decision inputs. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:168
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: K271
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria


1
Net Present Value and Other Investment Criteria
  • Business 2039

1
K. Hartviksen
2
This Chapter - Topics
  • Net Present Value
  • Payback Period
  • Discounted Payback
  • Average Accounting Return
  • Internal Rate of Return
  • Multiple IRRs
  • Mutually Exclusive Investments (NPV vs. IRR)
  • Profitability Index
  • capital rationing

2
K. Hartviksen
3
Long-Term Investments
  • When a firm considers a new project, corporate
    acquisition, plant expansion or asset acquisition
    that will produce income over the course of many
    yearsthis is called capital budgeting.
  • It is imperative that in the analysis of such
    projects that we consider the timing, riskiness
    and magnitude of the incremental, after-tax
    cashflows that the project is expected to
    generate for the firm.

4
Payback Method
  • This is a simple approach to capital budgeting
    that is designed to tell you how many years it
    will take to recover the initial investment.
  • It is often used by financial managers as one of
    a set of investment screens, because it gives the
    manager an intuitive sense of the projects risk.

5
Payback Example
6
Discounted Payback Example
7
Discounted Payback Graphed
NPV
Discounted Payback Point
Years
8
Discounted Payback
  • Overcomes the lack of consideration of the time
    value of money
  • can help us see the pattern of cashflows beyond
    the payback point.
  • If carried to the end of the projects useful
    lifewill tell us the projects NPV (if you are
    using the firms WACC)

9
Net Present Value
  • NPV -PV of initial cost PV of incremental
    after-tax benefits
  • if greater than 0 - accept
  • if equal to 0 - indifferent
  • if less than 0 - reject

10
Firms Cost of Capital
  • At this point in the course, you will be given
    the firms cost of capital
  • the firms cost of capital determines the minimum
    rate of return that would be acceptable for a
    capital project.
  • The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is
    the relevant discount rate for NPV analysis.

11
NPV Example
12
NPV Example
13
NPV Example
14
NPV Example
15
NPV Example
16
NPV Example
17
NPV Example
18
NPV Profile
NPV
IRR
0
Discount Rate
19
NPV Profiles
  • The slope of the NPV profile depends on the
    timing and magnitude of cashflows.
  • Projects with cashflows that occur late in the
    projects life will have an NPV that is more
    sensitive to discount rate changes.

20
IRR
  • The internal rate of return (IRR) is that
    discount rate that causes the NPV of the project
    to equal zero.
  • If IRR gt WACC, then the project is acceptable
    because it will return a rate of return on
    invested capital that is likely to be greater
    than the cost of funds used to invest in the
    project.

21
IRR Example
22
IRR Example
23
IRR vs. NPV
  • Both methods use the same basic decision inputs.
  • The only difference is the assumed discount rate.
  • The IRR assumes intermediate cashflows are
    reinvested at IRRNPV assumes they are reinvested
    at WACC

24
NPV Profile
NPV
IRR(B)
IRR(A)
0
Discount Rate
25
Profitability Index
  • Uses exactly the same decision inputs as NPV
  • simply expresses the relative profitability of
    the projects incremental after-tax cashflow
    benefits as a ratio to the projects initial
    cost.
  • PI PV of incremental ATCF benefits
  • PV of initial cost of project
  • If PIgt1, then we accept because the PV of
    benefits exceeds the PV of costs.

26
Capital Rationing
  • The corporate practice of limiting the amount of
    funds dedicated to capital investments in any one
    year.
  • Is academically illogical.
  • In the long-run could threaten a firms
    continuing existence through erosion of its
    competitive position.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com