www.newdirectionstraining.com - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

www.newdirectionstraining.com

Description:

Kouao claimed she was given money by French social security ... ASBO served no referral made. Initial referral made by carpenter ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: blaenaugw
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: www.newdirectionstraining.com


1
  • www.newdirectionstraining.com
  • Integrated Working Lessons to Learn
  • Mike Brown

2
Training should increase
  • Awareness-what to do if I am worried/concerned-how
    to report/who do I speak to?
  • Competence
  • Confidence
  • Professional judgement
  • Analysis and decision- which is clear and
    evidenced
  • Process of supervision-tasks and actions with
    timescales

3
Training should increase
  • How to professionally disagreement-SCR
  • Competence around completing chronologies-building
    that bigger picture
  • How not to be a passive recipient of
    information
  • How to write for the independent reader

4
Training should increase
  • Managers ability to manage, lead, direct and be
    in control. Autocratic vs democratic
  • Roles and responsibilities at every level across
    agencies
  • Knowledge/skills/abilities which equips
    professionals to do the job they are paid to do!!
  • Quality assessments and risk assessments
  • Developing protection plans
  • Effectively chairing core groups
  • Report writing
  • Court reports
  • Time management-how to be proactive/calm/clear
    thinker and not reactive/rushing around/losing
    control-what are the implications for the
    child/yp?

5
Training should increase
  • Working with avoidant families
  • How to prevent drift and know how to re-group?
  • Recognising when we should intervene and stop
    working in partnership
  • Legislation/theories/research/SCRs-evidence
    informed practice
  • Skills to work under pressure

6
Training should increase
  • A shared understanding of thresholds and
    processes/systems/common language
  • We are all in it together
  • Can do attitude and culture-supporting each other

7
Other types
  • Shadowing
  • Mentoring
  • Coaching
  • Comprehensive inductions
  • Reflective practice/clinical supervision
  • Debriefing
  • Making sure our work is inclusive/transparent/open
    and honest

8
Reflection!
  • Children are murdered by their
    parents/carers and not by professionals,
    however..

9
Reflection!
  • The extent of the failure to protect Victoria was
    lamentable. Tragically, it required nothing more
    than basic good practice being put into
    operation. This never happened.

10
Baby P
  • Limited effort to engage childs father
  • Trust and responsibility placed in familys
    friend
  • Insufficient assessment monitoring/review
  • Pervasive belief that injuries caused by lack of
    supervision and childs behaviour
  • Inability to identify and prosecute
  • Delay in referral and provision to specialist
    health

11
Baby P
  • Delay in holding a legal planning meeting and
    advice on threshold criteria
  • Various assessment processes had not reached an
    adequate understanding of how he got the injuries
    and bruises

12
Victoria Climbie
  • 12 missed opportunities-where someone could have
    done something
  • 3 housing depts
  • 4 SSD
  • 2 GPs
  • 2 hospitals
  • NSPCC run family centre
  • 2 Police CPT

13
PUTTING INFORMATION TOGETHER
  • Kouao and Victoria in London on a travel package
    which included seven nights BB(Kouao claimed
    that she was homeless)
  • Within two days, Kouao presented as homeless
  • Kouao had no means to support herself and
    Victoria for more than two days
  • Kouao said that she left three other children in
    France
  • Kouao said she came to England to improve her
    english

14
PUTTING INFORMATION TOGETHER
  • Victoria was said to be small and of stunted
    growth
  • Kouao and Victoria appeared to have a different
    skin colour
  • Kouao was forceful and manipulative and did
    not allow Victoria to answer questions staff
    directed to her
  • SSD believed that Victoria was being coached in
    her reactions
  • When Victoria cried it seemed to be staged
    managed

15
PUTTING INFORMATION TOGETHER
  • Kouao made it clear that she had no intention of
    returning to france
  • Kouao claimed she was given money by French
    social security
  • Kouao gave different stories to different workers
  • Victoria was wearing a wig
  • The photograph of Victoria on the passport was a
    questionable?
  • Kouao was well dressed
  • Victoria was shabby and resembled one of the
    adverts you see for Action Aid

16
PUTTING INFORMATION TOGETHER
  • When in the office Victoria did not play with the
    toys and stood silently
  • There did not appear to be any parental warmth
    from Kouao towards Victoria
  • When a meeting was fixed to perform an assessment
    of Victoria needs, Kouao attended without
    Victoria
  • Despite being in the country for two months,
    Victoria still had not been registered with a
    school

17
LL Case _ Caerphilly
  • Mother and step dad history of substance misuse
    and domestic abuse links!!!
  • ASBO served no referral made
  • Initial referral made by carpenter
  • Mother was hostile and uncooperative
  • Child placed on CPR but no CP medical but
    evidence of violence, acceptance of mothers
    reasons
  • Since case
  • Joint protocols between adult and children
    services around DA and SM
  • LSCB to receive reports on children on CPR who
    are medically examined
  • Listen to the community!

18
Reflection!!
  • Be respectfully uncertain
  • Do not just be a passive recipient of information
  • Can you critically separate the story given from
    the actual reality?

19
Key Messages-SCRs
  • Agencies not seeing or speaking to the child/ren
  • Lack of overview or reflection about events or
    about what is happening
  • Poor risk assessments and not recognising risk
    factors across agencies
  • Over-optimism about parenting capacity
  • Poor recording

20
Key Messages-SCRs
  • Poor analysis and decision-making
  • Not using historical information
  • Not checking on the male (often changing)
    composition of households
  • Being parent focused rather than child focused
  • Taking parental statements at face value
  • Poor communication between agencies

21
Key Messages-SCRs
  • Lack of management oversight of cases
  • Poorly trained, inexperienced staff and managers
  • Insufficient supervision
  • Lack of focus on the childs circumstances and
    their impact on the child
  • Not considering the full impact of domestic
    abuse, mental ill-health, substance misuse

22
Why we lose sight of child/YP
  • Professionals dont believe the childs account
  • Child/YP is fearful of the professionals
  • Professionals like the parents they are a nice
    family
  • Child/YP has no verbal communication
  • Parents appear nice and plausible
  • Child is fearful of being removed into care
  • Professionals are frighten of the parent (s)

23
Why we lose sight of the child/YP
  • Professionals dont want to be perceived as being
    racist or discriminatory towards the family
  • Professionals feel powerless and get frustrated
  • Overly sympathise with parents
  • Organisational pressures and changes
  • Lack of observations of child
  • No real attempt made to ascertain the wishes and
    feelings of child
  • Turnover of staff
  • Professionals not agreeing to disagree and remain
    professional-hence child/family manipulates the
    situation

24
ENGAGING CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE AND THEIR
FAMILIES INCLUDE
  • Working ethically and with consideration for
    consent and confidentiality
  • Understanding behaviour
  • Interviewing
  • Questioning
  • Observation
  • Listening
  • Summarising
  • Accurate empathy and reflective listening
  • Giving constructive feedback
  • Challenging
  • Working for change and positive outcomes for all

25
RIGHTS TO ACTION
  • Have a flying start in life
  • Have a comprehensive range of education and
    learning opportunities
  • Enjoy the best possible health and are free from
    abuse, victimisation and exploitation
  • Have access to play, leisure, sporting and
    cultural activities
  • Are listened to, treated with respect and have
    their race and cultural identity recognised
  • Have a safe home and a community which support
    physical and emotional well-being
  • Are not disadvantaged by poverty

26
Neglect
  • Neglect is the persistent failure to meet a
    childs basic physical and psychological needs,
    likely to result in the serious impairment of the
    childs health or development.
  • It may involve a parent or carer failing to
    provide adequate food, shelter and clothing,
    failure to protect a child from physical harm or
    danger, or the failure to ensure access to
    appropriate medical care or treatment.
  • It may also include neglect of a childs
    basic emotional needs.

27
Impact of Abuse and Neglect
  • There are immediate and life long health,
    social, physical and emotional impact to
    childrens development and may lead to
    difficulties into adulthood.
  • Children who experience abuse, witness violence
    and other trauma in early childhood may suffer
    long term, permanent impairment to their brain
    development

28
Impact of Abuse and Neglect
  • Trauma in early life can lead to problems in
    maintaining interpersonal relationships, coping
    with stressful situations and controlling
    emotions, learning and emotional difficulties,
    also it may lead to violence behaviours towards
    own partner and children, increased risk of
    teenage pregnancy, increased behavioural problems
    and increased risk of re-victimisation.

29
Keeping the Child Central
  • Children cannot wait indefinitely when the
    parents needs overtake the childs needs.
  • When parents needs are in conflict with their
    childs needs, this increases the vulnerability
    of the child

30
T.E.A.M _at_ Child/YP (holistic)
HV
School/College
Playgroup
CHILD
YOT
Police
Significant people
GP
Nursery
31
Barriers to effective multi-agency working
32
Working Together to Safeguard Children requires
All organisations providing services for children
to have
  • Priorities for safeguarding children
  • Commitment by senior management to safeguarding
  • Accountability for safeguarding children
  • Safe recruitment procedures
  • Allegations against staff procedures
  • Training in safeguarding children
  • Induction in safeguarding children
  • Policies and procedures for safeguarding children
  • Work on interagency basis to safeguard children
  • Culture of listening to children
  • Whistle blowing procedures

33
Partners
34
Putting Information Together
  • it is only when information from a range of
    sources is put together and analysed that a child
    either could be deemed a child in need or in
    need of protection (significant harm)

35
Information Sharing
  • Almost every child death enquiry since Maria
    Caldwell has never criticised professionals for
    sharing relevant information but they have for
    NOT.in a timely manner!

36
Sharing Information
  • Likely outcome if information is shared
  • Data Protection Act 1998
  • Human Rights Act 1998
  • Freedom of Information Act 2000
  • Children Act 1989 and 2004
  • Likely outcome if information is not shared

37
Sharing information without consent?
  • You believe you need to share information you
    have gathered but this has been refused or you
    think it would be not appropriate to seek consent
  • Decide if information is Confidential-if it
    is not and you judge information sharing to be
    legitimate and lawful, you may share. This
    should not be done ROUTINELY
  • Seek legal advice and support from your agency
    and others if in doubt!

38
Working Together
  • the support and protection of children cannot be
    achieved by one agencyevery service has to play
    its part.
  • All staff must have it place upon them the clear
    expectations that their primary responsibility is
    to the child and his/her family.
  • Victoria case, the focus was on the needs of
    the adults responsible for her, rather than the
    child herself
  • Lord Laming

39
Integrated Working
  • An awareness and appreciation of the role of
    others is essential for effective collaboration
    between organisations and their staff
  • At the same time it is important to emphasise
    that we all share responsibility for safeguarding
    and promoting the welfare of children and young
    children-this undertaking is important as well to
    enable those children to have optimum life
    chances and to enter adulthood successfully in
    line with Rights to Action-7 Core Aims

40
Significant Harm
  • When you are concerned that a child/YP has
    suffered or is likely to significant harm as a
    result of
  • -ill-treatment
  • -impairment of health or development
  • -seeing or hearing the ill-treatment of another
    person
  • Consult All Wales CP Procedures

41
Assessment Framework
Health
Basic care
Education
Ensuring safety
Emotional and behavioural development
Child Safeguarding and promoting Welfare
Emotional warmth
Identity
PARENTING CAPACITY
Stimulation
CHILDS DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS
Family and social relationships
Guidance and boundaries
Social presentation
Stability
Self-care skills
FAMILY AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Community resources
Family history functioning
Income
Housing
Familys social integration
Employment
Wider family
42
Analysis and Professional Judgement
  • A Child Developmental Needs must be based on
    knowledge/research of what would be expected of
    the childs development. Are their concerns
    about the childs development in relation to the
    dimensions?
  • Are we protecting the child from maltreatment?
  • Are we preventing impairment of childrens health
    or development?

43
Analysis and Professional Judgement
  • Parenting Capacity should be draw on knowledge
    about what would be reasonable to expect a parent
    to give their child which ensures that the child
    is growing up in circumstances consistent with
    the provision of safe and effective care
  • Whats missing?
  • Capacity and prognosis for change?
  • Can the parent change within the childs
    timescale? (Safety over time)

44
Analysis and Professional Judgement
  • Family and Environmental Factors should be
    drawing on knowledge about the impact these will
    have on both parenting capacity and directly on a
    childs development.
  • Is the accommodation suitable/accessible for a
    disabled child?
  • Impact of poverty/hardship/isolation?
  • Who else is in the family/extended family that
    could help/ support? (It takes a village to
    raise a child-African saying)

45
Risk Assessment
  • Assessing risk can be defined as the systematic
    collection of information to determine the degree
    to which a child/young person is likely to be
    abused or neglected at some future point in time.
    (Doueck et al 1992) It should be linked to the
    question of whether the child/young person is
    safe in the current living situation

46
Risk Assessment
  • Assessing risk is not just about assessing the
    intention of harm from parents/carers to the
    child/young person or to themselves. It is the
    compilation of significant events, both acute and
    long-standing, which interrupt, change or damage
    the childs physical and psychological
    development which causes the significant harm

47
Risk Assessment
  • Must consider a risk statement
  • Mike is at risk of physical and emotional
    neglect because/why.
  • (list the current risks)
  • Risk currently reduced by.
  • Risk in future might be increased by.

48
Signs of Safety Approach
49
Why is this approach useful?
  • Helps us to engage with children, young people
    and their families about their worries/concerns
    but also what is going well for them (strengths)
  • Organises and structures our thinking in a
    logical manner from the huge amount of
    information we gather from various sources
  • Helps us to be proactive not reactive
  • Enables children, young people and their families
    to problem-solve their own issues/difficulties to
    make sustainable changes which will lead to
    better outcomes

50
Why is this approach useful?
  • Ensures that professionals are honest, fair,
    objective, inclusive and transparent
  • Professionals have to justify their concerns and
    be accountable for them
  • Professionals have to use language that makes
    sense to children, young people and their
    families
  • Less likely to have families who are resistant or
    reluctant
  • Ensures not to just concentrate on the
    deficits/negatives (as you will only just get
    more of this)

51
Signs of Safety Approach
  • PROTECTIVE FACTORS SAFETY/STRENGTHS/RESONABLE
    WHICH REDUCES THE RISKS/WORRIES/CONCERNS/NEEDS OF
    CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE

  • Versus
  • VULNERABILITIES FACTORS-
  • RISKS/WORRIES/CONCERNS/NEEDS/DANGERS
  • CHILD DEVELOPMENT
  • PARENTING CAPACITY
  • FAMILY AND ENVIRONMENTAL

52
Putting Signs of Safety into Practice
  • We have been talking about some very serious
    matters. To give me a more balanced picture, can
    you tell me some of the things that you feel are
    good about this family?
  • How confident are you and your family that you
    can make your child safe?

53
Getting Plans to work
  • It is the plan that is developed where
    everyone involved knows clearly what needs to
    remain the same/change, what needs to be
    achieved, what needs to be different within what
    timescale, with clear actions that are measurable
    (SMART)
  • Children and their families are integral to
    this process. We must think and work differently
    in how we negotiate with children and their
    families

54
Scaling and Goal setting
  • What are the child/rens goals?
  • What are the parents/carers goals?
  • What are the agencies goals?
  • 1-No engagement/no progress made
  • 10-engagement/progress made which is real and
    meaningful to the childs safety and well-being

55
Process Questions
  • What is it we are trying to achieve?
  • How are we all trying to achieve the goals set?
  • How will we know that we have achieved our goals
    or that progress has been made?
  • Who/what objective process will inform us that
    our concerns have been reduced or no longer
    exist?
  • Who will do what, and by when, to achieve the
    goals?
  • What is our exit strategy? Is it safe to doso?

56
Review the Plan
  • Any review needs to consider
  • Have there been any changes since the last time
    we all met?
  • What progress has been made?
  • What difference has been made-have you made
    progress towards, or achieved, the differences
    you or the family hoped for?
  • Do we need to consider other options?

57
Put Simply!
  • What needs to change?
  • How will you know things have improved?

58
AN OUTCOME FOCUSED PRACTICE MODEL
Workers will Family Members will
OUTCOMES (specific, realistic measurable agree
how progress will be measured and scale current
situation from 1-10 )
What looks different? (scale against
outcomes) Have plans been carried out? Impact of
the change? (update assessment) Has a good
service been provided?
child/parent will
59
What are the solutions?
  • What are we going to do differently?
  • How can we improve the way we protect and
    safeguard children and young people?
  • What one thing are you going to do differently
    after today?

60
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com