RDA: Cataloging Code for the 21st Century? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

RDA: Cataloging Code for the 21st Century?

Description:

Printed Music 6. Sound Recordings 7. Motion Pictures and Video recordings 8. Graphic Materials 9. Electronic Resources 10. Three-Dimensional Artefacts and Realia 11. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:186
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 143
Provided by: rickb7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RDA: Cataloging Code for the 21st Century?


1
RDA Cataloging Code for the 21st Century?
  • Rick J. Block
  • Columbia University

2
Other Presentation Titles
  • RDA Boondoggle or Boon?And What About MARC?
  • NETSL April 2009
  • The Battle of RDA Victors or Victims
  • NYTSL November 2009

3
Rick Block On RDA
  • I think it is a disaster. I'm hoping it is never
    implemented.
  • Library Journal Nov. 15, 2008

4
Rick Block On MARC
  • Unlike some of his colleagues, he believes the
    MARC record has a future. He points out the
    example that Columbia has invested a great deal
    in it, even in its electronic displays. We have
    millions of records in MARC, says Block, so I
    don't think it will go away.
  • Library Journal Nov. 15, 2008

5
Rick Block on ?
  • When I was in library school in the early 80s,
    the students werent as interesting
  • New York Times July 8, 2007
  • A Hipper Crowd of Shushers

6
Rhode Island its neither a road nor an island
discuss
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
  • Still I can not help thinking that the golden
    age of cataloging is over, and that the
    difficulties and discussions which have furnished
    an innocent pleasure to so many will interest
    them no more. Another lost art.
  • Charles A. Cutter
  • Preface, 4th ed. Rules for a Dictionary
    Catalog (1904)

16
  • Several principles direct the construction of
    cataloguing codes. The highest is the convenience
    of the user.
  • Statement of International Cataloguing
    Principles (IFLA, 2009)

17
Why me? My perspective
  • Ive been quoted
  • I ignored it as long as I could
  • Im a teacher and a practitioner
  • Im struggling to understand RDA
  • Ive not lived through a code change
  • Goal for today present a balanced view of RDA as
    I understand it

18
Deja Vu All Over Again!
  • The War of AACR2 Victors or Victims.
  • Charles Martell. Journal of Academic
    Librarianship. Vol. 7. no. 1 (1981)
  • The War of AACR2
  • Michael Gorman. Our Singular Strengths
    Meditations for Librarians

19
RDA Wikipedia Disambiguation
  • Radioactive Dentin Abrasion
  • Redland Railway Station
  • Recommended Daily Allowance
  • Remote Database Access
  • Reader's Digest Association
  • Retirement Date Announced

20
(No Transcript)
21
Naming the Code
  • RDA an international standard
  • Took Anglo-American out of title
  • Even AACR2 used internationally
  • Translated into 25 different languages
  • Used in 45 countries outside the U.S.
  • Took Cataloguing out of title
  • Resource description better understood by
    metadata communities
  • Will still include basic principles of
    bibliographic description

22
Why New Cataloging Rules?
  • Feeling that continued revision of AACR2 not
    sufficient to address issues
  • Evolving formats, including items that belong to
    more than one class of material
  • Limitations with existing GMDs and SMDs
  • Integrating resources
  • Separation of content and carrier concepts
  • Integrate FRBR principles

23
RDA Big Picture Concepts
  • Designed for the digital world
  • Founded on AACR
  • Informed by FRBR and FRAR
  • Consistent, flexible and extensible framework
  • Compatible with international principles, models
    and standards
  • Useable outside the library community

24
Why Not AACR3?
AACR3
25
Why Not AACR3?
  • Reviewers of AACR3 Part I (2004-05) identified
    areas for improvement
  • Proposed structure of rules too awkward
  • More metadata-friendly less library jargon
  • More connection to FRBR
  • Modify the connection of the rules to ISBD
  • Changes need to be significant enough to merit a
    new cataloging code, but records still need to be
    compatible with AACR2

26
RDA is
  • RDA is a content standard, not a display
    standard and not a metadata schema. RDA is a set
    of guidelines that indicates how to describe a
    resource, focusing on the pieces of information
    (or attributes) that a user is most likely to
    need to know. It also encourages the description
    of relationships between related resources and
    between resources and persons or bodies that
    contributed to creation of that resource.
    (Oliver, 2007, Changing to RDA)

27
RDA will be
  • A new standard for resource description and
    access
  • Designed for the digital world
  • Optimized for use as an online product
  • Description and access of all resources
  • All types of content and media
  • Resulting records usable in the digital
    environment (Internet, Web OPACs, etc.)

28
A two-slide history of AACR (1)
  • 1967 AACR 1st ed.
  • 1978 AACR2
  • 1988
  • 1998
  • 2002
  • 2005 (last update)

29
A two-slide history of AACR (2)
Logical structure of AACR2
AACR2 catalogue production
Beyond MARC
  • International Conference on the Principles
    Future Development of AACR (1997)
  • International Conference on the Principles
    Future Development of AACR (1997)

Issues related to seriality
What is a work?
Content versus carrier
Access points for works
Bibliographic relationships
30
AACR2 Part 1
  • 1. General
  • 2. Books, Pamphlets, and Printed Sheets
  • 3. Cartographic Materials
  • 4. Manuscripts
  • 5. Printed Music
  • 6. Sound Recordings
  • 7. Motion Pictures and Video recordings
  • 8. Graphic Materials
  • 9. Electronic Resources
  • 10. Three-Dimensional Artefacts and Realia
  • 11. Microforms
  • 12. Continuing Resources
  • 13. Analysis

31
AACR2 Part 1
  • 1. General
  • 2. Books, Pamphlets, and Printed Sheets
  • 3. Cartographic Materials
  • 4. Manuscripts
  • 5. Printed Music
  • 6. Sound Recordings
  • 7. Motion Pictures and Video recordings
  • 8. Graphic Materials
  • 9. Electronic Resources
  • 10. Three-Dimensional Artefacts and Realia
  • 11. Microforms
  • 12. Continuing Resources
  • 13. Analysis
  • 14. Podcats

32
RDA
  • A FRBR-based approach to structuring
    bibliographic data
  • More explicitly machine-friendly linkages
    (preferably with URIs)
  • More emphasis on relationships and roles
  • Less reliance on cataloger-created notes and text
    strings (particularly for identification)

33
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
(FRBR)
  • User tasks
  • Find
  • Identify
  • Select
  • Obtain
  • Entity-relationship model
  • Entities Group 1, 2, 3
  • Relationships
  • Attributes
  • National level record elements (mandatory
    optional data)

34
Whats a conceptual model?
  • Abstract depiction of the universe of things
    being described
  • The things in that universe (entities)
  • Identifying characteristics of those entities
    (attributes/elements)
  • The relationships among the entities

35
FRBRs Entity-Relationship Model
Person
Work
created
was created by
Shakespeare
Hamlet
36
FRBR Entities
  • Group 1Products of intellectual artistic
    endeavor bibliographic resources
  • Work
  • Expression
  • Manifestation
  • Item

37
Vocabulary
  • Book
  • Door prop

(item)
  • publication
  • at bookstore
  • any copy

(manifestation)
38
Vocabulary
  • Book
  • Who translated?

(expression)
  • Who wrote?

(work)
39
Group 1
Work
is realized through
Expression
is embodied in
Manifestation
recursive
is exemplified by
one
Item
many
40
Examples
  1. Leatherbound autographed copy in Rare Books
    Collection?
  2. Digitized version of the Oxford University Press
    text published in 2008?
  3. French translation?
  4. London Symphony Orchestra 2005 performance?
  5. Three Musketeers?

Item
Manifestation
Expression
Expression
Work
40
41
Family of Works
Equivalent
Descriptive
Derivative
Free Translation
Review
Edition
Microform Reproduction
Casebook
Summary
Abstract
Dramatization
Simultaneous Publication
Abridged Edition
Criticism
Digest
Novelization
Screenplay
Copy
Libretto
Evaluation
Illustrated Edition
Revision
Change of Genre

Exact Reproduction
Parody
Annotated Edition
Translation
Expurgated Edition
Imitation
Same Style or Thematic Content
Variations or Versions
Facsimile
Arrangement
Commentary
Slight Modification
Reprint
Adaptation
Original Work - Same Expression
Same Work New Expression
New Work
Cataloging Rules Cut-Off Point
42
Relationships
Work
  • Inherent among the Group 1 entities
  • Content relationships among works/expressions

Expression
Manifestation
Item
Whole-Part
Sequential
Derivative
Accompanying
43
FRBR Entities
  • Group 1 Bibliographic resources
  • Work
  • Expression
  • Manifestation
  • Item

43
44
FRBR Entities
  • Group 2 Those responsible for the intellectual
    artistic content Parties
  • Person
  • Corporate body
  • Family

45
Group 2
Work
Expression
Manifestation
Item
is owned by
is produced by
is realized by
is created by
many
46
Subject Relationship
Created by
Work
Person
Creates
has subject
is subject of
Concept/Topic
47
FRBR Entities
  • Group 3Subjects of works
  • Groups 1 2 plus
  • Concept
  • Object
  • Event
  • Place
  • Subject relationship

48
Work
Work
Expression
has as subject
Manifestation
Item
Person
Family
has as subject
Corporate Body
Concept
Group 3
Object
has as subject
Event
Place
many
49
FRBR Benefits
  • Collocation
  • Better organization to catalog
  • More options to display
  • Identifying elements
  • Pathways

? Simplify cataloging enabling links and
re-use of identifying elements
50
Collocation
Shakespeare
  • Objectives of a catalog display
  • All the works associated with a person, etc.
  • All the expressions of the same work
  • All the manifestations of the same expression
  • All items/copies of the same manifestation

Hamlet
Romeo and Juliet
English
French
German
Swedish
Stockholm 2008
Columbia University Copy 1 Green leather binding
51
Pathways to Related Works
Shakespeare
Stoppard
Hamlet
Derivative works
Romeo and Juliet
Rosencrantz Guildenstern Are Dead
English
French
Text
Movies
German
Subject
Swedish
Stockholm 2008
Columbia University Copy 1 Green leather binding
52
Collocation by Works
  • Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616.
  • Alls well that ends well
  • As you like it
  • Hamlet
  • Macbeth
  • Midsummer nights dream

53
Collocation by Family of Works and Expressions
  • Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet.
  • Texts
  • Motion Pictures
  • Sound Recordings

54
Collocation by Expressions
  • Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet.
  • Texts Danish
  • Texts Dutch
  • Texts English
  • Texts French
  • Texts Spanish
  • Motion Pictures English
  • Sound Recordings - English

55
Collocation of Manifestations
  • Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Hamlet.
  • Motion pictures English
  • 1964 Director, Bill Collegan
  • 1990 Director, Kevin Kline, Kirk Browning
  • 1990 Director, Franco Zeffirelli
  • 1992 Director, Maria Muat
  • 1996 Director, Kenneth Branagh
  • 2000 Director, Campbell Scott, Eric Simonson

56
FRBR Display - Serial
  • Atlantic monthly
  • Atlantic monthly (Boston, Mass. 1993-)
  • Atlantic (Boston, Mass. 1981-1992)
  • Atlantic monthly (Boston, Mass. 1971-1980)
  • Atlantic (Boston, Mass. 1932-1970)
  • Atlantic monthly (Boston, Mass. 1857-1931)

57
FRBR Display - Serial
  • Atlantic monthly
  • Atlantic monthly (Boston, Mass. 1993-)
  • Online
  • Paper
  • Microfilm
  • Atlantic (Boston, Mass. 1981-1992)
  • Atlantic monthly (Boston, Mass. 1971-1980)
  • Atlantic (Boston, Mass. 1932-1970)
  • Atlantic monthly (Boston, Mass. 1857-1931)

58
FRBR Benefits
  • Circulation Place holds at Work or
    Expression level rather than only at
    manifestation level
  • (VTLS and OCLC demonstrate this)

Hamlet English
59
Database/format Scenarios
Based on Gordon Dunsires slide
FRBR registry
Future record
RDA element registry
FRBR record
Bib record (flat-file)
Bib record (description)
Work information
Name authority record
Author
Lee, T. B.
Title
Cataloguing has a future
Name
Work title
Cataloguing has a future
Identifier
Content type
Spoken word
Expression information
Carrier type
Audio disc
Subject authority record
Subject
Metadata
Manifestation information
Provenance
Donated by the author
Label
Identifier
ONIX
RDA content type registry
Item information
Label
Spoken word
Identifier
RDA carrier type registry
60
Linked Data
Work information
Name authority record
Author
Subject
Name
Lee, T. B.
Work Title Cataloguing has a future
Cataloguing has a future
Identifier
Expression information
Subject authority record
Content type
Manifestation information
Metadata
Label
Title
Cataloguing has a future
Identifier
Carrier type
RDA content type registry
Item information
Provenance
Donated by the author
Label
Spoken word
RDA carrier type registry
Identifier
Audio disc
61
Package for Data Sharing
Communication format record
Work information
Name authority record
Author
Subject
Name
Lee, T. B.
Lee, T. B.
Work Title Cataloguing has a future
Cataloguing has a future
Identifier
Expression information
Content type
Subject authority record
Manifestation information
Metadata
Label
Metadata
Title
Cataloguing has a future
Identifier
Carrier type
RDA content type registry
Item information
Provenance
Donated by the author
Label
Spoken word
Spoken word
Identifier
RDA carrier type registry
Audio disc
Audio disc
62
Whats Changing?
  • Changes in technology
  • Impact on descriptive/access data
  • book catalogs
  • card catalogs
  • OPACs
  • next generation
  • Move from individual library to international
    audience
  • Move from classes of materials to elements and
    values (more controlled vocabularies)

63
Internet
  • Catalogs are no longer in isolation
  • Global access to data
  • Integrate bibliographic data with wider Internet
    environment
  • Share data beyond institutions

64
Internet Cloud
Services
Databases, Repositories
Web front end
65
What RDA is intended to be
  • A content standard
  • A set of guidelines
  • Focused on user tasks (Find, Identify, Select,
    Obtain mantra throughout)
  • An online product (with possible print
    derivatives)
  • A more international standard
  • An effort to make library catalog data play
    better in the Web environment

66
What RDA is intended to be
  • Change in view from classes of materials in
    libraries to elements and relationships for
    entities in the bibliographic universe
  • May be used with many encoding schema such as
    MODS, MARC, Dublin Core
  • An attempt to improve the way we describe and
    present relationships among resources and
    bibliographic entities
  • Flexible and adaptable

67
What it is NOT intended to be
  • A display or presentation standard
  • A metadata schema
  • A rigid set of rules
  • Structured around ISBD areas and elements
  • Instructions on creating and formatting subject
    headings (yet)
  • Instructions on classification numbers

68
Goals of RDA
  • Provide consistent, flexible, and extensible
    framework for description of all types of
    resources and all types of content
  • Be compatible with internationally established
    principles, models and standards
  • Be usable primarily within the library community,
    but be capable of adaptation for other
    communities (e.g. archives and museums)
  • Be compatible with descriptions and access points
    devised using AACR2 in existing catalogs and
    databases

69
Goals of RDA
  • Written in plain English, and able to be used in
    other language communities
  • Be independent of the format, medium, or system
    used to store or communicate this data
  • Be readily adaptable to newly-emerging database
    structures

70
Foundations and Influences
  • FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic
    Records)
  • FRAD (Functional Requirements for Authority Data)
  • AACR2
  • Paris Principles (Statement of International
    Cataloguing Principles 2009 version)
  • ISBD (International Standard Bibliographic
    Description) But RDA does not follow ISBD order
    and ISBD punctuation is no longer required.

71
Stakeholders
  • Joint Steering Committee for Development of
    Resource Description and Access
  • American Library Association (ALA)
  • Association for Library Collections and Technical
    Services (ALCTS)
  • Cataloging and Classification Section
  • RDA Implementation Task Force
  • Australian Committee on Cataloguing (ACOC)
  • The British Library
  • Canadian Committee on Cataloguing (CCC)
  • CILIP Chartered Institute of Library and
    Information Professionals
  • The Library of Congress
  • International Federation of Library Associations
    and Institutions (IFLA)
  • Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI)
  • RDA/MARC Working Group

72
Stakeholders
  • Catalogers and
  • Library administrators
  • Cataloging educators
  • Public service librarians
  • Systems developers
  • Metadata communities
  • MARC format developers
  • National and international programs (PCC, ISSN,
    etc.)
  • You
  • ..to name a few..

73
Well, only if the rules actually achieve these
lofty, if laudable, goals
  • 2.1.1.1
  • If the resource does not contain any of the
    sources listed above, use as the preferred source
    of information another source within the resource
    itself, giving preference to formally presented
    sources

74
Well, only if the rules actually achieve these
lofty, if laudable, goals
  • Construct the preferred access point representing
    a libretto or song text, by adding Libretto to
    the preferred access point representing the work
    or part(s) of the work if the work or part(s)
    contain only the text of an opera, operetta,
    oratorio, or the like, or Text to the preferred
    access point representing the text of a song. For
    compilations by a single composer, add Librettos
    if the compilation contains only texts of operas,
    operettas, oratorios, or the like otherwise add
    Texts.

75
RDA Structure
  • General introduction
  • Elements
  • Relationships
  • Appendices
  • Capitalization, Abbreviations, Initial articles,
    etc.
  • Presentation (ISBD, MARC, etc.)
  • Relationship designators
  • Etc.
  • Glossary
  • Index

76
General Principles (ICP)
  • Convenience of user
  • Representation
  • Common usage
  • Accuracy
  • Sufficiency and necessity
  • Significance
  • Economy
  • Consistency and Standardization
  • Integration
  • Defensible, not arbitrary
  • If contradict, take a defensible, practical
    solution.

77
Structure of RDA
  • RDA contains
  • 10 sections
  • with 37 chapters
  • and 13 appendices
  • Table of Contents is 113 pages

78
0 Introduction (purpose and scope, foundations, objectives, principles, structure, core elements, etc.)
Section Attributes
1 Chapters 1-4 Manifestation and item (e.g., title, statement of responsibility, edition statement, publication information, etc.)
2 Chapters 5-7 Work and expression (e.g., title of the work, content type, etc.)
3 Chapters 8-11 Person, family and corporate body (e.g., name, identifier, associated dates, etc.)
4 Chapters 12-16 Concept, object, event, and place
79
Section Relationships
5 Chapter 17 Primary relationships between work, expression, manifestation, and item (hierarchical)
6 Chapters 18-22 Relationships to persons, families, and corporate bodies associated with a resource
7 Chapter 23 Subject relationships
8 Chapters 24-28 Relationships between works, expressions, manifestations, and items (successive, derivative, etc.)
9 Chapters 29-32 Relationships between persons, families, and corporate bodies
10 Chapters 33-37 Relationships between concepts, objects, events, and places (such as broader or narrower terms)
80
RDA Appendices
  • Capitalization
  • Abbreviations
  • Initial articles
  • Record syntaxes for descriptive data
  • Record syntaxes for access point control data
  • Additional instructions on names of persons
  • Titles of nobility, terms of rank, etc.
  • Dates in the Christian calendar
  • Relationship designators (4 appendices)
  • Complete examples

81
New Terminology
  • AACR2
  • area
  • main entry
  • added entry
  • uniform title
  • heading
  • see references
  • physical description
  • RDA
  • element
  • preferred access point
  • access point
  • preferred title for a work
  • preferred access point
  • variant access point
  • describing carriers

82
Transcription Principle of Representation in RDA
  • Take what you see
  • Correction of inaccuracies elsewhere
  • No more abbreviating (but take abbreviations
    found on the resource)
  • Accept what you get
  • Facilitating automated data capture
  • Next Slides from Barbara Tillett. Sharing
    Standards for Bibliographic Data Worldwide. June
    11, 2009.

83
Sample Changes from AACR2
  • Transcribed data
  • Option to keep rule of 3
  • e.g., and five others no more et. al.
  • First place of publication is core
  • Place of publication not identified not s.l.
  • Publisher not identified not s.n.
  • Date of publication not identified

84
Sample Changes from AACR2
  • General Material Designator ? ONIX/RDA (icons?)
  • Content type
  • e.g., notated music, performed music, sounds,
    spoken word, text, still image, two-dimensional
    moving image (MARC 336)
  • Media type
  • e.g., audio, computer, microform, projected,
    unmediated, video (MARC 337)
  • Carrier type
  • e.g., audio disc, online resource, microfiche,
    volume, object, videodisc (MARC 338)

85
Sample Changes from AACR2
  • Access points
  • Bible
  • Treaties
  • No more Polyglot
  • Birth/death dates (no more b. or d.)
  • More data in authority records

86
Reaction to RDA drafts
  • Rhetoric is at times heated
  • Mostly taking place on email lists and the
    blogosphere, rather than in the published
    literature
  • Falls into two camps
  • Too extreme
  • Not extreme enough
  • Both sides have some valid points both miss the
    point entirely at times
  • Jenn Riley. RDA and FRBR An Update.
  • http//www.dlib.indiana.edu/jenlrile/presentatio
    ns/ilf2007/rdafrbr.pdf

87
Reaction to RDA drafts
  • The JSC claims RDA will make shifts in the
    theoretical framework without invalidating
    previous cataloging work
  • So, we must both change the standard and not
    change the standard
  • This is why JSCs work has been criticized for
    being both too dramatic a change, and not a
    sufficient change

88
The too extreme argument goes something like
  • Abandonment of ISBD as a guiding structure is a
    step backwards
  • FRBR is just theory, we shouldnt be basing a
    cataloging code on it
  • Language is incomprehensible
  • Planned changes dont give enough benefit to
    warrant the costs of implementation
  • Adapted from Jenn Riley. RDA and FRBR An
    Update.

89
Too Extreme
  • No other communities are going to use this thing
    anyways
  • Any simplification of rules might reduce record
    quality and granularity
  • Trying to cater to multiple audiences pollutes a
    library cataloging standard.
  • Retraining staff will be expensive for libraries
    and confusing to catalogers the bigger the
    change, the more the cost and confusion.

90
Too Extreme
  • See Gorman paper for an example
  • The RDA seeks to find a third way between
    standard cataloguing (abandoning a slew of
    international agreements and understandings) on
    the one hand and the metadata crowd and
    boogie-woogie Google boys on the other.

91
The not extreme enough argument goes something
like
  • Too much data relegated to textual description
  • Length and specificity make it unlikely to be
    applied outside of libraries
  • Plans to remain backwards-compatible prohibit
    needed fundamental changes
  • FRBR integration only a surface attempt
  • RDA is a legacy standard mired in past
    thinking. It will never catch on outside of
    libraries if it remains so complicated (example
    2 chapters 120 pages of info.).
  • Adapted from Jenn Riley. RDA and FRBR An
    Update.

92
Not Extreme Enough
  • RDA is too bottom heavy. JSC should create broad
    rules for most scenarios and let specialized
    groups produce details.
  • JSC cannot create a robust standard for both
    digital and analog records. It must choose
    digital or risk losing forward thinking
    supporters.
  • A less structured approach would allow for more
    sophisticated computer mediation, which would
    create superior search results and better serve
    patron demands.

93
Not Extreme Enough
  • See Coyle/Hillmann paper for an example
  • Particularly problematic is the insistence that
    notions of "primary" and "secondary," designed to
    use effectively the space on a 3 x 5 inch card,
    must still be a part of RDA. Preferences about
    identification of materials continue to focus on
    transcription in concert with rules for creating
    textual "uniform" titles by which related
    resources can be gathered together for display to
    users. Similarly, relationships between works or
    derivations have been expressed using textual
    citation-like forms in notes.

94
Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic
Control
  • Develop a More Flexible, Extensible Metadata
    Carrier
  • Integrate Library Standards into Web Environment
  • Extend Use of Standard Identifiers
  • Develop a Coherent Framework for the Greater
    Bibliographic Apparatus
  • Improve the Standards Development Process,
    including return on investment and greater focus
    on lessons from user studies
  • Suspend Work on RDA

95
WG Recommendation 4.2
  • Presented their preliminary recommendations Nov.
    13, 2007 at the Library of Congress,
    recommendation 4.2 directed at RDA. The working
    group expressed their concerns about the new
    guidelines
  • RDA is being written on a framework that is not
    yet tested--FRBR concepts need to be tested on
    real cataloging data
  • "Temporarily suspend all further new work on RDA"
  • need thorough exploration of FRBR and
    implications on bibliographic control
  • WG needs assurance that RDA is based on practical
    reality as well as on theoretical construct, that
    this would improve the support for the new code
  • need more info on cost of implementation
  • need identification of the real benefits of
    implementation
  • need info on hospitality of systems to be able to
    handle the new rules
  • urge the JSC to go back and address these
    outstanding issues, as well as language issues,
    organization, and usability

96
  • We want to make clear that NAL and NLM have not
    yet reached a conclusion regarding the adoption
    of RDA. We are mindful that the sponsoring
    organizations have economic limitations and
    revenue projections tied to the publication of
    RDA. However, the decision to adopt a new code
    must be based on the content of that code and not
    the economic needs of the sponsoring
    organizations.
  • Statement posted to Autocat and other listservs.
    July 11, 2007

97
Draft Review Process Positive Features of RDA
  • Re-organization of the instructions around a
    clearly-defined element set
  • Effort to support both current and
    forward-looking implementation scenarios
  • Application of the FRBR/FRAD data models,
    including the attributes, relationships, and user
    tasks
  • Emphasis on relationships among resources and
    entities
  • Greater emphasis on describing entities, as
    opposed to creating access points

98
Draft Review Process Positive Features of RDA
  • Consistent specification of resource identifiers
    as an alternative to text strings for identifying
    entities
  • Effort to support international application of
    RDA outside of an English-language environment
  • Decision to define a place for subject entities
    and relationships in the RDA structure
  • Collaborations with the ONIX and DCMI communities
    have already yielded what may turn out to be some
    of the most significant products of the RDA
    project

99
Draft Review Process Not So Positive Features of
RDA
  • Constituency review of the RDA draft was deeply
    flawed and a difficult and unpleasant experience.
  • Calls into question whatever credibility the RDA
    project has left
  • The PDF files in which the full draft was finally
    issued were flawed documents, characterized by
    abundant typographical errors, faulty references,
    and a layout that obscured rather than supported
    the content

100
Draft Review Process Not So Positive Features of
RDA
  • Frustrating combination of a forward-looking
    structure with the retention of vast amounts of
    case law and arbitrary decisions from the past.
  • Instructions retain many of the arbitrary
    decisions inherited from AACR2, and the current
    reorganization now highlights how arbitrary many
    of those inherited decisions are.

101
Draft Review Process Not So Positive Features of
RDA
  • Catalogers of special types of resources, such as
    cartographic, archival and moving-image
    resources, have become convinced that they have
    nothing to gain from RDA and much to lose
  • RDA fails to meet many of its objectives, but
    none more fatally than the objective of clarity
    RDA is not clear and written in plain English.

102
Will RDA Ever be Implemented?
  • Heidi Hoerman's presentation on RDA from the 2008
    OLAC/MOUG/NOTSL Conference. She reviews RDA and
    predicts
  • "RDA will die a quiet death.
  • AACR2r2010 will be published.
  • RDA's aims will be realized in due time."

103
Will RDA Ever be Implemented?
  • Even if RDA proves to be as bad as detractors
    suggest, it may still have some important things
    to say about cataloging
  • Perhaps is RDA proves to be insufficient, its
    shortcomings will be addressed and the next
    standard will be the dramatic change
  • Or, maybe RDA will be just as dramatically
    wonderful as it has been suggested it will be

104
Cooperative Cataloging Rules
  • The site has two primary purposes
  • 1) to offer a serious alternative to RDA
  • 2) to offer a place for sharing bibliographic
    concepts within the general metadata community.
  • James Weinheimer post to Autocat, Oct. 15, 2009

105
(No Transcript)
106
MARC
  • The electronic embalming of the catalog card.
  • --Michael Gorman
  • MARC has always been an arcane standard. No
    other profession uses MARC or anything like it.
  • --Roy Tennant

107
MARC
  • There are only two kinds of people who believe
    themselves able to read a MARC record without
    referring to a stack of manuals a handful of our
    top catalogers and those on serious drugs.
  • Roy Tennant. MARC Must Die

108
(No Transcript)
109
  • OCLC NEW Rec stat n
  • Entered 20030207 Replaced 20030207
    Used 20030207
  • Type r ELvl I Srce d Audn
    Ctrl Lang dog
  • BLvl m Form GPub Time nnn
    MRec Ctry mou
  • Desc a TMat r Tech n DtSt m
    Dates 1999,9999
  • 040 a ZCU c ZCU
  • 020 a 101010101 c priceless
  • 090 a SF429.S64 b R62 1999
  • 092 a 636.76 2 21
  • 049 a ZPSA
  • 245 00 a Rocky h realia b beloved pet / c
    raised and loved
  • by Rick Block and Bill Vosburg.
  • 256 a Shih tzu
  • 260 a Missouri b Farm, c 1999-
  • 300 a 1 dog b male, black and white, 18
    lbs. c 51 x 33 cm.
  • 490 1 a Block/Vosburg dog series v no. 1
  • 0 a Shih tzu.
  • 830 0 a Block/Vosburg dog series v no. 1.

110
MARC WoGroFuBiCo
  • 3.1.1.1 LC Recognizing that Z39.2/MARC are no
    longer fit for the purpose, work with the library
    and other interested communities to specify and
    implement a carrier for bibliographic information
    that is capable of representing the full range of
    data of interest to libraries, and of
    facilitating the exchange of such data both
    within the library community and with related
    communities.

111
(No Transcript)
112
What about MARC? How will RDA change this
standard?
  • RDA/MARC Working Group is to propose changes to
    MARC21 to accommodate encoding of RDA data
  • MARC is only one possible encoding schema for RDA
    data
  • RDA online product will include mappings to MARC
    (current PDF draft has mappings to MARC21 in
    Appendix D)
  • JSC has gradually backed away from their
    original stance that RDA could be expressed
    easily in MARC21Diane Hillmann
  • Well supported rumors indicate that LC is
    considering discontinuing update of MARC21
    sometime in 2010

113
What about MARC? How will RDA change this
standard?
  • We dont have complete answers about how MARC
    will change with the adoption of RDA.
  • The RDA/MARC Working Group has formed to address
    these questions
  • Under the auspices of the British Library, the
    Library and Archives Canada, and the Library of
    Congress, an RDA/MARC Working Group has been
    established to collaborate on the development of
    proposals for changes to the MARC 21 formats to
    accommodate the encoding of RDA data. With the
    implementation of RDA anticipated for late 2009,
    the Working Group will be drafting proposals for
    review and discussion by the MARC community in
    June 2008.
  • Although the MARC 21 formats support the encoding
    of descriptions created according to a wide range
    of content standards, the close relationship
    between AACR and MARC 21 has contributed to the
    efficient exchange of information among libraries
    for decades. The RDA/MARC Working Group will
    identify what changes are required to MARC 21to
    support compatibility with RDA and ensure
    effective data exchange into the future.
  • (Taken from an email posted by Marjorie Blossto
    RDA-L on April 13, 2008.

114
Future of MARC
  • Discussion of the future of MARC is only
    partially about MARC
  • The broader digital information landscape
  • Technologies
  • Cataloging practices
  • The diminishing market share of
  • Libraries in the information marketplace
  • Library catalogs as a resource discovery tool

115
MARCs Richness
  • Metadata record with approximately 2,000 elements
    available
  • Approximately 200 fields
  • Approximately 1800 subfields or other structures
  • To what extent is the richness/complexity
    exploited

116
MARC My Thoughts
  • Rumors of MARCs death have been greatly
    exaggerated.
  • Nevertheless, the cult of MARC could keep us
    from seeing or moving ahead
  • Its not MARC thats killing us, its the record
  • The pursuit of the perfect record must end

117
MARC My Thoughts
  • Librarians have had greatest success with data
    sharing
  • Dont sweat over MARC
  • Can re-package MARC data
  • ILS systems need to gather and display records
    not a lot needs to be done to MARC records
  • Not convinced MARC will die either by murder or
    natural causes but

118
MARC My Thoughts
  • MARC does limit our ability to share and exchange
    data outside of libraries while the creation of
    metadata outside of libraries is undergoing
    exponential growth

119
RDA Database Implementation Scenarios
  • RDA is a content standard
  • RDA is not a display or encoding standard
  • RDA is not prescriptive as to the data structures
    that are used to create, exchange, store or
    access the metadata
  • New database structures needed to realize the
    full potential of RDA
  • Improve efficiency of cataloging
  • Improve searching and browsing for users
  • Next Slides from Rob Walls. Implementation
    scenarios, encoding structures and display.

120
Flat file database structure
Bibliographic record
Name Authority record
Name-Title Authority record
Holdings/Item record
121
Linked Bibliographic and Authority Records
Bibliographic record
Name Authority record
Name-Title Authority record
Holdings/Item record
122
Relational / object-orientated database structure
Manifestation
Work
Access Point Control Record
Expression
Holdings/Item
123
RDA and Dublin Core
  • DCMI/RDA Task Group
  • RDA Element Vocabulary
  • RDA metadata entities (elements, attributes)
  • E.g. Title, Content type
  • RDA value vocabularies (terms)
  • E.g. spoken word, microform (media type)
  • Enable RDA entities to be used in Semantic Web
    applications/by computers as well as people
  • DC Application Profile for RDA

124
Bibliographic system changes
  • Implement support for new/changed MARC 21 data
    elements
  • Cataloging interface
  • Record displays
  • Index definitions for new data elements
  • Input/verification functions

125
RDA Online Product Planned Features
  • Browse and Search text (chapters and appendices)
  • RDA-AACR2 Mappings
  • Mappings to Dublin Core, ISBD, MARC
  • Full or Core View options
  • Workflows and examples for different formats and
    types of resources
  • Links to external resources
  • Customizable views and settings
  • Demo from the IFLA Satellite Meeting, August
    2008 http//www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/jsc/docs/
    iflasatellite-20080808-demo.pdf

126
Testing
  • Six months
  • Coordinated by U.S. national libraries LC, NAL,
    NLM
  • Also includes PCC libraries of varying sizes,
    some archives, ILS vendors, OCLC
  • RDA itself and compared to AACR2

127
Testing
  • Feasibility of creating bibliographic data and
    populating MARC record
  • Workflow and time comparison to AACR2
  • Determination of possible changes to MARC to
    accommodate data created using RDA
  • Financial impact of training, workflow, and
    workflow adjustments
  • Usability for catalogers, by systems, ability of
    users to locate desired information
  • Co-existence of RDA and AACR2 records
  • Integration between online product and other
    tools
  • System development needed for implementation

128
Testing
  • Initial release of RDA Online will be tested
  • All methodology, results and data will be shared
    and available
  • Core set of 25 resources including text, AV,
    serials and integrating resources
  • Each institution will create both an RDA record
    and a record using their current rules
  • Different staff members will create the RDA
    record and the current rules record
  • Each institution will produce at least an
    additional 25 RDA records

129
  • The goal of the test is to assure the
    operational, technical and economic feasibility
    of RDA At the very least, the testing may
    simply reveal that the rules dont work and thus
    show us how not to develop cataloging guidelines,
    which is always a valuable lesson.
  • Shawne Miksa. Resource Description and Access
    (RDA) and New Research Potentials.

130
Current Timeline Version ??
  • Full draft released in PDF November 17, 2008
  • Comment period on full draft ended February 2,
    2009
  • RDA Online release June 2010
  • Testing will begin only after RDA is available
  • Test Days 1-90
  • Training period
  • Test Days 91-180
  • Records creation period
  • Post-Test Days 1-90
  • Steering Committee analyzes results
  • After Post-Test Day 91
  • Report is shared with US library community
  • Implementation?

131
Controversies, questions, considerations
  • Cost and accessibility of online product
  • It is unlikely that RDA in its entirety will be
    available through open access.
  • Too radical or not radical enough?
  • Drafts have been difficult to understand and
    inconsistent
  • Has FRBR been tested enough?
  • FRBR model doesnt apply equally well to all
    types of materials
  • WoGroFuBiCos recommendation to suspend work on
    RDA

132
Controversies, questions, considerations
  • Internationalization vs. Anglo-American
    membership on JSC
  • Flexibility and adaptability vs. specificity and
    detail
  • Break with the past vs. compatibility with legacy
    data
  • Simplicity and ease of use vs. length and FRBR
    jargon
  • Must MARC die?
  • What is OCLC going to do?
  • and others

133
Final Thoughts
  • The road to RDA has been extremely frustrating
  • Ive become even more convinced that despite its
    flaws we need to have it out and used (or not!)
  • Releasing an imperfect code is better than
    another 15 years of discussion
  • Release early, release often!

134
Too much change?!
  • In cataloging, all changes cost money. The
    larger the catalog in which the changes are
    introduced, the more they cost. That is why there
    is always a powerful conservative lobby among
    administrators of the largest and richest
    libraries when the revision of cataloging rules
    is under consideration.
  • Lewis, P.R. (1980). The Politics of Catalog
    Code Revision and Future Considerations.In The
    Making of a Code the Issues Underlying AACR2.
    held March 11-14, 1979, Tallahassee, Florida.
    Edited by Doris HargrettClack. Sponsored by the
    School of Library Science, Florida State
    University. Chicago ALA

135
Consider this past observation
  • failure to keep cataloging practice in line
    with changes in the characteristics in the
    documents in our libraries, and with the
    expectation and needs of document users in those
    libraries, leads to increasing inefficiencies
    and so long-term costs of avoiding catalog
    changes may be as high as those of accepting
    them, although this is not easy to demonstrate in
    library budgets. Either way, the longer the
    changes are deferred, the more they cost...the
    proper method is to carry out revisions
    promptly.
  • Lewis. P.R. (1980)

136
Once upon a time.penmanship was a required
course
137

138
What Should Catalogers Be Doing Right Now?
  • Get familiar with FRBR and RDA terminology
  • Explore the RDA website and other
    resourcesofficial and unofficial
  • Watch discussion lists and blogs for discussions
    and updates
  • Ask questions, talk with colleagues, participate
    in the online discussions
  • Keep an open mind
  • Be prepared for change, even if RDA dies
  • And, most importantly

139
(No Transcript)
140
(No Transcript)
141
(No Transcript)
142
  • You see, I dont believe that libraries should
    be drab places where people sit in silence, and
    thats been the main reason for our policy of
    employing wild animals as librarians Monty
    Python skit.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com