Business Impact Analysis 2.2.4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Business Impact Analysis 2.2.4

Description:

– PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: bgr95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Business Impact Analysis 2.2.4


1
(No Transcript)
2
Prime Minister Lyonchhen leaving to NY
3
Peach Melba for Dessert
4
Ministry Agr. and UNDP
5
(No Transcript)
6
Community Based Poverty Reduction
Initiative2008-2012
Royal Government of Bhutan
7
Objectives
  • Bring poor households above subsistence level by
    ensuring appreciable level of income.
  • Ensure social mobilization and collective
    decision making in the execution of economic
    activities.
  • Strengthen capacity of poor households through
    skill up-gradation training to ensure
    sustainability of employment activities beyond
    project period.

8
Project Overview
  • Scope 5 eastern districts (these are the 5
    poorest)
  • Duration Oct 1, 2008  - Sept 30, 2012
  • Budget US 500,000
  • Stakeholders Ministry of Agriculture
  • UNDP
  • Government registered CSOs
  • Representatives from the communities

9
Project Management
10
Strategy
  • Identification of the CSOs
  • Signature of individual contract between the
    districts, UNDP and the selected CSOs
  • Facilitation of social mobilization by CSOs
  • Particular focus on women and other disadvantaged
    groups identified
  • Empowerment and capacity building of the
    beneficiaries
  • Consolidation of the local farmers organizations

11
Roles Responsibilities (Govt UNDP)
  • Government   Identify CSOs with
    appropriate capability.   A government officer
    will oversee activities of the CSOs. 
    Facilitate interaction and consultation with
    departments, districts CSOs.  Through its
    designated agency either at National or District
    level monitor progress
  • through reviews, visits and
    participation in mtgs.UNDP  Provide financial
    resources   Technical assist. to CSOs in
    implementation of work plans (prepared by CSOs in
  • collaboration with Govt).
  •   With Govt and CSOs, support
    identification of options for HD initiatives at
    district
  • level and identification of
    research/training needs for beneficiaries. 
    Participate in review meetings and monitoring
    visits

12
Why CSO
  • Challenge reaching the genuine poor
  • Social mobilisation and development is not a
    spontaneous process.
  • Can play a critical role, as facilitator, in
  • Social mobilization
  • Organising them into clusters for development
    intervention
  • training and capacity building
  • Liaising with community to ensure sustainability

13
Roles Responsibilities (CSOs)
  • Draw up annual work plan
  • Liaise with community
  • Provision of orientation capacity building
    training
  • Identify location-specific feasible activities
  • Help beneficiaries prepare their economic
    proposal
  • Appraisal of proposal, funding and monitoring
  • Develop standard of product (product dev, design,
    packaging etc.)
  • Ensure collaboration with market and networking
  • Find out sustainable ways and means

14
Deliverables of CSOs
  • Survey and identification of feasible economic
    activities
  • Social mobilisation and formation of farmers
    group
  • 1/3rd must be of exclusively women farmers group
  • Awareness built on possible income generating
    ventures
  • Farmers provided with assistance for investment
    activities
  • Training needs assessment through participatory
    mechanism
  • Collaboration with research and institutes for
    training
  • Quality of products for better marketing improved
  • Marketing network established, marketing linkage
    facilitated

15
ME
  • Monitoring
  • Annual Reports by Project Manager presented to
    Project Board
  • Participatory process include beneficiaries
    reporting on results
  • Evaluation
  • Mid-term evaluation external, realign project
    as necessary
  • Final external, for lessons learnt for future
    interventions
  • Baseline
  • and of unemployed members in the
    employable age (15 65)
  • and of unemployed women in this age group
  • Average house hold incomes.
  • Results of initial survey of happiness using
    Bhutan methodology
  • Indicators of success
  • Annual incremental increases of 10 in all of
    the above indicators
  • Overall 40 increase over the project duration
  • Annual increase of 10 on level of happiness


16
Risk Management
17
Exit Strategy
  • Exit
  • Gradual exit of the program. Last year of the
    strategy will be only supervising and advising
    specific problem for the group.
  • Sustainability
  • Social and cultural - the micro-enterprise was
    identified in a participatory manner by the
    community members themselves..
  • Economic.- through continued improvement of the
    product and search for marketing networks.
  • Capital micro-savings and micro-insurance
    programme.
  • Political through, the participation of the
    government from the initial stages including
    through monitoring the progress of the
    implementation.

18
Gross National Happiness
Indicatorseducationhealthemploymenttime
usecultural vitalityenvironmental
diversityemotional well beingliving
standardgovernance
19
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT WASHING POWDER
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com