Roman Sculpture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Roman Sculpture

Description:

... design- Greek and Egyptian copied were in vogue at the time The s that follow focus on wholly Roman subjects- portraiture and narrative relief Aulus ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: HCPS6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Roman Sculpture


1
Roman Sculpture
2
  • Is there such a thing as a Roman style of
    sculpture?
  • Romans have reputation as imitators- copied many
    Greek sculptures, vast quantities of work are
    adaptations and variations of Greek models
  • Roman demand for sculpture was high- attributed
    to ANTIQUARIANISM (the love of antiquities) and
    their desire for interior design- Greek and
    Egyptian copied were in vogue at the time
  • The slides that follow focus on wholly Roman
    subjects- portraiture and narrative relief

3
  • Republican Sculpture
  • Political and military heroes were honored by
    having their statues put on public display
  • Found in Etruscan territory
  • This gesture reoccurs in hundreds of Roman
    statues
  • Artist was probably Etruscan, but worked in the
    Roman style
  • Very, serious, factual in detail(tied shoelaces)

Aulus Metellus, early 1st c., Bronze
4
  • Unmistakable purely Roman style of portraits
  • Detailed record of facial topography
  • Designed not to bring out emotion like Hellenic
    sculpture, but to show a Roman personality-rugged,
    stern, iron-willed, authoritative
  • Roman custom- at death, a waxen image was taken
    of the head of the family, this was then
    preserved in a special shrine in the house- none
    remain
  • Towards the 1st century BC, as the Republican era
    waned, people felt the need to record these
    images in stone, to prove their ancient lineage

Portrait of a Roman, c.80 BC
5
  • Shows the tradition of Roman with these busts
  • The wax images werent works of art- they were
    just copies of the face-when they were put into
    marble, the faces took on a spiritual quality
  • The waxes were often copied in marble many
    times-uniqueness was not an important Roman goal

Roman Patrician with Bust of his Ancestors, 1st
c. BC
6
  • Imperial Sculpture--
  • Portrait sculptures become more god-like
  • The idea of the divine ruler (Egypt and Near
    East) has returned!!
  • Has common Roman pose
  • Idealized figure and face
  • Realistic surface detail
  • inspired glance
  • Does have a definite likeness, when compared with
    other Augustus portraits
  • Emperors likeness was reproduced so many times,
    that it became a national emblem

Augustus of Prima Porta, c.20BC
7
Ara Pacis, c.13-9 BC
  • Narrative relief was also popular- to commemorate
    emperors achievements
  • This had not been done in Greece- no specific
    historic events were recorded
  • Ara Pacis- Augustus preferred to be depicted as a
    defender of peace rather than as a military hero
  • Monumental frieze depicts allegorical and
    legendary scenes

8
Ara Pacis detail
  • Has a Hellenistic, classicist style
  • Procession of a concrete event- the founding of
    the altar in 13 BC
  • People depicted are meant to be portraits
  • Great concern for spatial depth

9
Spoils from the Temple in Jerusalem, Arch of
Titus, 81 AD
  • Arch erected in 81 AD to commemorate the
    victories of Emperor Titus
  • Idea of movement is successfully portrayed-shows
    the procession moving away from the viewer

10
  • The purposes of Imperial art sometimes were
    incompatible with a realistic treatment of space
  • Commemorated Trajans victories over the Dacians
    (ancient Romanians)
  • Free standing columns were used as monuments
    since Hellenic times
  • Continuous spiral band of relief documents the
    history of the war
  • Column was originally topped with a statue that
    was destroyed in the Middle Ages
  • Band of relief is 656 Ft long- can only follow
    the relief if the viewer keeps turning around and
    the detail disappears as the column gets taller
  • Rarely shows actual combat-more attention to
    geography and politics
  • Similar to Near East reliefs, although unclear if
    there is a link

Column of Trajan, Rome, 106-13 AD
11
  • Production of portraits was vast in Imperial Rome
  • Vespasian did not really believe in the idea of
    the divine ruler
  • There is a Republican flavor to the portrait
  • Focus on skin and texture is very Greek

Vespasian, 75 AD
12
Graceful and gentle, softness of skin and detail
of fashionable hair
Portrait of a Lady c. 90 AD
13
  • Portrait has emotional intensity-a combination of
    Greek pathos and Roman nobility
  • Seen in strong brow, commanding gaze
  • Conformed to the Roman tradition of being
    clean-shaven-after this, emperors wore beards to
    depict Hellenic tradition

Trajan, 100 AD
14
  • Statue reflects the reign of Marcus Aurelius who
    was very interested in classical Greek philosophy
  • One of the few Roman sculptures to remain on
    public view through out the Middle Ages
  • Equestrian statues had been a tradition since
    Julius Caesar
  • Marcus Aureilius saw himself as a bringer of Peace

Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius, 161-180
15
  • 3rd century saw the empire in constant crisis
  • Emperors were soldier emperors- from outlying
    provinces
  • Emperors gained the throne through force
  • This is reflected in the portraits- a different
    mood- more emotional, less documentary
  • Plontius was a Greek philosopher who was very
    mystical
  • There was a spread of Oriental Mystery cults that
    foreshadowed the middle ages rather than
    reflecting Classicist tradition

Portrait Head (Plontius) late 3rd C. BC
16
  • First Christian ruler of Rome
  • Portraiture has become more symbolic than
    realistic- a visible symbol of the spiritual self
  • Statue does not show us what Constantine looked
    like, but what he thought about himself and his
    office

Constantine the Great, early 4th C. AD
17
  • Decorated with sculpture taken from earlier
    Imperial monuments- probably because of the poor
    conditions of the sculpture studios at the time
  • Also shows that Constantine saw himself as the
    restorer of Roman glory

Arch of Constantine, Rome, 312-15 AD
18
Frieze, Arch of Constantine, early 4th c.
  • Made specifically for the arch (not taken from
    elsewhere)
  • Shows Constantine addressing the Senate- no sense
    of movement, no spatial depth, no foreshortening,
    shallow doll-like figures, no contrapposto
  • Abstracted on purpose- symmetrical to show the
    importance of the emperor in the center the only
    figure to be shown full-frontal (although head
    has been knocked off)- looks forward to Christian
    art- does not revert back to archaic sculpture
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com