EMBARK Initiative investing in people and ideas. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

EMBARK Initiative investing in people and ideas.

Description:

– PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: researchca
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EMBARK Initiative investing in people and ideas.


1
EMBARK Initiative investing in people
and ideas.
  • The Postdoc in the European Context
  • CHIU 4 May 2005
  • Martin Hynes
  • info_at_ircset.ie www.ircset.ie

2
Postdoc in Irish context
  • Rapid acceleration of research investment from
    1.4 to 2.5 of GNP by 2010.
  • Explicit recognition of shortage of Ph.D s
    research professionals
  • Many new funding sources now available
  • Scientific excellence is the common denominator
  • IRCSET Unique niche, supporting researchers in
    early career stages across the SET disciplines

3
European setting
  • Traversed by differing structures German, Latin,
    Nordic, Anglo-Saxon and now-
  • Emerging Eastern European/ Academies of Science
    traditions
  • Different beasts rooted in different assumptions
  • Apprentice, Colleague, Employee or indeed
  • Vassal

4
European Commission proposes
  • Charters
  • Labour regulations
  • Mobility programmes
  • European Research Areas and Council
  • Single market Postdoc researcher trained to best
    practice

5
Research training agenda?
  • Marie Curie Fellowships, Charter, Bologna process
    are enabling
  • No prescription of one true and indivisible way
    to training excellence
  • Welcome conference opening up discussion
    INSERM/MRC/the Weizmann/ EPFL/ Scottish
    Universities models
  • Opportunity to better imagine the future

6
Decisions for Irish Research
  • Decisions about future being made now-consciously
    and pragmatically
  • Explicit choices and priorities along with
    inherent conflicts
  • --may be useful to imagine 4 scenarios
  • Not exclusive, overlaps existbut from your
    response we will see supporters and detractors of
    each model.

7
1 World Class Research in Ireland
  • Scholarship Research excellence
  • Top notch people and all else will flow-Robert
    Mertons CUDOS Communality, Universality,
    Disinterestedness, Originality and Scepticism
  • Duration short, how to deal with non-core
    activities?
  • Training curriculum, pedagogy, content

8
Scenario 1 Research focus
  • But two types of Postdoc
  • Fellowships and rights
  • Research contract and outputs
  • Both have PhDs with contracts but are different
  • Elitist world-only the best survive
  • For unto every one that hath shall be given ,
    and he shall have abundance , but from him that
    hath not shall be taken away even that which he
    hath St Matthew

9
1 Postdoc perspective
  • Loyalty research project, research group, global
    research community on ltthemegt
  • Working conditions variable, publication rights,
    working by doing
  • Target is tenured position with top-class group,
    not another Postdoc award
  • But where?

10
Sc. 2 Nature of research changing
  • Global leaders not such a target vide decline in
    Physics / Chemistry
  • Interdisciplinary research emphasised, effective
    in discovery innovation
  • Observation that establishing Quality and
    achieving recognition in University and
    employment track more challenging.

11
2 Postdoc perspective
  • Core discipline research proposal but added
    inputs from other Dept / Institution
  • Loyalty less to research area tools but more to
    research field and approaches
  • Fellow feelings with larger group, outside
  • University structures may look shaky
  • Who will eventually sit on selection committee?

12
2 Postdoc perspective
  • -probably applying to a Dept. structure which PD
    departed from!
  • Impact of research publications difficult to
    assess- new area, new journals
  • Improved prospects of employment outside
    traditional models better contacts across
    structures

13
Sc.3 University is critical part of Irish society
  • Community market for research industry turns
    knowledge into wealth and back to benefits for
    society
  • Quality and benchmarking most strongly supported
    by Govt with some Universities
  • Results linked to Benthamite funding system
  • Emphasis on quality of supervision and delivery
    of research training

14
3 Postdoc perspective
  • Social contract pervasive-may be strong upsides
    but also some difficult decisions
  • Research identity weakened and new stakeholders
    are far stronger
  • Employment and careers more varied? Research
    training or bridge to users of research results
    opened up

15
Sc. 4 Irish Universities as drivers of Economy
  • RD is seen as a driver of economic wealth and
    major employer
  • Research training systems will tend towards
    coherence as economic necessity
  • FDI was at heart of Celtic tiger but 2004 was
    first year in which RD investment outpaced that
    in manufacturing

16
RD the new Manufacturing?
17
Sc. 4 Techno-economic logic
  • Demands change- substantial rewards for wider
    range of measurements
  • Research indicators for areas perceived as
    being of economic importance
  • Cooperation with enterprise rewarded
  • Research may leave Dept and move to Research
    Centre as interface www.utc.fr

18
4 Postdoc perspective
  • Full recognition of worth, clear career path with
    strong mobility
  • Training now includes contract law, IPR, DRM,
    career planning, some economics
  • Research identity much broader-expectation to
    engage in commercialisation or translation
  • Industry much more comfortable with researchers
    as employees

19
So---
  • Four scenarios may co-exist flourish
  • None desirable on its own
  • Most pressing issue is clear stepping stones
    towards independence or employment
  • Draw best parts from each model and place within
    the legal framework

20
Strategic issues
  • Not just supply and demand need systems of
    innovation approach
  • Govt, industry and University triple Helix
  • Need to re-emphasise the Tree as a model, not the
    pipeline (Torsten Wiesel)
  • Globally competitive Postdoc competitions
    consistent with reasonable retention

21
The Tree, not pipeline
22
Tactical Issues
  • Formal commitment to research profession with
    rules of association
  • Across disciplinary boundaries and institutional
    boundaries
  • Professional society? www.nationalpostdoc.org
  • Explicit career path with clear indicators and
    quality goals

23
Johns Hopkins Medical - Guidelines for
Postdoctoral Training Programs
  • An initial appointment period of up to three
    years with reappointment on an annual basis. Six
    years would be the total time allowed for
    appointment as a fellow.
  • In some circumstances, the six year total time
    may be exceeded. Guidelines should be in place in
    each department in order to justify extending the
    training period. Exceptions would be recommended
    by the preceptor to the Department Director and
    reviewed by the Associate Dean for Postdoctoral
    Programs
  • A time frame for notification of
    non-reappointment should be established. This
    should occur at least six months prior to the end
    of the current appointment period.
  • All fellowship programs should have documentation
    regarding educational goals and objectives.
  • A postdoctoral training committee should be
    established in each department. The committee
    would meet with all fellows at least once a year
    during the fellowship to provide evaluation,
    counseling and career assessment.
  • Fellows should be informed that a postdoctoral
    fellowship appointment is not tantamount to a
    faculty appointment at the conclusion of the
    program.

24
Ireland in context
  • Supply of excellent graduates is still strong
  • Ireland perceived as an attractive location for
    Postdoc work
  • Real national commitment to change
  • Stage in research system maturity can work for
    us.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com