Strategy A View from the Top: Corporate Strategy: Shaping the Portfolio - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Strategy A View from the Top: Corporate Strategy: Shaping the Portfolio

Description:

Strategy A View from the Top: Corporate Strategy: Shaping the Portfolio Everett Gibson Alex Beverly Andrew Keeling Emily Dale Kolt Pedersen Carli Slingerland – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: kimboalB
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategy A View from the Top: Corporate Strategy: Shaping the Portfolio


1
Strategy A View from the Top Corporate
Strategy Shaping the Portfolio
  • Everett Gibson
  • Alex Beverly
  • Andrew Keeling
  • Emily Dale
  • Kolt Pedersen
  • Carli Slingerland
  • Hayley Rush

2
Introduction
  • What is your Strategy
  • For single business companies it should be clear
    and concise
  • For multibusiness corporations it is more complex
  • Most effective way to answer is to identify three
    to five strategic themes that are simple to
    communicate and comprehend
  • Example GEs key values Strength in developing
    leaders, ability to integrate business on a
    global scale, prowess in making skillful
    acquisitions

3
Introduction
  • Corporate Strategy is concerned with decisions
    about which businesses a company operates
    inactions that shape the corporate portfolio of
    businessesand with decisions about how to create
    value in the portfolio by exploiting synergies
    among multiple business units.

4
Economies of Scale
  • Occurs when the unit cost of performing an
    activity decreases as the scale of activity
    increases
  • Reasons better technologies in production
    processes or greater buyer power in large-scale
    purchasing situations
  • Economies of learning cumulative number of units
    processed or tasks performed drives the cost
    reduction-
  • occurs when cost is reduced as a result of
    finding better ways to perform a task

5
Economies of Scope
  • Occurs when the unit cost of an activity falls
    because the asset used is shared with some other
    activity
  • Frito Lay uses its trucks to deliver its Frito
    corn chips and Lays potato chips, as well as
    salsa and other dips.

6
Economies of Scope
  • Decision opportunities for creating economies of
    scope fall into three broad classes
  • Horizontal Scope-concern decisions of product
    scope
  • Geographical Scope-involves choices of
    geographical coverage
  • Vertical Scope- converned with how a company
    links its value chain activities vertically

7
Economies of Scope and Scale
  • To capitalize on the advantages of scale and
    scope
  • Companies must make related investments to create
    global marketing and distribution organizations
  • Must create the right mangement infrastructure to
    effectively coordinate the operations of a
    multinational corporation (Essential piece of
    Good-to-Great Companies)
  • Timing is Critical
  • First Mover advantage IBM, Intel, Microsoft, and
    Sony all dominant in their industries due to
    being first movers
  • Challengers Face uphill battle. They work on
    building productive capacity while the first
    movers are perfecting their production processes

8
What is Core?
  • A firms most valuable customers, most valuable
    products, most important channels, and
    distinctive capabilities.
  • -Strategy
  • You're Hedgehog

9
What is Core?
  • Not making a choice IS, making a choice.
  • Non-linear relationship to leadership
  • Increasing returns of scale

10
Strategy Traps
  • Assuming the business units that are performing
    well have peaked, and deciding not to make
    further investment.
  • Assuming there is more potential in
    underperforming businesses and making a risky
    investment
  • Prematurely abandoning core businesses.

11
Vertical Integration
  • Involves increasing a corporations vertical
    participation in an industrys value chain
  • Forward Integration- moving closer to the
    customer
  • Backward Integration- acquiring resource
    suppliers or raw materials or manufacturing
    components that used to be sourced elsewhere
  • Valuable when corporation already possesses a
    business unit with strong competitive position in
    highly attractive industry
  • Potentially costly by creating exit barrier that
    prevents company from leaving industry if its
    fortunes decline

VS
12
Horizontal Integration
  • Involves increasing the range of products and
    services already offered to current markets or
    expanding geographically
  • Often designed to leverage brand potential
  • In recent years, strategic alliances have become
    increasingly popular in implementing horizontal
    growth strategies
  • Ex GE- appliances, medical systems, aircraft
    engines, financing, etc

13
Diversification
  • Defined as a strategy of entering product markets
    different from those in which a company is
    currently engaged
  • Ex- Berkshire Hathaway operates in insurance,
    food, furniture, footwear, and a host of other
    businesses
  • Motivated by desire to
  • Create revenue growth
  • Increase profitability through shared resources
  • Reduce companys overall risk exposure
  • Exploit underutilized resources

14
Major Considerations
  • Potential for relatedness- the ability to target
    new business opportunities that have meaningful
    commonalities with the rest of the companys
    portfolio
  • Three degrees of relatedness dominant business
    companies, related business companies, and
    unrelated business companies companies with
    closely related portfolios outperform widely
    diversified corporations
  • Types of related diversification strategies
  • Target tangible links, such as opportunities
    arising from common buyers, channels,
    technologies, or other commonalities
  • Target intangible resources, such as knowledge or
    capabilities
  • Target ability of business units to jointly gain
    or exercise market power
  • Combination in which companies have opportunity
    to exploit the different types of relatedness

15
Porters 3 Tests
  • The attractiveness test- Is new industry
    attractive from growth, competitive, and
    profitability perspectives? Can company create
    such favorable conditions?
  • The cost of entry test- Costs of entry
    reasonable? How long before venture becomes
    profitable?
  • The better-off test- Does portfolios overall
    competitive position and performance improve?

16
Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Companies implement diversification strategies
    through internal development
  • Alliances
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Internal development is slow and expensive
  • Bonding with companies is the easiest way to
    diversify

17
Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Merger
  • Two companies have joined to form one company
  • Acquisition
  • When one firm buys another firm
  • The difference between the two is management
    control
  • Acquisitions quickly positions a firm

18
Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Acquisitions process is complex
  • Intense pressures
  • Frenzy environment
  • Six themes help the merger and acquisition
    process
  • Well developed corporate strategy
  • Ongoing, long term process
  • Disciplined strategic analysis
  • Add value
  • Objectivity is essential
  • Strategies must be formulated before acquisition

19
Cooperative Strategies
  • Cooperative strategies are becoming popular
  • Globalization is an important factor in
    cooperative ventures
  • Going alone is a big risk
  • Motivation for cooperative strategies is the
    corporations ability to spread its investments

20
Cooperative Strategies
  • Key drivers for cooperative strategies
  • Risk Sharing, Funding Limitations, Market Access,
    Technology Access
  • Risk Sharing
  • Most companies cannot afford to participate in
    all markets of interest
  • Companies must prioritize

21
Cooperative Strategies
  • Funding Limitations
  • Going it alone is not practical
  • Immense fixed costs with shorter payback
  • Market Access
  • Lack of prerequisite knowledge, infrastructure
  • Ex. Hitachi
  • Technology Access
  • Many different technologies
  • Technology spreading rapidly

22
Cooperative Strategies
  • Alternative reasons to pursue
  • Management skills
  • Inability to add value in house
  • Lack of opportunities
  • Airline Industry
  • Strategic alliance
  • Deregulation
  • Mergers blocked

23
The Strategic Logic of Alliances
  • Unique Alliance Drivers
  • Product Innovation
  • Credibility Early Growth
    Stage
  • Access to Capital
  • External Value
  • Customer Reach
  • Reduced Cost
  • Value-Chain Strengthening
  • Product Extension

Rapid Growth Stage
Stability Stage
24
Alliance Models
  • Franchise Model between a firm and one discrete
    class of partners.
  • Portfolio Model multiple class alliances
    managed by one firm.
  • Cooperative Model between many comparable sized
    peers.
  • Constellation Model multiple alliances led by
    two or more comparably sized peers.

25
Alliance Types
  • Expertise Alliances A collection of non
    competing firms
  • Share Expertise and have specific capabilities
  • New Business Alliances Partnerships focused on
    entering a new market
  • Popular when entering a new part of the world
    (China)
  • Cooperative Alliances Joint efforts by
    competitors
  • Looking for cheaper health insurance
  • MA - like Alliances Focus on near complete
    integration.
  • Prevented from doing so, due to legal constraints

26
Growth Strategic Risk
  • We can measure strategic risk in terms of how far
    a growth initiative takes a company away from the
    established strengths of its core business.
  • Bain International
  • This is calculated by assessing the degree of
    sharing between the core business and the growth
    opportunity

27
Growth Strategic Risk
  • Distance from the core is measured on five
    dimensions based off of certain adjacencies (1
    step, 2 steps, multi-step, diversification)
  • Shared customers
  • Shared costs
  • Shared channels
  • Shared competitors
  • Shared capabilities/technology
  • The chances of success vary by the type of
    adjacency that defines a particular growth
    initiative.

28
Growth Strategic Risk
  • Straying from the core almost always guarantees
    failure

Diversification (lt1)
Step 3 (7)
Step 2 (26)
Step 1 (38)
Core
29
Growth Strategic Risk
  • Two dimensions of strategic risk define a
    strategic map used to manage the risk profile of
    an overall corporate growth strategy
  • The distance from the core
  • The type of strategic adjacencies

30
Growth Strategic Risk
Probability of Successful Adjacency Move






New Business
Forward/Backward Integration
lt10
New Channel Segment
10 - 30
New Customer Segment
New Geography
30 - 50
New Products Services
Step 1
Step 2
Diversification
Step 3
Steps from Core
31
Disinvestments Sell-offs, Spin-offs, and
Liquidations
  • A sell-off or a spin-off into a separate company
    makes sense when analysis confirms the
    corporation is the wrong corporate parent for the
    business.
  • Example Chrysler Holding

32
Pitfalls
  • Splitting a company into a separate entity
    creates value for shareholders
  • For every one success there are two failures
  • Spin-off success factors
  • Ensure that both the parent corporation and the
    unit spun off have viable business and financial
    structures.
  • Meet or exceed earning expectations.
  • Continue growth

33
Conclusion
  • The Economics of Scale and Scope
  • What is core?
  • Growth Strategies
  • Disinvestments Sell-offs, Spin-offs, and
    Liquidations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com