POWER (KEKUASAAN) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

POWER (KEKUASAAN)

Description:

POWER (KEKUASAAN) Sharing power is a business necessity THE CONCEPT OF POWER Influence: a transaction in which person B is induced by person A to behave in a certain ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:205
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: Reni5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: POWER (KEKUASAAN)


1
POWER(KEKUASAAN)
2
Sharing power is a business necessity
3
THE CONCEPT OF POWER
  • Influence a transaction in which person B is
    induced by person A to behave in a certain way
  • Power (Robert Dahl) A has power over B to the
    extent that he can get B to do something B would
    not otherwise do
  • POWER
  • the capability to get someone to do something
  • the potential to influence
  • INFLUENCE
  • the exercise of that capability
  • power in action

4
  • You may have power but not use it on the other
    hand, you cannot influence anyone without power
  • It is important to stress that power is not an
    attribute of a particular person ? it is an
    aspect of relationship that exists between two
    (or more) people.
  • No individual or group can have power in
    isolation power must exist in relation to some
    other person or group.
  • Power relationships
  • symmetrical ? both parties are equal or have the
    same amount of power
  • asymmetrical ? one person in the relationship has
    more power than other

5
Social Influence, Power Politics How They Are
Related ( Greenberg dan Baron, 2003)
6
WHERE DOES POWER COME FROM?
  • INTERPERSONAL
  • Legitimate power
  • Reward power
  • Coercive power
  • Expert power
  • Referent power

7
TYPES OF INDIVIDUAL POWER A SUMMARY ( Greenberg
dan Baron, 2003)
8
INTERPERSONAL POWER
  • Legitimate power capacity to influence derived
    from the position of a manager in the
    organizational hierarchy. Subordinates believe
    that they ought to comply.
  • authority the ability to influence others based
    on the perceived power of ones position and role
    within an organization
  • Reward power an influence over others based on
    hope of reward - kemampuan atau wewenang untuk
    memberikan dan mengontrol reward
  • Coercive power influence over others based on
    fear - kemampuan atau wewenang untuk menghukum
    baik secara fisik maupun secara psikologis
  • Expert power capacity to influence related to
    some expertise, special skill, or knowledge
  • Referent power power based on a subordinates
    identification with a superior - mirip karisma
    karena melibatkan rasa percaya, penerimaan, kasih
    sayang, kesediaan untuk menjadi pengikut dan
    keterlibatan emosi

9
Subordinates responses to different power sources
  1. The use of legitimate or reward power will
    typically result in compliance subordinates
    will obey your requests, but are unlikely to
    exert more than the minimal effort necessary
  2. The use coercive power may result in resistance
    subordinates may only pretend to comply with your
    requests, and they may openly resist
  3. The use of expert and referent power frequently
    result in commitment subordinates are likely to
    exert high levels of effort to accomplish what
    you ask, perhaps even exceeding what you requested

10
American CEOs What are their power bases?
  • Source of power
  • Personality and leadership skills (83)
  • Support of the board of directors (70)
  • Support of senior colleagues (64)
  • Expertise knowledge (43)
  • Management decision control (28)
  • Support of the financial community (9)
  • ? a survey of more than 200 American CEOs
    revealed that they obtain their power primarily
    by cultivating the support of others at different
    levels of the organization (source based on data
    appearing in Stewart, 1999)

11
LEGITIMATE POWER
KOMITMEN KEPATUHAN PENOLAKAN
Mungkin, jika perintah dilakukan dengan sikap sopan dan baik hati Mungkin, jika perintah dirasakan legitimate Mungkin, jika bersikap arogan dan isi perintah tidak pada tempatnya
Bagaimana sebaiknya menggunakan legitimate power?
  • Bersikap ramah dan baik hati
  • Percaya diri
  • Membangun understanding
  • Yakini bahwa perintah yang diberikan cukup pantas
  • Jelaskan alasan diberikannya perintah
  • Sensitif terhadap perasaan dan keinginan bawahan

12
REWARD POWER
KOMITMEN KEPATUHAN PENOLAKAN
Mungkin, jika digunakan secara pribadi dan tidak jelas Sangat mungkin, jika dilakukan secara mekanis dan impersonal Mungkin, jika bersikap arogan dan manipulatif
Bagaimana sebaiknya menggunakan reward power?
  • Berikan perintah yang masuk akal
  • Hanya memberikan perintah yang pantas dan etis
  • Memberikan reward sesuai harapan bawahan
  • Hanya memberikan reward yang kredibel

13
COERCIVE POWER
KOMITMEN KEPATUHAN PENOLAKAN
Tidak mungkin Mungkin, jika digunakan secara tepat dan dengan sikap penyesalan Sangat mungkin, jika bersikap kejam dan manipulatif
Bagaimana sebaiknya menggunakan coercive power?
  • Menginformasikan pada bawahan mengenai peraturan
    dan hukuman
  • Memberi peringatan sebelum menghukum
  • Melaksanakan hukuman secara konsisten dan tidak
    pandang bulu
  • Memahami situasi sebelum bertindak
  • Menjaga kredibilitas
  • Hukuman sesuai dengan pelanggaran
  • Menghukum secara tertutup, tidak di depan orang
    lain

14
EXPERT POWER
KOMITMEN KEPATUHAN PENOLAKAN
Sangat mungkin, jika persuasif dan bawahan terlibat dalam pengambilan keputusan Mungkin, jika persuasuif tapi bawahan kurang cocok dengan tujuan pimpinan Mungkin, jika pemimpin bersikap arogan dan menghina, atau bawahan menentang tujuan pimpinan
Bagaimana sebaiknya menggunakan expert power?
  • Memperlihatkan kesan kepakaran (expertise)
  • Mempertahankan kredibilitas
  • Bertindak dengan percaya diri dan tegas
  • Selalu menambah informasi (meningkatkan
    kepakaran)
  • Hindari sikap yang merendahkan harga diri bawahan

15
REFERENT POWER
KOMITMEN KEPATUHAN PENOLAKAN
Sangat mungkin, jika perintah diyakini sebagai sesuatu yang penting bagi sang pemimpin Mungkin, jika perintahdiyakini sebagai sesuatu yang kurang penting bagi sang pemimpin Mungkin, jikaperintah atau kejadian akan berakibat buruk pada sang pemimpin
Bagaimana sebaiknya menggunakan referent power?
  • Memperlakukan bawahan secara adil
  • Membela kepentingan bawahan
  • Sensitif terhadap kebutuhan dan perasaan bawahan
    menjadi model peran (contoh teladan)

16
WHERE DOES POWER COME FROM?
  • STRUCTURAL
  • Resources
  • Decision making power
  • Information power

17
STRUCTURAL POWER
  • The structure of an organization is the control
    mechanism by which the organization is governed.
  • Organizational structure creates formal power and
    authority by specifying certain individuals to
    perform specific tasks and make certain
    decisions. Structure also significantly impacts
    informal power through its effect on information
    and communication flows within the system.
  • Resources
  • power stems from
  • access to resource, information, and support, and
  • the ability to get cooperation in doing necessary
    work
  • Power occurs when a person has open channels to
    resources money, human resources, technology,
    materials, customers, etc

18
STRUCTURAL POWER
  • Decision-Making Power
  • The degree to which individuals or subunits can
    affect decision making determines the amount of
    power acquired.
  • A person or sub unit with power can influence
    how the decision making process occurs, what
    alternatives are considered, and when a decision
    is made.
  • Individuals who influence a decision making
    process and its outcomes may or may not have
    formal authority.
  • Information Power
  • Knowledge a conclusion or analysis derived from
    data and information.
  • Having access to relevant and important
    knowledge information is power.
  • Information is the basis for making effective
    decisions. Thus, those who possess information
    needed in order to make potential decisions have
    power.
  • The powerful manager exist because s/he allocates
    required resources, makes crucial decisions, and
    has access to important information.
  • The powerless manager lacks the resources,
    information, and decision making prerogatives
    needed to be productive

19
KOALISI KOALISI DOMINAN
KOALISI ADALAH GABUNGAN BEBERAPA KELOMPOK YANG
MEMILIKI KEPENTINGAN TERTENTU YANG INGIN DICAPAI
DALAM ORGANISASI KOALISI DOMINAN TERDIRI DARI
ORANG-ORANG YANG MEMILIKI POWER TERKUAT DAN
BANYAK MENENTUKAN KEBIJAKAN ORGANISASI
20
INTERDEPARTEMENTAL POWER
  • THE STRATEGIC CONTINGENCIES MODEL POWER THROUGH
    DEPENDENCE
  • POWER TERBESAR ADA PADA AREA DALAM ORGANISASI
    YANG PALING MAMPU MENANGANI MASALAH-MASALAH
    KRITIS
  • Subunit Power, the power differential between
    subunits, is influenced by
  • the degree of ability to cope with uncertainty
  • the centrality of the subunit, and
  • the substitutability of the subunit

21
The Strategic Contingencies Model Power Through
Dependence
22
INTERDEPARTEMENTAL POWER( Greenberg dan Baron,
2003)
  • THE RESOURCE-DEPENDENCY MODEL CONTROLLING
    CRITICAL RESOURCES
  • the view that power resides within subunits able
    to control the greatest share of valued
    organizational resource
  • All subunits may contribute to an organization,
    but the most powerful are those that contribute
    the most important resources. Controlling the
    resources other departments need puts a subunit
    in a better position to bargain for the resources
    that it requires

23
The Resource Dependency Model An Example
24
MENDETEKSI POWER
  • PERTANYAAN YANG DAPAT DIAJUKAN
  • SIAPA YANG MENGAMBIL MAYORITAS KEPUTUSAN?
  • JABATAN APA SAJA YANG DIINCAR KEBANYAKAN
    KARYAWAN?
  • JABATAN APA SAJA YANG DIHINDARI KEBANYAKAN
    KARYAWAN?
  • BAGIAN MANA DALAM ORGANISASI YANG MEMILIKI HAK
    VETO UNTUK MENETAPKAN KEPUTUSAN BAGI BAGIAN LAIN?
  • SIAPA SAJA MANAJER YANG PALING BERPENGARUH?

25
Psychological Positions in Organization
IM OK YOURE OK IM NOT OK, YOURE OK
These organizational members are effective and confident. They take a positive, constructive approach toward others. In group they are willing to lead, but they do not dominate. They value others and their input. They use conflict positively, focusing on the task or goal. These managers trust their employees and judge them by their performance, not their sex or race. Although they recognize that misunderstanding arise because of cultural differences, they seek opportunities to build cooperation These organizational members feel anxious and insecure. They want to withdraw from others. They often are discouraged, and they see themselves less favorably than others. In groups, they avoid leadership and often defer to others who have more seniority or tenure. Historically, many women and minorities have perceived themselves in this position.
IM OK YOURE NOT OK IM NOT OK YOURE NOT OK
These organizational members are egoistical and feel superior. Their actions are often arrogant, condescending and paternalistic. In groups, they dictate the agenda and discourage interruption and disagreement. This position drives people away, and workers who attend meetings run by these managers are glad when the meetings are over so that they can get away from this type of boss. People in the dominant subgroup often show these behaviors in regards to those in other subgroup. These organizational members are depressed and hopeless. They often expect to fail and give up easily. When these managers are in charge, meetings become depressing because these managers do not plan or design creative strategies. This position believes that you get nowhere with people.
26
CARA INDIVIDU MEMANDANG DIRI SENDIRI DAN ORANG
LAIN
  • Cara memandang diri sendiri
  • IM NOT OK
  • IM NOT OK
  • IM OK
  • IM OK
  • Cara memandang orang lain
  • YOURE NOT OK
  • YOURE OK
  • YOURE NOT OK
  • YOURE OK

27
EMPOWERMENT
  • Empowerment
  • (Conger and Kanungo)
  • ?a process of enhancing feelings of self efficacy
    among organizational members through the
    identification of conditions that foster
    powerless and through their removal by both
    formal organizational practices and informal
    techniques of providing efficacy information
  • encouraging and/or assisting individuals and
    groups to make decisions that affect their work
    environment
  • the passing of responsibility and authority from
    managers to employees (Greenberg Baron, 2003)

28
The Empowerment Continuum Relinquishing Control
is a matter of degree(Greenberg Baron, 2003)
29
Increasing your effectiveness in empowering others
  1. When you delegate responsibility, make certain
    you are also delegating authority to go along
    with
  2. Be prepared to give up your managerial parent
    role and assume a partner role
  3. Assure your subordinates through words and deeds
    that it is OK to make mistakes
  4. Information sharing is important.
  5. Provide training opportunities so employees can
    develop skills to successfully perform new job
    responsibilities
  6. Performance feedback is always important it is
    particularly important for newly empowered
    employees.

30
What should you do tomorrow ?
  • Communication competencies for managing
    interactively
  • Interactive managers are able to
  • Make people and their knowledge accessible
    throughout an organization or business web
  • Share power with people at all levels of an
    organization
  • Design on-line and physical environments that
    enhance collaboration
  • Create effective rituals and experiences that
    build cultures
  • Actively use key interpersonal skills
  • Make information available, useful, and enticing
    to variety of stakeholders
  • Use stories in innovative ways to both share and
    capture knowledge
  • Resolve hidden conflict between actions and words
  • Listen to whole organization
  • Engage people across organizational boundaries

31
SHARE POWER
  • Sharing power is a business necessity
  • Power follows ability, not seniority
  • Sharing power from above
  • Sharing power from below
  • Everyone is responsible for sharing power, not
    just leaders
  • Technologies such as e-mail, voting software,
    augmented meetings, and on line discussion
    groups can help you share power
  • Avoid paternalistic messages and show trust in
    employees by sharing information

32
PRAKTEK POLITIK
  • usaha-usaha untuk menggunakan power guna
    mempengaruhi proses pengambilan keputusan
  • perilaku mementingkan diri sendiri tanpa
    mempertimbangkan untuk kebaikan orang lain atau
    organisasi

33
POLITICAL STRATEGIES AND TACTICS
  • Organizational Politics
  • Actions by individuals that are directed toward
    the goal of furthering their own self-interest
    without regard for the well-being of others or
    their organizations
  • all about actions not officially approved by an
    organization that are taken to influence others
    to meet ones personal goals
  • Political Behavior ? behavior outside the normal
    power system, designed to benefit an individual
    or a sub unit
  • Behavior that usually is outside the legitimate,
    recognized power system
  • Behavior that is designed to benefit an
    individual or subunit, often at the expense of
    the organization in general
  • Behavior that is intentional and is designed to
    acquire and maintain power

34
Research on Politics
  • Study of political behavior in the electronics
    industry in Southern California
  • 87 managers
  • - 30 CEO
  • - 28 higher level staff managers
  • - 29 supervisors
  • were interviewed and asked about a number of
    aspects organizational political behavior.
  • Among other questions, the managers were asked
    to describe the personal characteristics of
    organizational members who were effective
    politicians

35
13 Personal Characteristics of Effective
Organizational Politicians
  1. Articulate (pandai mengemukakan pendapat)
  2. Sensitive
  3. Socially adept (memiliki kemampuan adaptasi
    tinggi)
  4. Competent
  5. Popular
  6. Extroverted
  7. Self confident
  8. Aggressive
  9. Ambitious
  10. Devious (licik)
  11. Organization person (memiliki bakat organisasi)
  12. Highly intelligent
  13. Logical

36
THE ANTECEDENTS OF POLITICS WHY AND WHEN IT
OCCURS
Personal Characteristics High Machiavellianism
High Self-Monitoring Ambition
Extraversion Popularity

Organizational Politics
Organizational Factors Ambiguous Roles, Goals
Scarce Resources History of
Political Behavior High Centralization
Conflicting Goals Across Units or Subunits
Organizational Maturity or
Complexity
37
THE ANTECEDENTS OF POLITICS WHY AND WHEN IT
OCCURS
  • Personal and Organizational variables
  • Personal Characteristics high Machiavellianism,
    high self-monitoring, ambition, extraversion,
    popularity
  • Organizational Factors ambiguous roles, goals,
    scare resources, history of political behavior,
    high centralization, conflicting goals across
    units or subunits, organizational maturity or
    complexity
  • Politics in Human Resource Management
  • such as performance appraisal, personnel
    selection, and compensation decisions
  • Politics and the Organizational Life Span
  • the use of political practices in organizations
    is likely to be affected by its degree of
    maturity

38
POLITICAL TACTICS WHAT FORMS DO THEY TAKE?
  • Gaining control over and selective use of
    information
  • Cultivating a favorable impression ? image
    building (1) dressing for success, (2)
    associating oneself with the successful
    accomplishments of others, (3) simply calling
    attention to ones own successes and positive
    characteristics
  • Building powerful coalitions
  • Blaming and Attacking other finding a scapegoat
  • Associating with powerful others
  • Creating obligations and using reciprocity

39
PLAYING POLITICS
  • Political Influence Tactics
  • Individuals and groups engage in political
    behavior in order to influence the perceptions or
    behaviors of other individuals and groups
  • Based on research ? 9 specific tactics used by
    individuals to influence their superiors,
    coworkers, and subordinates to do what they
    wanted to do
  • Consultation
  • Rational persuasion
  • Inspirational appeals
  • Ingratiating tactics
  • Coalition tactics
  • Pressure tactics
  • Legitimating
  • Personal appeals
  • Exchange tactics

40
  • TACTICS OF SOCIAL INFLUENCEGETTING TO YES
  • CONSULTATION asking for participation in
    decision making or planning a change
  • RATIONAL PERSUASION using logical arguments and
    facts to persuade another that a desired result
    will occur
  • INSPIRATIONAL APPEAL arousing enthusiasm by
    appealing to anothers values and ideals
  • INGRATIATION the process of getting someone to
    do what you want by putting that person in a good
    mood or getting her/him to like you
  • COALITION-BUILDING seeking the assistance of
    others, or noting the support of others
  • PRESSURE seeking compliance by using demands,
    threats, or intimidation
  • LEGITIMATING pointing out ones authority to
    make a request, or verifying it is consistent
    with prevailing organizational policies and
    practices
  • PERSONAL APPEAL appealing to anothers feelings
    of loyalty and friendship before making a request
  • EXCHANGE promising some benefits in exchange for
    compliance with a request

41
PLAYING POLITICS
  • Impression Management
  • ? the actions individuals take to control the
    impressions that others form of them.
  • Research suggests that a significant part of
    behavior in organizations is motivated by the
    desire of organization members to be perceived by
    others in certain ways
  • Effective impression management can be quite
    useful.
  • e.g. the employment interview
  • Many impression management tactics are designed
    to emphasize the positive.
  • e.g. self promotion
  • Others impression management tactics may be aimed
    at reducing negatives.
  • e.g. providing an excuse for why you made
    mistake ? may be designed to further the
    impression that the error was beyond your control
  • self handicapping ? any actions taken in advance
    of an outcome that is designed to provide either
    an excuse for failure or a credit for success

42
ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS ITS EFFECTS
  • Adverse Effects of Organizational Politics
  • when the level of political behavior is high in
    organization, job satisfaction and organizational
    commitment may suffer with the result that good
    people decide to leave and seek employment
    elsewhere. Clearly this is a very negative effect
    of organizational politics.

43
ETHICS, POWER, AND POLITICS
  • WHAT, IF ANYTHING, IS UNETHICAL ABOUT
    ORGANIZATIONAL POLITIS?
  • Political Antics Top the Most Unethical List
  • Hiring, training, or promoting based on
    favouritism
  • Allowing differences in pay due to friendships
  • Sexual harassment
  • Gender discrimination in promotion
  • Using discipline in consistently
  • Not maintaining confidentiality
  • Gender discrimination in compensation
  • Non-performance factors used in appraisals
  • Arrangement with vendors leading to personal gain
  • Gender discrimination in recruitment or hiring

potentially political behaviour
44
ASSESSING THE ETHICS OF POLITICAL BEHAVIOR
  • The more power an individual has, the more
    tempted s/he is to use that power toward immoral
    or unethical purpose
  • The ethics of organizational politics must
    satisfy three moral principles
  • Criterion of utilitarian outcomes.
  • Utilitarian outcomes are only selfish
    interests promoted?
  • Criterion of individual rights.
  • Individual rights are privacy rights
    respected?
  • Criterion of distributive justice
  • Distributive justice is it fair?
  • What does a manager do when a potential behavior
    cannot pass the three criteria?
  • The behavior may still be considered ethical in
    the particular situation if it passes the
    criterion of overwhelming factors.

45
Guidelines for Determining Ethical Action
46
How to combat Organizational PoliticsAbolishing
organizational politics completely may be
impossible but managers can limit its effect.
Some of the most successful tactics are
summarized here
SUGESSTION DESCRIPTION
Clarify job expectation Open the communication process Be a good role model Do not turn a blind eye to game players Political behavior is nurtured by highly ambiguous conditions. To the extent managers help reduce uncertainty (e.g. by giving precise work assignments), they can minimize the likelihood of political behavior People have difficulty fostering their own goals at the expense of organizational goals when the communication process is open to scrutiny. It is hard to get away with anything when the system is open for all to examine Employees model the behavior of higher ranking officials. Accordingly, an openly political manager may encourage subordinates to behave in the same way Immediately confront an employee who attempts to take credit for anothers work. Managers who do not do so send a message that kind of behavior is acceptable
47
USING POWER TO MANAGE EFFECTIVELY
  • Jeffrey Pfeffer ? several considerations that are
    important in using power to manage effectively
  • Recognize that there are multiple interests in
    virtually every organization
  • Know what position relevant individuals and
    groups hold with respect to issues important to
    you
  • Understand that to get things done you must have
    power, and in the case of those who oppose you,
    you must have more power than they do
  • Recognize the strategies and tactics through
    which organizational power is developed and used
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com